| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The "init" and "set" subcommands in "git sparse-checkout" have been
unified for a better user experience and performance.
* en/sparse-checkout-set:
sparse-checkout: remove stray trailing space
clone: avoid using deprecated `sparse-checkout init`
Documentation: clarify/correct a few sparsity related statements
git-sparse-checkout.txt: update to document init/set/reapply changes
sparse-checkout: enable reapply to take --[no-]{cone,sparse-index}
sparse-checkout: enable `set` to initialize sparse-checkout mode
sparse-checkout: split out code for tweaking settings config
sparse-checkout: disallow --no-stdin as an argument to set
sparse-checkout: add sanity-checks on initial sparsity state
sparse-checkout: break apart functions for sparse_checkout_(set|add)
sparse-checkout: pass use_stdin as a parameter instead of as a global
|
|
Broken &&-chains in the test scripts have been corrected.
* es/test-chain-lint:
t6000-t9999: detect and signal failure within loop
t5000-t5999: detect and signal failure within loop
t4000-t4999: detect and signal failure within loop
t0000-t3999: detect and signal failure within loop
tests: simplify by dropping unnecessary `for` loops
tests: apply modern idiom for exiting loop upon failure
tests: apply modern idiom for signaling test failure
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `{...}` groups
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `$(...)` command substitutions
tests: fix broken &&-chains in compound statements
tests: use test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output
tests: simplify construction of large blocks of text
t9107: use shell parameter expansion to avoid breaking &&-chain
t6300: make `%(raw:size) --shell` test more robust
t5516: drop unnecessary subshell and command invocation
t4202: clarify intent by creating expected content less cleverly
t1020: avoid aborting entire test script when one test fails
t1010: fix unnoticed failure on Windows
t/lib-pager: use sane_unset() to avoid breaking &&-chain
|
|
The chainlint test script linter in the test suite has been updated.
* es/chainlint:
chainlint.sed: stop splitting "(..." into separate lines "(" and "..."
chainlint.sed: swallow comments consistently
chainlint.sed: stop throwing away here-doc tags
chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator
chainlint.sed: make here-doc "<<-" operator recognition more POSIX-like
chainlint.sed: drop subshell-closing ">" annotation
chainlint.sed: drop unnecessary distinction between ?!AMP?! and ?!SEMI?!
chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block
chainlint.sed: improve ?!SEMI?! placement accuracy
chainlint.sed: improve ?!AMP?! placement accuracy
t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test
t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge
t/chainlint/*.test: generalize self-test commentary
t/chainlint/*.test: fix invalid test cases due to mixing quote types
t/chainlint/*.test: don't use invalid shell syntax
|
|
"git apply" has been taught to ignore a message without a patch
with the "--allow-empty" option. It also learned to honor the
"--quiet" option given from the command line.
* jz/apply-quiet-and-allow-empty:
git-apply: add --allow-empty flag
git-apply: add --quiet flag
|
|
Code clean-up.
* ab/common-main-cleanup:
common-main.c: call exit(), don't return
|
|
"git fetch --set-upstream" did not check if there is a current
branch, leading to a segfault when it is run on a detached HEAD,
which has been corrected.
* ab/fetch-set-upstream-while-detached:
pull, fetch: fix segfault in --set-upstream option
|
|
Teach diff and blame to work well with sparse index.
* ld/sparse-diff-blame:
blame: enable and test the sparse index
diff: enable and test the sparse index
diff: replace --staged with --cached in t1092 tests
repo-settings: prepare_repo_settings only in git repos
test-read-cache: set up repo after git directory
commit-graph: return if there is no git directory
git: ensure correct git directory setup with -h
|
|
"git fetch" without the "--update-head-ok" option ought to protect
a checked out branch from getting updated, to prevent the working
tree that checks it out to go out of sync. The code was written
before the use of "git worktree" got widespread, and only checked
the branch that was checked out in the current worktree, which has
been updated.
(originally called ak/fetch-not-overwrite-any-current-branch)
* ak/protect-any-current-branch:
branch: protect branches checked out in all worktrees
receive-pack: protect current branch for bare repository worktree
receive-pack: clean dead code from update_worktree()
fetch: protect branches checked out in all worktrees
worktree: simplify find_shared_symref() memory ownership model
branch: lowercase error messages
receive-pack: lowercase error messages
fetch: lowercase error messages
|
|
The cryptographic signing using ssh keys can specify literal keys
for keytypes whose name do not begin with the "ssh-" prefix by
using the "key::" prefix mechanism (e.g. "key::ecdsa-sha2-nistp256").
