| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Our tests for handling duplicates in oid-array provide only a single
duplicate for each number, so our sorted array looks like:
44 44 55 55 88 88 aa aa
A slightly more interesting test is to have multiple duplicates, which
makes sure that we not only skip the duplicate, but keep skipping until
we are out of the set of matching duplicates.
Unsurprisingly this works just fine, but it's worth beefing up this test
since we're about to change the duplicate-detection code.
Note that we do need to adjust the results on the lookup test, since it
is returning the index of the found item (and now we have more items
before our range, and the range itself is slightly larger, since we'll
accept a match of any element).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The data type is an oid_array these days, and we are using "test-tool
oid-array", so let's name the test script appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
An earlier attempt to fix "git fetch --recurse-submodules" broke
another use case; revert it until a better fix is found.
* pk/subsub-fetch-fix:
Revert "submodules: fix of regression on fetching of non-init subsub-repo"
|
|
"git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules" checked for local changes
in a wrong range and failed to run correctly when it should.
* pb/pull-rebase-recurse-submodules:
pull: check for local submodule modifications with the right range
t5572: describe '--rebase' tests a little more
t5572: add notes on a peculiar test
pull --rebase: compute rebase arguments in separate function
|
|
This reverts commit 1b7ac4e6d4d490b224f5206af7418ed74e490608; in
<CAN0XMOLiS_8JZKF_wW70BvRRxkDHyUoa=Z3ODtB_Bd6f5Y=7JQ@mail.gmail.com>,
Ralf Thielow reports that "git fetch" with submodule.recurse set can
result in a bogus and infinitely recursive fetching of the same
submodule.
|
|
A test script got cleaned up and then made not to depend on the
value of init.defaultBranch.
* js/t3404-master-to-primary:
t3404: do not depend on any specific default branch name
|
|
Config parser fix for "git notes".
* na/notes-displayref-is-not-boolean:
t3301: test proper exit response to no-value notes.displayRef.
notes.c: fix a segfault in notes_display_config()
|
|
Test preparation.
* js/t1309-master-to-topic:
t1309: use a neutral branch name in the `onbranch` test cases
|
|
UI improvement.
* js/pull-rebase-use-advise:
pull: colorize the hint about setting `pull.rebase`
|
|
A test script got cleaned up not to depend on the value of
init.defaultBranch.
* js/t4015-wo-master:
t4015: let the test pass with any default branch name
|
|
Cleanup.
* js/t3040-cleanup:
t3040: remove stale note
|
|
A test script got cleaned up and then made not to depend on the
value of init.defaultBranch.
* js/t2106-cleanup:
t2106: ensure that the checkout fails for the expected reason
t2106: make test independent of the current main branch name
t2106: adjust style to the current conventions
|
|
A lazily defined test prerequisite can now be defined in terms of
another lazily defined test prerequisite.
* sg/tests-prereq:
tests: fix description of 'test_set_prereq'
tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliably
|
|
Since jgit does not yet work with SHA-256 repositories, mark the
tests that uses it not to run unless we are testing with ShA-1
repositories.
* sg/t5310-jgit-wants-sha1:
t5310-pack-bitmaps: skip JGit tests with SHA256
|
|
"git fetch" did not work correctly with nested submodules where the
innermost submodule that is not of interest got updated in the
upstream, which has been corrected.
* pk/subsub-fetch-fix:
submodules: fix of regression on fetching of non-init subsub-repo
|
|
The exchange between receive-pack and proc-receive hook did not
carefully check for errors.
* jx/t5411-flake-fix:
receive-pack: use default version 0 for proc-receive
receive-pack: gently write messages to proc-receive
t5411: new helper filter_out_user_friendly_and_stable_output
|
|
The command line completion script (in contrib/) learned to expand
commands that are alias of alias.
* fc/bash-completion-alias-of-alias:
completion: bash: improve alias loop detection
completion: bash: check for alias loop
completion: bash: support recursive aliases
|
|
Now that we can override the default branch name in the tests via
`GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME`, we should avoid expecting a
particular hard-coded name.
