| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Before, `--autostash` only worked with `git pull --rebase`. However, in
the last patch, merge learned `--autostash` as well so there's no reason
why we should have this restriction anymore. Teach pull to pass
`--autostash` to merge, just like it did for rebase.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Before, test_pull_autostash() was hardcoded to run
`test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy` to test that a rebase happened. However, in a
future patch, we plan on testing merging as well. Make
test_pull_autostash() accept a parent number as an argument so that, in
the future, we can test if a merge happened in addition to a rebase.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each:
Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because:
* 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used
for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used
in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones
given that we are making it the default.
* 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is.
* the directory where state is stored is not called
.git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge.
Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because:
* Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point.
* Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the
documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read
it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large
burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very
careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces
annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems.
* Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a
backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the
alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user
tries to explain to another what they are doing.
* While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am
is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools
for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too.
* The directory where state is stored has never been called
.git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply.
For all the reasons listed above:
* Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names
* Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names
to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere
(e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation)
* Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply
* Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new
backend names for us as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The am-backend drops information and thus limits what we can do:
* lack of full tree information from the original commits means we
cannot do directory rename detection and warn users that they might
want to move some of their new files that they placed in old
directories to prevent their becoming orphaned.[1]
* reduction in context from only having a few lines beyond those
changed means that when context lines are non-unique we can apply
patches incorrectly.[2]
* lack of access to original commits means that conflict marker
annotation has less information available.
* the am backend has safety problems with an ill-timed interrupt.
Also, the merge/interactive backend have far more abilities, appear to
currently have a slight performance advantage[3] and have room for more
optimizations than the am backend[4] (and work is underway to take
advantage of some of those possibilities).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqh8jeh1id.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGiu2nVMQY_t-rnFR5GQUz_ipyEE8oDocKeO+h+t4Mn4A@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://public-inbox.org/git/CABPp-BF=ev03WgODk6TMQmuNoatg2kiEe5DR__gJ0OTVqHSnfQ@mail.gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BGh7yW69QwxQb13K0HM38NKmQif3A6C6UULEKYnkEJ5vA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In order to ensure the merge/interactive backend gets similar coverage
to the am one, add some tests for cases where previously only the am
backend was tested.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Currently, if a git command fails in an unexpected way, such as a
segfault, it will be masked and ignored. Replace the ! with
test_must_fail so that only expected failures pass.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In the previous patches, the mechanical application of changes left some
duplicate statements in the test case which were not strictly incorrect
but were redundant and possibly misleading. Remove these duplicate
statements so that it is clear that the intent behind the tests are that
the content of the file stays the same throughout the whole test case.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We currently have many instances of `test <line> = $(cat <file>)` and
`test $(cat <file>) = <line>`. In the case where this fails, it will be
difficult for a developer to debug since the output will be masked.
Replace these instances with invocations of test_cmp().
This change was done with the following GNU sed expressions:
s/\(\s*\)test \([^=]*\)= "$(cat \([^)]*\))"/\1echo \2>expect \&\&\n\1test_cmp expect \3/
s/\(\s*\)test "$(cat \([^)]*\))" = \([^&]*\)\( &&\)\?$/\1echo \3 >expect \&\&\n\1test_cmp expect \2\4/
A future patch will clean up situations where we have multiple duplicate
statements within a test case. This is done to keep this patch purely
mechanical.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Before, if the invocation of git failed, it would be masked by the pipe
since only the return code of the last element of a pipe is used.
Rewrite the test to put the git command on its own line so its return
code is not masked.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In case an invocation of a git command fails within the command
substitution, the failure will be masked. Replace the command
substitution with a file-redirection and a call to test_cmp.
