| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The ort merge strategy has some slight differences in commit
descriptions (shortened hashes), stdout vs stderr, and in conflict
messages. Also, builtin/merge.c reports usage of "ort" as "Merge made
by the 'ort' strategy" -- while it is meant as a drop in replacement for
"recursive" it is not yet treated as though it is recursive. Update the
testcases to expect different output for the different merge backends.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Conflict markers carry an extra annotation of the form
REF-OR-COMMIT:FILENAME
to help distinguish where the content is coming from, with the :FILENAME
piece being left off if it is the same for both sides of history (thus
only renames with content conflicts carry that part of the annotation).
However, there were cases where the :FILENAME annotation was
accidentally left off, due to merge-recursive's
every-codepath-needs-a-copy-of-all-special-case-code format.
Update a few tests to have the correct :FILENAME extension on relevant
paths with the ort backend, while leaving the expectation for
merge-recursive the same to avoid destabilizing it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a file is renamed and has content conflicts, merge-recursive does
not have some stages for the old filename and some stages for the new
filename in the index; instead it copies all the stages corresponding to
the old filename over to the corresponding locations for the new
filename, so that there are three higher order stages all corresponding
to the new filename. Doing things this way makes it easier for the user
to access the different versions and to resolve the conflict (no need to
manually 'git rm' the old version as well as 'git add' the new one).
rename/deletes should be handled similarly -- there should be two stages
for the renamed file rather than just one. We do not want to
destabilize merge-recursive right now, so instead update relevant tests
to have different expectations depending on whether the "recursive" or
"ort" merge strategies are in use.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When files are renamed and modified, we need to do three-way content
merges to get the appropriate content in the right location. When we
have a rename/rename(1to2) conflict (both sides rename the same file,
but differently), that merged content should be placed in each of the
two resulting files. merge-recursive handled that fine when that was
all that was involved, but when one or more of the two resulting files
were ALSO involved in a directory/file conflict, it failed to propagate
the merged content to that file. Unfortunately, the one test in t6416
that touched on this combination of cases had been coded to not expect
the merged contents to be present.
Fix the test to check for the right behavior, and record how the
different merge backends will be expected to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
merge-recursive.c is built on the idea of running unpack_trees() and
then "doing minor touch-ups" to get the result. Unfortunately,
unpack_trees() was run in an update-as-it-goes mode, leading
merge-recursive.c to follow suit and end up with an immediate evaluation
and fix-it-up-as-you-go design. Some things like directory/file
conflicts are not well representable in the index data structure, and
required special extra code to handle. But then when it was discovered
that rename/delete conflicts could also be involved in directory/file
conflicts, the special directory/file conflict handling code had to be
copied to the rename/delete codepath. ...and then it had to be copied
for modify/delete, and for rename/rename(1to2) conflicts, ...and yet it
still missed some. Further, when it was discovered that there were also
file/submodule conflicts and submodule/directory conflicts, we needed to
copy the special submodule handling code to all the special cases
throughout the codebase.
And then it was discovered that our handling of directory/file conflicts
was suboptimal because it would create untracked files to store the
contents of the conflicting file, which would not be cleaned up if
someone were to run a 'git merge --abort' or 'git rebase --abort'. It
was also difficult or scary to try to add or remove the index entries
corresponding to these files given the directory/file conflict in the
index. But changing merge-recursive.c to handle these correctly was a
royal pain because there were so many sites in the code with similar but
not identical code for handling directory/file/submodule conflicts that
would all need to be updated.
I have worked hard to push all directory/file/submodule conflict
handling in merge-ort through a single codepath, and avoid creating
untracked files for storing tracked content (it does record things at
alternate paths, but makes sure they have higher-order stages in the
index).
Since updating merge-recursive is too much work and we don't want to
destabilize it, instead update the testsuite to have different
expectations for relevant directory/file/submodule conflict tests.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There are a number of tests that the "recursive" backend does not handle
correctly but which the redesign in "ort" will. Add a new helper in
lib-merge.sh for selecting a different test expectation based on the
setting of GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM, and use it in various testcases to
document which ones we expect to fail under recursive but pass under
ort.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Testcases 12b and 12c were both slightly weird; they were marked as
having a weird resolution, but with the note that even straightforward
simple rules can give weird results when the input is bizarre.