So let's rename the initial branch immediately to `primary` and work
with that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nate Avers <nate@roosteregg.cc>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A specialization of hashmap that uses a string as key has been
introduced. Hopefully it will see wider use over time.
* en/strmap:
shortlog: use strset from strmap.h
Use new HASHMAP_INIT macro to simplify hashmap initialization
strmap: take advantage of FLEXPTR_ALLOC_STR when relevant
strmap: enable allocations to come from a mem_pool
strmap: add a strset sub-type
strmap: split create_entry() out of strmap_put()
strmap: add functions facilitating use as a string->int map
strmap: enable faster clearing and reusing of strmaps
strmap: add more utility functions
strmap: new utility functions
hashmap: provide deallocation function names
hashmap: introduce a new hashmap_partial_clear()
hashmap: allow re-use after hashmap_free()
hashmap: adjust spacing to fix argument alignment
hashmap: add usage documentation explaining hashmap_free[_entries]()
|
|
Running "git diff" while allowing external diff in a state with
unmerged paths used to segfault, which has been corrected.
* jk/diff-release-filespec-fix:
t7800: simplify difftool test
diff: allow passing NULL to diff_free_filespec_data()
|
|
"git rev-parse" learned the "--end-of-options" to help scripts to
safely take a parameter that is supposed to be a revision, e.g.
"git rev-parse --verify -q --end-of-options $rev".
* jk/rev-parse-end-of-options:
rev-parse: handle --end-of-options
rev-parse: put all options under the "-" check
rev-parse: don't accept options after dashdash
|
|
The maximum length of output filenames "git format-patch" creates
has become configurable (used to be capped at 64).
* jc/format-patch-name-max:
format-patch: make output filename configurable
|
|
In d18c950a69f (pull: warn if the user didn't say whether to rebase or
to merge, 2020-03-09), a new hint was introduced to encourage users to
make a conscious decision about whether they want their pull to merge or
to rebase by configuring the `pull.rebase` setting.
This warning was clearly intended to advise users, but as pointed out in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/87ima2rdsm.fsf%40evledraar.gmail.com, it
uses `warning()` instead of `advise()`.
One consequence is that the advice is not colorized in the same manner
as other, similar messages. So let's use `advise()` instead.
Pointed-out-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We do not need to hard-code the actual branch name, as we can use the
`test_commit` function to simplify the code and use the tag it
generates, thereby being a lot more precise in what we want.
Strangely enough, this test case would have succeeded even with an
overridden default branch name, obviously for the wrong reason. Let's
verify that it passes for the expected reason, by looking for a
tell-tale in Git's output.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `onbranch` test cases touched by this patch do not actually try to
include any other config. Their purpose is to avoid regressing on two
bugs in the `include.onbranch:<name>.path` code that we fixed in the
past, bugs that are actually unrelated to any concrete branch name.
The first bug was fixed in 85fe0e800ca (config: work around bug with
includeif:onbranch and early config, 2019-07-31). Essentially, when
reading early config, there would be a catch-22 trying to access the
refs, and therefore we simply cannot evaluate the condition at that
point. The test case ensures that we avoid emitting this bogus message:
BUG: refs.c:1851: attempting to get main_ref_store outside of repository
The second test case concerns the non-Git scenario, where we simply do
not have a current branch to begin with (because we don't have a
repository in the first place), and the test case was introduced in
22932d9169f (config: stop checking whether the_repository is NULL,
2019-08-06) to ensure that we don't cause a segmentation fault should
the code still incorrectly try to look at any ref.
In short, neither of these two test cases will ever look at a current
branch name, even in case of regressions. Therefore, the actual branch
name does not matter at all. We can therefore easily avoid
racially-charged branch names here, and that's what this patch does.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git blame --ignore-revs-file=<file>" learned to ignore a
non-existent object name in the input, instead of complaining.
