summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-08-13t5318: use 'test_cmp_bin' to compare commit-graph filesLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-2/+2
The commit-graph files are binary files, so they should not be compared with 'test_cmp', because that might cause issues like crashing[1] or infinite loop[2] on Windows, where 'test_cmp' is a shell function to deal with random LF-CRLF conversions[3]. Use 'test_cmp_bin' instead. 1 - b93e6e3663 (t5000, t5003: do not use test_cmp to compare binary files, 2014-06-04) 2 - f9f3851b4d (t9300: use test_cmp_bin instead of test_cmp to compare binary files, 2014-09-12) 3 - 4d715ac05c (Windows: a test_cmp that is agnostic to random LF <> CRLF conversions, 2013-10-26) Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27gc: automatically write commit-graph filesLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+14
The commit-graph file is a very helpful feature for speeding up git operations. In order to make it more useful, make it possible to write the commit-graph file during standard garbage collection operations. Add a 'gc.commitGraph' config setting that triggers writing a commit-graph file after any non-trivial 'git gc' command. Defaults to false while the commit-graph feature matures. We specifically do not want to have this on by default until the commit-graph feature is fully integrated with history-modifying features like shallow clones. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: add '--reachable' optionLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+10
When writing commit-graph files, it can be convenient to ask for all reachable commits (starting at the ref set) in the resulting file. This is particularly helpful when writing to stdin is complicated, such as a future integration with 'git gc'. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27fsck: verify commit-graphLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+8
If core.commitGraph is true, verify the contents of the commit-graph during 'git fsck' using the 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand. Run this check on all alternates, as well. We use a new process for two reasons: 1. The subcommand decouples the details of loading and verifying a commit-graph file from the other fsck details. 2. The commit-graph verification requires the commits to be loaded in a specific order to guarantee we parse from the commit-graph file for some objects and from the object database for others. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify contents match checksumLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+6
The commit-graph file ends with a SHA1 hash of the previous contents. If a commit-graph file has errors but the checksum hash is correct, then we know that the problem is a bug in Git and not simply file corruption after-the-fact. Compute the checksum right away so it is the first error that appears, and make the message translatable since this error can be "corrected" by a user by simply deleting the file and recomputing. The rest of the errors are useful only to developers. Be sure to continue checking the rest of the file data if the checksum is wrong. This is important for our tests, as we break the checksum as we modify bytes of the commit-graph file. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: test for corrupted octopus edgeLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+10
The commit-graph file has an extra chunk to store the parent int-ids for parents beyond the first parent for octopus merges. Our test repo has a single octopus merge that we can manipulate to demonstrate the 'verify' subcommand detects incorrect values in that chunk. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify commit dateLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+6
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify generation numberLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+11
While iterating through the commit parents, perform the generation number calculation and compare against the value stored in the commit-graph. The tests demonstrate that having a different set of parents affects the generation number calculation, and this value propagates to descendants. Hence, we drop the single-line condition on the output. Since Git will ship with the commit-graph feature without generation numbers, we need to accept commit-graphs with all generation numbers equal to zero. In this case, ignore the generation number calculation. However, verify that we should never have a mix of zero and non-zero generation numbers. Create a test that sets one commit to generation zero and all following commits report a failure as they have non-zero generation in a file that contains generation number zero. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify parent listLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+18
The commit-graph file stores parents in a two-column portion of the commit data chunk. If there is only one parent, then the second column stores 0xFFFFFFFF to indicate no second parent. The 'verify' subcommand checks the parent list for the commit loaded from the commit-graph and the one parsed from the object database. Test these checks for corrupt parents, too many parents, and wrong parents. Add a boundary check to insert_parent_or_die() for when the parent position value is out of range. The octopus merge will be tested in a later commit. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify root tree OIDsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+7
