[bugfix] Fix Swagger spec and add test script (#2698)

* Add Swagger spec test script

* Fix Swagger spec errors not related to statuses with polls

* Add API tests that post a status with a poll

* Fix creating a status with a poll from form params

* Fix Swagger spec errors related to statuses with polls (this is the last error)

* Fix Swagger spec warnings not related to unused definitions

* Suppress a duplicate list update params definition that was somehow causing wrong param names

* Add Swagger test to CI

- updates Drone config
- vendorizes go-swagger
- fixes a file extension issue that caused the test script to generate JSON instead of YAML with the vendorized version

* Put `Sample: ` on its own line everywhere

* Remove unused id param from emojiCategoriesGet

* Add 5 more pairs of profile fields to account update API Swagger

* Remove Swagger prefix from dummy fields

It makes the generated code look weird

* Manually annotate params for statusCreate operation

* Fix all remaining Swagger spec warnings

- Change some models into operation parameters
- Ignore models that already correspond to manually documented operation parameters but can't be trivially changed (those with file fields)

* Documented that creating a status with scheduled_at isn't implemented yet

* sign drone.yml

* Fix filter API Swagger errors

* fixup! Fix filter API Swagger errors

---------

Co-authored-by: tobi <tobi.smethurst@protonmail.com>

1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/vendor/github.com/go-openapi/analysis/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md b/vendor/github.com/go-openapi/analysis/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9322b065e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/github.com/go-openapi/analysis/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
+
+## Our Pledge
+
+In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
+contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and
+our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
+size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience,
+nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and
+orientation.
+
+## Our Standards
+
+Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
+include:
+
+* Using welcoming and inclusive language
+* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
+* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
+* Focusing on what is best for the community
+* Showing empathy towards other community members
+
+Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
+
+* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
+advances
+* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
+* Public or private harassment
+* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic
+  address, without explicit permission
+* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
+  professional setting
+
+## Our Responsibilities
+
+Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
+behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
+response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
+
+Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
+reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
+that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or
+permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate,
+threatening, offensive, or harmful.
+
+## Scope
+
+This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces
+when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of
+representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail
+address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
+representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be
+further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
+
+## Enforcement
+
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
+reported by contacting the project team at ivan+abuse@flanders.co.nz. All
+complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that
+is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
+obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
+Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
+
+Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good
+faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other
+members of the project's leadership.
+
+## Attribution
+
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
+available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version]
+
+[homepage]: http://contributor-covenant.org
+[version]: http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/