* jc/blame-ignore-fix:
blame: silently ignore invalid ignore file objects
|
|
"git blame -L :funcname -- path" did not work well for a path for
which a userdiff driver is defined.
* pb/blame-funcname-range-userdiff:
blame: simplify 'setup_blame_bloom_data' interface
blame: simplify 'setup_scoreboard' interface
blame: enable funcname blaming with userdiff driver
line-log: mention both modes in 'blame' and 'log' short help
doc: add more pointers to gitattributes(5) for userdiff
blame-options.txt: also mention 'funcname' in '-L' description
doc: line-range: improve formatting
doc: log, gitk: move '-L' description to 'line-range-options.txt'
|
|
Preparation for a new merge strategy.
* en/merge-ort-api-null-impl:
merge,rebase,revert: select ort or recursive by config or environment
fast-rebase: demonstrate merge-ort's API via new test-tool command
merge-ort-wrappers: new convience wrappers to mimic the old merge API
merge-ort: barebones API of new merge strategy with empty implementation
|
|
Parts of "git maintenance" to ease writing crontab entries (and
other scheduling system configuration) for it.
* ds/maintenance-part-3:
maintenance: add troubleshooting guide to docs
maintenance: use 'incremental' strategy by default
maintenance: create maintenance.strategy config
maintenance: add start/stop subcommands
maintenance: add [un]register subcommands
for-each-repo: run subcommands on configured repos
maintenance: add --schedule option and config
maintenance: optionally skip --auto process
|
|
"git rebase -i" did not store ORIG_HEAD correctly.
* pw/rebase-i-orig-head:
rebase -i: simplify get_revision_ranges()
rebase -i: use struct object_id when writing state
rebase -i: use struct object_id rather than looking up commit
rebase -i: stop overwriting ORIG_HEAD buffer
|
|
"git format-patch --output=there" did not work as expected and
instead crashed. The option is now supported.
* jk/format-patch-output:
format-patch: support --output option
format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory
format-patch: refactor output selection
|
|
"git log -L<range>:<path>" is documented to take no pathspec, but
this was not enforced by the command line option parser, which has
been corrected.
* jc/line-log-takes-no-pathspec:
log: diagnose -L used with pathspec as an error
|
|
Add t/perf support for fsmonitor.
* nk/perf-fsmonitor:
t/perf/fsmonitor: add benchmark for dirty status
t/perf/fsmonitor: perf comparison of multiple fsmonitor integrations
t/perf/fsmonitor: initialize test with git reset
t/perf/fsmonitor: factor setup for fsmonitor into function
t/perf/fsmonitor: silence initial git commit
t/perf/fsmonitor: shorten DESC to basename
t/perf/fsmonitor: factor description out for readability
t/perf/fsmonitor: improve error message if typoing hook name
t/perf/fsmonitor: move watchman setup to one-time-repo-setup
t/perf/fsmonitor: separate one time repo initialization
|
|
Preparation for a new merge strategy.
* en/merge-tests:
t6423: add more details about direct resolution of directories
t6423: note improved ort handling with untracked files
t6423, t6436: note improved ort handling with dirty files
merge tests: expect slight differences in output for recursive vs. ort
t6423: expect improved conflict markers labels in the ort backend
t6404, t6423: expect improved rename/delete handling in ort backend
t6416: correct expectation for rename/rename(1to2) + directory/file
merge tests: expect improved directory/file conflict handling in ort
t/: new helper for tests that pass with ort but fail with recursive
|
|
Prepare a test script to transition of the default branch name to
'main'.
* js/default-branch-name-adjust-t5515:
t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (conclusion)
t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 3)
t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 2)
t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 1)
|
|
"git fetch --depth=<n>" over the stateless RPC / smart HTTP
transport handled EOF from the client poorly at the server end.
* dd/upload-pack-stateless-eof:
upload-pack: allow stateless client EOF just prior to haves
|
|
This comment was most likely a "note to self" during the development of
1c3e5c4ebc3 (Tests for core subproject support, 2007-04-19) and is
neither needed nor comprehensible at this point. Let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
'test_set_prereq's description claims that prereqs can be specified to
'test_expect_code', but that is not the case (it is not meant to run a
test _case_, but a git command), so remove it.