The 'verify' subcommand must compare the commit content parsed from the commit-graph against the content in the object database. Use lookup_commit() and parse_commit_in_graph_one() to parse the commits from the graph and compare against a commit that is loaded separately and parsed directly from the object database. Add checks for the root tree OID. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify objects existLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+7
In the 'verify' subcommand, load commits directly from the object database to ensure they exist. Parse by skipping the commit-graph. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify corrupt OID fanout and lookupLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+22
In the commit-graph file, the OID fanout chunk provides an index into the OID lookup. The 'verify' subcommand should find incorrect values in the fanout. Similarly, the 'verify' subcommand should find out-of-order values in the OID lookup. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify required chunks are presentLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+29
The commit-graph file requires the following three chunks: * OID Fanout * OID Lookup * Commit Data If any of these are missing, then the 'verify' subcommand should report a failure. This includes the chunk IDs malformed or the chunk count is truncated. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: verify catches corrupt signatureLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+43
This is the first of several commits that add a test to check that 'git commit-graph verify' catches corruption in the commit-graph file. The first test checks that the command catches an error in the file signature. This is a check that exists in the existing commit-graph reading code. Add a helper method 'corrupt_graph_and_verify' to the test script t5318-commit-graph.sh. This helper corrupts the commit-graph file at a certain location, runs 'git commit-graph verify', and reports the output to the 'err' file. This data is filtered to remove the lines added by 'test_must_fail' when the test is run verbosely. Then, the output is checked to contain a specific error message. Most messages from 'git commit-graph verify' will not be marked for translation. There will be one exception: the message that reports an invalid checksum will be marked for translation, as that is the only message that is intended for a typical user. Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27commit-graph: add 'verify' subcommandLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+10
If the commit-graph file becomes corrupt, we need a way to verify that its contents match the object database. In the manner of 'git fsck' we will implement a 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand to report all issues with the file. Add the 'verify' subcommand to the 'commit-graph' builtin and its documentation. The subcommand is currently a no-op except for loading the commit-graph into memory, which may trigger run-time errors that would be caught by normal use. Add a simple test that ensures the command returns a zero error code. If no commit-graph file exists, this is an acceptable state. Do not report any errors. Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27t5318-commit-graph.sh: use core.commitGraphLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-2/+2
The commit-graph tests should be checking that normal Git operations succeed and have matching output with and without the commit-graph feature enabled. However, the test was toggling 'core.graph' instead of the correct 'core.commitGraph' variable. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-25Merge branch 'cc/tests-without-assuming-ref-files-backend'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
Instead of mucking with filesystem directly, use plumbing commands update-ref etc. to manipulate the refs in the tests. * cc/tests-without-assuming-ref-files-backend: t9104: kosherly remove remote refs
2018-06-25Merge branch 'nd/reject-empty-shallow-request'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
"git fetch --shallow-since=<cutoff>" that specifies the cut-off point that is newer than the existing history used to end up grabbing the entire history. Such a request now errors out. * nd/reject-empty-shallow-request: upload-pack: reject shallow requests that would return nothing
2018-06-25Merge branch 'nd/complete-config-vars'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Continuing with the idea to programatically enumerate various pieces of data required for command line completion, teach the codebase to report the list of configuration variables subcommands care about to help complete them. * nd/complete-config-vars: completion: complete general config vars in two steps log-tree: allow to customize 'grafted' color completion: support case-insensitive config vars completion: keep other config var completion in camelCase completion: drop the hard coded list of config vars am: move advice.amWorkDir parsing back to advice.c advice: keep config name in camelCase in advice_config[] fsck: produce camelCase config key names help: add --config to list all available config fsck: factor out msg_id_info[] lazy initialization code grep: keep all colors in an array Add and use generic name->id mapping code for color slot parsing
2018-06-25Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-861/+1098