* fs/ssh-signing-other-keytypes:
ssh signing: make sign/amend test more resilient
ssh signing: support non ssh-* keytypes
|
|
Extend the signing of objects with SSH keys and learn to pay
attention to the key validity time range when verifying.
* fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime:
ssh signing: verify ssh-keygen in test prereq
ssh signing: make fmt-merge-msg consider key lifetime
ssh signing: make verify-tag consider key lifetime
ssh signing: make git log verify key lifetime
ssh signing: make verify-commit consider key lifetime
ssh signing: add key lifetime test prereqs
ssh signing: use sigc struct to pass payload
t/fmt-merge-msg: make gpgssh tests more specific
t/fmt-merge-msg: do not redirect stderr
|
|
When "git log" implicitly enabled the "decoration" processing
without being explicitly asked with "--decorate" option, it failed
to read and honor the settings given by the "--decorate-refs"
option.
* jk/log-decorate-opts-with-implicit-decorate:
log: load decorations with --simplify-by-decoration
log: handle --decorate-refs with userformat "%d"
|
|
"git rebase -x" by mistake started exporting the GIT_DIR and
GIT_WORK_TREE environment variables when the command was rewritten
in C, which has been corrected.
* en/rebase-x-wo-git-dir-env:
sequencer: do not export GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE for 'exec'
|
|
Most sparse-checkout subcommands (list, add, reapply) only make sense
when already in a sparse state. Add a quick check that will error out
early if this is not the case.
Also document with a comment why we do not exit early in `disable` even
when core.sparseCheckout starts as false.
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The test helper for refs subsystem learned to write bogus and/or
nonexistent object name to refs to simulate error situations we
want to test Git in.
* hn/allow-bogus-oid-in-ref-tests:
t1430: create valid symrefs using test-helper
t1430: remove refs using test-tool
refs: introduce REF_SKIP_REFNAME_VERIFICATION flag
refs: introduce REF_SKIP_OID_VERIFICATION flag
refs: update comment.
test-ref-store: plug memory leak in cmd_delete_refs
test-ref-store: parse symbolic flag constants
test-ref-store: remove force-create argument for create-reflog
|
|
"default" and "reset" colors have been added to our palette.
* re/color-default-reset:
color: allow colors to be prefixed with "reset"
color: support "default" to restore fg/bg color
color: add missing GIT_COLOR_* white/black constants
|
|
Allow running our tests while disabling fsync.
* ew/test-wo-fsync:
tests: disable fsync everywhere
|
|
The sparse-index/sparse-checkout feature had a bug in its use of
the matching code to determine which path is in or outside the
sparse checkout patterns.
* ds/sparse-deep-pattern-checkout-fix:
unpack-trees: use traverse_path instead of name
t1092: add deeper changes during a checkout
|
|
Many tests that used to need GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
mechanism to force "git" to use 'master' as the default name for
the initial branch no longer need it; the use of the mechanism from
them have been removed.
* js/test-initial-branch-override-cleanup:
tests: set GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME only when needed
|
|
"git worktree add" showed "Preparing worktree" message to the
standard output stream, but when it failed, the message from die()
went to the standard error stream. Depending on the order the
stdio streams are flushed at the program end, this resulted in
confusing output. It has been corrected by sending all the chatty
messages to the standard error stream.
* es/worktree-chatty-to-stderr:
git-worktree.txt: add missing `-v` to synopsis for `worktree list`
worktree: send "chatty" messages to stderr
|
|
Prepare tests on ref API to help testing reftable backends.
* hn/reflog-tests:
refs/debug: trim trailing LF from reflog message
test-ref-store: tweaks to for-each-reflog-ent format
t1405: check for_each_reflog_ent_reverse() more thoroughly
test-ref-store: don't add newline to reflog message
show-branch: show reflog message
|
|
Extend "git log --format=%(describe)" placeholder to allow passing
selected command-line options to the underlying "git describe"
command.
