summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t7201-co.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-06-17i18n: advice: mark string about detached head for translationLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-1/+1
Mark string with advice seen by the user when in detached head. Update test t7201-co.sh to pass under GETTEXT_POISON build. Pretend success if the number of lines of "git checkout renamer^" output is not greater than 1 and test are running under GETTEXT_POISON. Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t7201: fix &&-chain breakageLibravatar Jeff King1-13/+6
One of these breakages is in setup, but one is more severe and may miss a real test failure. These are pulled out from the rest, though, because we also clean up a few other anachronisms. The most interesting is the use of this here-doc construct: (cat >... <<EOF ... EOF ) && It looks like an attempt to make the &&-chaining more natural by letting it come at the end of the here-doc. But the extra sub-shell is so non-idiomatic (plus the lack of "<<-") that it ends up confusing. Since these are just using a single line, we can accomplish the same thing with a single printf (which also makes the use of tab more obvious than the verbatim whitespace). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: fix &&-chaining issues around setup which might failLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Many tests have an initial setup step that might fail based on whether earlier tests in the script have succeeded or not. Using a trick like "|| true" breaks the &&-chain, missing earlier failures (and fooling --chain-lint). We can use test_might_fail in some cases, which is correct and makes the intent more obvious. We can also use test_unconfig for unsetting config (and which is more robust, as well). The case in t9500 is an oddball. It wants to run cmd1 _or_ cmd2, and does it like: cmd1 || cmd2 && other_stuff It's not wrong in this case, but it's a bad habit to get into, because it breaks the &&-chain if used anywhere except at the beginning of the test (and we use the correct solution here, putting it inside a block for precedence). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-25checkout -m: attempt merge when deletion of path was stagedLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+17
twoway_merge() is missing an o->gently check in the case where a file that needs to be modified is missing from the index but present in the old and new trees. As a result, in this case 'git checkout -m' errors out instead of trying to perform a merge. Fix it by checking o->gently. While at it, inline the o->gently check into reject_merge to prevent future call sites from making the same mistake. Noticed by code inspection. The test for the motivating case was added by JC. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-21t7201.24: Add refspec to keep --track workingLibravatar Johan Herland1-0/+1
We are formalizing a requirement that any remote-tracking branch to be used as an upstream (i.e. as an argument to --track), _must_ "belong" to a configured remote by being matched by the "dst" side of a fetch refspec. Without this patch, this test would start failing when the new behavior is introduced. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-11tests: modernise style: more uses of test_line_countLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-2/+2
Prefer: test_line_count <OP> COUNT FILE over: test $(wc -l <FILE) <OP> COUNT (or similar usages) in several tests. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-13i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t7201Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+7
Some test were mistakenly disabled under GETTEXT_POISON as well, and they have been resurrected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-01Merge branch 'ab/i18n-st'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
* ab/i18n-st: (69 commits) i18n: git-shortlog basic messages i18n: git-revert split up "could not revert/apply" message i18n: git-revert literal "me" messages i18n: git-revert "Your local changes" message i18n: git-revert basic messages i18n: git-notes GIT_NOTES_REWRITE_MODE error message i18n: git-notes basic commands i18n: git-gc "Auto packing the repository" message i18n: git-gc basic messages i18n: git-describe basic messages i18n: git-clean clean.requireForce messages i18n: git-clean basic messages i18n: git-bundle basic messages i18n: git-archive basic messages i18n: git-status "renamed: " message i18n: git-status "Initial commit" message i18n: git-status "Changes to be committed" message i18n: git-status shortstatus messages i18n: git-status "nothing to commit" messages i18n: git-status basic messages ... Conflicts: builtin/branch.c builtin/checkout.c builtin/clone.c builtin/commit.c builtin/grep.c builtin/merge.c builtin/push.c builtin/revert.c t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
2011-03-09i18n: git-checkout "HEAD is now at" messageLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-5/+5
Gettextize the "HEAD is now at" messages. Several tests in t7201-co.sh explicitly checked for this message. Change them to skip under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-16branch/checkout --track: Ensure that upstream branch is indeed a branchLibravatar Johan Herland1-7/+9
