summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-11-06Merge branch 'jk/fetch-reflog-df-conflict'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+40
Corner-case bugfixes for "git fetch" around reflog handling. * jk/fetch-reflog-df-conflict: ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence fetch: load all default config at startup
2014-11-04fetch: load all default config at startupLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+40
When we start the git-fetch program, we call git_config to load all config, but our callback only processes the fetch.prune option; we do not chain to git_default_config at all. This means that we may not load some core configuration which will have an effect. For instance, we do not load core.logAllRefUpdates, which impacts whether or not we create reflogs in a bare repository. Note that I said "may" above. It gets even more exciting. If we have to transfer actual objects as part of the fetch, then we call fetch_pack as part of the same process. That function loads its own config, which does chain to git_default_config, impacting global variables which are used by the rest of fetch. But if the fetch is a pure ref update (e.g., a new ref which is a copy of an old one), we skip fetch_pack entirely. So we get inconsistent results depending on whether or not we have actual objects to transfer or not! Let's just load the core config at the start of fetch, so we know we have it (we may also load it again as part of fetch_pack, but that's OK; it's designed to be idempotent). Our tests check both cases (with and without a pack). We also check similar behavior for push for good measure, but it already works as expected. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19t5516: test pushing a tag of an otherwise unreferenced blobLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+13
It's not unreasonable to have a tag that points to a blob that is not part of the normal history. We do this in git.git to distribute gpg keys. However, we never explicitly checked in our test suite that this actually works (i.e., that pack-objects actually sends the blob because of the tag mentioning it). It does in fact work fine, but a recent patch under discussion broke this, and the test suite didn't notice. Let's make the test suite more complete. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-14Merge branch 'jk/remote-pushremote-config-reading'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+13
"git push" did not pay attention to branch.*.pushremote if it is defined earlier than remote.pushdefault; the order of these two variables in the configuration file should not matter, but it did by mistake. * jk/remote-pushremote-config-reading: remote: handle pushremote config in any order
2014-02-24remote: handle pushremote config in any orderLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+13
The remote we push can be defined either by remote.pushdefault or by branch.*.pushremote for the current branch. The order in which they appear in the config file should not matter to precedence (which should be to prefer the branch-specific config). The current code parses the config linearly and uses a single string to store both values, overwriting any previous value. Thus, config like: [branch "master"] pushremote = foo [remote] pushdefault = bar erroneously ends up pushing to "bar" from the master branch. We can fix this by storing both values and resolving the correct value after all config is read. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-04push: also use "upstream" mapping when pushing a single refLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+30
When the user is using the 'upstream' mode, these commands: $ git push $ git push origin would find the 'upstream' branch for the current branch, and then push the current branch to update it. However, pushing a single branch explicitly, i.e. $ git push origin $(git symbolic-ref --short HEAD) would not go through the same ref mapping process, and ends up updating the branch at 'origin' of the same name, which may not necessarily be the upstream of the branch being pushed. In the spirit similar to the previous one, map a colon-less refspec using the upstream mapping logic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-04push: use remote.$name.push as a refmapLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+45
Since f2690487 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs, 2013-05-11), we stopped taking a non-storing refspec given on the command line of "git fetch" literally, and instead started mapping it via remote.$name.fetch refspecs. This allows $ git fetch origin master from the 'origin' repository, which is configured with [remote "origin"] fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* to update refs/remotes/origin/master with the result, as if the command line were $ git fetch origin +master:refs/remotes/origin/master to reduce surprises and improve usability. Before that change, a refspec on the command line without a colon was only to fetch the history and leave the result in FETCH_HEAD, without updating the remote-tracking branches. When you are simulating a fetch from you by your mothership with a push by you into your mothership, instead of having: [remote "satellite"] fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/satellite/* on the mothership repository and running: mothership$ git fetch satellite you would have: [remote "mothership"] push = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/satellite/* on your satellite machine, and run: satellite$ git push mothership Because we so far did not make the corresponding change to the push side, this command: satellite$ git push mothership master does _not_ allow you on the satellite to only push 'master' out but still to the usual destination (i.e. refs/remotes/satellite/master). Implement the logic to map an unqualified refspec given on the command line via the remote.