summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-12-26git clone <url> C:\cygwin\home\USER\repo' is working (again)Libravatar Torsten Bögershausen1-1/+1
A regression for cygwin users was introduced with commit 05b458c, "real_path: resolve symlinks by hand". In the the commit message we read: The current implementation of real_path uses chdir() in order to resolve symlinks. Unfortunately this isn't thread-safe as chdir() affects a process as a whole... The old (and non-thread-save) OS calls chdir()/pwd() had been replaced by a string operation. The cygwin layer "knows" that "C:\cygwin" is an absolute path, but the new string operation does not. "git clone <url> C:\cygwin\home\USER\repo" fails like this: fatal: Invalid path '/home/USER/repo/C:\cygwin\home\USER\repo' The solution is to implement has_dos_drive_prefix(), skip_dos_drive_prefix() is_dir_sep(), offset_1st_component() and convert_slashes() for cygwin in the same way as it is done in 'Git for Windows' in compat/mingw.[ch] Extract the needed code into compat/win32/path-utils.[ch] and use it for cygwin as well. Reported-by: Steven Penny <svnpenn@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/test-rebase-editor-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-7/+7
* sg/test-rebase-editor-fix: t3404-rebase-interactive: test abbreviated commands
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ma/t7005-bash-workaround' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Test fix. * ma/t7005-bash-workaround: t7005-editor: quote filename to fix whitespace-issue
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ma/t1400-undebug-test' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Test fix. * ma/t1400-undebug-test: t1400: drop debug `echo` to actually execute `test`
2018-11-21Merge branch 'tg/t5551-with-curl-7.61.1' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-34/+34
Test update. Supersedes tz/t5551-with-curl-7.61.1 topic * tg/t5551-with-curl-7.61.1: t5551: compare sorted cookies files t5551: move setup code inside test_expect blocks
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/split-index-test' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-8/+11
Test updates. * sg/split-index-test: t0090: disable GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX for the test checking split index t1700-split-index: drop unnecessary 'grep'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/t3701-tighten-trace' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Test update. * sg/t3701-tighten-trace: t3701-add-interactive: tighten the check of trace output
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/detect-truncated-zlib-input' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+21
A regression in Git 2.12 era made "git fsck" fall into an infinite loop while processing truncated loose objects. * jk/detect-truncated-zlib-input: cat-file: handle streaming failures consistently check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflow t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage test
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/test-verbose-log' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+3
Our test scripts can now take the '-V' option as a synonym for the '--verbose-log' option. * sg/test-verbose-log: test-lib: introduce the '-V' short option for '--verbose-log'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'md/exclude-promisor-objects-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-0/+8
Operations on promisor objects make sense in the context of only a small subset of the commands that internally use the revisions machinery, but the "--exclude-promisor-objects" option were taken and led to nonsense results by commands like "log", to which it didn't make much sense. This has been corrected. * md/exclude-promisor-objects-fix: exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowed Documentation/git-log.txt: do not show --exclude-promisor-objects
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/shallow-and-fetch-prune' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
"git repack" in a shallow clone did not correctly update the shallow points in the repository, leading to a repository that does not pass fsck. * js/shallow-and-fetch-prune: repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commits shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow info
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jc/receive-deny-current-branch-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+7
The receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead codepath kicked in even when the push should have been rejected due to other reasons, such as it does not fast-forward or the update-hook rejects it, which has been corrected. * jc/receive-deny-current-branch-fix: receive: denyCurrentBranch=updateinstead should not blindly update
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/diff-notice-has-drive-prefix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
Under certain circumstances, "git diff D:/a/b/c D:/a/b/d" on Windows would strip initial parts from the paths because they were not recognized as absolute, which has been corrected. * js/diff-notice-has-drive-prefix: diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows paths
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/pack-objects-mutex-init-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+32
A mutex used in "git pack-objects" were not correctly initialized and this caused "git repack" to dump core on Windows. * js/pack-objects-mutex-init-fix: pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spot pack-objects (mingw): demonstrate a segmentation fault with large deltas pack-objects: fix typo 'detla' -> 'delta'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/run-command-notdot' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+12
The implementation of run_command() API on the UNIX platforms had a bug that caused a command not on $PATH to be found in the current directory. * jk/run-command-notdot: run-command: mark path lookup errors with ENOENT
2018-11-21Merge branch 'np/log-graph-octopus-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+102
"git log --graph" showing an octopus merge sometimes miscounted the number of display columns it is consuming to show the merge and its parent commits, which has been corrected. * np/log-graph-octopus-fix: log: fix coloring of certain octopus merge shapes
