summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5510-fetch.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-05-18Merge branch 'js/close-packs-before-gc' into HEADLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* js/close-packs-before-gc: t5510: run auto-gc in the foreground
2016-05-02t5510: run auto-gc in the foregroundLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-0/+1
The last test added to 't5510-fetch' in 0898c9628104 (fetch: release pack files before garbage-collecting, 2016-01-13) may sporadically trigger following error message from the test harness: rm: cannot remove 'trash directory.t5510-fetch/auto-gc/.git': Directory not empty The test in question forces an auto-gc, which, if the system supports it, runs in the background by default, and occasionally takes long enough for the test to finish and for 'test_done' to start housekeeping. This can lead to the test's 'git gc --auto' in the background and 'test_done's 'rm -rf $trash' in the foreground racing each other to create and delete files and directories. It might just happen that 'git gc' re-creates a directory that 'rm -rf' already visited and removed, which ultimately triggers the above error. Disable detaching the auto-gc process to ensure that it finishes before the test can continue, thus avoiding this racy situation. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-10Merge branch 'js/close-packs-before-gc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+6
A small future-proofing of a test added recently. * js/close-packs-before-gc: t5510: do not leave changed cwd
2016-03-04t5510: do not leave changed cwdLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-4/+6
t5510 carefully keeps the cwd at the test root by using either subshells or explicit cd'ing back to the root. Use a subshell for the last subtest, too. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-17Merge branch 'jk/drop-rsync-transport'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-36/+0
It turns out "git clone" over rsync transport has been broken when the source repository has packed references for a long time, and nobody noticed nor complained about it. * jk/drop-rsync-transport: transport: drop support for git-over-rsync
2016-02-01transport: drop support for git-over-rsyncLibravatar Jeff King1-36/+0
The git-over-rsync protocol is inefficient and broken, and has been for a long time. It transfers way more objects than it needs (grabbing all of the remote's "objects/", regardless of which objects we need). It does its own ad-hoc parsing of loose and packed refs from the remote, but doesn't properly override packed refs with loose ones, leading to garbage results (e.g., expecting the other side to have an object pointed to by a stale packed-refs entry, or complaining that the other side has two copies of the refs[1]). This latter breakage means that nobody could have successfully pulled from a moderately active repository since cd547b4 (fetch/push: readd rsync support, 2007-10-01). We never made an official deprecation notice in the release notes for git's rsync protocol, but the tutorial has marked it as such since 914328a (Update tutorial., 2005-08-30). And on the mailing list as far back as Oct 2005, we can find Junio mentioning it as having "been deprecated for quite some time."[2,3,4]. So it was old news then; cogito had deprecated the transport in July of 2005[5] (though it did come back briefly when Linus broke git-http-pull!). Of course some people professed their love of rsync through 2006, but Linus clarified in his usual gentle manner[6]: > Thanks! This is why I still use rsync, even though > everybody and their mother tells me "Linus says rsync is > deprecated." No. You're using rsync because you're actively doing something _wrong_. The deprecation sentiment was reinforced in 2008, with a mention that cloning via rsync is broken (with no fix)[7]. Even the commit porting rsync over to C from shell (cd547b4) lists it as deprecated! So between the 10 years of informal warnings, and the fact that it has been severely broken since 2007, it's probably safe to simply remove it without further deprecation warnings. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/285101 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/10093 [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/17734 [4] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/18911 [5] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/5617 [6] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/19354 [7] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/103635 Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-26Merge branch 'js/close-packs-before-gc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+13
Many codepaths that run "gc --auto" before exiting kept packfiles mapped and left the file descriptors to them open, which was not friendly to systems that cannot remove files that are open. They now close the packs before doing so. * js/close-packs-before-gc: receive-pack: release pack files before garbage-collecting merge: release pack files before garbage-collecting am: release pack files before garbage-collecting fetch: release pack files before garbage-collecting
2016-01-13fetch: release pack files before garbage-collectingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+13
Before auto-gc'ing, we need to make sure that the pack files are released in case they need to be repacked and garbage-collected. This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/500 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-28t/t5510-fetch.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitutionLibravatar Elia Pinto1-5/+5
