Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013-10-30 | fetch: improve the error messages emitted for conflicting refspecs | Michael Haggerty | 1 | -5/+9 | |
If we find two refspecs that want to update the same local reference, emit an error message that is more informative based on whether one of the conflicting refspecs is an opportunistic update during a fetch with explicit command-line refspecs. And especially, do not die if an opportunistic reference update conflicts with an express wish of the user; rather, just emit a warning and skip the opportunistic reference update. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |||||
2013-10-30 | t5536: new test of refspec conflicts when fetching | Michael Haggerty | 1 | -0/+96 | |
Add some tests that "git fetch" handles refspec conflicts (i.e., when the same local reference should be updated from two different remote references) correctly. There is a small bug when updating references opportunistically, namely that an explicit user wish like git fetch origin \ refs/heads/branch1:refs/remotes/origin/branch2 \ refs/heads/branch2:refs/remotes/origin/branch1 should override a configured refspec like +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* The current code incorrectly treats this as a fatal error. In a few commits we will improve the error messages for refspec conflicts in general and also turn this buggy fatal error into a warning. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |