diff options
author | 2023-04-06 13:43:13 +0200 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2023-04-06 12:43:13 +0100 | |
commit | 3510454768b1877540c6dc25f4967e4b608203a8 (patch) | |
tree | aed9c913711f08ae748591271132f968ef1e716f /internal/timeline/get_test.go | |
parent | [bugfix] Normalize status content (don't parse status content as IRI) (#1665) (diff) | |
download | gotosocial-3510454768b1877540c6dc25f4967e4b608203a8.tar.xz |
[bugfix/chore] Refactor timeline code (#1656)
* start poking timelines
* OK yes we're refactoring, but it's nothing like the last time so don't worry
* more fiddling
* update tests, simplify Get
* thanks linter, you're the best, mwah mwah kisses
* do a bit more tidying up
* start buggering about with the prepare function
* fix little oopsie
* start merging lists into 1
* ik heb een heel zwaar leven
nee nee echt waar
* hey it works we did it reddit
* regenerate swagger docs
* tidy up a wee bit
* adjust paging
* fix little error, remove unused functions
Diffstat (limited to 'internal/timeline/get_test.go')
-rw-r--r-- | internal/timeline/get_test.go | 390 |
1 files changed, 236 insertions, 154 deletions
diff --git a/internal/timeline/get_test.go b/internal/timeline/get_test.go index 071f33aaf..444c159c4 100644 --- a/internal/timeline/get_test.go +++ b/internal/timeline/get_test.go @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import ( "github.com/stretchr/testify/suite" "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/gtsmodel" + "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/id" "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/processing" "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/timeline" "github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/internal/visibility" @@ -43,8 +44,8 @@ func (suite *GetTestSuite) SetupSuite() { func (suite *GetTestSuite) SetupTest() { suite.state.Caches.Init() - testrig.InitTestLog() testrig.InitTestConfig() + testrig.InitTestLog() suite.db = testrig.NewTestDB(&suite.state) suite.tc = testrig.NewTestTypeConverter(suite.db) @@ -52,8 +53,9 @@ func (suite *GetTestSuite) SetupTest() { testrig.StandardDBSetup(suite.db, nil) - // let's take local_account_1 as the timeline owner - tl, err := timeline.NewTimeline( + // Take local_account_1 as the timeline owner, it + // doesn't really matter too much for these tests. + tl := timeline.NewTimeline( context.Background(), suite.testAccounts["local_account_1"].ID, processing.StatusGrabFunction(suite.db), @@ -61,20 +63,27 @@ func (suite *GetTestSuite) SetupTest() { processing.StatusPrepareFunction(suite.db, suite.tc), processing.StatusSkipInsertFunction(), ) - if err != nil { - suite.FailNow(err.Error()) - } - // put the status IDs in a determinate order since we can't trust a map to keep its order + // Put testrig statuses in a determinate order + // since we can't trust a map to keep order. statuses := []*gtsmodel.Status{} for _, s := range suite.testStatuses { statuses = append(statuses, s) } + sort.Slice(statuses, func(i, j int) bool { return statuses[i].ID > statuses[j].ID }) - // prepare the timeline by just shoving all test statuses in it -- let's not be fussy about who sees what + // Statuses are now highest -> lowest. + suite.highestStatusID = statuses[0].ID + suite.lowestStatusID = statuses[len(statuses)-1].ID + if suite.highestStatusID < suite.lowestStatusID { + suite.FailNow("", "statuses weren't ordered properly by sort") + } + + // Put all test statuses into the timeline; we don't + // need to be fussy about who sees what for these tests. for _, s := range statuses { _, err := tl.IndexAndPrepareOne(context.Background(), s.GetID(), s.BoostOfID, s.AccountID, s.BoostOfAccountID) if err != nil { @@ -89,219 +98,292 @@ func (suite *GetTestSuite) TearDownTest() { testrig.StandardDBTeardown(suite.db) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetDefault() { - // lastGot should be zero - suite.Zero(suite.timeline.LastGot()) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) checkStatuses(statuses []timeline.Preparable, maxID string, minID string, expectedLength int) { + if l := len(statuses); l != expectedLength { + suite.FailNow("", "expected %d statuses in slice, got %d", expectedLength, l) + } else if l == 0 { + // Can't test empty slice. + return + } + + // Check ordering + bounds of statuses. + highest := statuses[0].GetID() + for _, status := range statuses { + id := status.GetID() + + if id >= maxID { + suite.FailNow("", "%s greater than maxID %s", id, maxID) + } + + if id <= minID { + suite.FailNow("", "%s smaller than minID %s", id, minID) + } + + if id > highest { + suite.FailNow("", "statuses in slice were not ordered highest -> lowest ID") + } + + highest = id + } +} + +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetNewTimelinePageDown() { + // Take a fresh timeline for this test. + // This tests whether indexing works + // properly against uninitialized timelines. + tl := timeline.NewTimeline( + context.Background(), + suite.testAccounts["local_account_1"].ID, + processing.StatusGrabFunction(suite.db), + processing.StatusFilterFunction(suite.db, suite.filter), + processing.StatusPrepareFunction(suite.db, suite.tc), + processing.StatusSkipInsertFunction(), + ) - // get 10 20 the top and don't prepare the next query - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 20, "", "", "", false) + // Get 5 from the top. + statuses, err := tl.Get(context.Background(), 5, "", "", "", true) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, id.Lowest, 5) - // we only have 16 statuses in the test suite - suite.Len(statuses, 17) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } + // Get 5 from next