From 70495b556f5685afe0e41988e42d48b2331d77a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthieu Moy Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:52:41 +0200 Subject: Documentation/git-push.txt: explain better cases where --force is dangerous The behavior of "git push --force" is rather clear when it updates only one remote ref, but running it when pushing several branches can really be dangerous. Warn the users a bit more and give them the alternative to push only one branch. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- Documentation/git-push.txt | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/git-push.txt b/Documentation/git-push.txt index 8b637d339f..28a17c34ff 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-push.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-push.txt @@ -124,6 +124,15 @@ no `push.default` configuration variable is set. not an ancestor of the local ref used to overwrite it. This flag disables the check. This can cause the remote repository to lose commits; use it with care. + Note that `--force` applies to all the refs that are pushed, + hence using it with `push.default` set to `matching` or with + multiple push destinations configured with `remote.*.push` + may overwrite refs other than the current branch (including + local refs that are strictly behind their remote counterpart). + To force a push to only one branch, use a `+` in front of the + refspec to push (e.g `git push origin +master` to force a push + to the `master` branch). See the `...` section above + for details. --repo=:: This option is only relevant if no argument is -- cgit v1.2.3