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/split-index-racefix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-21/+245
The codepath to support the experimental split-index mode had remaining "racily clean" issues fixed. * sg/split-index-racefix: split-index: BUG() when cache entry refers to non-existing shared entry split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split index split-index: don't compare cached data of entries already marked for split index split-index: count the number of deleted entries t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situations split-index: add tests to demonstrate the racy split index problem t1700-split-index: document why FSMONITOR is disabled in this test script
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+41
A partial clone that is configured to lazily fetch missing objects will on-demand issue a "git fetch" request to the originating repository to fill not-yet-obtained objects. The request has been optimized for requesting a tree object (and not the leaf blob objects contained in it) by telling the originating repository that no blobs are needed. * jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch: fetch-pack: exclude blobs when lazy-fetching trees fetch-pack: avoid object flags if no_dependents
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sm/show-superproject-while-conflicted' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
A corner-case bugfix. * sm/show-superproject-while-conflicted: rev-parse: --show-superproject-working-tree should work during a merge
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
The code in "git status" sometimes hit an assertion failure. This was caused by a structure that was reused without cleaning the data used for the first run, which has been corrected. * en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix: commit: fix erroneous BUG, 'multiple renames on the same target? how?'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-with-grafts' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+68
The recently introduced commit-graph auxiliary data is incompatible with mechanisms such as replace & grafts that "breaks" immutable nature of the object reference relationship. Disable optimizations based on its use (and updating existing commit-graph) when these incompatible features are in use in the repository. * ds/commit-graph-with-grafts: commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk commit-graph: not compatible with uninitialized repo commit-graph: not compatible with grafts commit-graph: not compatible with replace objects test-repository: properly init repo commit-graph: update design document refs.c: upgrade for_each_replace_ref to be a each_repo_ref_fn callback refs.c: migrate internal ref iteration to pass thru repository argument
2018-11-21Merge branch 'tg/range-diff-corner-case-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
Recently added "range-diff" had a corner-case bug to cause it segfault, which has been corrected. * tg/range-diff-corner-case-fix: linear-assignment: fix potential out of bounds memory access
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/update-ref-no-deref-stdin' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+31
"git update-ref" learned to make both "--no-deref" and "--stdin" work at the same time. * en/update-ref-no-deref-stdin: update-ref: allow --no-deref with --stdin update-ref: fix type of update_flags variable to match its usage
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ms/remote-error-message-update' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Update error messages given by "git remote" and make them consistent. * ms/remote-error-message-update: builtin/remote: quote remote name on error to display empty name
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jt/lazy-object-fetch-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
The code to backfill objects in lazily cloned repository did not work correctly, which has been corrected. * jt/lazy-object-fetch-fix: fetch-object: set exact_oid when fetching fetch-object: unify fetch_object[s] functions
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/sequencer-empty-edit-result-aborts' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano3-15/+12
"git rebase" etc. in Git 2.19 fails to abort when given an empty commit log message as result of editing, which has been corrected. * en/sequencer-empty-edit-result-aborts: sequencer: fix --allow-empty-message behavior, make it smarter
2018-11-21Merge branch 'nd/attr-pathspec-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git add ':(attr:foo)'" is not supported and is supposed to be rejected while the command line arguments are parsed, but we fail to reject such a command line upfront. * nd/attr-pathspec-fix: add: do not accept pathspec magic 'attr'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/rerere-multi-stage-1-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+29
A corner case bugfix in "git rerere" code. * en/rerere-multi-stage-1-fix: rerere: avoid buffer overrun t4200: demonstrate rerere segfault on specially crafted merge
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/mingw-o-append' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-0/+95
Further fix for O_APPEND emulation on Windows * js/mingw-o-append: mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/reopen-tempfile-truncate' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+18
Fix for a long-standing bug that leaves the index file corrupt when it shrinks during a partial commit. * jk/reopen-tempfile-truncate: reopen_tempfile(): truncate opened file
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+19
"git rebase -i" did not clear the state files correctly when a run of "squash/fixup" is aborted and then the user manually amended the commit instead, which has been corrected. * js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix: rebase -i: be careful to wrap up fixup/squash chains rebase -i --autosquash: demonstrate a problem skipping the last squash
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/trailer-fixes' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-0/+104
