summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/wt-status.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2006-12-15git-status always says what branch it's onLibravatar Andy Parkins1-1/+1
If the current branch was "master" then git-status wouldn't say # On branch XXXX In its output. This patch makes it so that this message is always output; regardless of branch name. Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-15Align section headers of 'git status' to new 'git add'.Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-4/+5
Now that 'git add' is considered a first-class UI for 'update-index' and that the 'git add' documentation states "Even modified files must be added to the set of changes about to be committed" we should make the output of 'git status' align with that documentation and common usage. So now we see a status output such as: # Added but not yet committed: # (will commit) # # new file: x # # Changed but not added: # (use "git add file1 file2" to include for commit) # # modified: x # # Untracked files: # (use "git add" on files to include for commit) # # y which just reads better in the context of using 'git add' to manipulate a commit (and not a checkin, whatever the heck that is). We also now support 'color.status.added' as an alias for the existing 'color.status.updated', as this alias more closely aligns with the current output and documentation. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-15Suggest use of "git add file1 file2" when there is nothing to commit.Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-5/+6
If a user modifies files and runs 'git commit' (without the very useful -a option) and they have not yet updated the index they are probably coming from another SCM-like tool which would perform the same as 'git commit -a' in this case. Showing the user their current status and a final line of "nothing to commit" is not very reassuring, as the user might believe that Git did not recognize their files were modified. Instead we can suggest as part of the 'nothing to commit' message that the user invoke 'git add' to add files to their next commit. Suggested by Andy Parkins' Git 'niggles' list (<200612132237.10051.andyparkins@gmail.com>). Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-13Merge branch 'np/addcommit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* np/addcommit: git-commit: allow --only to lose what was staged earlier. Documentation/git-commit: rewrite to make it more end-user friendly. make 'git add' a first class user friendly interface to the index
2006-12-13Allow subcommand.color and color.subcommand color configurationLibravatar Andy Parkins1-2/+2
While adding colour to the branch command it was pointed out that a config option like "branch.color" conflicts with the pre-existing "branch.something" namespace used for specifying default merge urls and branches. The suggested solution was to flip the order of the components to "color.branch", which I did for colourising branch. This patch does the same thing for - git-log (color.diff) - git-status (color.status) - git-diff (color.diff) - pager (color.pager) I haven't removed the old config options; but they should probably be deprecated and eventually removed to prevent future namespace collisions. I've done this deprecation by changing the documentation for the config file to match the new names; and adding the "color.XXX" options to contrib/completion/git-completion.bash. Unfortunately git-svn reads "diff.color" and "pager.color"; which I don't like to change unilaterally. Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-04make 'git add' a first class user friendly interface to the indexLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-1/+1
This brings the power of the index up front using a proper mental model without talking about the index at all. See for example how all the technical discussion has been evacuated from the git-add man page. Any content to be committed must be added together. Whether that content comes from new files or modified files doesn't matter. You just need to "add" it, either with git-add, or by providing git-commit with -a (for already known files only of course). No need for a separate command to distinguish new vs modified files please. That would only screw the mental model everybody should have when using GIT. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-08git-status: quote LF in its outputLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+53
Otherwise, commit log template would get the remainder of the filename start on a new line unquoted and the log gets messed up. I initially considered using the full quote_c_style(), but the output from the command is primarily for human consumption so chose to leave other control characters and bytes with high-bits unmolested. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-07Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
* maint: remove an unneeded test
2006-11-07remove an unneeded testLibravatar Tero Roponen1-2/+0
In wt-status.c there is a test which does nothing. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-06Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+3
* maint: Documentation: Transplanting branch with git-rebase --onto merge-recursive implicitely depends on trust_executable_bit adjust_shared_perm: chmod() only when needed. Fix git-runstatus for repositories containing a file named HEAD
2006-11-05Fix git-runstatus for repositories containing a file named HEADLibravatar Jeff King1-8/+3
The wt_status_print_updated() and wt_status_print_untracked() routines call setup_revisions() with 'HEAD' being the reference to the tip of the current branch. However, setup_revisions() gets confused if the branch also contains a file named 'HEAD' resulting in a fatal error. Instead, don't pass an argv to setup_revisions() at all; simply give it no arguments, and make 'HEAD' the default revision. Bug noticed by Rocco Rutte <pdmef@gmx.net>. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-01Merge branch 'lj/refs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+2
* lj/refs: (63 commits) Fix show-ref usagestring t3200: git-branch testsuite update sha1_name.c: avoid compilation warnings. Make git-branch a builtin ref-log: fix D/F conflict coming from deleted refs. git-revert with conflicts to behave as git-merge with conflicts core.logallrefupdates thinko-fix git-pack-refs --all core.logallrefupdates create new log file only for branch heads. Remove bashism from t3210-pack-refs.sh ref-log: allow ref@{count} syntax. pack-refs: call fflush before fsync. pack-refs: use lockfile as everybody else does. git-fetch: do not look into $GIT_DIR/refs to see if a tag exists. lock_ref_sha1_basic does not remove empty directories on BSD Do not create tag leading directories since git update-ref does it. Check that a tag exists using show-ref instead of looking for the ref file. Use git-update-ref to delete a tag instead of rm()ing the ref file. Fix refs.c;:repack_without_ref() clean-up path Clean up "git-branch.sh" and add remove recursive dir test cases. ...
2006-10-26Make filenames line up in git-status outputLibravatar Andy Parkins1-7/+7
When all the filenames line up it's much easier to copy and paste them somewhere else, or to remove the "modified:", "copied:", etc prefix. Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-20Tell between packed, unpacked and symbolic refs.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This adds a "int *flag" parameter to resolve_ref() and makes for_each_ref() family to call callback function with an extra "int flag" parameter. They are used to give two bits of information (REF_ISSYMREF and REF_ISPACKED) about the ref. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-17wt-status: use simplified resolve_ref to find current branchLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+2
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-13wt-status: remove extraneous newline from 'deleted:' outputLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
This was accidentally introduced during the fixes to avoid putting newlines inside of colorized output. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-12Teach runstatus about --untrackedLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+5
Actually, teach runstatus what to do if it is not passed; it should not list the contents of completely untracked directories, but only the name of that directory (plus a trailing '/'). [jc: with comments by Jeff King to match hide-empty-directories behaviour of the original.] Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-08git-commit.sh: convert run_status to a C builtinLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+271
This creates a new git-runstatus which should do roughly the same thing as the run_status function from git-commit.sh. Except for color support, the main focus has been to keep the output identical, so that it can be verified as correct and then used as a C platform for other improvements to the status printing code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>