* es/pretty-describe-more:
pretty: add abbrev option to %(describe)
pretty: add tag option to %(describe)
pretty.c: rework describe options parsing for better extensibility
|
|
API clean-up.
* ab/run-command:
run-command API: remove "env" member, always use "env_array"
difftool: use "env_array" to simplify memory management
run-command API: remove "argv" member, always use "args"
run-command API users: use strvec_push(), not argv construction
run-command API users: use strvec_pushl(), not argv construction
run-command tests: use strvec_pushv(), not argv assignment
run-command API users: use strvec_pushv(), not argv assignment
upload-archive: use regular "struct child_process" pattern
worktree: stop being overly intimate with run_command() internals
|
|
Test update.
* hn/t1404-df-limitation-is-ref-files-only:
t1404: mark directory/file conflict tests with REFFILES
|
|
"Zealous diff3" style of merge conflict presentation has been added.
* en/zdiff3:
update documentation for new zdiff3 conflictStyle
xdiff: implement a zealous diff3, or "zdiff3"
|
|
The default setting for trace2 event nesting was too low to cause
test failures, which is worked around by bumping it up in the test
framework.
* ds/trace2-regions-in-tests:
t/t*: remove custom GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING
test-lib.sh: set GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING
|
|
The test framework learns to list unsatisfied test prerequisites,
and optionally error out when prerequisites that are expected to be
satisfied are not.
* fs/test-prereq:
test-lib: make BAIL_OUT() work in tests and prereq
test-lib: introduce required prereq for test runs
test-lib: show missing prereq summary
|
|
More tests are marked as leak-free.
* ab/mark-leak-free-tests-even-more:
leak tests: mark some fast-import tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some config tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some status tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some clone tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some add tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some diff tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some apply tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some notes tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some update-index tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some rev-parse tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some rev-list tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark some misc tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark most gettext tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark "sort" test as passing SANITIZE=leak
leak tests: mark a read-tree test as passing SANITIZE=leak
|
|
The "reftable" backend for the refs API, without integrating into
the refs subsystem, has been added.
* hn/reftable:
Add "test-tool dump-reftable" command.
reftable: add dump utility
reftable: implement stack, a mutable database of reftable files.
reftable: implement refname validation
reftable: add merged table view
reftable: add a heap-based priority queue for reftable records
reftable: reftable file level tests
reftable: read reftable files
reftable: generic interface to tables
reftable: write reftable files
reftable: a generic binary tree implementation
reftable: reading/writing blocks
Provide zlib's uncompress2 from compat/zlib-compat.c
reftable: (de)serialization for the polymorphic record type.
reftable: add blocksource, an abstraction for random access reads
reftable: utility functions
reftable: add error related functionality
reftable: add LICENSE
hash.h: provide constants for the hash IDs
|
|
Some users or scripts will pipe "git diff"
output to "git apply" when replaying diffs
or commits. In these cases, they will rely
on the return value of "git apply" to know
whether the diff was applied successfully.
However, for empty commits, "git apply" will
fail. This complicates scripts since they
have to either buffer the diff and check
its length, or run diff again with "exit-code",
essentially doing the diff twice.
Add the "--allow-empty" flag to "git apply"
which allows it to handle both empty diffs
and empty commits created by "git format-patch
--always" by doing nothing and returning 0.
Add tests for both with and without --allow-empty.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Because `sed` is line-oriented, for ease of implementation, when
chainlint.sed encounters an opening subshell in which the first command
is cuddled with the "(", it splits the line into two lines: one
containing only "(", and the other containing whatever follows "(".
This allows chainlint.sed to get by with a single set of regular
expressions for matching shell statements rather than having to
duplicate each expression (one set for matching non-cuddled statements,
and one set for matching cuddled statements).
However, although syntactically and semantically immaterial, this
transformation has no value to test authors and might even confuse them
into thinking that the linter is misbehaving by inserting (whitespace)
line-noise into the shell code it is validating. Moreover, it also
allows an implementation detail of chainlint.sed to seep into the
chainlint self-test "expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult
to reuse the self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be
developed.
To address these concerns, stop splitting cuddled "(..." into two lines.
Note that, as an implementation artifact, due to sed's line-oriented
nature, this change inserts a blank line at output time just before the
"(..." line is emitted. It would be possible to suppress this blank line
but doing so would add a fair bit of complexity to chainlint.sed.
