summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t6406-merge-attr.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-16Merge branch 'en/remerge-diff'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
"git log --remerge-diff" shows the difference from mechanical merge result and the result that is actually recorded in a merge commit. * en/remerge-diff: diff-merges: avoid history simplifications when diffing merges merge-ort: mark conflict/warning messages from inner merges as omittable show, log: include conflict/warning messages in --remerge-diff headers diff: add ability to insert additional headers for paths merge-ort: format messages slightly different for use in headers merge-ort: mark a few more conflict messages as omittable merge-ort: capture and print ll-merge warnings in our preferred fashion ll-merge: make callers responsible for showing warnings log: clean unneeded objects during `log --remerge-diff` show, log: provide a --remerge-diff capability
2022-02-02merge-ort: capture and print ll-merge warnings in our preferred fashionLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+7
Instead of immediately printing ll-merge warnings to stderr, we save them in our output strbuf. Besides allowing us to move these warnings to a special file for --remerge-diff, this has two other benefits for regular merges done by merge-ort: * The deferral of messages ensures we can print all messages about any given path together (merge-recursive was known to sometimes intersperse messages about other paths, particularly when renames were involved). * The deferral of messages means we can avoid printing spurious conflict messages when we just end up aborting due to local user modifications in the way. (In contrast to merge-recursive.c which prematurely checks for local modifications in the way via unpack_trees() and gets the check wrong both in terms of false positives and false negatives relative to renames, merge-ort does not perform the local modifications in the way check until the checkout() step after the full merge has been computed.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-13tests: simplify construction of large blocks of textLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-4/+4
Take advantage of here-docs to create large blocks of text rather than using a series of `echo` statements. Not only are here-docs a natural fit for such a task, but there is less opportunity for a broken &&-chain. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-11ll_union_merge(): pass name labels to ll_xdl_merge()Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+2
Since cd1d61c44f (make union merge an xdl merge favor, 2010-03-01), we pass NULL to ll_xdl_merge() for the "name" labels of the ancestor, ours and theirs buffers. We usually use these for annotating conflict markers left in a file. For a union merge, these shouldn't matter; the point of it is that we'd never leave conflict markers in the first place. But there is one code path where we may dereference them: if the file contents appear to be binary, ll_binary_merge() will give up and pass them to warning() to generate a message for the user (that was true even when cd1d61c44f was written, though the warning was in ll_xdl_merge() back then). That can result in a segfault, though on many systems (including glibc), the printf routines will helpfully just say "(null)" instead. We can extend our binary-union test in t6406 to check stderr, which catches the problem on all systems. This also fixes a warning from "gcc -O3". Unlike lower optimization levels, it inlines enough to see that the NULL can make it to warning() and complains: In function ‘ll_binary_merge’, inlined from ‘ll_xdl_merge’ at ll-merge.c:115:10, inlined from ‘ll_union_merge’ at ll-merge.c:151:9: ll-merge.c:74:4: warning: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Wformat-overflow=] 74 | warning("Cannot merge binary files: %s (%s vs. %s)", | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 75 | path, name1, name2); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-11ll_binary_merge(): handle XDL_MERGE_FAVOR_UNIONLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+17
Prior to commit a944af1d86 (merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driver, 2012-09-08), we always reported a conflict from ll_binary_merge() by returning "1" (in the xdl_merge and ll_merge code, this value is the number of conflict hunks). After that commit, we report zero conflicts if the "variant" flag is set, under the assumption that it is one of XDL_MERGE_FAVOR_OURS or XDL_MERGE_FAVOR_THEIRS. But this gets confused by XDL_MERGE_FAVOR_UNION. We do not know how to do a binary union merge, but erroneously report no conflicts anyway (and just blindly use the "ours" content as the result). Let's tighten our check to just the cases that a944af1d86 meant to cover. This fixes the union case (which existed already back when that commit was made), as well as future-proofing us against any other variants that get added later. Note that you can't trigger this from "git merge-file --union", as that bails on binary files before even calling into the ll-merge machinery. The test here uses the "union" merge attribute, which does erroneously report a successful merge. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t6[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-13/+13
This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t6[4-9]*.sh) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+3
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-19Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+207
Updates to "git merge" tests, in preparation for a new merge strategy backend. * en/merge-tests: t6425: be more flexible with rename/delete conflict messages t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renames t6422, t6426: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving renames t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not pass t6416, t6423: clarify some comments and fix some typos t6422: fix multiple errors with the mod6 test expectations t6423: fix test setup for a couple tests t6416, t6422: fix incorrect untracked file count t6422: fix bad check against missing file t6418: tighten delete/normalize conflict testcase Collect merge-related tests to t64xx
2020-08-10Collect merge-related tests to t64xxLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+207
The tests for the merge machinery are spread over several places. Collect them into t64xx for simplicity. Some notes: t60[234]*.sh: Merge tests started in t602*, overgrew bisect and remote tracking tests in t6030, t6040, and t6041, and nearly overtook replace tests in t6050. This made picking out relevant tests that I wanted to run in a tighter loop slightly more annoying for years. t303*.sh: These started out as tests for the 'merge-recursive' toplevel command, but did not restrict to that and had lots of overlap with the underlying merge machinery. t7405, t7613: submodule-specific merge logic started out in submodule.c but was moved to merge-recursive.c in commit 18cfc08866 ("submodule.c: move submodule merging to merge-recursive.c", 2018-05-15). Since these tests are about the logic found in the merge machinery, moving these tests to be with the merge tests makes sense. t7607, t7609: Having tests spread all over the place makes it more likely that additional tests related to a certain piece of logic grow in all those other places. Much like t303*.sh, these two tests were about the underlying merge machinery rather than outer levels. Tests that were NOT moved: t76[01]*.sh: Other than the four tests mentioned above, the remaining tests in t76[01]*.sh are related to non-recursive merge strategies, parameter parsing, and other stuff associated with the highlevel builtin/merge.c rather than the recursive merge machinery. t3[45]*.sh: The rebase testcases in t34*.sh also test the merge logic pretty heavily; sometimes changes I make only trigger failures in the rebase tests. The rebase tests are already nicely coupled together, though, and I didn't want to mess that up. Similar comments apply for the cherry-pick tests in t35*.sh. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>