$name.push refspec. This will bring a bit more symmetry between "fetch" and "push". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-13push: respect --no-thinLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+17
- From the beginning of push.c in 755225d, 2006-04-29, "thin" option was enabled by default but could be turned off with --no-thin. - Then Shawn changed the default to 0 in favor of saving server resources in a4503a1, 2007-09-09. --no-thin worked great. - One day later, in 9b28851 Daniel extracted some code from push.c to create transport.c. He (probably accidentally) flipped the default value from 0 to 1 in transport_get(). From then on --no-thin is effectively no-op because git-push still expects the default value to be false and only calls transport_set_option() when "thin" variable in push.c is true (which is unnecessary). Correct the code to respect --no-thin by calling transport_set_option() in both cases. receive-pack learns about --reject-thin-pack-for-testing option, which only is for testing purposes, hence no document update. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-18Merge branch 'jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple' (early part)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+7
Adjust our tests for upcoming migration of the default value for the "push.default" configuration variable to "simple" from "mixed". * 'jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple' (early part): t5570: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5551: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5550: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t9401: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t9400: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t7406: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5531: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5519: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5517: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5516: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5505: do not assume the "matching" push is the default t5404: do not assume the "matching" push is the default
2013-04-07Merge branch 'rr/triangle'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-138/+184
Support "pull from one place, push to another place" workflow better by introducing remote.pushdefault (overrides the "origin" thing) and branch.*.pushremote (overrides the branch.*.remote). * rr/triangle: remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremote remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefault remote.c: introduce a way to have different remotes for fetch/push t5516 (fetch-push): drop implicit arguments from helper functions t5516 (fetch-push): update test description remote.c: simplify a bit of code using git_config_string()
2013-04-03Merge branch 'jc/t5516-pushInsteadOf-vs-pushURL'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Update a test to match the documented interaction between pushURL and pushInsteadOf. * jc/t5516-pushInsteadOf-vs-pushURL: t5516: test interaction between pushURL and pushInsteadOf correctly
2013-04-02remote.c: introduce branch.<name>.pushremoteLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+15
This new configuration variable overrides `remote.pushdefault` and `branch.<name>.remote` for pushes. When you pull from one place (e.g. your upstream) and push to another place (e.g. your own publishing repository), you would want to set `remote.pushdefault` to specify the remote to push to for all branches, and use this option to override it for a specific branch. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-02remote.c: introduce remote.pushdefaultLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+12
This new configuration variable defines the default remote to push to, and overrides `branch.<name>.remote` for all branches. It is useful in the typical triangular-workflow setup, where the remote you're fetching from is different from the remote you're pushing to. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-02t5516 (fetch-push): drop implicit arguments from helper functionsLibravatar Jeff King1-137/+145
Many of the tests in t5516 look like: mk_empty && git push testrepo ... && check_push_result $commit heads/master It's reasonably easy to see what is being tested, with the exception that "testrepo" is a magic global name (it is implicitly used in the helpers, but we have to name it explicitly when calling git directly). Let's make it explicit when call the helpers, too. This is slightly more typing, but makes the test snippets read more naturally. It also makes it easy for future tests to use an alternate or multiple repositories, without a proliferation of helper functions. [rr: fixed sloppy quoting] Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-02t5516 (fetch-push): update test descriptionLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-1/+12