maxID. + nextMaxID := statuses[len(statuses)-1].GetID() + statuses, err = tl.Get(context.Background(), 5, nextMaxID, "", "", false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, nextMaxID, id.Lowest, 5) +} - // lastGot should be up to date - suite.WithinDuration(time.Now(), suite.timeline.LastGot(), 1*time.Second) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetNewTimelinePageUp() { + // Take a fresh timeline for this test. + // This tests whether indexing works + // properly against uninitialized timelines. + tl := timeline.NewTimeline( + context.Background(), + suite.testAccounts["local_account_1"].ID, + processing.StatusGrabFunction(suite.db), + processing.StatusFilterFunction(suite.db, suite.filter), + processing.StatusPrepareFunction(suite.db, suite.tc), + processing.StatusSkipInsertFunction(), + ) + + // Get 5 from the back. + statuses, err := tl.Get(context.Background(), 5, "", "", id.Lowest, false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) + } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, id.Lowest, 5) + + // Page upwards. + nextMinID := statuses[len(statuses)-1].GetID() + statuses, err = tl.Get(context.Background(), 5, "", "", nextMinID, false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) + } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, nextMinID, 5) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetDefaultPrepareNext() { - // get 10 from the top and prepare the next query - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "", "", "", true) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetNewTimelineMoreThanPossible() { + // Take a fresh timeline for this test. + // This tests whether indexing works + // properly against uninitialized timelines. + tl := timeline.NewTimeline( + context.Background(), + suite.testAccounts["local_account_1"].ID, + processing.StatusGrabFunction(suite.db), + processing.StatusFilterFunction(suite.db, suite.filter), + processing.StatusPrepareFunction(suite.db, suite.tc), + processing.StatusSkipInsertFunction(), + ) + + // Get 100 from the top. + statuses, err := tl.Get(context.Background(), 100, id.Highest, "", "", false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, id.Lowest, 16) +} - suite.Len(statuses, 10) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetNewTimelineMoreThanPossiblePageUp() { + // Take a fresh timeline for this test. + // This tests whether indexing works + // properly against uninitialized timelines. + tl := timeline.NewTimeline( + context.Background(), + suite.testAccounts["local_account_1"].ID, + processing.StatusGrabFunction(suite.db), + processing.StatusFilterFunction(suite.db, suite.filter), + processing.StatusPrepareFunction(suite.db, suite.tc), + processing.StatusSkipInsertFunction(), + ) - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } + // Get 100 from the back. + statuses, err := tl.Get(context.Background(), 100, "", "", id.Lowest, false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) + } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, id.Lowest, 16) +} + +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetNoParams() { + // Get 10 statuses from the top (no params). + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "", "", "", false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // sleep a second so the next query can run - time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, id.Lowest, 10) + + // First status should have the highest ID in the testrig. + suite.Equal(suite.highestStatusID, statuses[0].GetID()) } func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMaxID() { - // ask for 10 with a max ID somewhere in the middle of the stack - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", "", "", false) + // Ask for 10 with a max ID somewhere in the middle of the stack. + maxID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, maxID, "", "", false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 6 statuses back, since we asked for a max ID that excludes some of our entries - suite.Len(statuses, 6) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } - } + // We'll only get 6 statuses back. + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, maxID, id.Lowest, 6) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMaxIDPrepareNext() { - // ask for 10 with a max ID somewhere in the middle of the stack - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", "", "", true) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetSinceID() { + // Ask for 10 with a since ID somewhere in the middle of the stack. + sinceID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "", sinceID, "", false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 6 statuses back, since we asked for a max ID that excludes some of our entries - suite.Len(statuses, 6) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, sinceID, 10) + + // The first status in the stack should have the highest ID of all + // in the testrig, because we're paging down. + suite.Equal(suite.highestStatusID, statuses[0].GetID()) +} + +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetSinceIDOneOnly() { + // Ask for 1 with a since ID somewhere in the middle of the stack. + sinceID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 1, "", sinceID, "", false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // sleep a second so the next query can run - time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, sinceID, 1) + + // The one status we got back should have the highest ID of all in + // the testrig, because using sinceID means we're paging down. + suite.Equal(suite.highestStatusID, statuses[0].GetID()) } func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMinID() { - // ask