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}" done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: fix trivial &&-chain breakageLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: fix severe &&-chain breakageLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, in a location which causes a significant portion of the test to be missed (e.g., the test effectively does nothing, or consists of a long string of actions and output comparisons, and we throw away the exit code of at least one part of the string). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-05fetch: allow explicit --refmap to override configurationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+37
Since the introduction of opportunisitic updates of remote-tracking branches, started at around f2690487 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs, 2013-05-11) with a few updates in v1.8.4 era, the remote.*.fetch configuration always kicks in even when a refspec to specify what to fetch is given on the command line, and there is no way to disable or override it per-invocation. Teach the command to pay attention to the --refmap=<lhs>:<rhs> command-line options that can be used to override the use of configured remote.*.fetch as the refmap. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> ---
2014-04-03Merge branch 'cn/fetch-prune-overlapping-destination'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+20
Protect refs in a hierarchy that can come from more than one remote hierarcies from incorrect removal by "git fetch --prune". * cn/fetch-prune-overlapping-destination: fetch: handle overlaping refspecs on --prune fetch: add a failing test for prunning with overlapping refspecs
2014-03-26fetch: handle overlaping refspecs on --pruneLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-1/+1
We need to consider that a remote-tracking branch may match more than one rhs of a fetch refspec. In such a case, it is not enough to stop at the first match but look at all of the matches in order to determine whether a head is stale. To this goal, introduce a variant of query_refspecs which returns all of the matching refspecs and loop over those answers to check for staleness. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-19t5510: Do not use $(pwd) when fetching / pushing / pulling via rsyncLibravatar Sebastian Schuberth1-3/+3
On MINGW, "pwd" is defined as "pwd -W" in test-lib.sh. This usually is the right thing, but the absolute Windows path with a colon confuses rsync. We could use $PWD in this case to work around the issue, but in fact there is no need to use an absolute path in the first place, so get rid of it. This was discovered in the context of the mingwGitDevEnv project and only did not surface before with msysgit because the latter does not ship rsync. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-28fetch: add a failing test for prunning with overlapping refspecsLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-0/+20
When a remote has multiple fetch refspecs and these overlap in the target namespace, fetch may prune a remote-tracking branch which still exists in the remote. The test uses a popular form of this, by putting pull requests as stored in a popular hosting platform alongside "real" remote-tracking branches. The fetch command makes a decision of whether to prune based on the first matching refspec, which in this case is insufficient, as it covers the pull request names. This pair of refspecs does work as expected if the more "specific" refspec is the first in the list. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-13Merge branch 'jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
"git clone" would fail to clone from a repository that has a ref directly under "refs/", e.g. "refs/stash", because different validation paths do different things on such a refname. Loosen the client side's validation to allow such a ref. * jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname: fetch-pack: do not filter out one-level refs
2014-01-27Merge branch 'jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
"git clone" would fail to clone from a repository that has a ref directly under "refs/", e.g. "refs/stash", because different validation paths do different things on such a refname. Loosen the client side's validation to allow such a ref. * jk/allow-fetch-onelevel-refname: fetch-pack: do not filter out one-level refs
2014-01-15fetch-pack: do not filter out one-level refsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+11
Currently fetching a one-level ref like "refs/foo" does not work consistently. The outer "git fetch" program filters the list of refs, checking each against check_refname_format. Then it feeds the result to do_fetch_pack to actually negotiate the haves/wants and get the pack. The fetch-pack code does its own filter, and it behaves differently. The fetch-pack filter looks for refs in "refs/", and then feeds everything _after_ the slash (i.e., just "foo") into check_refname_format. But check_refname_format is not designed to look at a partial refname. It complains that the ref has only one component, thinking it is at the root (i.e., alongside "HEAD"), when in reality we just fed it a partial refname. As a result, we omit a ref like "refs/foo" from the pack request, even though "git fetch" then tries to store the resulting ref. If we happen to get the object anyway (e.g., because the ref is contained in another ref we are fetching), then the fetch succeeds. But if it is a unique object, we fail when trying to update "refs/foo". We can fix this by just passing the whole refname into check_refname_format; we know the part we were omitting is "refs/", which is acceptable in a refname. This at least makes the checks consistent with each other. This problem happens most commonly with "refs/stash", which is the only one-level ref in wide use. However, our test does not use "refs/stash", as we may later want to restrict it specifically (not because it is one-level, but because of the semantics of stashes). We may also want to do away with the multiple levels of filtering (which can cause problems when they are out of sync), or even forbid one-level refs entirely. However, those decisions can come later; this fixes the most immediate problem, which is the mismatch between the two. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-03fetch --prune: Run prune before fetchingLibravatar Tom Miller1-0/+14
When we have a remote-tracking branch named "frotz/nitfol" from a previous fetch, and the upstream now has a branch named "frotz", fetch would fail to remove "frotz/nitfol" with a "git fetch --prune" from the upstream. git would inform the user to use "git remote prune" to fix the problem. Change the way "fetch --prune" works by moving the pruning operation before the fetching operation. This way, instead of warning the user of a conflict, it autmatically fixes it. Signed-off-by: Tom Miller <jackerran@gmail.com> Tested-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-03fetch --prune: always print header urlLibravatar Tom Miller1-0/+12
If "fetch --prune" is run with no new refs to fetch, but it has refs to prune. Then, the header url is not printed as it would if there were new refs to fetch. Output before this patch: $ git fetch --prune remote-with-no-new-refs x [deleted] (none) -> origin/world Output after this patch: $ git fetch --prune remote-with-no-new-refs From https://github.com/git/git x [deleted] (none) -> origin/test Signed-off-by: Tom Miller <jackerran@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-30fetch --prune: prune only based on explicit refspecsLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-5/+5
The old behavior of "fetch --prune" was to prune whatever was being fetched. In particular, "fetch --prune --tags" caused tags not only to be fetched, but also to be pruned. This is inappropriate because there is only one tags namespace that is shared among the local repository and all remotes. Therefore, if the user defines a local tag and then runs "git fetch --prune --tags", then the local tag is deleted. Moreover, "--prune" and "--tags" can also be configured via fetch.prune / remote.<name>.prune and remote.<name>.tagopt, making it even less obvious that an invocation of "git fetch" could result in tag lossage. Since the command "git remote update" invokes "git fetch", it had the same problem. The command "git remote prune", on the other hand, disregarded the setting of remote.<name>.tagopt, and so its behavior was inconsistent with that of the other commands. So the old behavior made it too easy to lose tags. To fix this problem, change "fetch --prune" to prune references based only on refspecs specified explicitly by the user, either on the command line or via remote.<name>.fetch. Thus, tags are no longer made subject to pruning by the --tags option or the remote.<name>.tagopt setting. However, tags *are* still subject to pruning if they are fetched as part of a refspec, and that is good. For example: * On the command line, git fetch --prune 'refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*' causes tags, and only tags, to be fetched and pruned, and is therefore a simple way for the user to get the equivalent of the old behavior of "--prune --tag". * For a remote that was configured with the "--mirror" option, the configuration is set to include [remote "name"] fetch = +refs/*:refs/* , which causes tags to be subject to pruning along with all other references. This is the behavior that will typically be desired for a mirror. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-30fetch --tags: fetch tags *in addition to* other stuffLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-3/+19
Previously, fetch's "--tags" option was considered equivalent to specifying the refspec "refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*" on the command line; in particular, it caused the remote.<name>.refspec configuration to be ignored. But it is not very useful to fetch tags without also fetching other references, whereas it *is* quite useful to be able to fetch tags *in addition to* other references. So change the semantics of this option to do the latter. If a user wants to fetch *only* tags, then it is still possible to specifying an explicit refspec: git fetch <remote> 'refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*' Please note that the documentation prior to 1.8.0.3 was ambiguous about this aspect of "fetch --tags" behavior. Commit f0cb2f137c 2012-12-14 fetch --tags: clarify documentation made the documentation match the old behavior. This commit changes the documentation to match the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-24t5510: check that "git fetch --prune --tags" does not prune branchesLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-0/+4
