summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t7001-mv.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-05-08Merge branch 'km/avoid-cp-a' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Some tests used shell constructs that did not work well on FreeBSD * km/avoid-cp-a: test: fix t7001 cp to use POSIX options
2014-04-11test: fix t7001 cp to use POSIX optionsLibravatar Kyle J. McKay1-2/+2
Since 11502468 and 04c1ee57 (both first appearing in v1.8.5), the t7001-mv test has used "cp -a" to perform a copy in several of the tests. However, the "-a" option is not required for a POSIX cp utility and some platforms' cp utilities do not support it. The POSIX equivalent of -a is -R -P -p. Change "cp -a" to "cp -R -P -p" so that the t7001-mv test works on systems with a cp utility that only implements the POSIX required set of options and not the "-a" option. Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-03Merge branch 'jk/mv-submodules-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+12
* jk/mv-submodules-fix: mv: prevent mismatched data when ignoring errors. builtin/mv: fix out of bounds write Conflicts: t/t7001-mv.sh
2014-03-17mv: prevent mismatched data when ignoring errors.Libravatar brian m. carlson1-1/+12
We shrink the source and destination arrays, but not the modes or submodule_gitfile arrays, resulting in potentially mismatched data. Shrink all the arrays at the same time to prevent this. Add tests to ensure the problem does not recur. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-07mv: better document side effects when moving a submoduleLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+21
The "Submodules" section of the "git mv" documentation mentions what will happen when a submodule with a gitfile gets moved with newer git. But it doesn't talk about what happens when the user changes between commits before and after the move, which does not update the work tree like using the mv command did the first time. Explain what happens and what the user has to do manually to fix that in the new BUGS section. Also document this behavior in a new test. Reported-by: George Papanikolaou <g3orge.app@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-04mv: let 'git mv file no-such-dir/' error outLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+29
Git used to trim the trailing slash, and make the command equivalent to 'git mv file no-such-dir', which created the file no-such-dir (while the trailing slash explicitly stated that it could only be a directory). This patch skips the trailing slash removal for the destination path. The path with its trailing slash is passed to rename(2), which errors out with the appropriate message: $ git mv file no-such-dir/ fatal: renaming 'file' failed: Not a directory Original-patch-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-13mv: Fix spurious warning when moving a file in presence of submodulesLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+26
In commit 0656781fa "git mv" learned to update the submodule path in the .gitmodules file when moving a submodule in the work tree. But since that commit update_path_in_gitmodules() gets called no matter if we moved a submodule or a regular file, which is wrong and leads to a bogus warning when moving a regular file in a repo containing a .gitmodules file: warning: Could not find section in .gitmodules where path=<filename> Fix that by only calling update_path_in_gitmodules() when moving a submodule. To achieve that, we introduce the special SUBMODULE_WITH_GITDIR define to distinguish the cases where we also have to connect work tree and git directory from those where we only need to update the .gitmodules setting. A test for submodules using a .git directory together with a .gitmodules file has been added to t7001. Even though newer git versions will always use a gitfile when cloning submodules, repositories cloned with older git versions will still use this layout. Reported-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-08-06mv: update the path entry in .gitmodules for moved submodulesLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+75
Currently using "git mv" on a submodule moves the submodule's work tree in that of the superproject. But the submodule's path setting in .gitmodules is left untouched, which is now inconsistent with the work tree and makes git commands that rely on the proper path -> name mapping (like status and diff) behave strangely. Let "git mv" help here by not only moving the submodule's work tree but also updating the "submodule.<submodule name>.path" setting from the .gitmodules file and stage both. This doesn't happen when no .gitmodules file is found and only issues a warning when it doesn't have a section for this submodule. This is because the user might just use plain gitlinks without the .gitmodules file or has already updated the path setting by hand before issuing the "git mv" command (in which case the warning reminds him that mv would have done that for him). Only when .gitmodules is found and contains merge conflicts the mv command will fail and tell the user to resolve the conflict before trying again. Also extend the man page to inform the user about this new feature. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-30mv: move submodules using a gitfileLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+19
When moving a submodule which uses a gitfile to point to the git directory stored in .git/modules/<name> of the superproject two changes must be made to make the submodule work: the .git file and the core.worktree setting must be adjusted to point from work tree to git directory and back. Achieve that by remembering which submodule uses a gitfile by storing the result of read_gitfile() of each submodule. If that is not NULL the new function connect_work_tree_and_git_dir() is called after renaming the submodule's work tree which updates the two settings to the new values. Extend the man page to inform the user about that feature (and while at it change the description to not talk about a script anymore, as mv is a builtin for quite some time now). Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-30mv: move submodules together with their work treesLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+34
Currently the attempt to use "git mv" on a submodule errors out with: fatal: source directory is empty, source=<src>, destination=<dest> The reason is that mv searches for the submodule with a trailing slash in the index, which it doesn't find (because it is stored without a trailing slash). As it doesn't find any index entries inside the submodule it claims the directory would be empty even though it isn't. Fix that by searching for the name without a trailing slash and continue if it is a submodule. Then rename() will move the submodule work tree just like it moves a file. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07tests: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite (trivial cases)Libravatar Johannes Sixt1-7/+11
