tgif.git - Terin's Improved Git Fork

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2012-01-03	write first for-merge ref to FETCH_HEAD first	Joey Hess	1	-1/+1
	The FETCH_HEAD refname is supposed to refer to the ref that was fetched and should be merged. However all fetched refs are written to .git/FETCH_HEAD in an arbitrary order, and resolve_ref_unsafe simply takes the first ref as the FETCH_HEAD, which is often the wrong one, when other branches were also fetched. The solution is to write the for-merge ref(s) to FETCH_HEAD first. Then, unless --append is used, the FETCH_HEAD refname behaves as intended. If the user uses --append, they presumably are doing so in order to preserve the old FETCH_HEAD. While we are at it, update an old example in the read-tree documentation that implied that each entry in FETCH_HEAD only has the object name, which is not true for quite a while. [jc: adjusted tests] Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-04	fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD	Linus Torvalds	1	-3/+3
	We do not want to record tags as parents of a merge when the user does "git pull $there tag v1.0" to merge tagged commit, but that is not a good enough excuse to peel the tag down to commit when storing in FETCH_HEAD. The caller of underlying "git fetch $there tag v1.0" may have other uses of information contained in v1.0 tag in mind. [jc: the test adjustment is to update for the new expectation] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-03-05	t/t5515-fetch-merge-logic.sh: Added tests for the merge login in git-fetch	Santi Béjar	1	-0/+11
	Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>