Clean up tests in t6xxx series about 'merge' command. * en/merge-recursive-tests: t6036: prefer test_when_finished to manual cleanup in following test t6036, t6042: prefer test_cmp to sequences of test t6036, t6042: prefer test_path_is_file, test_path_is_missing t6036, t6042: use test_line_count instead of wc -l t6036, t6042: use test_create_repo to keep tests independent
2018-06-25Merge branch 'nd/diff-apply-ita'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-10/+64
"git diff" compares the index and the working tree. For paths added with intent-to-add bit, the command shows the full contents of them as added, but the paths themselves were not marked as new files. They are now shown as new by default. "git apply" learned the "--intent-to-add" option so that an otherwise working-tree-only application of a patch will add new paths to the index marked with the "intent-to-add" bit. * nd/diff-apply-ita: apply: add --intent-to-add t2203: add a test about "diff HEAD" case diff: turn --ita-invisible-in-index on by default diff: ignore --ita-[in]visible-in-index when diffing worktree-to-tree
2018-06-25Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-lockfile-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
Update to ds/generation-numbers topic. * ds/commit-graph-lockfile-fix: commit-graph: fix UX issue when .lock file exists commit-graph.txt: update design document merge: check config before loading commits commit: use generation number in remove_redundant() commit: add short-circuit to paint_down_to_common() commit: use generation numbers for in_merge_bases() ref-filter: use generation number for --contains commit-graph: always load commit-graph information commit: use generations in paint_down_to_common() commit-graph: compute generation numbers commit: add generation number to struct commit ref-filter: fix outdated comment on in_commit_list
2018-06-25Merge branch 'pc/submodule-helper-foreach'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+35
The bulk of "git submodule foreach" has been rewritten in C. * pc/submodule-helper-foreach: submodule: port submodule subcommand 'foreach' from shell to C submodule foreach: document variable '$displaypath' submodule foreach: document '$sm_path' instead of '$path' submodule foreach: correct '$path' in nested submodules from a subdirectory
2018-06-19Merge branch 'cf/submodule-progress-dissociate'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
* cf/submodule-progress-dissociate: t7400: encapsulate setup code in test_expect_success
2018-06-19Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-root-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* js/rebase-i-root-fix: t3404: check root commit in 'rebase -i --root reword root commit'
2018-06-19t7400: encapsulate setup code in test_expect_successLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+4
When running t7400 in a shell you observe more output than expected: ... ok 8 - setup - hide init subdirectory ok 9 - setup - repository to add submodules to ok 10 - submodule add [master (root-commit) d79ce16] one Author: A U Thor <author@example.com> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 one.t ok 11 - redirected submodule add does not show progress ok 12 - redirected submodule add --progress does show progress ok 13 - submodule add to .gitignored path fails ... Fix the output by encapsulating the setup code in test_expect_success Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-19t3404: check root commit in 'rebase -i --root reword root commit'Libravatar Todd Zullinger1-1/+2
When testing a reworded root commit, ensure that the squash-onto commit which is created and amended is still the root commit. Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18Merge branch 'sg/t7406-chain-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+6
Test fix. * sg/t7406-chain-fix: t7406-submodule-update: fix broken &&-chains
2018-06-18Merge branch 'ks/branch-set-upstream'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A test title has been reworded to clarify it. * ks/branch-set-upstream: t3200: clarify description of --set-upstream test
2018-06-18Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-root-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
A regression to "rebase -i --root" introduced during this cycle has been fixed. * js/rebase-i-root-fix: rebase --root: fix amending root commit messages rebase --root: demonstrate a bug while amending root commit messages
2018-06-18Merge branch 'jk/ewah-bounds-check'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+13
The code to read compressed bitmap was not careful to avoid reading past the end of the file, which has been corrected. * jk/ewah-bounds-check: ewah: adjust callers of ewah_read_mmap() ewah_read_mmap: bounds-check mmap reads
2018-06-18Merge branch 'ld/git-p4-updates'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-0/+126
"git p4" updates. * ld/git-p4-updates: git-p4: auto-size the block git-p4: narrow the scope of exceptions caught when parsing an int git-p4: raise exceptions from p4CmdList based on error from p4 server git-p4: better error reporting when p4 fails git-p4: add option to disable syncing of p4/master with p4 git-p4: disable-rebase: allow setting this via configuration git-p4: add options --commit and --disable-rebase
2018-06-18t7406-submodule-update: fix broken &&-chainsLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-6/+6