However, during optimization work for merge-ort, I discovered a
significant speedup that is possible if we add one more fairly
straightforward rule: we don't bother doing directory rename detection
if there are no new files added to the directory on the other side of
the history to be affected by the directory rename. This seems like an
obvious and straightforward rule, but there was one funny corner case
where directory rename detection could affect only existing files: the
funny corner case where two directories are renamed into each other on
opposite sides of history. In other words, it only results in a
different output for testcases 12b and 12c.
Since we already thought testcases 12b and 12c were weird anyway, and
because the optimization often has a significant effect on common cases
(but is entirely prevented if we can't change how 12b and 12c function),
let's add the additional rule and tweak how 12b and 12c work. Split
both testcases into two (one where we add no new files, and one where
the side that doesn't rename a given directory will add files to it),
and mark them with the new expectation.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
While investigating the issues highlighted by the testcase in the
previous patch, I also found a shortcoming in the directory rename
detection rules. Split testcase 6b into two to explain this issue
and update directory-rename-detection.txt to remove one of the previous
rules that I know believe to be detrimental. Also, update the wording
around testcase 8e; while we are not modifying the results of that
testcase, we were previously unsure of the appropriate resolution of
that test and the new rule makes the previously chosen resolution for
that testcase a bit more solid.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a new testcase modelled on a real world repository example that
served multiple purposes:
* it uncovered a bug in the current directory rename detection
implementation.
* it is a good test of needing to do directory rename detection for
a series of commits instead of just one (and uses rebase instead
of just merge like all the other tests in this testfile).
* it is an excellent stress test for some of the optimizations in
my new merge-ort engine
I can expand on the final item later when I have submitted more of
merge-ort, but the bug is the main immediate concern. It arises as
follows:
* dir/subdir/ has several files
* almost all files in dir/subdir/ are renamed to folder/subdir/
* one of the files in dir/subdir/ is renamed to folder/subdir/newsubdir/
* If the other side of history (that doesn't do the renames) adds a
new file to dir/subdir/, where should it be placed after the merge?
The most obvious two choices are: (1) leave the new file in dir/subdir/,
don't make it follow the rename, and (2) move the new file to
folder/subdir/, following the rename of most the files. However,
there's a possible third choice here: (3) move the new file to
folder/subdir/newsubdir/. The choice reinforce the fact that
merge.directoryRenames=conflict is a good default, but when the merge
machinery needs to stick it somewhere and notify the user of the
possibility that they might want to place it elsewhere. Surprisingly,
the current code would always choose (3), while the real world
repository was clearly expecting (2) -- move the file along with where
the herd of files was going, not with the special exception.
The problem here is that for the majority of the file renames,
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/
is actually represented as
dir/ -> folder/
This directory rename would have a big weight associated with it since
most the files followed that rename. However, we always consult the
most immediate directory first, and there is only one rename rule for
it:
dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
Since this rule is the only one for mapping from dir/subdir/, it
automatically wins and that directory rename was followed instead of the
desired dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/.
Unfortunately, the fix is a bit involved so for now just add the
testcase documenting the issue.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test preparation for the switch of default branch name continues.
* js/default-branch-name-part-3:
tests: avoid using the branch name `main`
t1415: avoid using `main` as ref name
|
|
Hotfix and clean-up for the jt/threaded-index-pack topic that has
graduated to v2.29-rc0.
* jk/index-pack-hotfixes:
index-pack: make get_base_data() comment clearer
index-pack: drop type_cas mutex
index-pack: restore "resolving deltas" progress meter
|
|
Hotfix to a recently added test script.
