| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Running "fast-export --anonymize" will leave "refs/heads/master"
untouched in the output, for two reasons:
- it helped to have some known reference point between the original
and anonymized repository
- since it's historically the default branch name, it doesn't leak any
information
Now that we can ask fast-export to retain particular tokens, we have a
much better tool for the first one (because it works for any ref, not
just master).
For the second, the notion of "default branch name" is likely to become
configurable soon, at which point the name _does_ leak information.
Let's drop this special case in preparation.
Note that we have to adjust the test a bit, since it relied on using the
name "master" in the anonymized repos. We could just use
--anonymize-map=master to keep the same output, but then we wouldn't
know if it works because of our hard-coded master or because of the
explicit map.
So let's flip the test a bit, and confirm that we anonymize "master",
but keep "other" in the output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
After you anonymize a repository, it can be hard to find which commits
correspond between the original and the result, and thus hard to
reproduce commands that triggered bugs in the original.
Let's make it possible to seed the anonymization map. This lets users
either:
- mark names to be retained as-is, if they don't consider them secret
(in which case their original commands would just work)
- map names to new values, which lets them adapt the reproduction
recipe to the new names without revealing the originals
The implementation is fairly straight-forward. We already store each
anonymized token in a hashmap (so that the same token appearing twice is
converted to the same result). We can just introduce a new "seed"
hashmap which is consulted first.
This does make a few more promises to the user about how we'll anonymize
things (e.g., token-splitting pathnames). But it's unlikely that we'd
want to change those rules, even if the actual anonymization of a single
token changes. And it makes things much easier for the user, who can
unblind only a directory name without having to specify each path within
it.
One alternative to this approach would be to anonymize as we see fit,
and then dump the whole refname and pathname mappings to a file. This
does work, but it's a bit awkward to use (you have to manually dig the
items you care about out of the mapping).
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Our anonymize_mem() function is careful to take a ptr/len pair to allow
storing binary tokens like object ids, as well as partial strings (e.g.,
just "foo" of "foo/bar"). But it duplicates the hash key using
xstrdup()! That means that:
- for a partial string, we'd store all bytes up to the NUL, even
though we'd never look at anything past "len". This didn't produce
wrong behavior, but was wasteful.
- for a binary oid that doesn't contain a zero byte, we'd copy garbage
bytes off the end of the array (though as long as nothing complained
about reading uninitialized bytes, further reads would be limited by
"len", and we'd produce the correct results)
- for a binary oid that does contain a zero byte, we'd copy _fewer_
bytes than intended into the hashmap struct. When we later try to
look up a value, we'd access uninitialized memory and potentially
falsely claim that a particular oid is not present.
The most common reason to store an oid is an anonymized gitlink, but our
test case doesn't have any gitlinks at all. So let's add one whose oid
contains a NUL and is present at two different paths. ASan catches the
memory error, but even without it we can detect the bug because the oid
is not anonymized the same way for both paths.
And of course the fix is to copy the correct number of bytes. We don't
technically need the appended NUL from xmemdupz(), but it doesn't hurt
as an extra protection against anybody treating it like a string (plus a
future patch will push us more in that direction).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Our tests of the anonymized repo just hard-code the expected set of
objects in the root and subdirectory trees. This makes them brittle to
the test setup changing (e.g., adding new paths that need tested).
Let's look at the original repo to compute our expected set of objects.
Note that this isn't completely perfect (e.g., we still rely on there
being only one tree in the root), but it does simplify later patches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Sometimes users want to report a bug they experience on
their repository, but they are not at liberty to share the
contents of the repository. It would be useful if they could
produce a repository that has a similar shape to its history
and tree, but without leaking any information. This
"anonymized" repository could then be shared with developers
(assuming it still replicates the original problem).
This patch implements an "--anonymize" option to
fast-export, which generates a stream that can recreate such
a repository. Producing a single stream makes it easy for
the caller to verify that they are not leaking any useful
information. You can get an overview of what will be shared
by running a command like:
git fast-export --anonymize --all |
perl -pe 's/\d+/X/g' |
sort -u |
less
which will show every unique line we generate, modulo any
numbers (each anonymized token is assigned a number, like
"User 0", and we replace it consistently in the output).
In addition to anonymizing, this produces test cases that
are relatively small (compared to the original repository)
and fast to generate (compared to using filter-branch, or
modifying the output of fast-export yourself). Here are
numbers for git.git:
$ time git fast-export --anonymize --all \
--tag-of-filtered-object=drop >output
real 0m2.883s
user 0m2.828s
sys 0m0.052s
$ gzip output
$ ls -lh output.gz | awk '{print $5}'
2.9M
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Jeff King