"git interpret-trailers" and its underlying machinery had a buggy code that attempted to ignore patch text after commit log message, which triggered in various codepaths that will always get the log message alone and never get such an input. * jk/trailer-fixes: append_signoff: use size_t for string offsets sequencer: ignore "---" divider when parsing trailers pretty, ref-filter: format %(trailers) with no_divider option interpret-trailers: allow suppressing "---" divider interpret-trailers: tighten check for "---" patch boundary trailer: pass process_trailer_opts to trailer_info_get() trailer: use size_t for iterating trailer list trailer: use size_t for string offsets
2018-10-31Adjust for 2.19.x seriesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+21
* jk/detect-truncated-zlib-input cat-file: handle streaming failures consistently check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflow t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage test
2018-10-31check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflowLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+19
This commit fixes an infinite loop when fscking large truncated loose objects. The check_stream_sha1() function takes an mmap'd loose object buffer and streams 4k of output at a time, checking its sha1. The loop quits when we've output enough bytes (we know the size from the object header), or when zlib tells us anything except Z_OK or Z_BUF_ERROR. The latter is expected because zlib may run out of room in our 4k buffer, and that is how it tells us to process the output and loop again. But Z_BUF_ERROR also covers another case: one in which zlib cannot make forward progress because it needs more _input_. This should never happen in this loop, because though we're streaming the output, we have the entire deflated input available in the mmap'd buffer. But since we don't check this case, we'll just loop infinitely if we do see a truncated object, thinking that zlib is asking for more output space. It's tempting to fix this by checking stream->avail_in as part of the loop condition (and quitting if all of our bytes have been consumed). But that assumes that once zlib has consumed the input, there is nothing left to do. That's not necessarily the case: it may have read our input into its internal state, but still have bytes to output. Instead, let's continue on Z_BUF_ERROR only when we see the case we're expecting: the previous round filled our output buffer completely. If it didn't (and we still saw Z_BUF_ERROR), we know something is wrong and should break out of the loop. The bug comes from commit f6371f9210 (sha1_file: add read_loose_object() function, 2017-01-13), which reimplemented some of the existing loose object functions. So it's worth checking if this bug was inherited from any of those. The answers seems to be no. The two obvious candidates are both OK: 1. unpack_sha1_rest(); this doesn't need to loop on Z_BUF_ERROR at all, since it allocates the expected output buffer in advance (which we can't do since we're explicitly streaming here) 2. check_object_signature(); the streaming path relies on the istream interface, which uses read_istream_loose() for this case. That function uses a similar "is our output buffer full" check with Z_BUF_ERROR (which is where I stole it from for this patch!) Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-31t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage testLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
Commit cce044df7f (fsck: detect trailing garbage in all object types, 2017-01-13) added two tests of trailing garbage in a loose object file: one with a commit and one with a blob. The point of having two is that blobs would follow a different code path that streamed the contents, instead of loading it into a buffer as usual. At the time, merely being a blob was enough to trigger the streaming code path. But since 7ac4f3a007 (fsck: actually fsck blob data, 2018-05-02), we now only stream blobs that are actually large. So since then, the streaming code path is not tested at all for this case. We can restore the original intent of the test by tweaking core.bigFileThreshold to make our small blob seem large. There's no easy way to externally verify that we followed the streaming code path, but I did check before/after using a temporary debug statement. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-30test-lib: introduce the '-V' short option for '--verbose-log'Libravatar SZEDER Gábor2-2/+3
'--verbose-log' is one of the most useful and thus most frequently used test options, but due to its length it's a pain to type on the command line. Let's introduce the corresponding short option '-V' to save some keystrokes. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-29t3404-rebase-interactive: test abbreviated commandsLibravatar Johannes Sixt2-7/+7
Make sure that each short command is tested at least once. To not exacerbate the runtime of the test script, do not add new tests, but modify existing ones according to these criteria: - The test does not have a prerequisite. - The 'git rebase' command is not guarded by test_must_fail. The pick commands are optional in the FAKE_LINES variable, but when used, they do end up in the insn sheet. Test them, too. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commitsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
`git repack` can drop unreachable commits without further warning, making the corresponding entries in `.git/shallow` invalid, which causes serious problems when deepening the branches. One scenario where unreachable commits are dropped by `git repack` is when a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable that was reachable before. Therefore it is not safe to assume that a `git repack -adlf` will keep unreachable commits alone (under the assumption that they had not been packed in the first place, which is an assumption at least some of Git's code seems to make). This is particularly important to keep in mind when looking at the `.git/shallow` file: if any commits listed in that file become unreachable, it is not a problem, but if they go missing, it *is* a problem. One symptom of this problem is that a deepening fetch may now fail with fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash> To avoid this problem, let's prune the shallow list in `git repack` when the `-d` option is passed, unless `-A` is passed, too (which would force the now-unreachable objects to be turned into loose objects instead of being deleted). Additionally, we also need to take `--keep-reachable` and `--unpack-unreachable=<date>` into account. Note: an alternative solution discussed during the review of this patch was to teach `git fetch` to simply ignore entries in .git/shallow if the corresponding commits do not exist locally. A quick test, however, revealed that the .git/shallow file is written during a shallow *clone*, in which case the commits do not exist, either, but the "shallow" line *does* need to be sent. Therefore, this approach would be a lot more finicky than the approach presented by the this patch. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow infoLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+27
