| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This test does a commit that is a pure mode change, submits
it to p4 but causes the submit to fail. It verifies that
the state in p4 as well as the client directory are both
unmodified after the failed submit.
On cygwin, "chmod +x" does nothing, so use the test_chmod
function to modify the index directly too.
Also on cygwin, the executable bit cannot be seen in the
filesystem, so avoid that part of the test. The checks of
p4 state are still valid, though.
Thanks-to: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This allows specifying what to do when a conflict
happens when applying a commit to p4, automating the
interactive prompt.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The user can decide not to continue with a submission,
by not saving the p4 submit template, then answering "no" to
the "Submit anyway?" prompt. In this case, be sure to
return the p4 client to its initial state.
Deleted files were not reverted; fix this and test all cases.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test a variety of cases where a patch failed to apply to
p4 and had to be cleaned up.
If the patch failed to apply cleanly, do not try to remove
to-be-added files, as they have not really been added yet.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When applying a commit to the p4 workspace fails, a prompt
asks what to do next. This belongs up in run() instead
of in applyCommit(), where run() can notice, for instance,
that the prompt is unnecessary because this is the last commit.
Offer two options about how to continue at conflict: [s]kip or
[q]uit. Having an explicit "quit" option gives git p4 a chance
to clean up, show the applied-commit summary, and do tag export.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If a commit fails to apply cleanly to the p4 tree, an interactive
prompt asks what to do next. In all cases (skip, apply, write),
the behavior after the prompt had a few problems.
Change it so that it does not claim erroneously that all commits
were applied. Instead list the set of the patches under
consideration, and mark with an asterisk those that were
applied successfully. Like this example:
Applying 592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
...
Unfortunately applying the change failed!
What do you want to do?
[s]kip this patch / [a]pply the patch forcibly and with .rej files / [w]rite the patch to a file (patch.txt) s
Skipping! Good luck with the next patches...
//depot/file1#4 - was edit, reverted
Applying b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
...
Change 6 submitted.
Applied only the commits marked with '*':
592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
* b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
Do not try to sync and rebase unless all patches were applied.
If there was a conflict during the submit, there is sure to be one
at the rebase. Let the user to do the sync and rebase manually.
This changes how a couple tets in t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh behave:
- git p4 now does not leave files open and edited in the
client
- If a git commit contains a change to a file that was
deleted in p4, the test used to check that the sync/rebase
loop happened after the failure to apply the change. Since
now sync/rebase does not happen after failure, do not test
this. Normal rebase machinery, outside of git p4, will let
rebase --skip work.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Pete Wyckoff