Therefore, rather than suppressing the extra blank line, the Makefile's
`check-chainlint` target which runs the chainlint self-tests is instead
modified to ignore blank lines when comparing chainlint output against
the self-test "expect" output. This is a reasonable compromise for two
reasons. First, the purpose of the chainlint self-tests is to verify
that the ?!AMP?! annotations are being correctly added; precise
whitespace is immaterial. Second, by necessity, chainlint.sed itself
already throws away all blank lines within subshells since, when
checking for a broken &&-chain, it needs to check the final _statement_
in a subshell, not the final _line_ (which might be blank), thus it has
never made any attempt to precisely reproduce blank lines in its output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When checking for broken a &&-chain, chainlint.sed knows that the final
statement in a subshell should not end with `&&`, so it takes care to
make a distinction between the final line which is an actual statement
and any lines which may be mere comments preceding the closing ')'. As
such, it swallows comment lines so that they do not interfere with the
&&-chain check.
However, since `sed` does not provide any sort of real recursion,
chainlint.sed only checks &&-chains in subshells one level deep; it
doesn't do any checking in deeper subshells or in `{...}` blocks within
subshells. Furthermore, on account of potential implementation
complexity, it doesn't check &&-chains within `case` arms.
Due to an oversight, it also doesn't swallow comments inside deep
subshells, `{...}` blocks, or `case` statements, which makes its output
inconsistent (swallowing comments in some cases but not others).
Unfortunately, this inconsistency seeps into the chainlint self-test
"expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult to reuse the
self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be developed. Therefore,
teach chainlint.sed to consistently swallow comments in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The purpose of chainlint is to highlight problems it finds in test code
by inserting annotations at the location of each problem. Arbitrarily
eliding bits of the code it is checking is not helpful, yet this is
exactly what chainlint.sed does by cavalierly and unnecessarily dropping
the here-doc operator and tag; i.e. `cat <<TAG` becomes simply `cat` in
the output. This behavior can make it more difficult for the test writer
to align the annotated output of chainlint.sed with the original test
code. Address this by retaining here-doc tags.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Tighten here-doc recognition to prevent it from being fooled by text
which looks like a here-doc operator but happens merely to be the
content of a string, such as this real-world case from t7201:
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
echo ourside &&
echo "=======" &&
echo theirside &&
echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
This problem went unnoticed because chainlint.sed is not a real parser,
but rather applies heuristics to pretend to understand shell code. In
this case, it saw what it thought was a here-doc operator (`<< ours`),
and fell off the end of the test looking for the closing tag "ours"
which it never found, thus swallowed the remainder of the test without
checking it for &&-chain breakage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
According to POSIX, "<<" and "<<-" are distinct shell operators. For the
latter to be recognized, no whitespace is allowed before the "-", though
whitespace is allowed after the operator. However, the chainlint
patterns which identify here-docs are both too loose and too tight,
incorrectly allowing whitespace between "<<" and "-" but disallowing it
between "-" and the here-doc tag. Fix the patterns to better match
POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
chainlint.sed inserts a ">" annotation at the beginning of a line to
signal that its heuristics have identified an end-of-subshell. This was
useful as a debugging aid during development of the script, but it has
no value to test writers and might even confuse them into thinking that
the linter is misbehaving by inserting line-noise into the shell code it
is validating. Moreover, its presence also potentially makes it
difficult to reuse the chainlint self-test "expect" output should a more
capable linter ever be developed. Therefore, drop the ">" annotation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
>From inception, when chainlint.sed encountered a line using semicolon to
separate commands rather than `&&`, it would insert a ?!SEMI?!
annotation at the beginning of the line rather ?!AMP?! even though the
&&-chain is also broken by the semicolon. Given a line such as:
?!SEMI?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
the ?!SEMI?! annotation makes it easier to see what the problem is than
if the output had been:
?!AMP?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
which might confuse the test author into thinking that the linter is
broken (since the line clearly ends with `&&`).
However, now that the ?!AMP?! an ?!SEMI?! annotations are inserted at
the point of breakage rather than at the beginning of the line, and
taking into account that both represent a broken &&-chain, there is
little reason to distinguish between the two. Using ?!AMP?! alone is
sufficient to point the test author at the problem. For instance, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 &&
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd1` and `cmd2`.