A `git fetch --prune` can turn previously-reachable objects unreachable, even commits that are in the `shallow` list. A subsequent `git repack -ad` will then unceremoniously drop those unreachable commits, and the `shallow` list will become stale. This means that when we try to fetch with a larger `--depth` the next time, we may end up with: fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash> Reported by Alejandro Pauly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25t0061: adjust to test-tool transitionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+12
2018-10-25run-command: mark path lookup errors with ENOENTLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+12
Since commit e3a434468f (run-command: use the async-signal-safe execv instead of execvp, 2017-04-19), prepare_cmd() does its own PATH lookup for any commands we run (on non-Windows platforms). However, its logic does not match the old execvp call when we fail to find a matching entry in the PATH. Instead of feeding the name directly to execv, execvp would consider that an ENOENT error. By continuing and passing the name directly to execv, we effectively behave as if "." was included at the end of the PATH. This can have confusing and even dangerous results. The fix itself is pretty straight-forward. There's a new test in t0061 to cover this explicitly, and I've also added a duplicate of the ENOENT test to ensure that we return the correct errno for this case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-23exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowedLibravatar Matthew DeVore2-0/+8
The --exclude-promisor-objects option causes some funny behavior in at least two commands: log and blame. It causes a BUG crash: $ git log --exclude-promisor-objects BUG: revision.c:2143: exclude_promisor_objects can only be used when fetch_if_missing is 0 Aborted [134] Fix this such that the option is treated like any other unknown option. The commands that must support it are limited, so declare in those commands that the flag is supported. In particular: pack-objects prune rev-list The commands were found by searching for logic which parses --exclude-promisor-objects outside of revision.c. Extra logic outside of revision.c is needed because fetch_if_missing must be turned on before revision.c sees the option or it will BUG-crash. The above list is supported by the fact that no other command is introspectively invoked by another command passing --exclude-promisor-object. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-22diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows pathsLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+10
git diff can be invoked with absolute paths. Typically, this triggers the --no-index case. Then the absolute paths remain in the file names that are printed in the output. There is one peculiarity, though: When the command is invoked from a a sub-directory in a repository, then it is attempted to strip the sub-directory from the beginning of relative paths. Yet, to detect a relative path the code just checks for an initial forward slash. This mistakes a Windows style path like "D:/base" as a relative path and the output looks like this, for example: D:\dir\test\one>git -P diff --numstat D:\dir\base D:\dir\diff 1 1 ir/{base => diff}/1.txt where the correct output should be D:\dir\test\one>git -P diff --numstat D:\dir\base D:\dir\diff 1 1 D:/dir/{base => diff}/1.txt If the sub-directory where 'git diff' is invoked is sufficiently deep that the prefix becomes longer than the path to be printed, then the subsequent code accesses the path out of bounds. Use is_absolute_path() to detect Windows style absolute paths. One might wonder whether the check for a directory separator that is visible in the patch context should be changed from == '/' to is_dir_sep() or not. It turns out not to be necessary. That code only ever investigates paths that have undergone pathspec normalization, after which there are only forward slashes even on Windows. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19receive: denyCurrentBranch=updateinstead should not blindly updateLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+7
The handling of receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead was added to a switch statement that handles other values of the variable, but all the other case arms only checked a condition to reject the attempted push, or let later logic in the same function to still intervene, so that a push that does not fast-forward (which is checked after the switch statement in question) is still rejected. But the handling of updateInstead incorrectly took immediate effect, without giving other checks a chance to intervene. Instead of calling update_worktree() that causes the side effect immediately, just note the fact that we will need to call the function later, and first give other checks a chance to reject the request. After the update-hook gets a chance to reject the push (which happens as the last step in a series of checks), call update_worktree() when we earlier detected the need to. Reported-by: Rajesh Madamanchi Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spotLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