Three tests in 't7406-submodule-update' contain broken &&-chains, but since they are all in subshells, chain-lint couldn't notice them. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18rebase --root: fix amending root commit messagesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
The code path that triggered that "BUG" really does not want to run without an explicit commit message. In the case where we want to amend a commit message, we have an *implicit* commit message, though: the one of the commit to amend. Therefore, this code path should not even be entered. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18rebase --root: demonstrate a bug while amending root commit messagesLibravatar Todd Zullinger1-0/+9
When splitting a repository, running `git rebase -i --root` to reword the initial commit, Git dies with BUG: sequencer.c:795: root commit without message. Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18ewah_read_mmap: bounds-check mmap readsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+13
The on-disk ewah format tells us how big the ewah data is, and we blindly read that much from the buffer without considering whether the mmap'd data is long enough, which can lead to out-of-bound reads. Let's make sure we have data available before reading it, both for the ewah header/footer as well as for the bit data itself. In particular: - keep our ptr/len pair in sync as we move through the buffer, and check it before each read - check the size for integer overflow (this should be impossible on 64-bit, as the size is given as a 32-bit count of 8-byte words, but is possible on a 32-bit system) - return the number of bytes read as an ssize_t instead of an int, again to prevent integer overflow - compute the return value using a pointer difference; this should yield the same result as the existing code, but makes it more obvious that we got our computations right The included test is far from comprehensive, as it just picks a static point at which to truncate the generated bitmap. But in practice this will hit in the middle of an ewah and make sure we're at least exercising this code. Reported-by: Luat Nguyen <root@l4w.io> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18t3200: clarify description of --set-upstream testLibravatar Kaartic Sivaraam1-1/+1
Support for the --set-upstream option was removed in 52668846ea (builtin/branch: stop supporting the "--set-upstream" option, 2017-08-17). The change did not completely remove the command due to an issue noted in the commit's log message. So, a test was added to ensure that a command which uses the '--set-upstream' option fails instead of silently acting as an alias for the '--set-upstream-to' option due to option parsing features. To avoid confusion, clarify that the option is disabled intentionally in the corresponding test description. The test is expected to be around as long as we intentionally fail on seeing the '--set-upstream' option which in turn we expect to do for a period of time after which we can be sure that existing users of '--set-upstream' are aware that the option is no longer supported. Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-13Merge branch 'jk/index-pack-maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-0/+16
"index-pack --strict" has been taught to make sure that it runs the final object integrity checks after making the freshly indexed packfile available to itself. * jk/index-pack-maint: index-pack: correct install_packed_git() args index-pack: handle --strict checks of non-repo packs prepare_commit_graft: treat non-repository as a noop
2018-06-13Merge branch 'jk/submodule-fsck-loose-fixup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+22
Finishing touches to a topic that already is in 'maint'. * jk/submodule-fsck-loose-fixup: fsck: avoid looking at NULL blob->object t7415: don't bother creating commit for symlink test
2018-06-12git-p4: auto-size the blockLibravatar Luke Diamand1-0/+8
git-p4 originally would fetch changes in one query. On large repos this could fail because of the limits that Perforce imposes on the number of items returned and the number of queries in the database. To fix this, git-p4 learned to query changes in blocks of 512 changes, However, this can be very slow - if you have a few million changes, with each chunk taking about a second, it can be an hour or so. Although it's possible to tune this value manually with the "--changes-block-size" option, it's far from obvious to ordinary users that this is what needs doing. This change alters the block size dynamically by looking for the specific error messages returned from the Perforce server, and reducing the block size if the error is seen, either to the limit reported by the server, or to half the current block size. That means we can start out with a very large block size, and then let it automatically drop down to a value that works without error, while still failing correctly if some other error occurs. Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-12git-p4: better error reporting when p4 failsLibravatar Luke Diamand1-0/+78
Currently when p4 fails to run, git-p4 just crashes with an obscure error message. For example, if the P4 ticket has expired, you get: Error: Cannot locate perforce checkout of <path> in client view This change checks whether git-p4 can talk to the Perforce server when the first P4 operation is attempted, and tries to print a meaningful error message if it fails. Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-12git-p4: add options --commit and --disable-rebaseLibravatar Romain Merland1-0/+40
On a daily work with multiple local git branches, the usual way to submit only a specified commit was to cherry-pick the commit on master then run git-p4 submit. It can be very annoying to switch between local branches and master, only to submit one commit. The proposed new way is to select directly the commit you want to submit. Add option --commit to command 'git-p4 submit' in order to submit only specified commit(s) in p4. On a daily work developping software with big compilation time, one may not want to rebase on his local git tree, in order to avoid long recompilation. Add option --disable-rebase to command 'git-p4 submit' in order to disable rebase after submission. Thanks-to: Cedric Borgese <cedric.borgese@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> Signed-off-by: Romain Merland <merlorom@yahoo.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-11fsck: avoid looking at NULL blob->objectLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+18
Commit 159e7b080b (fsck: detect gitmodules files, 2018-05-02) taught fsck to look at the content of .gitmodules files. If the object turns out not to be a blob at all, we just complain and punt on checking the content. And since this was such an obvious and trivial code path, I didn't even bother to add a test. Except it _does_ do one non-trivial thing, which is call the report() function, which wants us to pass a pointer to a "struct object". Which we don't have (we have only a "struct object_id"). So we erroneously pass a NULL object to report(), which gets dereferenced and causes a segfault. It seems like we could refactor report() to just take the object_id itself. But we pass the object pointer along to a callback function, and indeed this ends up in builtin/fsck.c's objreport() which does want to look at other parts of the object (like the type). So instead, let's just use lookup_unknown_object() to get the real "struct object", and pass that. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-11t7415: don't bother creating commit for symlink testLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+4
Early versions of the fsck .gitmodules detection code actually required a tree to be at the root of a commit for it to be checked for .gitmodules. What we ended up with in 159e7b080b (fsck: detect gitmodules files, 2018-05-02), though, finds a .gitmodules file in _any_ tree (see that commit for more discussion). As a result, there's no need to create a commit in our tests. Let's drop it in the name of simplicity. And since that was the only thing referencing $tree, we can pull our tree creation out of a command substitution. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-04Merge branch 'bc/t3430-fixup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
Test fix. * bc/t3430-fixup: t3430: test clean-up
2018-06-04Merge branch 'jt/submodule-pull-recurse-rebase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+21
"git pull -recurse-submodules --rebase", when the submodule repository's history did not have anything common between ours and the upstream's, failed to execute. We need to fetch from them to continue even in such a case. * jt/submodule-pull-recurse-rebase: submodule: do not pass null OID to setup_revisions
2018-06-04t9104: kosherly remove remote refsLibravatar Christian Couder1-1/+3
As there are plans to implement other ref storage systems, let's use a way to remove remote refs that does not depend on refs being files. This makes it clear to readers that this test does not depend on which ref backend is used. Suggested-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-04t3430: test clean-upLibravatar brian m. carlson1-3/+2
Remove unnecessary test_tick etc... Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-04upload-pack: reject shallow requests that would return nothingLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+11
Shallow clones with --shallow-since or --shalow-exclude work by running rev-list to get all reachable commits, then draw a boundary between reachable and unreachable and send "shallow" requests based on that. The code does miss one corner case: if rev-list returns nothing, we'll have no border and we'll send no shallow requests back to the client (i.e. no history cuts). This essentially means a full clone (or a full branch if the client requests just one branch). One example is the oldest commit is older than what is specified by --shallow-since. To avoid this, if rev-list returns nothing, we abort the clone/fetch. The user could adjust their request (e.g. --shallow-since further back in the past) and retry. Another possible option for this case is to fall back to a default depth (like depth 1). But I don't like too much magic that way because we may return something unexpected to the user. If they request "history since 2008" and we return a single depth at 2000, that might break stuff for them. It is better to tell them that something is wrong and let them take the best course of action. Note that we need to die() in get_shallow_commits_by_rev_list() instead of just checking for empty result from its caller deepen_by_rev_list() and handling the error there. The reason is, empty result could be a valid case: if you have commits in year 2013 and you request --shallow-since=year.2000 then you should get a full clone (i.e. empty result). Reported-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-01Merge branch 'bw/ref-prefix-for-configured-refspec'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+19
* bw/ref-prefix-for-configured-refspec: fetch: do not pass ref-prefixes for fetch by exact SHA1