| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This allows you to say:
git bisect start
git bisect bad $bad
git bisect next
to start bisection without knowing a good commit. This would
have you try a commit that is half-way since the beginning of
the history, which is rather wasteful if you already know a good
commit, but if you don't (or your history is short enough that
you do not care), there is no reason not to allow this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
Verify that git-bisect does not start before getting one bad and
one good commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
One bad commit is fundamentally needed for bisect to run,
and if we beforehand know more good commits, we can narrow
the bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout
every time we give good commits.
This patch implements:
git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<pathspec>...]
as a short-hand for this command sequence:
git bisect start
git bisect bad $bad
git bisect good $good1 $good2...
On the other hand, there may be some confusion between revs
(<bad> and <good>...) and <pathspec>... if -- is not used
and if an invalid rev or a pathspec that looks like a rev is
given.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
This idea was suggested by Bill Lear
(Message-ID: <17920.38942.364466.642979@lisa.zopyra.com>)
and I think it is a very good one.
This patch adds a new test file for "git bisect run", but there
is currently only one basic test.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
Junio C Hamano
Christian Couder