"git fetch --prune --tags" is currently interpreted as follows: * "--tags" is equivalent to specifying a refspec "refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*", and supersedes any default refspecs configured via remote.$REMOTE.fetch. * "--prune" only operates on the refspecs being fetched. Therefore, "git fetch --prune --tags" prunes tags in refs/tags/* but does not fetch or prune other references. The fact that this command does not prune references outside of refs/tags/* was previously untested. So add a test that verifies the status quo. However, the status quo is surprising, so it will be changed later in this patch series. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-24t5510: prepare test refs more straightforwardlyLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+4
"git fetch" was being used with contrived refspecs to create tags and remote-tracking branches in test repositories in preparation for the actual tests. This is obscure and also makes one wonder whether this is indeed just preparation or whether some side-effect of "git fetch" is being tested. So use the more straightforward commands "git tag" / "git update-ref" when preparing branches in test repositories. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-24t5510: use the correct tag name in testLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-1/+1
Fix an apparent copy-paste error: A few lines earlier, a tag "refs/tags/sometag" is created. Check for the (non-)existence of that tag, not "somebranch", which is otherwise never mentioned in the script. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-09Merge branch 'ms/fetch-prune-configuration'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+82
Allow fetch.prune and remote.*.prune configuration variables to be set, and "git fetch" to behave as if "--prune" is given. "git fetch" that honors remote.*.prune is fine, but I wonder if we should somehow make "git push" aware of it as well. Perhaps remote.*.prune should not be just a boolean, but a 4-way "none", "push", "fetch", "both"? * ms/fetch-prune-configuration: fetch: make --prune configurable
2013-07-18fetch: make --prune configurableLibravatar Michael Schubert1-0/+82
Without "git fetch --prune", remote-tracking branches for a branch the other side already has removed will stay forever. Some people want to always run "git fetch --prune". To accommodate users who want to either prune always or when fetching from a particular remote, add two new configuration variables "fetch.prune" and "remote.<name>.prune": - "fetch.prune" allows to enable prune for all fetch operations. - "remote.<name>.prune" allows to change the behaviour per remote. The latter will naturally override the former, and the --[no-]prune option from the command line will override the configured default. Since --prune is a potentially destructive operation (Git doesn't keep reflogs for deleted references yet), we don't want to prune without users consent, so this configuration will not be on by default. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert <mschub@elegosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-28fetch: don't try to update unfetched tracking refsLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+16
Since commit f269048 (fetch: opportunistically update tracking refs, 2013-05-11) we update tracking refs opportunistically when fetching remote branches. However, if there is a configured non-pattern refspec that does not match any of the refspecs given on the command line then a fatal error occurs. Fix this by setting the "missing_ok" flag when calling get_fetch_map. Test-added-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12fetch: opportunistically update tracking refsLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+4
When we run a regular "git fetch" without arguments, we update the tracking refs according to the configured refspec. However, when we run "git fetch origin master" (or "git pull origin master"), we do not look at the configured refspecs at all, and just update FETCH_HEAD. We miss an opportunity to update "refs/remotes/origin/master" (or whatever the user has configured). Some users find this confusing, because they would want to do further comparisons against the old state of the remote master, like: $ git pull origin master $ git log HEAD...origin/master In the currnet code, they are comparing against whatever commit happened to be in origin/master from the last time they did a complete "git fetch". This patch will update a ref from the RHS of a configured refspec whenever we happen to be fetching its LHS. That makes the case above work. The downside is that any users who really care about whether and when their tracking branches are updated may be surprised. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12t5510: start tracking-ref tests from a known stateLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+10
We have three sequential tests for for whether tracking refs are updated by various fetches and pulls; the first two should not update the ref, and the third should. Each test depends on the state left by the test before. This is fragile (a failing early test will confuse later tests), and means we cannot add more "should update" tests after the third one. Let's instead save the initial state before these tests, and then reset to a known state before running each test. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-17fetch: describe new refs based on where it came fromLibravatar Marc Branchaud1-0/+30
update_local_ref() used to say "[new branch]" when we stored a new ref outside refs/tags/ hierarchy, but the message is more about what we fetched, so use the refname at the origin to make that decision. Also, only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/. Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-12Merge branch 'tr/maint-bundle-boundary' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+35