* hx/push-atomic-with-cert:
t5534: split stdout and stderr redirection
|
|
In the near future, we want to change Git's default branch name to
`main`. In preparation for that, stop using it as a branch name in the
test suite. Replace that branch name by `topic`, the same name we used
to rename variations of `master` in b6211b89eb3 (tests: avoid variations
of the `master` branch name, 2020-09-26).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In preparation for a patch series that will change the fall-back for
`init.defaultBranch` to `main`, let's not use `main` as ref name in this
test script.
Otherwise, the `git for-each-ref ... | grep main` which wants to catch
those refs would also unexpectedly catch `refs/heads/main`.
Since the refs in question are worktree-local ones (i.e. each worktree
has their own, just like `HEAD`), and since the test case already uses a
secondary worktree called "second", let's use the name "first" for those
refs instead.
While at it, adjust the test titles that talk about a "repo" when they
meant a "worktree" instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit f08cbf60fe (index-pack: make quantum of work smaller, 2020-09-08)
refactored the main loop in threaded_second_pass(), but also deleted the
call to display_progress() at the top of the loop. This means that users
typically see no progress at all during the delta resolution phase (and
for large repositories, Git appears to hang).
This looks like an accident that was unrelated to the intended change of
that commit, since we continue to update nr_resolved_deltas in
resolve_delta(). Let's restore the call to get that progress back.
We'll also add a test that confirms we generate the expected progress.
This isn't perfect, as it wouldn't catch a bug where progress was
delayed to the end. That was probably possible to trigger when receiving
a thin pack, because we'd eventually call display_progress() from
fix_unresolved_deltas(), but only once after doing all the work.
However, since our test case generates a complete pack, it reliably
demonstrates this particular bug and its fix. And we can't do better
without making the test racy.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
On atomic pushing failure with GnuPG, we expect a very specific output
in stdout due to `--porcelain` switch.
On such failure, we also write down some helpful hint into stderr
in order to help user understand what happens and how to continue from
those failures.
On a lot of system, those hint (in stderr) will be flushed first,
then those messages in stdout will be flushed. In such systems, the
current test code is fine as is.
However, we don't have such guarantee, (at least) there're some real
systems that writes those stream interleaved. On such systems, we may
see the stderr stream written in the middle of stdout stream.
Let's split those stream redirection. By splitting those stream,
the output stream will contain exactly what we want to compare,
thus, saving us a "sed" invocation.
While we're at it, change the `test_i18ncmp` to `test_cmp` because we
will never translate those messages (because of `--porcelain`).
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git format-patch" learns to take "whenAble" as a possible value
for the format.useAutoBase configuration variable to become no-op
when the automatically computed base does not make sense.
* jk/format-auto-base-when-able:
format-patch: teach format.useAutoBase "whenAble" option
|
|
"log -c --find-object=X" did not work well to find a merge that
involves a change to an object X from only one parent.
* jk/diff-cc-oidfind-fix:
combine-diff: handle --find-object in multitree code path
|
|
"git fetch" and "git push" support negative refspecs.
* jk/refspecs-negative:
refspec: add support for negative refspecs
|
|
"git archive" learns the "--add-file" option to include untracked
files into a snapshot from a tree-ish.
* rs/archive-add-file:
Makefile: use git-archive --add-file
archive: add --add-file
archive: read short blobs in archive.c::write_archive_entry()
|
|
The lazy fetching done internally to make missing objects available
in a partial clone incorrectly made permanent damage to the partial
clone filter in the repository, which has been corrected.
* jt/keep-partial-clone-filter-upon-lazy-fetch:
fetch: do not override partial clone filter
promisor-remote: remove unused variable
|
|
"git submodule update --quiet" did not squelch underlying "rebase"
and "pull" commands.
* td/submodule-update-quiet:
submodule update: silence underlying merge/rebase with "--quiet"
|
|
Code cleanup.
* jk/unused:
dir.c: drop unused "untracked" from treat_path_fast()
sequencer: handle ignore_footer when parsing trailers
test-advise: check argument count with argc instead of argv
sparse-checkout: fill in some options boilerplate
sequencer: drop repository argument from run_git_commit()
push: drop unused repo argument to do_push()
assert PARSE_OPT_NONEG in parse-options callbacks
env--helper: write to opt->value in parseopt helper
drop unused argc parameters
convert: drop unused crlf_action from check_global_conv_flags_eol()
|
|
Update the tests to drop word 'master' from them.