This change was done with the following GNU sed expressions:
s/\(\s*\)test \([^ ]*\) = "$(\(git [^)]*\))"/\1echo \2 >expect \&\&\n\1\3 >actual \&\&\n\1test_cmp expect actual/
s/\(\s*\)test "$(\(git [^)]*\))" = \([^ ]*\)/\1echo \3 >expect \&\&\n\1\2 >actual \&\&\n\1test_cmp expect actual/
A future patch will clean up situations where we have multiple duplicate
statements within a test case. This is done to keep this patch purely
mechanical.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In case an invocation of `git rev-list` fails within the command
substitution, the failure will be masked. Remove the command
substitution and use test_cmp_rev() so that failures can be discovered.
This change was done with the following sed expressions:
s/test "$(git rev-parse.* \([^)]*\))" = "$(git rev-parse \([^)]*\))"/test_cmp_rev \1 \2/
s/test \([^ ]*\) = "$(git rev-parse.* \([^)]*\))"/test_cmp_rev \1 \2/
s/test "$(git rev-parse.* \([^)]*\))" != "$(git rev-parse.* \([^)]*\))"/test_cmp_rev ! \1 \2/
s/test \([^ ]*\) != "$(git rev-parse.* \([^)]*\))"/test_cmp_rev ! \1 \2/
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When wrapping a git command in a command substitution within another
command, we throw away the git command's exit code. In case the git
command fails, we would like to know about it rather than the failure
being silent. Extract git commands so that their exit codes are not
lost.
Instead of using `test -n` or `test -z`, replace them respectively with
invocations of test_file_not_empty() and test_must_be_empty() so that we
get better debugging information in the case of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Instead of rolling our own functionality to test the number of lines a
command outputs, use test_line_count() which provides better debugging
information in the case of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The style for tests in Git is to have the redirect operator attached to
the filename with no spaces. Fix test cases where this is not the case.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Although `test -f` has the same functionality as test_path_is_file(), in
the case where test_path_is_file() fails, we get much better debugging
information.
Replace `test -f` with test_path_is_file() so that future developers
will have a better experience debugging these test cases.
Also, in the case of `! test -f`, not only should that path not be a
file, it shouldn't exist at all so replace it with
test_path_is_missing().
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We were using a redirection operator to feed input into sed. However,
since sed is capable of opening its own files, make sed open its own
files instead of redirecting input into it.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The usual convention is for test case names to be written between
single-quotes. Change all double-quoted test case names to single-quotes
except for two test case names that use variables within.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Improve the test style by removing leading and trailing empty lines
within test cases. Also, reformat multi-line subshells to conform to the
existing style.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `--preserve-merges` mode of the `rebase` command is slated to be
deprecated soon, as the more powerful `--rebase-merges` mode is
available now, and the latter was designed with the express intent to
address the shortcomings of `--preserve-merges`' design (e.g. the
inability to reorder commits in an interactive rebase).
As such, we will eventually even remove the `--preserve-merges` support,
and along with it, its tests.
In preparation for this, and also to allow the Windows phase of our
automated tests to save some well-needed time when running the test
suite, this commit introduces a new prerequisite REBASE_P, which can be
forced to being unmet by setting the environment variable
`GIT_TEST_SKIP_REBASE_P` to any non-empty string.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git pull --rebase=interactive" learned "i" as a short-hand for
"interactive".
* js/pull-rebase-type-shorthand:
pull --rebase=<type>: allow single-letter abbreviations for the type
|
|
Git for Windows' original 4aa8b8c8283 (Teach 'git pull' to handle
--rebase=interactive, 2011-10-21) had support for the very convenient
abbreviation
git pull --rebase=i
which was later lost when it was ported to the builtin `git pull`, and
it was not introduced before the patch eventually made it into Git as
f5eb87b98dd (pull: allow interactive rebase with --rebase=interactive,
2016-01-13).
However, it is *really* a useful short hand for the occasional rebasing
pull on branches that do not usually want to be rebased.
So let's reintroduce this convenience, at long last.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If has_uncommitted_changes() can't resolve HEAD (e.g.,
because it's unborn or corrupt), then we end up calling
run_diff_index() with an empty revs.pending array. This
causes a segfault, as run_diff_index() blindly looks at the
first pending item.