When creating a new branch using the --track option, we must make sure that we don't try to set an upstream that does not make sense to follow (using 'git pull') or update (using 'git push'). The current code checks against using HEAD as upstream (since tracking a symref doesn't make sense). However, tracking a tag doesn't make sense either. Indeed, tracking _any_ ref that is not a (local or remote) branch doesn't make sense, and should be disallowed. This patch achieves this by checking that the ref we're trying to --track resides within refs/heads/* or refs/remotes/*. This new check replaces the previous check against HEAD. A couple of testcases are also added, verifying that we cannot create branches with tags as upstreams. Finally, some selftests relying on using a non-branch as an upstream have been reworked or removed: - t6040: Reverse the meaning of two tests that depend on the ability to use (lightweight and annotated) tags as upstreams. These two tests were originally added in commits 1be570f and 57ffc5f, and this patch reverts the intention of those two commits. - t7201: Remove part of a test (introduced in 9188ed8) relying on a non-branch as upstream. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20checkout -m --conflict=diff3: add a label for ancestorLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
git checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 can be used to present conflict hunks including text from the common ancestor. The added information is helpful for resolving a merge by hand, and merge tools tend to understand it because it is very similar to what ‘diff3 -m’ produces. Unlike current git, diff3 -m includes a label for the merge base on the ||||||| line, and unfortunately, some tools cannot parse the conflict hunks without it. Humans can benefit from a cue when learning to interpreting the format, too. Mark the start of the text from the old branch with a label based on the branch’s name. git rerere does not have trouble parsing this output and its preimage ids are unchanged since it includes its own code for recreating conflict hunks. No other code in git tries to parse conflict hunks. Requested-by: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20checkout --conflict=diff3: add a label for ancestorLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-2/+2
git checkout --conflict=diff3 can be used to present conflicts hunks including text from the common ancestor: <<<<<<< ours ourside ||||||| original ======= theirside >>>>>>> theirs The added information is helpful for resolving a merge by hand, and merge tools can usually understand it without trouble because it looks like output from ‘diff3 -m’. diff3 includes a label for the merge base on the ||||||| line, and it seems some tools (for example, Emacs 22’s smerge-mode) cannot parse conflict hunks without such a label. Humans could use help in interpreting the output, too. So change the marker for the start of the text from the common ancestor to include the label “base”. git rerere’s conflict identifiers are not affected: to parse conflict hunks, rerere looks for whitespace after the ||||||| marker rather than a newline, and to compute preimage ids, rerere has its own code for creating conflict hunks. No other code in git tries to parse conflict hunks. Requested-by: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20tests: document format of conflicts from checkout -mLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+61
We are about to change the format of the conflict hunks that ‘checkout --merge’ writes. Add tests checking the current behavior first. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-29Reword "detached HEAD" notificationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+22
The old "advice" message explained how to create a branch after going into a detached HEAD state but didn't make it clear why the user may want to do so. Also "moving to ... which isn't a local branch" was unclear if it is complaining, if it is describing the new state, or if it is explaining why the HEAD is detached (the true reason is the last one). Give the established phrase 'detached HEAD' first to make it easy for users to look up the concept in documentation, and briefly describe what can be done in the state (i.e. play around without having to clean up) before telling the user how to keep what was done during the temporary state. Allow the long description to be hidden by setting advice.detachedHead configuration to false. We might want to customize the advice depending on how the commit to check out was spelled (e.g. instead of "new-branch-name", we way want to say "topic" when "git checkout origin/topic" triggered this message) in later updates, but this encapsulates that into a separate function and it should be a good first step. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-17Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.1-checkout-m-custom-merge'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+57
* jc/maint-1.6.1-checkout-m-custom-merge: checkout -m path: fix recreating conflicts Conflicts: t/t7201-co.sh
2010-01-06checkout -m path: fix recreating conflictsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+57
We should tell ll_merge() that the 3-way merge between stages #2 and #3 is an outermost merge, not a virtual-ancestor creation. Back when this code was originally written, users couldn't write custom merge drivers easily, so the bug didn't matter, but these days it does. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-16test: checkout shouldn't say that HEAD has moved if it didn'tLibravatar Nanako Shiraishi1-0/+8