The file was originally created in bcdb34f (Test wildcard push/fetch, 2007-06-08), and only contained tests that exercised wildcard functionality at the time. In subsequent commits, many other tests unrelated to wildcards were added but the test description was never updated. Fix this. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01Merge branch 'jn/push-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-91/+65
Update t5516 with style fixes. * jn/push-tests: push test: rely on &&-chaining instead of 'if bad; then echo Oops; fi' push test: simplify check of push result push test: use test_config when appropriate
2013-03-28t5516: test interaction between pushURL and pushInsteadOf correctlyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
1c2eafb89bca (Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push only, 2009-09-07) wants to make sure that a push destination read from URL is not rewritten by pushInsteadOf because an explicit pushURL exists; for that, a pushInsteadOf rewrite rule for the value of remote.r.URL is set to a non-existent is set up. We would also want to make sure that pushInsteadOf rewrite rule is not applied to the location read from pushURL. This way, we will make sure that - "testrepo/" (pushURL) gets updated; - the push does not try to update "trash2/" (the result of applying pushInsteadOf to pushURL); - the push does not try to update "trash3/" (the result of applying pushInsteadOf to URL). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25Merge branch 'jc/push-follow-tag'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+73
The new "--follow-tags" option tells "git push" to push relevant annotated tags when pushing branches out. * jc/push-follow-tag: push: --follow-tags commit.c: use clear_commit_marks_many() in in_merge_bases_many() commit.c: add in_merge_bases_many() commit.c: add clear_commit_marks_many()
2013-03-21Merge branch 'jc/fetch-raw-sha1'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+34
Allows requests to fetch objects at any tip of refs (including hidden ones). It seems that there may be use cases even outside Gerrit (e.g. $gmane/215701). * jc/fetch-raw-sha1: fetch: fetch objects by their exact SHA-1 object names upload-pack: optionally allow fetching from the tips of hidden refs fetch: use struct ref to represent refs to be fetched parse_fetch_refspec(): clarify the codeflow a bit
2013-03-19push test: rely on &&-chaining instead of 'if bad; then echo Oops; fi'Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-11/+4
When it is unclear which command from a test has failed, usual practice these days is to debug by running the test again with "sh -x" instead of relying on debugging 'echo' statements. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-19push test: simplify check of push resultLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-63/+51
This test checks each ref with code like the following: r=$(git show-ref -s --verify refs/$ref) && test "z$r" = "z$the_first_commit" Afterward it counts refs: test 1 = $(git for-each-ref refs/remotes/origin | wc -l) Simpler to test the number and values of relevant refs in for-each-ref output at the same time using test_cmp. This makes the test more readable and provides more helpful "./t5516-push-push.sh -v" output when the test fails. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-19push test: use test_config when appropriateLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-17/+10
Configuration from test_config does not last beyond the end of the current test assertion, making each test easier to think about in isolation. This changes the meaning of some of the tests. For example, currently "push with insteadOf" passes even if the line setting "url.$TRASH.pushInsteadOf" is dropped because an url.$TRASH.insteadOf setting leaks in from a previous test. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-05push: --follow-tagsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+73
The new option "--follow-tags" tells "git push" to push annotated tags that are missing from the other side and that can be reached by the history that is otherwise pushed out. For example, if you are using the "simple", "current", or "upstream" push, you would ordinarily push the history leading to the commit at your current HEAD and nothing else. With this option, you would also push all annotated tags that can be reached from that commit to the other side. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-17Merge branch 'jc/hidden-refs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
Allow the server side to redact the refs/ namespace it shows to the client. Will merge to 'master'. * jc/hidden-refs: upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchies upload-pack: simplify request validation upload-pack: share more code
2013-02-07fetch: fetch objects by their exact SHA-1 object namesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+34