for 15 with a min ID somewhere in the middle of the stack - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "", "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", "", false) + // Ask for 5 with a min ID somewhere in the middle of the stack. + minID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 5, "", "", minID, false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 10 statuses back, since we asked for a min ID that excludes some of our entries - suite.Len(statuses, 10) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } - } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, minID, 5) + + // We're paging up so even the highest status ID in the pile + // shouldn't be the highest ID we have. + suite.NotEqual(suite.highestStatusID, statuses[0]) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetSinceID() { - // ask for 15 with a since ID somewhere in the middle of the stack - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 15, "", "", "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", false) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMinIDOneOnly() { + // Ask for 1 with a min ID somewhere in the middle of the stack. + minID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 1, "", "", minID, false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 10 statuses back, since we asked for a since ID that excludes some of our entries - suite.Len(statuses, 10) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } - } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, minID, 1) + + // The one status we got back should have the an ID equal to the + // one ID immediately newer than it. + suite.Equal("01F8MHC0H0A7XHTVH5F596ZKBM", statuses[0].GetID()) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetSinceIDPrepareNext() { - // ask for 15 with a since ID somewhere in the middle of the stack - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 15, "", "", "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", true) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMinIDFromLowestInTestrig() { + // Ask for 1 with minID equal to the lowest status in the testrig. + minID := suite.lowestStatusID + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 1, "", "", minID, false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 10 statuses back, since we asked for a since ID that excludes some of our entries - suite.Len(statuses, 10) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, minID, 1) + + // The one status we got back should have an id higher than + // the lowest status in the testrig, since minID is not inclusive. + suite.Greater(statuses[0].GetID(), suite.lowestStatusID) +} + +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetMinIDFromLowestPossible() { + // Ask for 1 with the lowest possible min ID. + minID := id.Lowest + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 1, "", "", minID, false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // sleep a second so the next query can run - time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, id.Highest, minID, 1) + + // The one status we got back should have the an ID equal to the + // lowest ID status in the test rig. + suite.Equal(suite.lowestStatusID, statuses[0].GetID()) } func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetBetweenID() { - // ask for 10 between these two IDs - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "01F8MHCP5P2NWYQ416SBA0XSEV", "", "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", false) + // Ask for 10 between these two IDs + maxID := "01F8MHCP5P2NWYQ416SBA0XSEV" + minID := "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA" + + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, maxID, "", minID, false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 2 statuses back, since there are only two statuses between the given IDs - suite.Len(statuses, 2) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } - } + // There's only two statuses between these two IDs. + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, maxID, minID, 2) } -func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetBetweenIDPrepareNext() { - // ask for 10 between these two IDs - statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "01F8MHCP5P2NWYQ416SBA0XSEV", "", "01F8MHBQCBTDKN6X5VHGMMN4MA", true) +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestGetBetweenIDImpossible() { + // Ask for 10 between these two IDs which present + // an impossible query. + maxID := id.Lowest + minID := id.Highest + + statuses, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, maxID, "", minID, false) if err != nil { suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // we should only get 2 statuses back, since there are only two statuses between the given IDs - suite.Len(statuses, 2) - - // statuses should be sorted highest to lowest ID - var highest string - for i, s := range statuses { - if i == 0 { - highest = s.GetID() - } else { - suite.Less(s.GetID(), highest) - highest = s.GetID() - } + // We should have nothing back. + suite.checkStatuses(statuses, maxID, minID, 0) +} + +func (suite *GetTestSuite) TestLastGot() { + // LastGot should be zero + suite.Zero(suite.timeline.LastGot()) + + // Get some from the top + _, err := suite.timeline.Get(context.Background(), 10, "", "", "", false) + if err != nil { + suite.FailNow(err.Error()) } - // sleep a second so the next query can run - time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) + // LastGot should be updated + suite.WithinDuration(time.Now(), suite.timeline.LastGot(), 1*time.Second) } func TestGetTestSuite(t *testing.T) { |