Signed-off-by: しらいしななこ <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-07Change double quotes to single quotes in messageLibravatar Jari Aalto1-1/+1
Most of the time when we give branch name in the message, we quote it inside a pair of single-quotes. git-checkout uses double-quotes; this patch corrects the inconsistency. Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-21Merge branch 'jc/maint-co-track'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+20
* jc/maint-co-track: Enhance hold_lock_file_for_{update,append}() API demonstrate breakage of detached checkout with symbolic link HEAD Fix "checkout --track -b newbranch" on detached HEAD Conflicts: builtin-commit.c
2008-10-19Enhance hold_lock_file_for_{update,append}() APILibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This changes the "die_on_error" boolean parameter to a mere "flags", and changes the existing callers of hold_lock_file_for_update/append() functions to pass LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-19demonstrate breakage of detached checkout with symbolic link HEADLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
When core.prefersymlinkrefs is in use, detaching the HEAD by checkout incorrectly clobbers the tip of the current branch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-17Fix "checkout --track -b newbranch" on detached HEADLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+8
The test to make sure that checkout fails when --track was asked for and we cannot set up tracking information in t7201 was wrong, and it turns out that the implementation for that feature itself was buggy. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-29Merge branch 'jc/better-conflict-resolution'Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-2/+121
* jc/better-conflict-resolution: Fix AsciiDoc errors in merge documentation git-merge documentation: describe how conflict is presented checkout --conflict=<style>: recreate merge in a non-default style checkout -m: recreate merge when checking out of unmerged index git-merge-recursive: learn to honor merge.conflictstyle merge.conflictstyle: choose between "merge" and "diff3 -m" styles rerere: understand "diff3 -m" style conflicts with the original rerere.c: use symbolic constants to keep track of parsing states xmerge.c: "diff3 -m" style clips merge reduction level to EAGER or less xmerge.c: minimum readability fixups xdiff-merge: optionally show conflicts in "diff3 -m" style xdl_fill_merge_buffer(): separate out a too deeply nested function checkout --ours/--theirs: allow checking out one side of a conflicting merge checkout -f: allow ignoring unmerged paths when checking out of the index Conflicts: Documentation/git-checkout.txt builtin-checkout.c builtin-merge-recursive.c t/t7201-co.sh
2008-09-21Merge branch 'db/maint-checkout-b'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
* db/maint-checkout-b: Check early that a new branch is new and valid
2008-09-21Check early that a new branch is new and validLibravatar Daniel Barkalow1-0/+10
If you fail to update refs to change branches in checkout, your index and working tree are left already updated. We don't have an easy way to undo this, but at least we can check things that would make the creation of a new branch fail. These checks were in the shell version, and were lost in the C conversion. The messages are from the shell version, and should probably be made nicer. [jc: added test to t7201] Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-10Merge branch 'jc/maint-checkout-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+22
* jc/maint-checkout-fix: checkout: do not check out unmerged higher stages randomly
2008-09-07Merge branch 'jc/maint-checkout-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+22
* jc/maint-checkout-fix: checkout: do not check out unmerged higher stages randomly Conflicts: t/t7201-co.sh
2008-09-03Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Start 1.6.0.2 maintenance cycle tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7200 - t9001) tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7000 - t7199) Fix passwd(5) ref and reflect that commit doens't use commit-tree improve handling of sideband message display tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999) tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599) checkout: fix message when leaving detached HEAD clone: fix creation of explicitly named target directory 'git foo' program identifies itself without dash in die() messages setup_git_directory(): fix move to worktree toplevel directory update-index: fix worktree setup Start conforming code to "git subcmd" style read-tree: setup worktree if merge is required grep: fix worktree setup diff*: fix worktree setup Conflicts: RelNotes t/t3900-i18n-commit.sh t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
2008-09-03tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7200 - t9001)Libravatar Nanako Shiraishi1-1/+1
Converts tests between t7201-t9001. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-31checkout --conflict=<style>: recreate merge in a non-default styleLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-46/+54