* js/default-branch-name-part-2:
t9902: avoid using the branch name `master`
tests: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
t3200: avoid variations of the `master` branch name
fast-export: avoid using unnecessary language in a code comment
t/test-terminal: avoid non-inclusive language
|
|
in_merge_bases_many(), a way to see if a commit is reachable from
any commit in a set of commits, was totally broken when the
commit-graph feature was in use, which has been corrected.
* ds/in-merge-bases-many-optim-bug:
commit-reach: fix in_merge_bases_many bug
|
|
"git shortlog" has been taught to group commits by the contents of
the trailer lines, like "Reviewed-by:", "Coauthored-by:", etc.
* jk/shortlog-group-by-trailer:
shortlog: allow multiple groups to be specified
shortlog: parse trailer idents
shortlog: rename parse_stdin_ident()
shortlog: de-duplicate trailer values
shortlog: match commit trailers with --group
trailer: add interface for iterating over commit trailers
shortlog: add grouping option
shortlog: change "author" variables to "ident"
|
|
"git bisect start X Y", when X and Y are not valid committish
object names, should take X and Y as pathspec, but didn't.
* cc/bisect-start-fix:
bisect: don't use invalid oid as rev when starting
|
|
"git blame --ignore-rev/--ignore-revs-file" failed to validate
their input are valid revision, and failed to take into account
that the user may want to give an annotated tag instead of a
commit, which has been corrected.
* jc/blame-ignore-fix:
blame: validate and peel the object names on the ignore list
t8013: minimum preparatory clean-up
|
|
Way back in f9b8908b (commit.c: use generation numbers for
in_merge_bases(), 2018-05-01), a heuristic was used to short-circuit
the in_merge_bases() walk. This works just fine as long as the
caller is checking only two commits, but when there are multiple,
there is a possibility that this heuristic is _very wrong_.
Some code moves since then has changed this method to
repo_in_merge_bases_many() inside commit-reach.c. The heuristic
computes the minimum generation number of the "reference" list, then
compares this number to the generation number of the "commit".
In a recent topic, a test was added that used in_merge_bases_many()
to test if a commit was reachable from a number of commits pulled
from a reflog. However, this highlighted the problem: if any of the
reference commits have a smaller generation number than the given
commit, then the walk is skipped _even if there exist some with
higher generation number_.
This heuristic is wrong! It must check the MAXIMUM generation number
of the reference commits, not the MINIMUM.
This highlights a testing gap. t6600-test-reach.sh covers many
methods in commit-reach.c, including in_merge_bases() and
get_merge_bases_many(), but since these methods either restrict to
two input commits or actually look for the full list of merge bases,
they don't check this heuristic!
Add a possible input to "test-tool reach" that tests
in_merge_bases_many() and add tests to t6600-test-reach.sh that
cover this heuristic. This includes cases for the reference commits
having generation above and below the generation of the input commit,
but also having maximum generation below the generation of the input
commit.
The fix itself is to swap min_generation with a max_generation in
repo_in_merge_bases_many().
Reported-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The format.useAutoBase configuration option exists to allow users to
enable '--base=auto' for format-patch by default.
This can sometimes lead to poor workflow, due to unexpected failures
when attempting to format an ancient patch:
$ git format-patch -1 <an old commit>
fatal: base commit shouldn't be in revision list
This can be very confusing, as it is not necessarily immediately obvious
that the user requested a --base (since this was in the configuration,
not on the command line).
We do want --base=auto to fail when it cannot provide a suitable base,
as it would be equally confusing if a formatted patch did not include
the base information when it was requested.
Teach format.useAutoBase a new mode, "whenAble". This mode will cause
format-patch to attempt to include a base commit when it can. However,
if no valid base commit can be found, then format-patch will continue
formatting the patch without a base commit.
In order to avoid making yet another branch name unusable with --base,
do not teach --base=whenAble or --base=whenable.
