summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-11-29status: show branchname with a configurable colorLibravatar Aleksi Aalto1-2/+3
You can tell "git status" to paint the name of the current branch in its output (the line that says "On branch ...") by setting the configuration variable color.status.branch; it is by default turned off. Signed-off-by: Aleksi Aalto <aga@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-24Merge branch 'cb/maint-orphan-merge-noclobber'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
* cb/maint-orphan-merge-noclobber: do not overwrite untracked during merge from unborn branch
2010-11-24Merge branch 'ao/send-email-irt'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+43
* ao/send-email-irt: git-send-email.perl: make initial In-Reply-To apply only to first email t9001: send-email interation with --in-reply-to and --chain-reply-to
2010-11-24Merge branch 'kb/maint-rebase-autosquash'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+74
* kb/maint-rebase-autosquash: rebase: teach --autosquash to match on sha1 in addition to message rebase: better rearranging of fixup!/squash! lines with --autosquash
2010-11-24Merge branch 'mm/phrase-remote-tracking'Libravatar Junio C Hamano7-26/+28
* mm/phrase-remote-tracking: git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream configuration user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C code Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking" Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking" Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
2010-11-24Merge branch 'en/and-cascade-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano114-657/+597
* en/and-cascade-tests: (25 commits) t4124 (apply --whitespace): use test_might_fail t3404: do not use 'describe' to implement test_cmp_rev t3404 (rebase -i): introduce helper to check position of HEAD t3404 (rebase -i): move comment to description t3404 (rebase -i): unroll test_commit loops t3301 (notes): use test_expect_code for clarity t1400 (update-ref): use test_must_fail t1502 (rev-parse --parseopt): test exit code from "-h" t6022 (renaming merge): chain test commands with && test-lib: introduce test_line_count to measure files tests: add missing &&, batch 2 tests: add missing && Introduce sane_unset and use it to ensure proper && chaining t7800 (difftool): add missing && t7601 (merge-pull-config): add missing && t7001 (mv): add missing && t6016 (rev-list-graph-simplify-history): add missing && t5602 (clone-remote-exec): add missing && t4026 (color): remove unneeded and unchained command t4019 (diff-wserror): add lots of missing && ... Conflicts: t/t7006-pager.sh
2010-11-17Merge branch 'kb/maint-submodule-savearg'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+50
* kb/maint-submodule-savearg: submodule: only preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations submodule: preserve all arguments exactly when recursing
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jk/missing-config'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+29
* jk/missing-config: config: treat non-existent config files as empty
2010-11-17Merge branch 'kb/maint-diff-ws-check'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-44/+114
* kb/maint-diff-ws-check: diff: handle lines containing only whitespace and tabs better test-lib: extend test_decode_color to handle more color codes
2010-11-17Merge branch 'bg/maint-gitweb-test-lib'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* bg/maint-gitweb-test-lib: t/gitweb-lib: Don't pass constant to decode_utf8 Conflicts: t/gitweb-lib.sh
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jm/mailmap'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+55
* jm/mailmap: t4203: do not let "git shortlog" DWIM based on tty t4203 (mailmap): stop hardcoding commit ids and dates mailmap: fix use of freed memory
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jk/maint-apply-no-binary'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+26
* jk/maint-apply-no-binary: apply: don't segfault on binary files with missing data
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jk/push-progress'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-51/+107
* jk/push-progress: push: pass --progress down to git-pack-objects t5523-push-upstream: test progress messages t5523-push-upstream: add function to ensure fresh upstream repo test_terminal: ensure redirections work reliably test_terminal: catch use without TTY prerequisite test-lib: allow test code to check the list of declared prerequisites tests: test terminal output to both stdout and stderr tests: factor out terminal handling from t7006
2010-11-17Merge branch 'tr/maint-merge-file-subdir'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
* tr/maint-merge-file-subdir: merge-file: correctly find files when called in subdir prefix_filename(): safely handle the case where pfx_len=0
2010-11-17Merge branch 'mg/make-prove'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+15
* mg/make-prove: test: allow running the tests under "prove"
2010-11-17Merge branch 'ak/submodule-sync'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+11
* ak/submodule-sync: submodule sync: Update "submodule.<name>.url" for empty directories
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jk/maint-rev-list-nul'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-4/+12
* jk/maint-rev-list-nul: rev-list: handle %x00 NUL in user format
2010-11-17Merge branch 'ks/no-textconv-symlink'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-12/+88
* ks/no-textconv-symlink: blame,cat-file --textconv: Don't assume mode is ``S_IFREF | 0664'' blame,cat-file: Demonstrate --textconv is wrongly running converter on symlinks blame,cat-file: Prepare --textconv tests for correctly-failing conversion program
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jn/gitweb-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+23
* jn/gitweb-test: gitweb/Makefile: Include gitweb/config.mak gitweb/Makefile: Add 'test' and 'test-installed' targets t/gitweb-lib.sh: Add support for GITWEB_TEST_INSTALLED gitweb: Move call to evaluate_git_version after evaluate_gitweb_config
2010-11-17Merge branch 'cb/diff-fname-optim'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+109
* cb/diff-fname-optim: diff: avoid repeated scanning while looking for funcname do not search functions for patch ID add rebase patch id tests
2010-11-17Merge branch 'jk/no-textconv-symlink'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+26