This new option does essentially the same thing as -m option when checking unmerged paths out of the index, but it uses the specified style instead of configured merge.conflictstyle. Setting "merge.conflictstyle" to "diff3" is usually less useful than using the default "merge" style, because the latter allows a conflict that results by both sides changing the same region in a very similar way to get simplified substancially by reducing the common lines. However, when one side removed a group of lines (perhaps a function was moved to some other file) while the other side modified it, the default "merge" style does not give any clue as to why the hunk is left conflicting. You would need the original to understand what is going on. The recommended use would be not to set merge.conflictstyle variable so that you would usually use the default "merge" style conflict, and when the result in a path in a particular merge is too hard to understand, use "git checkout --conflict=diff3 $path" to check it out with the original to review what is going on. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-30checkout -m: recreate merge when checking out of unmerged indexLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+63
This teaches git-checkout to recreate a merge out of unmerged index entries while resolving conflicts. With this patch, checking out an unmerged path from the index now have the following possibilities: * Without any option, an attempt to checkout an unmerged path will atomically fail (i.e. no other cleanly-merged paths are checked out either); * With "-f", other cleanly-merged paths are checked out, and unmerged paths are ignored; * With "--ours" or "--theirs, the contents from the specified stage is checked out; * With "-m" (we should add "--merge" as synonym), the 3-way merge is recreated from the staged object names and checked out. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-30checkout --ours/--theirs: allow checking out one side of a conflicting mergeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+25
This lets you to check out 'our' (or 'their') version of an unmerged path out of the index while resolving conflicts. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-30checkout -f: allow ignoring unmerged paths when checking out of the indexLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
Earlier we made "git checkout $pathspec" to atomically refuse the operation of $pathspec matched any path with unmerged stages. This patch allows: $ git checkout -f a b c to ignore, instead of error out on, such unmerged paths. The fix to prevent checkout of an unmerged path from random stages is still there. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-30checkout: do not check out unmerged higher stages randomlyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+22
During a conflicted merge when you have unmerged stages for a path F in the index, if you said: $ git checkout F we rewrote F as many times as we have stages for it, and the last one (typically "theirs") was left in the work tree, without resolving the conflict. This fixes it by noticing that a specified pathspec pattern matches an unmerged path, and by erroring out. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-22Extend "checkout --track" DWIM to support more casesLibravatar Alex Riesen1-1/+22
The code handles additionally "refs/remotes/<something>/name", "remotes/<something>/name", and "refs/<namespace>/name". Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-11checkout --track: make up a sensible branch name if '-b' was omittedLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+11
What does the user most likely want with this command? $ git checkout --track origin/next Exactly. A branch called 'next', that tracks origin's branch 'next'. Make it so. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-23t3200,t7201: replace '!' with test_must_failLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-13add test_cmp function for test scriptsLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+9
Many scripts compare actual and expected output using "diff -u". This is nicer than "cmp" because the output shows how the two differ. However, not all versions of diff understand -u, leading to unnecessary test failure. This adds a test_cmp function to the test scripts and switches all "diff -u" invocations to use it. The function uses the contents of "$GIT_TEST_CMP" to compare its arguments; the default is "diff -u". On systems with a less-capable diff, you can do: GIT_TEST_CMP=cmp make test Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-27Merge branch 'js/branch-track'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+24
* js/branch-track: doc: documentation update for the branch track changes branch: optionally setup branch.*.merge from upstream local branches Conflicts: Documentation/config.txt Documentation/git-branch.txt Documentation/git-checkout.txt builtin-branch.c cache.h t/t7201-co.sh
2008-02-27Merge branch 'db/checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-16/+43
* db/checkout: (21 commits) checkout: error out when index is unmerged even with -m checkout: show progress when checkout takes long time while switching branches Add merge-subtree back checkout: updates to tracking report builtin-checkout.c: Remove unused prefix arguments in switch_branches path checkout: work from a subdirectory checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messages Clean up reporting differences on branch switch builtin-checkout.c: fix possible usage segfault checkout: notice when the switched branch is behind or forked Build in checkout Move code to clean up after a branch change to branch.c Library function to check for unmerged index entries Use diff -u instead of diff in t7201 Move create_branch into a library file Build-in merge-recursive Add "skip_unmerged" option to unpack_trees. Discard "deleted" cache entries after using them to update the working tree Send unpack-trees debugging output to stderr Add flag to make unpack_trees() not print errors. ... Conflicts: Makefile