Fixing this raises a question of fault: should
run_diff_index() handle this case, or is the caller wrong to
pass an empty pending list?
Looking at the other callers of run_diff_index(), they
handle this in one of three ways:
- they resolve the object themselves, and avoid doing the
diff if it's not valid
- they resolve the object themselves, and fall back to the
empty tree
- they use setup_revisions(), which will die() if the
object isn't valid
Since this is the only broken caller, that argues that the
fix should go there. Falling back to the empty tree makes
sense here, as we'd claim uncommitted changes if and only if
the index is non-empty. This may be a little funny in the
case of corruption (the corrupt HEAD probably _isn't_
empty), but:
- we don't actually know the reason here that HEAD didn't
resolve (the much more likely case is that we have an
unborn HEAD, in which case the empty tree comparison is
the right thing)
- this matches how other code, like "git diff", behaves
While we're thinking about it, let's add an assertion to
run_diff_index(). It should always be passed a single
object, and as this bug shows, it's easy to get it wrong
(and an assertion is easier to hunt down than a segfault, or
a quietly ignored extra tree).
Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The git UI can be improved by addressing the error messages to those
they help: inexperienced and casual git users. To this intent, it is
helpful to make sure the terms used in those messages can be understood
by this segment of users, and that they guide them to resolve the
problem.
In particular, failure to apply a patch during a git rebase is a common
problem that can be very destabilizing for the inexperienced user. It is
important to lead them toward the resolution of the conflict (which is a
3-steps process, thus complex) and reassure them that they can escape a
situation they can't handle with "--abort". This commit answer those two
points by detailling the resolution process and by avoiding cryptic git
linguo.
Signed-off-by: William Duclot <william.duclot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When `git pull --rebase --autostash` in a dirty repository resulted in a
fast-forward, nothing was being autostashed and the pull failed. This
was due to a shortcut to avoid running rebase when we can fast-forward,
but autostash is ignored on that codepath.
Now we will only take the shortcut if autostash is not in effect.
Based on a few tests against the git.git repo, the shortcut does not
seem to give us significant performance benefits, on Linux at least.
Regardless, it is more important to be correct than to be fast.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Brazier <tyler@tylerbrazier.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git pull --rebase", when there is no new commits on our side since
we forked from the upstream, should be able to fast-forward without
invoking "git rebase", but it didn't.
* jc/pull-rebase-ff:
pull: fast-forward "pull --rebase=true"
|
|
"git pull --rebase" always runs "git rebase" after fetching the
commit to serve as the new base, even when the new base is a
descendant of the current HEAD, i.e. we haven't done any work.
In such a case, we can instead fast-forward to the new base without
invoking the rebase process.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Use test_i18ngrep function instead of grep for grepping strings.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It was noticed by Brendan Forster last October that the builtin `git am`
regressed on that. Our hot fix reverted to spawning the recursive merge
instead of using it as a library function.
As we are about to revert that hot fix, after making the recursive merge a
true library function (i.e. a function that does not die() in case of
"normal" errors), let's add a test that verifies that we do not regress on
the same problem which made the hot fix necessary in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
More markings of messages for i18n, with updates to various tests
to pass GETTEXT_POISON tests.
One patch from the original submission dropped due to conflicts
with jk/upload-pack-hook, which is still in flux.