OTOH that description doesn't mention 'test_external' and
'test_external_without_stderr' that do accept prereqs, so mention
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some test prereqs depend on other prereqs, so in a couple of cases we
have nested prereqs that look something like this:
test_lazy_prereq FOO '
test_have_prereq BAR &&
check-foo
'
This can be problematic, because lazy prereqs are evaluated in the
'$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir' directory, which is the same for
every prereq, and which is automatically removed after the prereq has
been evaluated. So if the inner prereq (BAR above) is a lazy prereq
that hasn't been evaluated yet, then after its evaluation the
'prereq-test-dir' shared with the outer prereq will be removed.
Consequently, 'check-foo' will find itself in a non-existing
directory, and won't be able to create/access any files in its cwd,
which could result in an unfulfilled outer prereq.
Luckily, this doesn't affect any of our current nested prereqs, either
because the inner prereq is not a lazy prereq (e.g. MINGW, CYGWIN or
PERL), or because the outer prereq happens to be checked without
touching any paths in its cwd (GPGSM and RFC1991 in 'lib-gpg.sh').
So to prevent nested prereqs from interfering with each other let's
evaluate each prereq in its own dedicated directory by appending the
prereq's name to the directory name, e.g. 'prereq-test-dir-SYMLINKS'.
In the test we check not only that the prereq test dir is still there,
but also that the inner prereq can't mess with the outer prereq's
files.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
During the transition of the test suite to a new default branch name, it
was noticed that this test case succeeded for the wrong reason when the
default branch name was overridden.
While we fixed that in the previous commit, let's make sure that we look
for a tell-tale in the error message that the `git checkout` failed for
the reason we wanted it to fail.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We do have this wonderful shortcut `git checkout -` to go back to the
previous branch, thanks to the reflog.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We settled on the style where the test cases' code starts by the opening
single quote being on the `test_expect_*` line, and the closing quote
being in its own line after the code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Ever since 'git pull' learned '--recurse-submodules' in a6d7eb2c7a
(pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only),
2017-06-23), we check if there are local submodule modifications by
checking the revision range 'curr_head --not rebase_fork_point'.
The goal of this check is to abort the pull if there are submodule
modifications in the local commits being rebased, since this scenario is
not supported.
However, the actual range of commits being rebased is not
'rebase_fork_point..curr_head', as the logic in
'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream' reveals, it is 'upstream..curr_head'.
If the 'git merge-base --fork-point' invocation in
'get_rebase_fork_point' fails to find a fork point between the current
branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling from,
'rebase_fork_point' is null and since 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass
null OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), 'submodule_touches_in_range'
checks 'curr_head' and all its ancestors for submodule modifications.
Since it is highly likely that there are submodule modifications in this
range (which is in effect the whole history of the current branch), this
prevents 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules' from succeeding if no
fork point exists between the current branch and the remote-tracking
branch being pulled. This can happen, for example, when the current
branch was forked from a commit which was never recorded in the reflog
of the remote-tracking branch we are pulling, as the last two paragraphs
of the "Discussion on fork-point mode" section in git-merge-base(1)
explain.
Fix this bug by passing 'upstream' instead of 'rebase_fork_point' as the
'excl_oid' argument to 'submodule_touches_in_range'.
Reported-by: Brice Goglin <bgoglin@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It can be hard at first glance to distinguish what is different between
the two tests 'recursive rebasing pull' and 'pull rebase recursing fails
with conflicts' in 't5572-pull-submodule.sh', and to understand how they
relate to the scenarios described in a6d7eb2c7a (pull: optionally rebase
submodules (remote submodule changes only), 2017-06-23), which
implemented '--recurse-submodules' for 'git pull' and added these tests.
