| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since 98bf8a47c296f51ea9722fef4bb81dbfb70cd4bb status would claim that
git-commit could be useful even if there are no changes except untracked files.
Since wt-status is already computing all the information needed go the whole
way and actually track the (non-)emptiness of all three sections separately,
unify the code, and provide useful messages for each individual case.
Thanks to Junio and Michael Loeffler for suggestions.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
|
|
Previously git-status in a clean working directory would advice the user to use
git add. This isn't very helpful when there is nothing to add in the working
directory, therefore note a clean working directory while displaying the other
sections and print the appropriate message for each case.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
Actually, teach runstatus what to do if it is not passed; it should not list
the contents of completely untracked directories, but only the name of that
directory (plus a trailing '/').
[jc: with comments by Jeff King to match hide-empty-directories
behaviour of the original.]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
This creates a new git-runstatus which should do roughly the same thing
as the run_status function from git-commit.sh. Except for color support,
the main focus has been to keep the output identical, so that it can be
verified as correct and then used as a C platform for other improvements to
the status printing code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
Jürgen Rühle
Johannes Schindelin
Jeff King