2008-02-20checkout: work from a subdirectoryLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+34
When switching branches from a subdirectory, checkout rewritten in C extracted the toplevel of the tree in there. This should fix it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-19branch: optionally setup branch.*.merge from upstream local branchesLibravatar Jay Soffian1-0/+24
"git branch" and "git checkout -b" now honor --track option even when the upstream branch is local. Previously --track was silently ignored when forking from a local branch. Also the command did not error out when --track was explicitly asked for but the forked point specified was not an existing branch (i.e. when there is no way to set up the tracking configuration), but now it correctly does. The configuration setting branch.autosetupmerge can now be set to "always", which is equivalent to using --track from the command line. Setting branch.autosetupmerge to "true" will retain the former behavior of only setting up branch.*.merge for remote upstream branches. Includes test cases for the new functionality. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-16Build in checkoutLibravatar Daniel Barkalow1-7/+0
The only differences in behavior should be: - git checkout -m with non-trivial merging won't print out merge-recursive messages (see the change in t7201-co.sh) - git checkout -- paths... will give a sensible error message if HEAD is invalid as a commit. - some intermediate states which were written to disk in the shell version (in particular, index states) are only kept in memory in this version, and therefore these can no longer be revealed by later write operations becoming impossible. - when we change branches, we discard MERGE_MSG, SQUASH_MSG, and rr-cache/MERGE_RR, like reset always has. I'm not 100% sure I got the merge recursive setup exactly right; the base for a non-trivial merge in the shell code doesn't seem theoretically justified to me, but I tried to match it anyway, and the tests all pass this way. Other than these items, the results should be identical to the shell version, so far as I can tell. [jc: squashed lock-file fix from Dscho in] Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-09Use diff -u instead of diff in t7201Libravatar Daniel Barkalow1-9/+9
If the test failed, it was giving really unclear ed script output. Instead, give a diff that sort of suggests the problem. Also replaces the use of "git diff" for this purpose with "diff -u". Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
2008-02-04Test :/string form for checkoutLibravatar Daniel Barkalow1-0/+16
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-12-10Add more checkout testsLibravatar Daniel Barkalow1-3/+43
If you have local changes that don't conflict with the branch-switching changes, these should be kept, not cause errors even without -m, and be reported afterwards in name-status format. With -m, the changes carried across should be listed as well. And, for now, include the merge-recursive output from this process. Also test the detatched head message in at least one case. Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-04clean: require -f to do damage by defaultLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+6
This makes the clean.requireForce configuration default to true. Too many people are burned by typing "git clean" by mistake when they meant to say "make clean". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-08checkout: do not get confused with ambiguous tag/branch namesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+40
Although it is not advisable, we have always allowed a branch and a tag to have the same basename (i.e. it is not illegal to have refs/heads/frotz and refs/tags/frotz at the same time). When talking about a specific commit, the interpretation of 'frotz' has always been "use tag and then check branch", although we warn when ambiguities exist. However "git checkout $name" is defined to (1) first see if it matches the branch name, and if so switch to that branch; (2) otherwise it is an instruction to detach HEAD to point at the commit named by $name. We did not follow this definition when $name appeared under both refs/heads/ and refs/tags/ -- we switched to the branch but read the tree from the tagged commit, which was utterly bogus. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-04-03checkout: allow detaching to HEAD even when switching to the tip of a branchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+62
You cannot currently checkout the tip of an existing branch without moving to the branch. This allows you to detach your HEAD and place it at such a commit, with: $ git checkout master^0 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-23git-checkout -m: fix merge caseLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+27
Commit c1a4278e switched the "merging checkout" implementation from 3-way read-tree to merge-recursive, but forgot that merge-recursive will signal an unmerged state with its own exit status code. This prevented the clean-up phase (paths cleanly merged should not be updated in the index) from running. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>