Instead, refactor the base_commit option to use a callback, and rely on
the global configuration variable auto_base.
This does mean that a user cannot request this optional base commit
generation from the command line. However, this is likely not too
valuable. If the user requests base information manually, they will be
immediately informed of the failure to acquire a suitable base commit.
This allows the user to make an informed choice about whether to
continue the format.
Add tests to cover the new mode of operation for --base.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commands such as
$ git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules --quiet
produce non-quiet output from the merge or rebase. Pass the --quiet
option down when invoking "rebase" and "merge".
Also fix the parsing of git submodule update -v.
When e84c3cf3 (git-submodule.sh: accept verbose flag in cmd_update
to be non-quiet, 2018-08-14) taught "git submodule update" to take
"--quiet", it apparently did not know how ${GIT_QUIET:+--quiet}
works, and reviewers seem to have missed that setting the variable
to "0", rather than unsetting it, still results in "--quiet" being
passed to underlying commands.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Dubois <tbodt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Both fetch and push support pattern refspecs which allow fetching or
pushing references that match a specific pattern. Because these patterns
are globs, they have somewhat limited ability to express more complex
situations.
For example, suppose you wish to fetch all branches from a remote except
for a specific one. To allow this, you must setup a set of refspecs
which match only the branches you want. Because refspecs are either
explicit name matches, or simple globs, many patterns cannot be
expressed.
Add support for a new type of refspec, referred to as "negative"
refspecs. These are prefixed with a '^' and mean "exclude any ref
matching this refspec". They can only have one "side" which always
refers to the source. During a fetch, this refers to the name of the ref
on the remote. During a push, this refers to the name of the ref on the
local side.
With negative refspecs, users can express more complex patterns. For
example:
git fetch origin refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* ^refs/heads/dontwant
will fetch all branches on origin into remotes/origin, but will exclude
fetching the branch named dontwant.
Refspecs today are commutative, meaning that order doesn't expressly
matter. Rather than forcing an implied order, negative refspecs will
always be applied last. That is, in order to match, a ref must match at
least one positive refspec, and match none of the negative refspecs.
This is similar to how negative pathspecs work.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When doing combined diffs, we have two possible code paths:
- a slower one which independently diffs against each parent, applies
any filters, and then intersects the resulting paths
- a faster one which walks all trees simultaneously
When the diff options specify that we must do certain filters, like
pickaxe, then we always use the slow path, since the pickaxe code only
knows how to handle filepairs, not the n-parent entries generated for
combined diffs.
But there are two problems with the slow path:
1. It's slow. Running:
git rev-list HEAD | git diff-tree --stdin -r -c
in git.git takes ~3s on my machine. But adding "--find-object" to
that increases it to ~6s, even though find-object itself should
incur only a few extra oid comparisons. On linux.git, it's even
worse: 35s versus 215s.
2. It doesn't catch all cases where a particular path is interesting.
Consider a merge with parent blobs X and Y for a particular path,
and end result Z. That should be interesting according to "-c",
because the result doesn't match either parent. And it should be
interesting even with "--find-object=X", because "X" went away in
the merge.
But because we perform each pairwise diff independently, this
confuses the intersection code. The change from X to Z is still
interesting according to --find-object. But in the other parent we
went from Y to Z, so the diff appears empty! That causes the
intersection code to think that parent didn't change the path, and
thus it's not interesting for "-c".
This patch fixes both by implementing --find-object for the multitree
code. It's a bit unfortunate that we have to duplicate some logic from
diffcore-pickaxe, but this is the best we can do for now. In an ideal
world, all of the diffcore code would stop thinking about filepairs and
start thinking about n-parent sets, and we could use the multitree walk
with all of it.
Until then, there are some leftover warts:
- other pickaxe operations, like -S or -G, still suffer from both
problems. These would be hard to adapt because they rely on having
a diff_filespec() for each path to look at content. And we'd need to
define what an n-way "change" means in each case (probably easy for
"-S", which can compare counts, but not so clear for -G, which is
about grepping diffs).