* jk/no-textconv-symlink: diff: don't use pathname-based diff drivers for symlinks
2010-11-17Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+21
* maint: clean: remove redundant variable baselen Documentation/git-pull: clarify configuration Document that rev-list --graph triggers parent rewriting. clean: avoid quoting twice document sigchain api Keep together options controlling the behaviour of diffcore-rename. t3402: test "rebase -s<strategy> -X<opt>"
2010-11-15do not overwrite untracked during merge from unborn branchLibravatar Clemens Buchacher1-0/+16
In case HEAD does not point to a valid commit yet, merge is implemented as a hard reset. This will cause untracked files to be overwritten. Instead, assume the empty tree for HEAD and do a regular merge. An untracked file will cause the merge to abort and do nothing. If no conflicting files are present, the merge will have the same effect as a hard reset. Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-14tests: use test_cmp instead of piping to diff(1)Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2-47/+94
Change submodule tests that piped to diff(1) to use test_cmp. The resulting unified diff is easier to read. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-14t7004-tag.sh: re-arrange git tag comment for clarityLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-5/+15
Split the "message in editor has initial comment" test into three tests. The motivation is to be able to only skip the middle part under NO_GETTEXT_POISON. In addition the return value of 'git tag' was being returned. We now check that it's non-zero. I used ! instead of test_must_fail so that the GIT_EDITOR variable was only used in this command invocation, and because the surrounding tests use this style. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-12git-send-email.perl: make initial In-Reply-To apply only to first emailLibravatar Antonio Ospite1-1/+3
When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with the same name behaves. Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_ email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting. Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior ensures: (before the patch) | (after the patch) [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests [PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear as a separate subtree in the discussion. Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-11t3402: test "rebase -s<strategy> -X<opt>"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+21
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t4124 (apply --whitespace): use test_might_failLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+2
Use test_might_fail instead of ignoring the exit status from git config --unset, and let the exit status propagate past rm -f (which does not fail on ENOENT). Otherwise bugs that lead git config to crash would not be detected when this test runs. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404: do not use 'describe' to implement test_cmp_revLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): introduce helper to check position of HEADLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-15/+9
The same code to check the position of HEAD is used by several tests in this script. Factor it out as a function and simplify it. Noticed using an &&-chaining tester, because the current code does not propagate the precise exit status from errors. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): move comment to descriptionLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-18/+17
Add a comment describing the setup in t3404 to its --help output. This should make it easier to decide where to put new functions without disrupting the flow of the file or obstructing the description of the test setup. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): unroll test_commit loopsLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-12/+11
Allow test_commit failures in loop iterations before the last one to cause the test assertion to fail. More importantly, avoiding these loops makes the test a little simpler to read and decreases the vertical screen footprint of the setup test assertion by one line. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3301 (notes): use test_expect_code for clarityLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Use the test_expect_code helper instead of open-coding it. The main behavior change is to print the command and actual exit status when the test fails. More importantly, this would make it easier to add commands before "git notes show" as part of the same test assertion if needed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t1400 (update-ref): use test_must_failLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+2
As t/README explains: When a gitcommand dies due to a segfault, test_must_fail diagnoses it as an error; "! git <command>" treats it as just another expected failure, which would let such a bug go unnoticed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t1502 (rev-parse --parseopt): test exit code from "-h"Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
rev-parse --parseopt exits with code 129 (usage error) when asked to dump usage with -h on behalf of another command. Scripts can take advantage of this to avoid trying to parse usage information as though it were the regular output from some git command. Noticed with an &&-chaining tester. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t6022 (renaming merge): chain test commands with &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-190/+92
Using 'return' in an attempt to end a test assertion can have unpredictable results (probably escaping from test_run_ and breaking its bookkeeping). Redo the control flow using helpers like test_expect_code and git diff --exit-code, so each test assertion can follow the usual form command that should succeed && command that should succeed && command that should succeed && ... Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09test-lib: introduce test_line_count to measure filesLibravatar Jonathan Nieder2-0/+26