Rename the tests to be more descriptive and add some bullet points
comments describing the different scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test 5572.63 ("branch has no merge base with remote-tracking
counterpart") was introduced in 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass null
OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), as a regression test for the bug
this commit was fixing (preventing a 'fatal: bad object' error when the
current branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling have no
merge-base).
However, the commit message for 4d36f88be7 does not describe in which
real-life situation this bug was encountered. The brief discussion on the
mailing list [1] does not either.
The regression test is not really representative of a real-life
scenario: both the local repository and its upstream have only a single
commit, and the "no merge-base" scenario is simulated by recreating this
root commit in the local repository using 'git commit-tree' before
calling 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules'. The rebase succeeds
and results in the local branch being reset to the same root commit as
the upstream branch.
The fix in 4d36f88be7 modifies 'submodule.c::submodule_touches_in_range'
so that if 'excl_oid' is null, which is the case when the 'git merge-base
--fork-point' invocation in 'builtin/pull.c::get_rebase_fork_point'
errors (no fork-point), then instead of 'incl_oid --not excl_oid' being
passed to setup_revisions, only 'incl_oid' is passed, and
'submodule_touches_in_range' examines 'incl_oid' and all its ancestors
to verify that they do not touch the submodule.
In test 5572.63, the recreated lone root commit in the local repository is
thus the only commit being examined by 'submodule_touches_in_range', and
this commit *adds* the submodule. However, 'submodule_touches_in_range'
*succeeds* because 'combine-diff.c::diff_tree_combined' (see the
backtrace below) returns early since this commit is the root commit
and has no parents.
#0 diff_tree_combined at combine-diff.c:1494
#1 0x0000000100150cbe in diff_tree_combined_merge at combine-diff.c:1649
#2 0x00000001002c7147 in collect_changed_submodules at submodule.c:869
#3 0x00000001002c7d6f in submodule_touches_in_range at submodule.c:1268
#4 0x00000001000ad58b in cmd_pull at builtin/pull.c:1040
In light of all this, add a note in t5572 documenting this peculiar
test.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180524204729.19896-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/t/#u
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 't5310-pack-bitmaps.sh' two tests make sure that our pack bitmaps
are compatible with JGit's bitmaps. Alas, not even the most recent
JGit version (5.9.0.202009080501-r) supports SHA256 yet, so when this
test script is run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256 on a setup with
JGit installed in PATH, then these two tests fail.
Protect these two tests with the SHA1 prereq in order to skip them
when testing with SHA256.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A regression has been introduced by a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28).
The scenario in which it triggers is when one has a remote repository
with a subrepository inside a subrepository like this:
superproject/middle_repo/inner_repo
Person A and B have both a clone of it, while Person B is not working
with the inner_repo and thus does not have it initialized in his working
copy.
Now person A introduces a change to the inner_repo and propagates it
through the middle_repo and the superproject.
Once person A pushed the changes and person B wants to fetch them using
"git fetch" on superproject level, B's git call will return with error
saying:
Could not access submodule 'inner_repo'
Errors during submodule fetch:
middle_repo
Expectation is that in this case the inner submodule will be recognized
as uninitialized subrepository and skipped by the git fetch command.
This used to work correctly before 'a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28)'.
Starting with a62387b the code wants to evaluate "is_empty_dir()" inside
.git/modules for a directory only existing in the worktree, delivering
then of course wrong return value.
This patch reverts the changes of a62387b and introduces a regression
test.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kaestle <peter.kaestle@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test clean-up.
* js/test-file-size:
tests: consolidate the `file_size` function into `test-lib-functions.sh`
|
|
Test code clean-up.
* js/test-whitespace-fixes:
t9603: use tabs for indentation
t5570: remove trailing padding
t5400,t5402: consistently indent with tabs, not with spaces
t3427: adjust stale comment
t3406: indent with tabs, not spaces
t1004: insert missing "branch" in a message
|
Jeff King
Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin
Nate Avers
SZEDER Gábor
Philippe Blain
Peter Kaestle