summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t7415-submodule-names.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-05-21fsck: complain when .gitmodules is a symlinkLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+29
We've recently forbidden .gitmodules to be a symlink in verify_path(). And it's an easy way to circumvent our fsck checks for .gitmodules content. So let's complain when we see it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2018-05-21index-pack: check .gitmodules files with --strictLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+38
Now that the internal fsck code has all of the plumbing we need, we can start checking incoming .gitmodules files. Naively, it seems like we would just need to add a call to fsck_finish() after we've processed all of the objects. And that would be enough to cover the initial test included here. But there are two extra bits: 1. We currently don't bother calling fsck_object() at all for blobs, since it has traditionally been a noop. We'd actually catch these blobs in fsck_finish() at the end, but it's more efficient to check them when we already have the object loaded in memory. 2. The second pass done by fsck_finish() needs to access the objects, but we're actually indexing the pack in this process. In theory we could give the fsck code a special callback for accessing the in-pack data, but it's actually quite tricky: a. We don't have an internal efficient index mapping oids to packfile offsets. We only generate it on the fly as part of writing out the .idx file. b. We'd still have to reconstruct deltas, which means we'd basically have to replicate all of the reading logic in packfile.c. Instead, let's avoid running fsck_finish() until after we've written out the .idx file, and then just add it to our internal packed_git list. This does mean that the objects are "in the repository" before we finish our fsck checks. But unpack-objects already exhibits this same behavior, and it's an acceptable tradeoff here for the same reason: the quarantine mechanism means that pushes will be fully protected. In addition to a basic push test in t7415, we add a sneaky pack that reverses the usual object order in the pack, requiring that index-pack access the tree and blob during the "finish" step. This already works for unpack-objects (since it will have written out loose objects), but we'll check it with this sneaky pack for good measure. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2018-05-21unpack-objects: call fsck_finish() after fscking objectsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+7
As with the previous commit, we must call fsck's "finish" function in order to catch any queued objects for .gitmodules checks. This second pass will be able to access any incoming objects, because we will have exploded them to loose objects by now. This isn't quite ideal, because it means that bad objects may have been written to the object database (and a subsequent operation could then reference them, even if the other side doesn't send the objects again). However, this is sufficient when used with receive.fsckObjects, since those loose objects will all be placed in a temporary quarantine area that will get wiped if we find any problems. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2018-05-21fsck: call fsck_finish() after fscking objectsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+4
Now that the internal fsck code is capable of checking .gitmodules files, we just need to teach its callers to use the "finish" function to check any queued objects. With this, we can now catch the malicious case in t7415 with git-fsck. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2018-05-21submodule-config: verify submodule names as pathsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+76
Submodule "names" come from the untrusted .gitmodules file, but we blindly append them to $GIT_DIR/modules to create our on-disk repo paths. This means you can do bad things by putting "../" into the name (among other things). Let's sanity-check these names to avoid building a path that can be exploited. There are two main decisions: 1. What should the allowed syntax be? It's tempting to reuse verify_path(), since submodule names typically come from in-repo paths. But there are two reasons not to: a. It's technically more strict than what we need, as we really care only about breaking out of the $GIT_DIR/modules/ hierarchy. E.g., having a submodule named "foo/.git" isn't actually dangerous, and it's possible that somebody has manually given such a funny name. b. Since we'll eventually use this checking logic in fsck to prevent downstream repositories, it should be consistent across platforms. Because verify_path() relies on is_dir_sep(), it wouldn't block "foo\..\bar" on a non-Windows machine. 2. Where should we enforce it? These days most of the .gitmodules reads go through submodule-config.c, so I've put it there in the reading step. That should cover all of the C code. We also construct the name for "git submodule add" inside the git-submodule.sh script. This is probably not a big deal for security since the name is coming from the user anyway, but it would be polite to remind them if the name they pick is invalid (and we need to expose the name-checker to the shell anyway for our test scripts). This patch issues a warning when reading .gitmodules and just ignores the related config entry completely. This will generally end up producing a sensible error, as it works the same as a .gitmodules file which is missing a submodule entry (so "submodule update" will barf, but "git clone --recurse-submodules" will print an error but not abort the clone. There is one minor oddity, which is that we print the warning once per malformed config key (since that's how the config subsystem gives us the entries). So in the new test, for example, the user would see three warnings. That's OK, since the intent is that this case should never come up outside of malicious repositories (and then it might even benefit the user to see the message multiple times). Credit for finding this vulnerability and the proof of concept from which the test script was adapted goes to Etienne Stalmans. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>