- other options besides --find-object may cause us to use the slow
pairwise path, in which case we'll go back to producing a different
(wrong) answer for the X/Y/Z case above.
We may be able to hack around these, but I think the ultimate solution
will be a larger rewrite of the diffcore code. For now, this patch
improves one specific case but leaves the rest.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We complain if "test-tool advise" is not given an argument, but we
quietly ignore any additional arguments it receives. Let's instead check
that we got the expected number. As a bonus, this silences
-Wunused-parameter, which notes that we don't ever look at argc.
While we're here, we can also fix the indentation in the conditional.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Many functions take an argv/argc pair, but never actually look at argc.
This makes it useless at best (we use the NULL sentinel in argv to find
the end of the array), and misleading at worst (what happens if the argc
count does not match the argv NULL?).
In each of these instances, the argv NULL does match the argc count, so
there are no bugs here. But let's tighten the interfaces to make it
harder to get wrong (and to reduce some -Wunused-parameter complaints).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Earlier we taught "git pull" to warn when the user does not say the
histories need to be merged, rebased or accepts only fast-
forwarding, but the warning triggered for those who have set the
pull.ff configuration variable.
* ah/pull:
pull: don't warn if pull.ff has been set
|
|
"git range-diff" showed incorrect diffstat, which has been
corrected.
* tg/range-diff-same-file-fix:
diff: fix modified lines stats with --stat and --numstat
|
|
Test update.
* jc/t1506-rev-parse-leaves-range-endpoint-unpeeled:
t1506: rev-parse A..B and A...B
|
|
"git clone" that clones from SHA-1 repository, while
GIT_DEFAULT_HASH set to use SHA-256 already, resulted in an
unusable repository that half-claims to be SHA-256 repository
with SHA-1 objects and refs. This has been corrected.
* bc/clone-with-git-default-hash-fix:
builtin/clone: avoid failure with GIT_DEFAULT_HASH
|
|
"git commit-graph write" learned to limit the number of bloom
filters that are computed from scratch with the --max-new-filters
option.
* tb/bloom-improvements:
commit-graph: introduce 'commitGraph.maxNewFilters'
builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--max-new-filters=<n>'
commit-graph: rename 'split_commit_graph_opts'
bloom: encode out-of-bounds filters as non-empty
bloom/diff: properly short-circuit on max_changes
bloom: use provided 'struct bloom_filter_settings'
bloom: split 'get_bloom_filter()' in two
commit-graph.c: store maximum changed paths
commit-graph: respect 'commitGraph.readChangedPaths'
t/helper/test-read-graph.c: prepare repo settings
commit-graph: pass a 'struct repository *' in more places
t4216: use an '&&'-chain
commit-graph: introduce 'get_bloom_filter_settings()'
|
|
When a fetch with the --filter argument is made, the configured default
filter is set even if one already exists. This change was made in
5e46139376 ("builtin/fetch: remove unique promisor remote limitation",
2019-06-25) - in particular, changing from:
* If this is the FIRST partial-fetch request, we enable partial
* on this repo and remember the given filter-spec as the default
* for subsequent fetches to this remote.
to:
* If this is a partial-fetch request, we enable partial on
* this repo if not already enabled and remember the given
* filter-spec as the default for subsequent fetches to this
* remote.
(The given filter-spec is "remembered" even if there is already an
existing one.)
This is problematic whenever a lazy fetch is made, because lazy fetches
are made using "git fetch --filter=blob:none", but this will also happen
if the user invokes "git fetch --filter=<filter>" manually. Therefore,
restore the behavior prior to 5e46139376, which writes a filter-spec
only if the current fetch request is the first partial-fetch one (for
that remote).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Now that shortlog supports reading from trailers, it can be useful to
combine counts from multiple trailers, or between trailers and authors.
This can be done manually by post-processing the output from multiple
runs, but it's non-trivial to make sure that each name/commit pair is
counted only once.
This patch teaches shortlog to accept multiple --group options on the
command line, and pull data from all of them. That makes it possible to
run:
git shortlog -ns --group=author --group=trailer:co-authored-by
to get a shortlog that counts authors and co-authors equally.