Teach "git fetch" to accept an exact SHA-1 object name the user may obtain out of band on the LHS of a pathspec, and send it on a "want" message when the server side advertises the allow-tip-sha1-in-want capability. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-07upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchiesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
A repository may have refs that are only used for its internal bookkeeping purposes that should not be exposed to the others that come over the network. Teach upload-pack to omit some refs from its initial advertisement by paying attention to the uploadpack.hiderefs multi-valued configuration variable. Do the same to receive-pack via the receive.hiderefs variable. As a convenient short-hand, allow using transfer.hiderefs to set the value to both of these variables. Any ref that is under the hierarchies listed on the value of these variable is excluded from responses to requests made by "ls-remote", "fetch", etc. (for upload-pack) and "push" (for receive-pack). Because these hidden refs do not count as OUR_REF, an attempt to fetch objects at the tip of them will be rejected, and because these refs do not get advertised, "git push :" will not see local branches that have the same name as them as "matching" ones to be sent. An attempt to update/delete these hidden refs with an explicit refspec, e.g. "git push origin :refs/hidden/22", is rejected. This is not a new restriction. To the pusher, it would appear that there is no such ref, so its push request will conclude with "Now that I sent you all the data, it is time for you to update the refs. I saw that the ref did not exist when I started pushing, and I want the result to point at this commit". The receiving end will apply the compare-and-swap rule to this request and rejects the push with "Well, your update request conflicts with somebody else; I see there is such a ref.", which is the right thing to do. Otherwise a push to a hidden ref will always be "the last one wins", which is not a good default. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-16push: fix "refs/tags/ hierarchy cannot be updated without --force"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-21/+0
When pushing to update a branch with a commit that is not a descendant of the commit at the tip, a wrong message "already exists" was given, instead of the correct "non-fast-forward", if we do not have the object sitting in the destination repository at the tip of the ref we are updating. The primary cause of the bug is that the check in a new helper function is_forwardable() assumed both old and new objects are available and can be checked, which is not always the case. The way the caller uses the result of this function is also wrong. If the helper says "we do not want to let this push go through", the caller unconditionally translates it into "we blocked it because the destination already exists", which is not true at all in this case. Fix this by doing these three things: * Remove unnecessary not_forwardable from "struct ref"; it is only used inside set_ref_status_for_push(); * Make "refs/tags/" the only hierarchy that cannot be replaced without --force; * Remove the misguided attempt to force that everything that updates an existing ref has to be a commit outside "refs/tags/" hierarchy. The policy last one tried to implement may later be resurrected and extended to ensure fast-forwardness (defined as "not losing objects", extending from the traditional "not losing commits from the resulting history") when objects that are not commit are involved (e.g. an annotated tag in hierarchies outside refs/tags), but such a logic belongs to "is this a fast-forward?" check that is done by ref_newer(); is_forwardable(), which is now removed, was not the right place to do so. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-04t5516: do not assume the "matching" push is the defaultLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-02push: require force for annotated tagsLibravatar Chris Rorvick1-0/+21
Do not allow fast-forwarding of references that point to a tag object. Updating from a tag is potentially destructive since it would likely leave the tag dangling. Disallowing updates to a tag also makes sense semantically and is consistent with the behavior of lightweight tags. Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-02push: require force for refs under refs/tags/Libravatar Chris Rorvick1-1/+22
References are allowed to update from one commit-ish to another if the former is an ancestor of the latter. This behavior is oriented to branches which are expected to move with commits. Tag references are expected to be static in a repository, though, thus an update to something under refs/tags/ should be rejected unless the update is forced. Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-22push: add '--prune' optionLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-0/+16
When pushing groups of refs to a remote, there is no simple way to remove old refs that still exist at the remote that is no longer updated from us. This will allow us to remove such refs from the remote. With this change, running this command $ git push --prune remote refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/laptop/* removes refs/remotes/laptop/foo from the remote if we do not have branch "foo" locally anymore. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-30receive-pack: don't pass non-existent refs to post-{receive,update} hooksLibravatar Pang Yan Han1-0/+197