In 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas, 2018-07-22), a mutex was introduced that is used to guard the call to set the delta size. This commit even added code to initialize it, but at an incorrect spot: in `init_threaded_search()`, while the call to `oe_set_delta_size()` (and hence to `packing_data_lock()`) can happen in the call chain `check_object()` <- `get_object_details()` <- `prepare_pack()` <- `cmd_pack_objects()`, which is long before the `prepare_pack()` function calls `ll_find_deltas()` (which initializes the threaded search). Another tell-tale that the mutex was initialized in an incorrect spot is that the function to initialize it lives in builtin/, while the code that uses the mutex is defined in a libgit.a header file. Let's use a more appropriate function: `prepare_packing_data()`, which not only lives in libgit.a, but *has* to be called before the `packing_data` struct is used that contains that mutex. This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19pack-objects (mingw): demonstrate a segmentation fault with large deltasLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+32
There is a problem in the way 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas, 2018-07-22) initializes that mutex in the `packing_data` struct. The problem manifests in a segmentation fault on Windows, when a mutex (AKA critical section) is accessed without being initialized. (With pthreads, you apparently do not really have to initialize them?) This was reported in https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-12log: fix coloring of certain octopus merge shapesLibravatar Noam Postavsky1-0/+102
For octopus merges where the first parent edge immediately merges into the next column to the left, the number of columns should be one less than the usual case. First parent to the left case: | *-. | |\ \ |/ / / The usual case: | *-. | |\ \ | | | * Also refactor the code to iterate over columns rather than dashes, building from an initial patch suggested by Jeff King. Signed-off-by: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-12split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split indexLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-6/+2
Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem. Consider the following sequence of commands updating the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # size stays the same! # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file Normally, when a non-split index is updated, then do_write_index() (the function responsible for writing all kinds of indexes, "regular", split, and shared) recognizes racily clean cache entries, and writes them with smudged stat data, i.e. with file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. In the above example, however, in the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() decides which cache entries stored only in the shared index should be replaced in the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, it won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean. Modify prepare_to_write_split_index() to recognize racily clean cache entries, and mark them to be added to the split index. Note that there are two places where it should check raciness: first those cache entries that are only stored in the shared index, and then those that have been copied by unpack_trees() from the shared index while it constructed a new index. This way do_write_index() will get these racily clean cache entries as well, and will then write them with smudged stat data to the new split index. This change makes all tests in 't1701-racy-split-index.sh' pass, so flip the two 'test_expect_failure' tests to success. Also add the '#' (as in nr. of trial) to those tests' description that were omitted when the tests expected failure. Note that after this change if the index is split when it contains a racily clean cache entry, then a smudged cache entry will be written both to the new shared and to the new split indexes. This doesn't affect regular git commands: as far as they are concerned this is just an entry in the split index replacing an outdated entry in the shared index. It did affect a few tests in 't1700-split-index.sh', though, because they actually check which entries are stored in the split index; a previous patch in this series has already made the necessary adjustments in 't1700'. And racily clean cache entries and index splitting are rare enough to not worry about the resulting duplicated smudged cache entries, and the additional complexity required to prevent them is not worth it. Several tests failed occasionally when the test suite was run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes'. Here are those that I managed to trace back to this racy split index problem, starting with those failing more frequently, with a link to a failing Travis CI build job for each. The highlighted line [2] shows when the racy file was written, which is not always in the failing test but in a preceeding setup test. t3903-stash.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/385542084#L5858 t4024-diff-optimize-common.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/386531969#L3174 t4015-diff-whitespace.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/360797600#L8215 t2200-add-update.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/382543426#L3051 t0090-cache-tree.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/416583010#L3679 There might be others, e.g. perhaps 't1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh' and others using 'lib-read-tree-m-3way.sh', but I couldn't confirm yet. [1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16). [2] Note that those highlighted lines are in the 'after failure' fold, and your browser might unhelpfully fold it up before you could take a good look. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-12t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situationsLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-21/+28
