summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t7608-merge-messages.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-23fmt-merge-msg: stop treating `master` speciallyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-5/+5
In the context of many projects renaming their primary branch names away from `master`, Git wants to stop treating the `master` branch specially. Let's start with `git fmt-merge-msg`. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-07merge: notice local merging of tags and keep it unwrappedLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
This also updates the autogenerated merge title message from "merge commit X" to "merge tag X", and its effect can be seen in the changes to the test suite. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C codeLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-2/+2
(Just like we did for documentation already) In the process, we change "non-remote branch" to "branch outside the refs/remotes/ hierarchy" to avoid the ugly "non-remote-tracking branch". The new formulation actually corresponds to how the code detects this case (i.e. prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")). Also, we use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages (by merge an fmt-merge-msg). Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09merge: indicate remote tracking branches in merge messageLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+10
Previously when merging directly from a local tracking branch like: git merge origin/master The merge message said: Merge commit 'origin/master' * commit 'origin/master': ... Instead, let's be more explicit about what we are merging: Merge remote branch 'origin/master' * origin/master: ... We accomplish this by recognizing remote tracking branches in git-merge when we build the simulated FETCH_HEAD output that we feed to fmt-merge-msg. In addition to a new test in t7608, we have to tweak the expected output of t3409, which does such a merge. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09merge: fix incorrect merge message for ambiguous tag/branchLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
If we have both a tag and a branch named "foo", then calling "git merge foo" will warn about the ambiguous ref, but merge the tag. When generating the commit message, though, we simply checked whether "refs/heads/foo" existed, and if it did, assumed it was a branch. This led to the statement "Merge branch 'foo'" in the commit message, which is quite wrong. Instead, we should use dwim_ref to find the actual ref used, and describe it appropriately. In addition to the test in t7608, we must also tweak the expected output of t4202, which was accidentally triggering this bug. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-09add tests for merge message headingsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+50
When calling "git merge $X", we automatically generate a commit message containing something like "Merge branch '$X'". This test script checks that those messages say what they should, and exposes a failure when merging a refname that is ambiguous between a tag and a branch. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>