When a push specifies deletion of non-existent refs, the post post-receive and post-update hooks receive them as input/arguments. For instance, for the following push, where refs/heads/nonexistent is a ref which does not exist on the remote side: git push origin :refs/heads/nonexistent the post-receive hook receives from standard input: <null-sha1> SP <null-sha1> SP refs/heads/nonexistent and the post-update hook receives as arguments: refs/heads/nonexistent which does not make sense since it is a no-op. Teach receive-pack not to pass non-existent refs to the post-receive and post-update hooks. If the push only attempts to delete non-existent refs, these hooks are not even called. The update and pre-receive hooks are still notified about attempted deletion of non-existent refs to give them a chance to inspect the situation and act on it. [jc: mild fix-ups to avoid introducing an extra list; also added fixes to some tests] Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-06-16Fix typo: existant->existentLibravatar Dmitry Ivankov1-5/+5
refs.c had a error message "Trying to write ref with nonexistant object". And no tests relied on the wrong spelling. Also typo was present in some test scripts internals, these tests still pass. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ivankov <divanorama@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+4
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-21Merge branch 'js/maint-receive-pack-symref-alias'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-23/+95
* js/maint-receive-pack-symref-alias: t5516-fetch-push.sh: style cleanup receive-pack: detect aliased updates which can occur with symrefs receive-pack: switch global variable 'commands' to a parameter Conflicts: t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
2010-05-20start_command: close cmd->err descriptor when fork/spawn failsLibravatar bert Dvornik1-1/+1
Fix the problem where the cmd->err passed into start_command wasn't being properly closed when certain types of errors occurr. (Compare the affected code with the clean shutdown code later in the function.) On Windows, this problem would be triggered if mingw_spawnvpe() failed, which would happen if the command to be executed was malformed (e.g. a text file that didn't start with a #! line). If cmd->err was a pipe, the failure to close it could result in a hang while the other side was waiting (forever) for either input or pipe close, e.g. while trying to shove the output into the side band. On msysGit, this problem was causing a hang in t5516-fetch-push. [J6t: With a slight adjustment of the test case, the hang is also observed on Linux.] Signed-off-by: bert Dvornik <dvornik+git@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-19t5516-fetch-push.sh: style cleanupLibravatar Jay Soffian1-23/+46
Cleanup t5516-fetch-push.sh to use prevailing test script style Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-19receive-pack: detect aliased updates which can occur with symrefsLibravatar Jay Soffian1-0/+49
When pushing to a remote repo the sending side filters out aliased updates (e.g., foo:baz bar:baz). However, it is not possible for the sender to know if two refs are aliased on the receiving side via symrefs. Here is one such scenario: $ git init origin $ (cd origin && touch file && git add file && git commit -a -m intial) $ git clone --bare origin origin.git $ rm -rf origin $ git clone origin.git client $ git clone --mirror client backup.git && $ (cd backup.git && git remote set-head origin --auto) $ (cd client && git remote add --mirror backup ../backup.git && echo change1 > file && git commit -a -m change1 && git push origin && git push backup ) The push to backup fails with: Counting objects: 5, done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 244 bytes, done. Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done. error: Ref refs/remotes/origin/master is at ef3... but expected 262... remote: error: failed to lock refs/remotes/origin/master To ../backup.git 262cd57..ef307ff master -> master 262cd57..ef307ff origin/HEAD -> origin/HEAD ! [remote rejected] origin/master -> origin/master (failed to lock) error: failed to push some refs to '../backup.git' The reason is that refs/remotes/origin/HEAD is a symref to refs/remotes/origin/master, but it is not possible for the sending side to unambiguously know this. This commit fixes the issue by having receive-pack ignore any update to a symref whose target is being identically updated. If a symref and its target are being updated inconsistently, then the update for both fails with an error message ("refusing inconsistent update...") to help diagnose the situation. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-11t5516: Use test_cmp when appropriateLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Consistently using test_cmp would make debugging test scripts far easier, as output from them run under "-v" option becomes readable. Besides, some platforms' "diff" implementations lack "-q" option. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-28git-push: add tests for git push --porcelainLibravatar Larry D'Anna1-0/+50