There are many instances where the treatment of symbolic links in the object model and the algorithms are tested, but where it is not necessary to actually have a symbolic link in the worktree. Make adjustments to the tests and remove the SYMLINKS prerequisite when appropriate in trivial cases, where "trivial" means: - merely a replacement of 'ln -s a b && git add b' by test_ln_s_add is needed; - a test for symbolic link on the file system can be split off (and remains protected by SYMLINKS); - existing code is equivalent to test_ln_s_add. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&, batch 2Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of some lines in the test suite. Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last batch if they look okay. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-06t7001 (mv): add missing &&Libravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Also, prefix an expected-to-fail git mv command with 'test_must_fail'. Acked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-22git-mv: fix moving more than one source to a single destinationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
The code used as if return value from basename(3) were stable, but often the function is implemented to return a pointer to a static storage internal to it. Because basename(3) is also allowed to modify its input parameter in place, casting constness away from the strings we obtained from the caller and giving them to basename is a no-no. Reported, and initial fix and test supplied by David Rydh. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-22Use prerequisite tags to skip tests that depend on symbolic linksLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-2/+2
Many tests depend on that symbolic links work. This introduces a check that sets the prerequisite tag SYMLINKS if the file system supports symbolic links. Since so many tests have to check for this prerequisite, we do the check in test-lib.sh, so that we don't need to repeat the test in many scripts. To check for 'ln -s' failures, you can use a FAT partition on Linux: $ mkdosfs -C git-on-fat 1000000 $ sudo mount -o loop,uid=j6t,gid=users,shortname=winnt git-on-fat /mnt Clone git to /mnt and $ GIT_SKIP_TESTS='t0001.1[34] t0010 t1301 t403[34] t4129.[47] t5701.7 t7701.3 t9100 t9101.26 t9119 t9124.[67] t9200.10 t9600.6' \ make test (These additionally skipped tests depend on POSIX permissions that FAT on Linux does not provide.) Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
2009-02-04Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+9
* maint-1.6.0: builtin-mv.c: check for unversionned files before looking at the destination. Add a testcase for "git mv -f" on untracked files. Missing && in t/t7001.sh.
2009-02-04builtin-mv.c: check for unversionned files before looking at the destination.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
The previous code was failing in the case where one moves an unversionned file to an existing destination, with mv -f: the "existing destination" was checked first, and the error was cancelled by the force flag. We now check the unrecoverable error first, which fixes the bug. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-04Add a testcase for "git mv -f" on untracked files.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+8
This currently fails with: git: builtin-mv.c:217: cmd_mv: Assertion `pos >= 0' failed. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-04Missing && in t/t7001.sh.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
Without this, the exit status is only the one of the last line. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-14Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+25
* maint-1.6.0: fix handling of multiple untracked files for git mv -k add test cases for "git mv -k"
2009-01-14fix handling of multiple untracked files for git mv -kLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-1/+1
The "-k" option to "git mv" should allow specifying multiple untracked files. Currently, multiple untracked files raise an assertion if they appear consecutively as arguments. Fix this by decrementing the loop index after removing one entry from the array of arguments. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-14add test cases for "git mv -k"Libravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+25
Add test cases for ignoring nonexisting and untracked files using the -k option to "git mv". There is one known breakage related to multiple untracked files specfied as consecutive arguments. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-03Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+6
* maint: Start 1.6.0.2 maintenance cycle tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7200 - t9001) tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7000 - t7199) Fix passwd(5) ref and reflect that commit doens't use commit-tree improve handling of sideband message display tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999) tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599) checkout: fix message when leaving detached HEAD clone: fix creation of explicitly named target directory 'git foo' program identifies itself without dash in die() messages setup_git_directory(): fix move to worktree toplevel directory update-index: fix worktree setup Start conforming code to "git subcmd" style read-tree: setup worktree if merge is required grep: fix worktree setup diff*: fix worktree setup Conflicts: RelNotes t/t3900-i18n-commit.sh t/t7003-filter-branch.sh
2008-09-03tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t7000 - t7199)Libravatar Nanako Shiraishi1-6/+6
Converts tests between t7001-t7103. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-17tests: use $TEST_DIRECTORY to refer to the t/ directoryLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Many test scripts assumed that they will start in a 'trash' subdirectory that is a single level down from the t/ directory, and referred to their test vector files by asking for files like "../t9999/expect". This will break if we move the 'trash' subdirectory elsewhere. To solve this, we earlier introduced "$TEST_DIRECTORY" so that they can refer to t/ directory reliably. This finally makes all the tests use it to refer to the outside environment. With this patch, and a one-liner not included here (because it would contradict with what Dscho really wants to do): | diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh | index 70ea7e0..60e69e4 100644 | --- a/t/test-lib.sh | +++ b/t/test-lib.sh | @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ fi | . ../GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS | | # Test repository | -test="trash directory" | +test="trash directory/another level/yet another" | rm -fr "$test" || { | trap - exit | echo >&5 "FATAL: Cannot prepare test area" all the tests still pass, but we would want extra sets of eyeballs on this type of change to really make sure. [jc: with help from Stephan Beyer on http-push tests I do not run myself; credits for locating silly quoting errors go to Olivier Marin.] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-28t7001: fix "git mv" testLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
