1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
|
git-read-tree(1)
================
v0.1, May 2005
NAME
----
git-read-tree - Reads tree information into the directory cache
SYNOPSIS
--------
'git-read-tree' (<tree-ish> | -m <tree-ish1> [<tree-ish2> <tree-ish3>])"
DESCRIPTION
-----------
Reads the tree information given by <tree> into the directory cache,
but does not actually *update* any of the files it "caches". (see:
git-checkout-cache)
Optionally, it can merge a tree into the cache or perform a 3-way
merge.
Trivial merges are done by "git-read-tree" itself. Only conflicting paths
will be in unmerged state when "git-read-tree" returns.
OPTIONS
-------
-m::
Perform a merge, not just a read
<tree-ish#>::
The id of the tree object(s) to be read/merged.
Merging
-------
If '-m' is specified, "git-read-tree" performs 2 kinds of merge, a single tree
merge if only 1 tree is given or a 3-way merge if 3 trees are
provided.
Single Tree Merge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If only 1 tree is specified, git-read-tree operates as if the user did not
specify '-m', except that if the original cache has an entry for a
given pathname; and the contents of the path matches with the tree
being read, the stat info from the cache is used. (In other words, the
cache's stat()s take precedence over the merged tree's)
That means that if you do a "git-read-tree -m <newtree>" followed by a
"git-checkout-cache -f -a", the "git-checkout-cache" only checks out
the stuff that really changed.
This is used to avoid unnecessary false hits when "git-diff-files" is
run after git-read-tree.
3-Way Merge
~~~~~~~~~~~
Each "index" entry has two bits worth of "stage" state. stage 0 is the
normal one, and is the only one you'd see in any kind of normal use.
However, when you do "git-read-tree" with three trees, the "stage"
starts out at 1.
This means that you can do
git-read-tree -m <tree1> <tree2> <tree3>
and you will end up with an index with all of the <tree1> entries in
"stage1", all of the <tree2> entries in "stage2" and all of the
<tree3> entries in "stage3".
Furthermore, "git-read-tree" has special-case logic that says: if you see
a file that matches in all respects in the following states, it
"collapses" back to "stage0":
- stage 2 and 3 are the same; take one or the other (it makes no
difference - the same work has been done on stage 2 and 3)
- stage 1 and stage 2 are the same and stage 3 is different; take
stage 3 (some work has been done on stage 3)
- stage 1 and stage 3 are the same and stage 2 is different take
stage 2 (some work has been done on stage 2)
The "git-write-tree" command refuses to write a nonsensical tree, and it
will complain about unmerged entries if it sees a single entry that is not
stage 0.
Ok, this all sounds like a collection of totally nonsensical rules,
but it's actually exactly what you want in order to do a fast
merge. The different stages represent the "result tree" (stage 0, aka
"merged"), the original tree (stage 1, aka "orig"), and the two trees
you are trying to merge (stage 2 and 3 respectively).
In fact, the way "git-read-tree" works, it's entirely agnostic about how
you assign the stages, and you could really assign them any which way,
and the above is just a suggested way to do it (except since
"git-write-tree" refuses to write anything but stage0 entries, it makes
sense to always consider stage 0 to be the "full merge" state).
So what happens? Try it out. Select the original tree, and two trees
to merge, and look how it works:
- if a file exists in identical format in all three trees, it will
automatically collapse to "merged" state by the new git-read-tree.
- a file that has _any_ difference what-so-ever in the three trees
will stay as separate entries in the index. It's up to "script
policy" to determine how to remove the non-0 stages, and insert a
merged version. But since the index is always sorted, they're easy
to find: they'll be clustered together.
- the index file saves and restores with all this information, so you
can merge things incrementally, but as long as it has entries in
stages 1/2/3 (ie "unmerged entries") you can't write the result. So
now the merge algorithm ends up being really simple:
* you walk the index in order, and ignore all entries of stage 0,
since they've already been done.
* if you find a "stage1", but no matching "stage2" or "stage3", you
know it's been removed from both trees (it only existed in the
original tree), and you remove that entry.
* if you find a matching "stage2" and "stage3" tree, you remove one
of them, and turn the other into a "stage0" entry. Remove any
matching "stage1" entry if it exists too. .. all the normal
trivial rules ..
Incidentally - it also means that you don't even have to have a
separate subdirectory for this. All the information literally is in
the index file, which is a temporary thing anyway. There is no need to
worry about what is in the working directory, since it is never shown
and never used.
See Also
--------
link:git-write-tree.html[git-write-tree]; link:git-ls-files.html[git-ls-files]
Author
------
Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Documentation
--------------
Documentation by David Greaves, Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
GIT
---
Part of the link:git.html[git] suite
|
