summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5531-deep-submodule-push.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-01-04t5531: do not assume the "matching" push is the defaultLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-30push: teach --recurse-submodules the on-demand optionLibravatar Heiko Voigt1-0/+94
When using this option git will search for all submodules that have changed in the revisions to be send. It will then try to push the currently checked out branch of each submodule. This helps when a user has finished working on a change which involves submodules and just wants to push everything in one go. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-20push: Don't push a repository with unpushed submodulesLibravatar Fredrik Gustafsson1-0/+87
When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a submodule to the server but pushing a super-project that contains a commit for that submodule. The result is that the superproject points at a submodule commit that is not available on the server. This adds the option --recurse-submodules=check to push. When using this option git will check that all submodule commits that are about to be pushed are present on a remote of the submodule. To be able to use a combined diff, disabling a diff callback has been removed from combined-diff.c. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-02tests: make all test files executableLibravatar Mark Rada1-0/+0
For consistency with the rest of the test files. Signed-off-by: Mark Rada <marada@uwaterloo.ca> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2009-08-14Fix "unpack-objects --strict"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+35
When unpack-objects is run under the --strict option, objects that have pointers to other objects are verified for the reachability at the end, by calling check_object() on each of them, and letting check_object to walk the reachable objects from them using fsck_walk() recursively. The function however misunderstands the semantics of fsck_walk() function when it makes a call to it, setting itself as the callback. fsck_walk() expects the callback function to return a non-zero value to signal an error (negative value causes an immediate abort, positive value is still an error but allows further checks on sibling objects) and return zero to signal a success. The function however returned 1 on some non error cases, and to cover up this mistake, complained only when fsck_walk() did not detect any error. To fix this double-bug, make the function return zero on all success cases, and also check for non-zero return from fsck_walk() for an error. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>