From 2de9b71138171dca7279db3b3fe67e868c76d921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Ackermann Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:17:53 +0100 Subject: Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git' Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt index 8a685483f4..075418eeeb 100644 --- a/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt +++ b/Documentation/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.txt @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ merged. So it's debugging hell, because now you don't have lots of small changes that you can try to pinpoint which _part_ of it changes. But does it all work? Sure it does. You can revert a merge, and from a -purely technical angle, git did it very naturally and had no real +purely technical angle, Git did it very naturally and had no real troubles. It just considered it a change from "state before merge" to "state after merge", and that was it. Nothing complicated, nothing odd, nothing really dangerous. Git will do it without even thinking about it. -- cgit v1.2.3