* va/i18n-even-more: (38 commits)
t5541: become resilient to GETTEXT_POISON
i18n: branch: mark comment when editing branch description for translation
i18n: unmark die messages for translation
i18n: submodule: escape shell variables inside eval_gettext
i18n: submodule: join strings marked for translation
i18n: init-db: join message pieces
i18n: remote: allow translations to reorder message
i18n: remote: mark URL fallback text for translation
i18n: standardise messages
i18n: sequencer: add period to error message
i18n: merge: change command option help to lowercase
i18n: merge: mark messages for translation
i18n: notes: mark options for translation
i18n: notes: mark strings for translation
i18n: transport-helper.c: change N_() call to _()
i18n: bisect: mark strings for translation
t5523: use test_i18ngrep for negation
t4153: fix negated test_i18ngrep call
t9003: become resilient to GETTEXT_POISON
tests: unpack-trees: update to use test_i18n* functions
...
|
|
Mark message for translation telling the user she has conflicts to
resolve. Expose each particular use case, in order to enable translating
entire sentences which would facilitate translating into other
languages.
Change "Pull" to lowercase to match other instances. Update test
t5520-pull.sh, that relied on the old error message, to use the new one.
Although we loose in source code conciseness, we would gain better
translations because translators can 1) translate the entire sentence,
including those terms concerning Git (committing, merging, etc) 2) have
leeway to adapt to their languages.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
git-pull silently ignores the --verify-signatures option when
running --rebase, potentially leaving users in the belief that
the rebase operation would check for valid GPG signatures.
Implementing --verify-signatures for git-rebase was talked about,
but doubts for a valid workflow rose up. Since you usually merge
other's branches into your branch you might have an interest that
their side has a valid GPG signature.
Rebasing, on the other hand, is to rebuild your branch on top of
other's work, in order to push the result back, and it is too late
to reject their work even if you find their commits lack acceptable
signature.
Let's warn users that the --verify-signatures option is ignored
during "pull --rebase"; users do not wonder what would happen if
their commits lack acceptable signature that way.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Hirsch <1zeeky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The "--[no-]autostash" options for git-pull are only valid in
rebase mode (i.e. either --rebase is used or pull.rebase=true).
Existing tests already check the cases when --rebase is used but
fail to check for pull.rebase=true case.
Add two new tests to check that the --[no-]autostash options work
with pull.rebase=true.
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
These two tests are almost similar and thus can be folded in a for-loop.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Three tests contains repetitive lines of code.
Factor out common code into test_pull_autostash_fail() and then call it in
these tests.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Four tests contains repetitive lines of code.
Factor out common code into test_pull_autostash() and then call it in
these tests.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Checking stderr output using test_i18ncmp may lead to test failure as
some shells write trace output to stderr when run under 'set -x'.
Use test_i18ngrep instead of test_i18ncmp.
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test title says that tests are done with rebase.autostash unset,
but does not take any action to make sure that it is indeed unset.
This may lead to test failure if future changes somehow pollutes
the configuration globally.
Ensure consistent test conditions by explicitly unsetting
rebase.autostash.
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If rebase.autoStash configuration variable is set, there is no way to
override it for "git pull --rebase" from the command line.
Teach "git pull --rebase" the --[no-]autostash command line flag which
overrides the current value of rebase.autoStash, if set. As "git rebase"
understands the --[no-]autostash option, it's just a matter of passing
the option to underlying "git rebase" when "git pull --rebase" is called.
Helped-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehul Jain <mehul.jain2029@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A couple of years ago, I found the need to collaborate on topic
branches that were rebased all the time, and I really needed to see
what I was rebasing when pulling, so I introduced an
interactively-rebasing pull.
The way builtin pull works, this change also supports the value
'interactive' for the 'branch.<name>.rebase' config variable, which
is a neat thing because users can now configure given branches for
interactively-rebasing pulls without having to type out the complete
`--rebase=interactive` option every time they pull.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git pull --rebase" has been taught to pay attention to
rebase.autostash configuration.
* kd/pull-rebase-autostash:
pull: allow dirty tree when rebase.autostash enabled
|
|
rebase learned to stash changes when it encounters a dirty work tree,
but git pull --rebase does not.
Only verify if the working tree is dirty when rebase.autostash is not
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info>
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
While parsing the command-line arguments, git-pull stops parsing at the
first unrecognized option, assuming that any subsequent options are for
git-fetch, and can thus be kept in the shell's positional parameters
list, so that it can be passed to git-fetch via the expansion of "$@".