The test assumed that we can keep the cached stat information fresh across rename(2); many filesystems however update st_ctime (and POSIX allows them to do so), and that assumption does not hold. We can explicitly refresh the index for the purpose of these tests. The only thing we are interested in is the staged contents and the mode bits are preserved across "git mv". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-27git-mv: Keep moved index entries inactLibravatar Petr Baudis1-0/+52
The rewrite of git-mv from a shell script to a builtin was perhaps a little too straightforward: the git add and git rm queues were emulated directly, which resulted in a rather complicated code and caused an inconsistent behaviour when moving dirty index entries; git mv would update the entry based on working tree state, except in case of overwrites, where the new entry would still have sha1 of the old file. This patch introduces rename_index_entry_at() into the index toolkit, which will rename an entry while removing any entries the new entry might render duplicate. This is then used in git mv instead of all the file queues, resulting in a major simplification of the code and an inevitable change in git mv -n output format. Also the code used to refuse renaming overwriting symlink with a regular file and vice versa; there is no need for that. A few new tests have been added to the testsuite to reflect this change. Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"Libravatar Stephan Beyer1-2/+2
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git". This is useful to - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal, e.g. SIGSEGV, and - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-05builtin-mv: minimum fix to avoid losing filesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+38
An incorrect command "git mv subdir /outer/space" threw the subdirectory to outside of the repository and then noticed that /outer/space/subdir/ would be outside of the repository. The error checking is backwards. This fixes the issue by being careful about use of the return value of get_pathspec(). Since the implementation already has handcrafted loop to munge each path on the command line, we use prefix_path() instead. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01Sane use of test_expect_failureLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-05t/t7001: avoid unnecessary ERE when using grepLibravatar Miklos Vajna1-6/+6
As pointed out by Junio, it's unnecessary to use "grep -E" and ".+" when we can just use "grep" and "..*". Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-16/+16
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-01-12use 'init' instead of 'init-db' for shipped docs and toolsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-2/+2
While 'init-db' still is and probably will always remain a valid git command for obvious backward compatibility reasons, it would be a good idea to move shipped tools and docs to using 'init' instead. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-04git-mv: search more precisely for source directory in indexLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+13
A move of a directory should find the entries in the index by searching for the name _including_ the slash. Otherwise, the directory can be shadowed by a file when it matches the prefix and is lexicographically smaller, e.g. "ab.c" shadows "ab/". Noticed by Sergey Vlasov. [jc: added Sergey's original reproduction recipe as a test case at the end of t7001.] Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-01git-mv: invalidate the removed path properly in cache-treeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+19
The command updated the cache without invalidating the cache tree entries while removing an existing entry. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-21git-mv: special case destination "."Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
Since the normalized basename of "." is "", the check for directory failed erroneously. Noticed by Fredrik Kuivinen. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-15git-mv: succeed even if source is a prefix of destinationLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
As noted by Fredrik Kuivinen, without this patch, git-mv fails on git-mv README README-renamed because "README" is a prefix of "README-renamed". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-26builtin git-mv: support moving directoriesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
This fixes the builtin mv for the test which Josef provided, and also fixes moving directories into existing directories, as noted by Jon Smirl. In case the destination exists, fail early (this cannot be overridden by -f). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-26t7001: add test for git-mv dir1 dir2/Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+15
If dir2 already exists, git-mv should move dir1 _into_dir2/. Noticed by Jon Smirl. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-26Extend testing git-mv for renaming of subdirectoriesLibravatar Josef Weidendorfer1-0/+21
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-03git-mv: fix moves into a subdir from outsideLibravatar Josef Weidendorfer1-2/+16
git-mv needs to be run from the base directory so that the check if a file is under revision also covers files outside of a subdirectory. Previously, e.g. in the git repo, cd Documentation; git-mv ../README . produced the error Error: '../README' not under version control The test is extended for this case; it previously only tested one direction. Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-29[PATCH] Add tests for git-mv in subdirectoriesLibravatar Alex Riesen1-0/+27
Junio C Hamano, Sat, Nov 26, 2005 03:45:52 +0100: > I haven't seriously used git-mv myself, so > somebody needs to test it, and if it actually works and Ack on > it, please. It actually works in subdirs. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>