"git bundle" did not record boundary commits correctly when there are many of them. By Thomas Rast * tr/maint-bundle-boundary: bundle: keep around names passed to add_pending_object() t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir t5510: refactor bundle->pack conversion
2012-03-01bundle: keep around names passed to add_pending_object()Libravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+15
The 'name' field passed to add_pending_object() is used to later deduplicate in object_array_remove_duplicates(). git-bundle had a bug in this area since 18449ab (git-bundle: avoid packing objects which are in the prerequisites, 2007-03-08): it passed the name of each boundary object in a static buffer. In other words, all that object_array_remove_duplicates() saw was the name of the *last* added boundary object. The recent switch to a strbuf in bc2fed4 (bundle: use a strbuf to scan the log for boundary commits, 2012-02-22) made this slightly worse: we now free the buffer at the end, so it is not even guaranteed that it still points into addressable memory by the time object_array_remove_ duplicates looks at it. On the plus side however, it was now detectable by valgrind. The fix is easy: pass a copy of the string to add_pending_object. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-01t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dirLibravatar Thomas Rast1-8/+10
The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which is not so nice to the next test writer. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-01t5510: refactor bundle->pack conversionLibravatar Thomas Rast1-14/+10
It's not so much a conversion as a "strip everything up to and including the first blank line", but it will come in handy again. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-03write first for-merge ref to FETCH_HEAD firstLibravatar Joey Hess1-1/+1
The FETCH_HEAD refname is supposed to refer to the ref that was fetched and should be merged. However all fetched refs are written to .git/FETCH_HEAD in an arbitrary order, and resolve_ref_unsafe simply takes the first ref as the FETCH_HEAD, which is often the wrong one, when other branches were also fetched. The solution is to write the for-merge ref(s) to FETCH_HEAD first. Then, unless --append is used, the FETCH_HEAD refname behaves as intended. If the user uses --append, they presumably are doing so in order to preserve the old FETCH_HEAD. While we are at it, update an old example in the read-tree documentation that implied that each entry in FETCH_HEAD only has the object name, which is not true for quite a while. [jc: adjusted tests] Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-09Merge branch 'jc/pull-signed-tag'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
* jc/pull-signed-tag: commit-tree: teach -m/-F options to read logs from elsewhere commit-tree: update the command line parsing commit: teach --amend to carry forward extra headers merge: force edit and no-ff mode when merging a tag object commit: copy merged signed tags to headers of merge commit merge: record tag objects without peeling in MERGE_HEAD merge: make usage of commit->util more extensible fmt-merge-msg: Add contents of merged tag in the merge message fmt-merge-msg: package options into a structure fmt-merge-msg: avoid early returns refs DWIMmery: use the same rule for both "git fetch" and others fetch: allow "git fetch $there v1.0" to fetch a tag merge: notice local merging of tags and keep it unwrapped fetch: do not store peeled tag object names in FETCH_HEAD Split GPG interface into its own helper library Conflicts: builtin/fmt-merge-msg.c builtin/merge.c
2011-11-07refs DWIMmery: use the same rule for both "git fetch" and othersLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
"git log frotz" can DWIM to "refs/remotes/frotz/HEAD", but in the remote access context, "git fetch frotz" to fetch what the other side happened to have fetched from what it calls 'frotz' (which may not have any relation to what we consider is 'frotz') the last time would not make much sense, so the fetch rules table did not include "refs/remotes/%.*s/HEAD". When the user really wants to, "git fetch $there remotes/frotz/HEAD" would let her do so anyway, so this is not about safety or security; it merely is about confusion avoidance and discouraging meaningless usage. Specifically, it is _not_ about ambiguity avoidance. A name that would become ambiguous if we use the same rules table for both fetch and local rev-parse would be ambiguous locally at the remote side. So for the same reason as we added rule to allow "git fetch $there v1.0" instead of "git fetch $there tags/v1.0" in the previous commit, here is a bit longer rope for the users, which incidentally simplifies our code. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-15fetch: treat --tags like refs/tags/*:refs/tags/* when pruningLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-2/+2
If --tags is specified, add that refspec to the list given to prune_refs so it knows to treat it as a filter on what refs to should consider for prunning. This way git fetch --prune --tags origin only prunes tags and doesn't delete the branch refs. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-15fetch: honor the user-provided refspecs when pruning refsLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-2/+2