However, certain functions in git-pull assume that the positional
parameters do not contain any options:
* error_on_no_merge_candidates() uses the number of positional
parameters to determine which error message to print out, and will
thus print the wrong message if git-fetch's options are passed in as
well.
* the call to get_remote_merge_branch() assumes that the positional
parameters only contains the optional repo and refspecs, and will
thus silently fail if git-fetch's options are passed in as well.
* --dry-run is a valid git-fetch option, but if provided after any
git-fetch options, it is not recognized by git-pull and thus git-pull
will continue to run the merge or rebase.
Fix these bugs by teaching git-pull to parse git-fetch's options as
well. Add tests to prevent regressions.
This removes the limitation where git-fetch's options have to come after
git-merge's and git-rebase's options on the command line. Update the
documentation to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When testing a fast-forward merge with git-pull, check to see if the
reflog action is "pull" with the arguments passed to git-pull.
While we are in the vicinity, remove the empty line as well.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit 19a7fcb (allow pull --rebase on branch yet to be born,
2009-08-11) special cases git-pull on an unborn branch in a different
code path such that git-pull --rebase is still valid even though there
is no HEAD yet.
This code path still ensures that there is no index in order not to lose
any staged changes. Implement a test to ensure that this check is
triggered.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since rebasing on top of multiple upstream branches does not make sense,
since 51b2ead (disallow providing multiple upstream branches to rebase,
pull --rebase, 2009-02-18), git-pull explicitly disallowed specifying
multiple branches in the rebase case.
Implement tests to ensure that git-pull fails and prints out the
user-friendly error message in such a case.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since b10ac50 (Fix pulling into the same branch., 2005-08-25), git-pull,
upon detecting that git-fetch updated the current head, will
fast-forward the working tree to the updated head commit.
Implement tests to ensure that the fast-forward occurs in such a case,
as well as to ensure that the user-friendly advice is printed upon
failure.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Commit d38a30d (Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something
because of conflict., 2010-01-12) introduced code paths to git-pull
which will error out with user-friendly advices if the user is in the
middle of a merge or has unmerged files.
Implement tests to ensure that git-pull will not run, and will print
these advices, if the user is in the middle of a merge or has unmerged
files in the index.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
a8c9bef (pull: improve advice for unconfigured error case, 2009-10-05)
fully established the current advices given by git-pull for the
different cases where git-fetch will not have anything marked for merge:
1. We fetched from a specific remote, and a refspec was given, but it
ended up not fetching anything. This is usually because the user
provided a wildcard refspec which had no matches on the remote end.
2. We fetched from a non-default remote, but didn't specify a branch to
merge. We can't use the configured one because it applies to the
default remote, and thus the user must specify the branches to merge.
3. We fetched from the branch's or repo's default remote, but:
a. We are not on a branch, so there will never be a configured branch
to merge with.
b. We are on a branch, but there is no configured branch to merge
with.
4. We fetched from the branch's or repo's default remote, but the
configured branch to merge didn't get fetched (either it doesn't
exist, or wasn't part of the configured fetch refspec)
Implement tests for the above 5 cases to ensure that the correct code
paths are triggered for each of these cases.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Many tests in t5520 used the following to test the contents of files:
test `cat file` = expected
or
test $(cat file) = expected
These 2 forms, however, will be affected by field splitting and,
depending on the value of $IFS, may be split into multiple arguments,
making the test fail in mysterious ways.
Replace the above 2 forms with:
test "$(cat file)" = expected
as quoting the command substitution will prevent field splitting.
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Denton Liu
Elijah Newren
Johannes Schindelin
Junio C Hamano
Jeff King
William Duclot
Tyler Brazier
Vasco Almeida
Alexander Hirsch
Mehul Jain
Kevin Daudt
Paul Tan