From 515377ea9ec6192f82a2fa5c5b5b7651d9d6cf6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:31:29 -0500 Subject: "init-db" can really be just "init" Make "init" the equivalent of "init-db". This should make first GIT impression a little more friendly. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- Documentation/git-init-db.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'Documentation/git-init-db.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/git-init-db.txt b/Documentation/git-init-db.txt index ca7d09dc0a..bc3ba14939 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-init-db.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-init-db.txt @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ Running `git-init-db` in an existing repository is safe. It will not overwrite things that are already there. The primary reason for rerunning `git-init-db` is to pick up newly added templates. +Note that `git-init` is the same as `git-init-db`. EXAMPLES -- cgit v1.2.3