The implementation is mostly straightforward. The "group" enum becomes a
bitfield, and the trailer key becomes a list. I didn't bother
implementing the multi-group semantics for reading from stdin. It would
be possible to do, but the existing matching code makes it awkward, and
I doubt anybody cares.
The duplicate suppression we used for trailers now covers authors and
committers as well (though in non-trailer single-group mode we can skip
the hash insertion and lookup, since we only see one value per commit).
There is one subtlety: we now care about the case when no group bit is
set (in which case we default to showing the author). The caller in
builtin/log.c needs to be adapted to ask explicitly for authors, rather
than relying on shortlog_init(). It would be possible with some
gymnastics to make this keep working as-is, but it's not worth it for a
single caller.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Trailers don't necessarily contain name/email identity values, so
shortlog has so far treated them as opaque strings. However, since many
trailers do contain identities, it's useful to treat them as such when
they can be parsed. That lets "-e" work as usual, as well as mailmap.
When they can't be parsed, we'll continue with the old behavior of
treating them as a single string (there's no new test for that here,
since the existing tests cover a trailer like this).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The current documentation is vague about what happens with
--group=trailer:signed-off-by when we see a commit with:
Signed-off-by: One
Signed-off-by: Two
Signed-off-by: One
We clearly should credit both "One" and "Two", but should "One" get
credited twice? The current code does so, but mostly because that was
the easiest thing to do. It's probably more useful to count each commit
at most once. This will become especially important when we allow
values from multiple sources in a future patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If a project uses commit trailers, this patch lets you use
shortlog to see who is performing each action. For example,
running:
git shortlog -ns --group=trailer:reviewed-by
in git.git shows who has reviewed. You can even use a custom
format to see things like who has helped whom:
git shortlog --format="...helped %an (%ad)" \
--group=trailer:helped-by
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In preparation for adding more grouping types, let's refactor the
committer/author grouping code and add a user-facing option that binds
them together. In particular:
- the main option is now "--group", to make it clear
that the various group types are mutually exclusive. The
"--committer" option is an alias for "--group=committer".
- we keep an enum rather than a binary flag, to prepare
for more values
- we prefer switch statements to ternary assignment, since
other group types will need more custom code
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The completion tests used that name unnecessarily, and it is a
non-inclusive term, so let's avoid using it here.
Since three of the touched test cases make use of the fact that two of
the branch names (`master` and `maint`) start with the same letter (or
even with the same two letters), we choose to replace the use of
`master` by a name that also has that property: `main`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The term `master` has a loaded history that serves as a constant
reminder of racial injustice. The Git project has no desire to
perpetuate this and already started avoiding it.
The test suite uses variations of this name for branches other than the
default one. Apart from t3200, where we just addressed this in the
previous commit, those instances can be renamed in an automated manner
because they do not require any changes outside of the test script, so
let's do that.
Seeing as the touched branches have very little (if anything) to do with
the default branch, we choose to use a completely separate naming
scheme: `topic_<number>` (it cannot be `topic-<number>` because t5515
uses the `test_oid` machinery with the term, and that machinery uses
shell variables internally, whose names cannot contain dashes).
This trick was performed by this (GNU) sed invocation:
$ sed -i 's/master\([a-z0-9]\)/topic_\1/g' t/t*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git push" that wants to be atomic and wants to send push
certificate learned not to prepare and sign the push certificate
when it fails the local check (hence due to atomicity it is known
that no certificate is needed).
* hx/push-atomic-with-cert:
send-pack: run GPG after atomic push checking
|
|
The "unshelve" subcommand of "git p4" used incorrectly used
commit^N where it meant to say commit~N to name the Nth generation
ancestor, which has been corrected.
* ld/p4-unshelve-fix:
git-p4: use HEAD~$n to find parent commit for unshelve
git-p4 unshelve: adding a commit breaks git-p4 unshelve
|
Elijah Newren
Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin
Jeff King
Đoàn Trần Công Danh
Derrick Stolee
Jacob Keller
Theodore Dubois
Jonathan Tan