summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t7060-wtstatus.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-05-02Merge branch 'ab/i18n-fixup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* ab/i18n-fixup: (24 commits) i18n: use test_i18n{cmp,grep} in t7600, t7607, t7611 and t7811 i18n: use test_i18n{grep,cmp} in t7508 i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t7506 i18n: use test_i18ngrep and test_i18ncmp in t7502 i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t7501 i18n: use test_i18ncmp in t7500 i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t7201 i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t7102 and t7110 i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t5541, t6040, t6120, t7004, t7012 and t7060 i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t3700, t4001 and t4014 i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t3203, t3501 and t3507 i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t2020, t2204, t3030, and t3200 i18n: use test_i18ngrep in lib-httpd and t2019 i18n: do not overuse C_LOCALE_OUTPUT (grep) i18n: use test_i18ncmp in t1200 and t2200 i18n: .git file is not a human readable message (t5601) i18n: do not overuse C_LOCALE_OUTPUT i18n: mark init-db messages for translation i18n: mark checkout plural warning for translation i18n: mark checkout --detach messages for translation ...
2011-05-02Merge branch 'mz/maint-rename-unmerged'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+62
* mz/maint-rename-unmerged: diffcore-rename: don't consider unmerged path as source
2011-04-13i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t5541, t6040, t6120, t7004, ↵Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
t7012 and t7060 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-23diffcore-rename: don't consider unmerged path as sourceLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-0/+62
Since e9c8409 (diff-index --cached --raw: show tree entry on the LHS for unmerged entries., 2007-01-05), an unmerged entry should be detected by using DIFF_PAIR_UNMERGED(p), not by noticing both one and two sides of the filepair records mode=0 entries. However, it forgot to update some parts of the rename detection logic. This only makes difference in the "diff --cached" codepath where an unmerged filepair carries information on the entries that came from the tree. It probably hasn't been noticed for a long time because nobody would run "diff -M" during a conflict resolution, but "git status" uses rename detection when it internally runs "diff-index" and "diff-files" and gives nonsense results. In an unmerged pair, "one" side can have a valid filespec to record the tree entry (e.g. what's in HEAD) when running "diff --cached". This can be used as a rename source to other paths in the index that are not unmerged. The path that is unmerged by definition does not have the final content yet (i.e. "two" side cannot have a valid filespec), so it can never be a rename destination. Use the DIFF_PAIR_UNMERGED() to detect unmerged filepair correctly, and allow the valid "one" side of an unmerged filepair to be considered a potential rename source, but never to be considered a rename destination. Commit message and first two test cases by Junio, the rest by Martin. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-09i18n: git-status basic messagesLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Gettextize the most common git-status messages. Many tests checked for these explicitly. Change them to skip under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease. Some of the tests in t7508-status.sh needed to be split up when I added C_LOCALE_OUTPUT to them, since parts of them affected later tests (some of which aren't being skipped) indirectly. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-12status/commit: do not suggest "reset HEAD <path>" while mergingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
Suggesting "'reset HEAD <path>' to unstage" is dead wrong if we are about to record a merge commit. For either an unmerged path (i.e. with unresolved conflicts), or an updated path, it would result in discarding what the other branch did. Note that we do not do anything special in a case where we are amending a merge. The user is making an evil merge starting from an already committed merge, and running "reset HEAD <path>" is the right way to get rid of the local edit that has been added to the index. Once "reset --unresolve <path>" becomes available, we might want to suggest it for a merged path that has unresolve information, but until then, just remove the incorrect advice. We might also want to suggest "checkout --conflict <path>" to revert the file in the work tree to the state of failed automerge for an unmerged path, but we never did that, and this commit does not change that. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-12commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolveLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
When the desired resolution is to remove the path, "git rm <path>" is the command the user needs to use. Just like in "Changed but not updated" section, suggest to use "git add/rm" as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-22git status: not "commit --dry-run" anymoreLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+5
This removes tentative "git stat" and make it take over "git status". There are some tests that expect "git status" to exit with non-zero status when there is something staged. Some tests expect "git status path..." to show the status for a partial commit. For these, replace "git status" with "git commit --dry-run". For the ones that do not attempt a dry-run of a partial commit that check the output from the command, check the output from "git status" as well, as they should be identical. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-06status: show worktree status of conflicted paths separatelyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
When a path is unmerged in the index, we used to always say "unmerged" in the "Changed but not updated" section, even when the path was deleted in the work tree. Remove unmerged entries from the "Updated" section, and create a new section "Unmerged paths". Describe how the different stages conflict in more detail in this new section. Note that with the current 3-way merge policy (with or without recursive), certain combinations of index stages should never happen. For example, having only stage #2 means that a path that did not exist in the common ancestor was added by us while the other branch did not do anything to it, which would have autoresolved to take our addition. The code nevertheless prepares for the possibility that future merge policies may leave a path in such a state. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-05diff-index: report unmerged new entriesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+31
Since an earlier change to diff-index by d1f2d7e (Make run_diff_index() use unpack_trees(), not read_tree(), 2008-01-19), we stopped reporting an unmerged path that does not exist in the tree, but we should. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>