summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5604-clone-reference.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-01-15t5604: make hash independentLibravatar brian m. carlson1-2/+3
To make our values hash independent, we turn the directory of the object into "Y" and the file name into "Z" after having sorted items by their name. However, when using SHA-256, one of our file names begins with an "a" character, which means it sorts into the wrong place in the list, causing the test to fail. Since we don't care about the order of these items, just sort them after stripping actual hash contents, which means they'll work with any hash algorithm. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-11clone: copy hidden paths at local cloneLibravatar Matheus Tavares1-0/+9
Make the copy_or_link_directory function no longer skip hidden directories. This function, used to copy .git/objects, currently skips all hidden directories but not hidden files, which is an odd behaviour. The reason for that could be unintentional: probably the intention was to skip '.' and '..' only but it ended up accidentally skipping all directories starting with '.'. Besides being more natural, the new behaviour is more permissive to the user. Also adjust tests to reflect this behaviour change. Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-11clone: better handle symlinked files at .git/objects/Libravatar Matheus Tavares1-7/+20
There is currently an odd behaviour when locally cloning a repository with symlinks at .git/objects: using --no-hardlinks all symlinks are dereferenced but without it, Git will try to hardlink the files with the link() function, which has an OS-specific behaviour on symlinks. On OSX and NetBSD, it creates a hardlink to the file pointed by the symlink whilst on GNU/Linux, it creates a hardlink to the symlink itself. On Manjaro GNU/Linux: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ link b c $ ls -li a b c 155 [...] a 156 [...] b -> a 156 [...] c -> a But on NetBSD: $ ls -li a b c 2609160 [...] a 2609164 [...] b -> a 2609160 [...] c It's not good to have the result of a local clone to be OS-dependent and besides that, the current behaviour on GNU/Linux may result in broken symlinks. So let's standardize this by making the hardlinks always point to dereferenced paths, instead of the symlinks themselves. Also, add tests for symlinked files at .git/objects/. Note: Git won't create symlinks at .git/objects itself, but it's better to handle this case and be friendly with users who manually create them. Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-11clone: test for our behavior on odd objects/* contentLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+111
Add tests for what happens when we perform a local clone on a repo containing odd files at .git/object directory, such as symlinks to other dirs, or unknown files. I'm bending over backwards here to avoid a SHA-1 dependency. See [1] for an earlier and simpler version that hardcoded SHA-1s. This behavior has been the same for a *long* time, but hasn't been tested for. There's a good post-hoc argument to be made for copying over unknown things, e.g. I'd like a git version that doesn't know about the commit-graph to copy it under "clone --local" so a newer git version can make use of it. In follow-up commits we'll look at changing some of this behavior, but for now, let's just assert it as-is so we'll notice what we'll change later. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/20190226002625.13022-5-avarab@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> [matheus.bernardino: improved and split tests in more than one patch] Helped-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-06Merge branch 'sb/clone-t57-t56'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+224
Rename bunch of tests on "git clone" for better organization. * sb/clone-t57-t56: clone tests: rename t57* => t56*
2016-03-16clone tests: rename t57* => t56*Libravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+224
When trying to find a good spot for testing clone with submodules, I got confused where to add a new test file. There are both tests in t560* as well as t57* both testing the clone command. t/README claims the second digit is to indicate the command, which is inconsistent to the current naming structure. Rename all t57* tests to be in t56* to follow the pattern of the digits as laid out in t/README. It would have been less work to rename t56* => t57* because there are less files, but the tests in t56* look more basic and I assumed the higher the last digits the more complicated niche details are tested, so with the patch now it looks more in order to me. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>