Some tests check their output with code like the following: test "$(git ls-files -u B | wc -l)" -eq 3 || { echo "BAD: should have left stages for B" return 1 } The verbose failure condition is used because test, unlike diff, does not print any useful information about the nature of the failure when it fails. Introduce a test_line_count function to help. If used like git ls-files -u B >output && test_line_count -eq 3 output it will produce output like test_line_count: line count for output !-eq 3 100644 b023018cabc396e7692c70bbf5784a93d3f738ab 2 hi.c 100644 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 3 hi.c on failure. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&, batch 2Libravatar Jonathan Nieder13-48/+48
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of some lines in the test suite. Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last batch if they look okay. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder84-166/+166
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+7
* maint: Documentation: document show -s dir.c: fix EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match in sparse checkout
2010-11-09rebase: teach --autosquash to match on sha1 in addition to messageLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+31
Support lines of the form "fixup! 7a235b" that specify an exact commit in addition to the normal "squash! Old commit message" form. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09rebase: better rearranging of fixup!/squash! lines with --autosquashLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+43
The current behvaior of --autosquash can duplicate fixup!/squash! lines if they match multiple commits, and it can also apply them to commits that come after them in the todo list. Even more oddly, a commit that looks like "fixup! fixup!" will match itself and be duplicated in the todo list. Change the todo list rearranging to mark all commits as used as soon as they are emitted, and to avoid emitting a fixup/squash commit if the commit has already been marked as used. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-08dir.c: fix EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match in sparse checkoutLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-3/+7
Commit c84de70 (excluded_1(): support exclude files in index - 2009-08-20) tries to work around the fact that there is no directory/file information in index entries, therefore EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match would fail. Unfortunately the workaround is flawed. This fixes it. Reported-by: Thomas Rinderknecht <thomasr@sailguy.org> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-05t9001: send-email interation with --in-reply-to and --chain-reply-toLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+41
1. When --in-reply-to gives $reply_to, the first one becomes a reply to that message, with or without --chain-reply-to. 2. When --chain-reply-to is in effect, all the messages are strung together to form a single chain. The first message may be in reply to the $reply_to given by --in-reply-to command line option (see previous), or the root of the discussion thread. The second one is a response to the first one, and the third one is a response to the second one, etc. 3. When --chain-reply-to is not in effect: a. When --in-reply-to is used, too, the second and the subsequent ones become replies to $reply_to. Together with the first rule, all messages become replies to $reply_to given by --in-reply-to. b. When --in-reply-to is not used, presumably the second and subsequent ones become replies to the first one, which would be the root. The documentation is reasonably clear about the 1., 2. and 3a. above, I think, even though I do not think 3b. is clearly specified. The two tests added by this patch at least documents what happens between these two options. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03submodule: only preserve flags across recursive status/update invocationsLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+34
Recursive invocations of submodule update/status preserve all arguments, so executing git submodule update --recursive -- foo attempts to recursively update a submodule named "foo". Naturally, this fails as one cannot have an infinitely-deep stack of submodules each containing a submodule named "foo". The desired behavior is instead to update foo and then recursively update all submodules inside of foo. This commit accomplishes that by only saving the flags for use in the recursive invocation. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03submodule: preserve all arguments exactly when recursingLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+16
Shell variables only hold strings, not lists of parameters, so $orig_args after orig_args="$@" fails to remember where each parameter starts and ends, if some include whitespace. So git submodule update \ --reference='/var/lib/common objects.git' \ --recursive --init becomes git submodule update --reference=/var/lib/common \ objects.git --recursive --init in the inner repositories. Use "git rev-parse --sq-quote" to save parameters in quoted form ready for evaluation by the shell, avoiding this problem. Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C codeLibravatar Matthieu Moy4-7/+9
(Just like we did for documentation already) In the process, we change "non-remote branch" to "branch outside the refs/remotes/ hierarchy" to avoid the ugly "non-remote-tracking branch". The new formulation actually corresponds to how the code detects this case (i.e. prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")). Also, we use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages (by merge an fmt-merge-msg). Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial placesLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
To complement the straightforward perl application in previous patch, this adds a few manual changes. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking"Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
"remote-tracking" branch makes it explicit that the branch is "tracking a remote", as opposed to "remote, and tracking something". See discussion in e.g. http://mid.gmane.org/8835ADF9-45E5-4A26-9F7F-A72ECC065BB2@gmail.com for more details. This patch is a straightforward application of perl -pi -e 's/remote tracking branch/remote-tracking branch/' except in the RelNotes directory. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-statusLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-17/+17
Older Gits talked about "updating" a file to add its content to the index, but this terminology is confusing for new users. "to stage" is far more intuitive and already used in e.g. the "git stage" command name. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>