't1700-split-index.sh' checks that the index was split correctly under various circumstances and that all the different ways to turn the split index feature on and off work correctly. To do so, most of its tests use 'test-tool dump-split-index' to see which files have their cache entries in the split index. All these tests assume that all cache entries are written to the shared index (called "base" throughout these tests) when a new shared index is created. This is an implementation detail: most git commands (basically all except 'git update-index') don't care or know at all about split index or whether a cache entry is stored in the split or shared index. As demonstrated in the previous patch, refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git issue. The next patch will fix this issue, but while doing so it will also slightly change this behaviour: only cache entries with mtime in the past will be written only to the newly created shared index, but racily clean cache entries will be written to the new split index (with smudged stat data). While this upcoming change won't at all affect any git commands, it will violate the above mentioned assumption of 't1700's tests. Since these tests create or modify files and create or refresh the split index in rapid succession, there are plenty of racily clean cache entries to be dealt with, which will then be written to the new split indexes, and, ultimately, will cause several tests in 't1700' to fail. Let's prepare 't1700-split-index.sh' for this upcoming change and modify its tests to avoid racily clean files by backdating the mtime of any file modifications (and since a lot of tests create or modify files, encapsulate it into a helper function). Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-12split-index: add tests to demonstrate the racy split index problemLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-0/+218
Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem. There are a couple of unrelated tests in the test suite that occasionally fail when run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes', but 't1700-split-index.sh', the only test script focusing solely on split index, has never noticed this issue, because it only cares about how the index is split under various circumstances and all the different ways to turn the split index feature on and off. Add a dedicated test script 't1701-racy-split-index.sh' to exercise the split index feature in racy situations as well; kind of a "t0010-racy-git.sh for split index" but with modern style (the tests do everything in &&-chained list of commands in 'test_expect_...' blocks, and use 'test_cmp' for more informative output on failure). The tests cover the following sequences of index splitting, updating, and racy file modifications, with the last two cases demonstrating the racy split index problem: 1. Split the index while adding a racily clean file: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # size stays the same This case already works properly. Even though the cache entry's stat data matches with the modifid file in the worktree, subsequent git commands will notice that the (split) index and the file have the same mtime, and then will go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 2. Add a racily clean file to an already split index: git update-index --split-index echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file This case already works properly. After the second 'git update-index' writes the newly added file's cache entry to the new split index, it basically works in the same way as case #1. 3. Split the index when it (i.e. the not yet splitted index) contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --split-index --add other-file This case already works properly. The shared index is written by do_write_index(), i.e. the same function that is responsible for writing "regular" and split indexes as well. This function cleverly notices the racily clean cache entry, and writes the entry to the new shared index with smudged stat data, i.e. file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 4. Update the split index when it contains a racily clean cache entry: git update-index --split-index echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file This case already works properly. After the second 'git update-index' the newly added file's cache entry is only stored in the split index. If a cache entry is present in the split index (even if it is a replacement of an outdated entry in the shared index), then it will always be included in the new split index on subsequent split index updates (until the file is removed or a new shared index is written), independently from whether the entry is racily clean or not. When do_write_index() writes the new split index, it notices the racily clean cache entry, and smudges its stat date. Subsequent git commands reading the index will notice the smudged stat data and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 5. Update the split index when a racily clean cache entry is stored only in the shared index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file This case fails due to the racy split index problem. In the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() decides, among other things, which cache entries stored only in the shared index should be replaced in the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, the entry won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean. 6. Update the split index after unpack_trees() copied a racily clean cache entry from the shared index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git read-tree -m HEAD This case fails due to the racy split index problem. This basically fails for the same reason as case #5 above, but there is one important difference, which warrants the dedicated test. While that second 'git update-index' in case #5 updates index_state in place, in this case 'git read-tree -m' calls unpack_trees(), which throws out the entire index, and constructs a new one from the (potentially updated) copies of the original's cache entries. Consequently, when prepare_to_write_split_index() gets to work on this reconstructed index, it takes a different code path than in case #5 when deciding which cache entries in the shared index should be replaced. The result is the same, though: the racily clean cache entry goes unnoticed, it isn't added to the split index with smudged stat data, and subsequent git commands will then erroneously consider the file clean. Note that in the last two 'test_expect_failure' cases I omitted the '#' (as in nr. of trial) from the tests' description on purpose for now, as it breakes the TAP output [2]; it will be added at the end of the series, when those two tests will be flipped to 'test_expect_success'. [1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16). [2] In the TAP output a '#' should separate the test's description from the TODO directive emitted by 'test_expect_failure'. The additional '#' in "#$trial" interferes with this, the test harness won't recognize the TODO directive, and will report that those tests failed unexpectedly. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>