| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since the recent rework of the object listing mechanism of
pack-objects/rev-list, git-repack now properly packs objects from alternate
repositories even when the local repository contains packs.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
Conflicts:
t/t7700-repack.sh
|
|
If pack-objects is called with the --unpack-unreachable option then it
will unpack (i.e. loosen) all unreferenced objects from local not-kept
packs, including those that also exist in packs residing in an alternate
object database or a locally kept pack. The only user of this option is
git-repack.
In this case, repack will follow the call to pack-objects with a call to
prune-packed, which will delete these newly loosened objects, making the
act of loosening a waste of time. The unnecessary loosening can be
avoided by checking whether an object exists in a non-local pack or a
locally kept pack before loosening it.
This fixes the 'local packed unreachable obs that exist in alternate ODB
are not loosened' test in t7700.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If an unreferenced object exists in both a local pack and in either a pack
residing in an alternate object database or a local kept pack, then the
pack-objects call made by repack will loosen that object only to have it
immediately pruned by repack's call to prune-packed.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
These two features were invented for use by repack when repack will delete
the local packs that have been made redundant. The packs accessible
through alternates are not deleted by repack, so the objects contained in
them are still accessible after the local packs are deleted. They do not
need to be repacked into the new pack or loosened. For the case of
loosening they would immediately be deleted by the subsequent prune-packed
that is called by repack anyway.
This fixes the test
'packed unreachable obs in alternate ODB are not loosened' in t7700.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects treats all kept packs as equal.
This results in objects that reside in an alternate pack that has a .keep
file, not being packed into a newly created pack when the user specifies the
-a option to repack. Since the user may not have any control over the
alternate database, git should not refrain from repacking those objects
even though they are in a pack with a .keep file.
This fixes the 'packed obs in alternate ODB kept pack are repacked' test in
t7700.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
1) The new --kept-pack-only mechansim of rev-list/pack-objects has
replaced --unpacked=. This new mechansim does not operate solely on
"local" packs now. The result is that objects residing in an alternate
pack which has a .keep file will not be repacked with repack -a.
This flaw is only apparent when a commit object is the one residing in
an alternate kept pack.
2) The 'repack unpacked objects' and 'loosen unpacked objects' mechanisms
of pack-objects, i.e. --keep-unreachable and --unpack-unreachable,
now do not operate solely on local packs. The --keep-unreachable
option no longer has any callers, but --unpack-unreachable is used when
repack is called with '-A -d' and the local repo has existing packs.
In this case, objects residing in alternate, not-kept packs will be
loosened, and then immediately deleted by repack's call to
prune-packed.
The test must manually call pack-objects to avoid the call to
prune-packed that is made by repack when -d is used.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The ability to "...fatten [the] local repository by packing everything that
is needed by the local ref into a single new pack, including things that are
borrowed from alternates"[1] is supposed to be provided by the '-a' or '-A'
options to repack when '-l' is not used, but there is a flaw. For each
pack in the local repository without a .keep file, repack supplies a
--unpacked=<pack> argument to pack-objects.
The --unpacked option to pack-objects, with or without an argument, causes
pack-objects to ignore any object which is packed in a pack not mentioned
in an argument to --unpacked=. So, if there are local packs, and
'repack -a' is called, then any objects which reside in packs accessible
through alternates will _not_ be packed. If there are no local packs, then
no --unpacked argument will be supplied, and repack will behave as expected.
[1] http://mid.gmane.org/7v8wrwidi3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Previously, when 'repack -a' was called and there were no packs in the local
repository without a .keep file, the repack would fall back to calling
pack-objects with '--unpacked --incremental'. This resulted in the created
pack file, if any, to be missing the packed objects in the alternate object
store. Test that this specific case has been fixed.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
With this patch, --local means pack only local objects that are not already
packed.
Additionally, this fixes t7700 testing whether loose objects in an alternate
object database are repacked.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Loose objects residing in an alternate object database should not be packed
when the -l option to repack is used.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If the user created a .keep file for a local pack, then it can be inferred
that the user does not want those objects repacked.
This fixes the repack bug tested by t7700.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Objects residing in pack files that have an associated .keep file are not
supposed to be repacked into new pack files, but they are.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Brandon Casey
Junio C Hamano
Brandon Casey