If the user gave us refspecs on the command line, we should use those when deciding whether to prune a ref instead of relying on the refspecs in the config. Previously, running git fetch --prune origin refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master would delete every other ref under the origin namespace because we were using the refspec to filter the available refs but using the configured refspec to figure out if a ref had been deleted on the remote. This is clearly the wrong thing to do. Change prune_refs and get_stale_heads to simply accept a list of references and a list of refspecs. The caller of either function needs to decide what refspecs should be used to decide whether a ref is stale. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-07t5510: add tests for fetch --pruneLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-0/+50
The failures will be fixed in later commits. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-15Merge branch 'jl/fix-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+22
* jl/fix-test: t1020: Get rid of 'cd "$HERE"' at the start of each test t2016 (checkout -p): add missing && t1302 (core.repositoryversion): style tweaks t2105 (gitfile): add missing && t1450 (fsck): remove dangling objects tests: subshell indentation stylefix Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around
2010-09-09t/t5510-fetch.sh: improve testing with explicit URL and merge specLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+28
Commit 6106ce46 introduced a test to demonstrate fetch's failure to retrieve any objects or update FETCH_HEAD when it was supplied a repository URL and the current branch had a configured merge spec. This commit expands the original test based on comments from Junio Hamano. In addition to actually verifying that the fetch updates FETCH_HEAD correctly, and does not update the current branch, two more tests are added to ensure that the merge configuration is ignored even when the supplied URL matches the URL of the remote configured for the branch. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09tests: subshell indentation stylefixLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-16/+19
Format the subshells introduced by the previous patch (Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around, 2010-09-06) like so: ( cd subdir && ... ) && This is generally easier to read and has the nice side-effect that this patch will show what commands are used in the subshell, making it easier to check for lost environment variables and similar behavior changes. Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-08Merge branch 'bc/maint-fetch-url-only'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
* bc/maint-fetch-url-only: builtin/fetch.c: ignore merge config when not fetching from branch's remote t/t5510: demonstrate failure to fetch when current branch has merge ref
2010-09-06Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of aroundLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-9/+9
Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell. Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.". Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-25builtin/fetch.c: ignore merge config when not fetching from branch's remoteLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+1
When 'git fetch' is supplied a single argument, it tries to match it against a configured remote and then fetch the refs specified by the named remote's fetchspec. Additionally, or alternatively, if the current branch has a merge ref configured, and if the name of the remote supplied to fetch matches the one in the branch's configuration, then git also adds the merge ref to the list of refs to update. If the argument to fetch does not specify a named remote, or if the name supplied does not match the remote configured for the current branch, then the current branch's merge configuration should not be considered. git currently mishandles the case when the argument to fetch specifies a GIT URL(i.e. not a named remote) and the current branch has a configured merge ref. In this case, fetch should ignore the branch's merge ref and attempt to fetch from the remote repository's HEAD branch. But, since fetch only checks _whether_ the current branch has a merge ref configured, and does _not_ check whether the branch's configured remote matches the command line argument (until later), it will mistakenly enter the wrong branch of an 'if' statement and will not fall back to fetch the HEAD branch. The fetch ends up doing nothing and returns with a successful zero status. Fix this by comparing the remote repository's name to the branch's remote name, in addition to whether it has a configured merge ref, sooner, so that fetch can correctly decide whether the branch's configuration is interesting or not, and fall back to fetching from the remote's HEAD branch when appropriate. This fixes the test in t5510. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-25t/t5510: demonstrate failure to fetch when current branch has merge refLibravatar Brandon Casey1-0/+6
When 'git fetch' is supplied just a repository URL (not a remote name), and without a fetch refspec, it should fetch from the remote HEAD branch and update FETCH_HEAD with the fetched ref. Currently, when 'git fetch' is called like this, it fails to retrieve anything, and does not update FETCH_HEAD, if the current checked-out branch has a configured merge ref. i.e. this fetch fails to retrieve anything nor update FETCH_HEAD: git checkout master git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git but this one does: git config --unset branch.master.merge git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git Add a test to demonstrate this flaw. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>