Likewise, in:
cmd1 && cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd2` and `cmd3`.
Finally, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between each command.
Hence, there is no longer a good reason to make a distinction between a
broken &&-chain due to a semicolon and a broken chain due to a missing
`&&` at end-of-line. Therefore, drop the ?!SEMI?! annotation and use
?!AMP?! exclusively.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
chainlint.sed flags ";" when used as a command terminator since it
breaks the &&-chain, thus can allow failures to go undetected. However,
when a command terminated by ";" is the last command in the body of a
compound statement, such as `command-2` in:
if test $# -gt 1
then
command-1 &&
command-2;
fi
then the ";" is harmless and the exit code from `command-2` is passed
through untouched and becomes the exit code of the compound statement,
as if the ";" was not present. Therefore, tolerate a trailing ";" in
this position rather than complaining about broken &&-chain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When chainlint.sed detects commands separated by a semicolon rather than
by `&&`, it places a ?!SEMI?! annotation at the beginning of the line.
However, this is an unusual location for programmers accustomed to error
messages (from compilers, for instance) indicating the exact point of
the problem. Therefore, relocate the ?!SEMI?! annotation to the location
of the semicolon in order to better direct the programmer's attention to
the source of the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When chainlint.sed detects a broken &&-chain, it places an ?!AMP?!
annotation at the beginning of the line. However, this is an unusual
location for programmers accustomed to error messages (from compilers,
for instance) indicating the exact point of the problem. Therefore,
relocate the ?!AMP?! annotation to the end of the line in order to
better direct the programmer's attention to the source of the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Rather than running `chainlint` and `diff` once per self-test -- which
may become expensive as more tests are added -- instead run `chainlint`
a single time over all tests bodies collectively and compare the result
to the collective "expected" output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117.
Unfortunately, one of the chainlint.sed self-tests has overly intimate
knowledge of this particular division of responsibilities and only cares
about what chainlint.sed itself will produce, while ignoring the fact
that a more all-encompassing linter would complain about a broken
&&-chain outside the subshell. This makes it difficult to re-use the
test with a more capable chainlint implementation should one ever be
developed. Therefore, adjust the test and its "expected" output to
avoid being specific to the tunnel-vision of this one implementation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117. However, this division of labor may not
always be the case if a more capable chainlint implementation is ever
developed. Beyond that, due to being sed-based and due to its use of
heuristics, chainlint.sed has several limitations (such as being unable
to detect &&-chain breakage in subshells more than one level deep since
it only manually emulates recursion into a subshell).
Some of the comments in the chainlint self-tests unnecessarily reflect
the limitations of chainlint.sed even though those limitations are not
what is being tested. Therefore, simplify and generalize the comments to
explain only what is being tested, thus ensuring that they won't become
outdated if a more capable chainlint is ever developed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The chainlint self-test code snippets are supposed to represent the body
of a test_expect_success() or test_expect_failure(), yet the contents of
a few tests would have caused the shell to report syntax errors had they
been real test bodies due to the mix of single- and double-quotes.
Although chainlint.sed, with its simplistic heuristics, is blind to this
problem, a future more robust chainlint implementation might not have
such a limitation. Therefore, stop mixing quote types haphazardly in
those tests and unify quoting throughout. While at it, drop chunks of
tests which merely repeat what is already tested elsewhere but with
alternative quotes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The chainlint self-test code snippets are supposed to represent the body
of a test_expect_success() or test_expect_failure(), yet the contents of
these tests would have caused the shell to report syntax errors had they
been real test bodies. Although chainlint.sed, with its simplistic
heuristics, is blind to these syntactic problems, a future more robust
chainlint implementation might not have such a limitation, so make these
snippets syntactically valid.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Rather than manually looping over a set of items and plugging those
items into a template string which is printed repeatedly, achieve the
same effect by taking advantage of `printf` which loops over its
arguments automatically.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Rather than maintaining a flag indicating a failure within a loop and
aborting the test when the loop ends if the flag is set, modern practice
is to signal the failure immediately by exiting the loop early via
`return 1` (or `exit 1` if inside a subshell). Simplify these loops by
following the modern idiom.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Junio C Hamano
Elijah Newren
Jerry Zhang
Eric Sunshine