Verify that the output format is correct for successful, rejected, and flagrantly erroneous pushes. Signed-off-by: Larry D'Anna <larry@elder-gods.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-10Merge branch 'jk/push-to-delete'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+26
* jk/push-to-delete: builtin-push: add --delete as syntactic sugar for :foo
2009-12-30builtin-push: add --delete as syntactic sugar for :fooLibravatar Jan Krüger1-0/+26
Refspecs without a source side have been reported as confusing by many. As an alternative, this adds support for commands like: git push origin --delete somebranch git push origin --delete tag sometag Specifically, --delete will prepend a colon to all colon-less refspecs given on the command line, and will refuse to accept refspecs with colons to prevent undue confusion. Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-26Merge branch 'jc/1.7.0-push-safety'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* jc/1.7.0-push-safety: Refuse deleting the current branch via push Refuse updating the current branch in a non-bare repository via push
2009-09-08Add url.<base>.pushInsteadOf: URL rewriting for push onlyLibravatar Josh Triplett1-0/+47
This configuration option allows systematically rewriting fetch-only URLs to push-capable URLs when used with push. For instance: [url "ssh://example.org/"] pushInsteadOf = "git://example.org/" This will allow clones of "git://example.org/path/to/repo" to subsequently push to "ssh://example.org/path/to/repo", without manually configuring pushurl for that remote. Includes documentation for the new option, bash completion updates, and test cases (both that pushInsteadOf applies to push, that it does not apply to fetch, and that it is ignored when pushURL is already defined). Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-29Refuse updating the current branch in a non-bare repository via pushLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
This makes git-push refuse pushing into a non-bare repository to update the current branch by default. To help people who are used to be able to do this (and later "reset --hard" it in some other way), an error message is issued when this refusal is triggered, instructing how to resurrect the old behaviour. Hosting sites that do not give the users direct access to customize their repositories (e.g. repo.or.cz, gitorious, github etc.) may further want to explicitly set the configuration variable to "refuse" for their customers' repositories. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-09t5516: Check pushurl config settingLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+13
Check whether the new remote.${remotename}.pushurl setting is obeyed and whether it overrides remote.${remotename}.url. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-03receive-pack: explain what to do when push updates the current branchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
This makes "git push" issue a more detailed instruction when a user pushes into the current branch of a non-bare repository without having an explicit configuration set to receive.denycurrentbranch. In such a case, it will also tell the user that the default will change to refusal in a future version of git. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-12Merge branch 'mk/maint-cg-push'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+50
* mk/maint-cg-push: git push: Interpret $GIT_DIR/branches in a Cogito compatible way Conflicts: t/t5516-fetch-push.sh
2008-11-11git push: Interpret $GIT_DIR/branches in a Cogito compatible wayLibravatar Martin Koegler1-0/+50
Current git versions ignore everything after # (called <head> in the following) when pushing. Older versions (before cf818348f1ab57), interpret #<head> as part of the URL, which make git bail out. As branches origin from Cogito, it is the best to correct this by using the behaviour of cg-push, that is to push HEAD to remote refs/heads/<head>. Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-09receive-pack: detect push to current branch of non-bare repoLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+37
Pushing into the currently checked out branch of a non-bare repository can be dangerous; the HEAD then loses sync with the index and working tree, and it looks in the receiving repo as if the pushed changes have been reverted in the index (since they were never there in the first place). This patch adds a safety valve that checks for this condition and either generates a warning or denies the update. We trigger the check only on a non-bare repository, since a bare repo does not have a working tree (and in fact, pushing to the HEAD branch is a common workflow for publishing repositories). The behavior is configurable via receive.denyCurrentBranch, defaulting to "warn" so as not to break existing setups (though it may, after a deprecation period, switch to "refuse" by default). For users who know what they are doing and want to silence the warning (e.g., because they have a post-receive hook that reconciles the HEAD and working tree), they can turn off the warning by setting it to false or "ignore". Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>