| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We just started preparing t5515 for the upcoming change of the default
branch name to `main`. This patch adjusts roughly half of the supporting
material in `t/t5515/` (the patch adjusting all of `t/t5515/` would have
weighed more than 100kB and therefore not made it to the Git mailing
list for review).
Similar to what we did for the `t5515` script itself in the previous
commit, this patch was generated via:
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/Master/Main/g' \
-e 's/6c9dec2b923228c9ff994c6cfe4ae16c12408dc5/ecf3b3627b498bdcb735cc4343bf165f76964e9a/g' \
-e 's/8521c3072461fcfe8f32d67f95cc6e6b832a2db2fa29769ffc788bce85ebcd75/fff666109892bb4b1c80cd1649d2d8762a0663db8b5d46c8be98360b64fbba5f/g' \
-e 's/754b754407bf032e9a2f9d5a9ad05ca79a6b228f/b4ab76b1a01ea602209932134a44f1e6bd610832/g' \
-e 's/6c7abaea8a6d8ef4d89877e68462758dc6774690fbbbb0e6d7dd57415c9abde0/380ebae0113f877ce46fcdf39d5bc33e4dc0928db5c5a4d5fdc78381c4d55ae3/g' \
-- t/t5515/fetch.*
In addition to that, we need to adjust some file _names_ in `t/t5515/`
because they encode the branch name:
eval "$(git ls-files t/t5515/fetch.\* | sed -n \
-e 's/\(.*\)master\(.*\)/git mv & \1main\2;/p')"
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The FETCH_HEAD refname is supposed to refer to the ref that was fetched
and should be merged. However all fetched refs are written to
.git/FETCH_HEAD in an arbitrary order, and resolve_ref_unsafe simply
takes the first ref as the FETCH_HEAD, which is often the wrong one,
when other branches were also fetched.
The solution is to write the for-merge ref(s) to FETCH_HEAD first.
Then, unless --append is used, the FETCH_HEAD refname behaves as intended.
If the user uses --append, they presumably are doing so in order to
preserve the old FETCH_HEAD.
While we are at it, update an old example in the read-tree documentation
that implied that each entry in FETCH_HEAD only has the object name, which
is not true for quite a while.
[jc: adjusted tests]
Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does
"git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good
enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD.
The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses
of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind.
[jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Thanks to Johannes Schindelin for review and fixes, and Julian
Phillips for the original C translation.
This changes a few small bits of behavior:
branch.<name>.merge is parsed as if it were the lhs of a fetch
refspec, and does not have to exactly match the actual lhs of a
refspec, so long as it is a valid abbreviation for the same ref.
branch.<name>.merge is no longer ignored if the remote is configured
with a branches/* file. Neither behavior is useful, because there can
only be one ref that gets fetched, but this is more consistant.
Also, fetch prints different information to standard out.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
Johannes Schindelin
Joey Hess
Linus Torvalds
Daniel Barkalow
Santi Béjar