summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5411/test-0039-report-mixed-refs--porcelain.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-03-17proc-receive hook tests: use "test_hook" instead of "write_script"Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Change the t5411/*.sh tests to use the test_hook helper instead of "write_script". Unfortunately these tests do the setup and test across different test_expect_success blocks, so we have to use --clobber (implying --setup) for these. Let's change those that can use a quoted here-doc to do so while we're at it. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-17test: refactor to use "get_abbrev_oid" to get abbrev oidLibravatar Jiang Xin1-2/+2
Add new function "get_abbrev_oid" to get abbrev object ID. This function has a default value which helps to prepare a nonempty replace pattern for sed command. An empty replace pattern may cause sed fail to allocate memory. Refactor function "make_user_friendly_and_stable_output" to use "get_abbrev_oid" to get abbrev object ID. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-17test: compare raw output, not mangle tabs and spacesLibravatar Jiang Xin1-38/+38
Before comparing with the expect file, we used to call function "make_user_friendly_and_stable_output" to filter out trailing spaces in output. Ævar recommends using pattern "s/Z$//" to prepare expect file, and then compare it with raw output. Since we have fixed the issue of occasionally missing the clear-to-eol suffix when displaying sideband #2 messages, it is safe and stable to test against raw output. Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-22t5411: refactor check of refs using test_cmp_refsLibravatar Jiang Xin1-4/+2
Add new helper 'test_cmp_refs' to check references in a repository. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-22t5411: use different out file to prevent overwritingLibravatar Jiang Xin1-2/+2
SZEDER reported that t5411 failed in Travis CI's s390x environment a couple of times, and could be reproduced with '--stress' test on this specific environment. The test failure messages might look like this: + test_cmp expect actual --- expect 2021-01-17 21:55:23.430750004 +0000 +++ actual 2021-01-17 21:55:23.430750004 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/main +<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/maifatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly error: last command exited with $?=1 not ok 86 - proc-receive: not support push options (builtin protocol) The file 'actual' is filtered from the file 'out' which contains result of 'git show-ref' command. Due to the error messages from other process is written into the file 'out' accidentally, t5411 failed. SZEDER finds the root cause of this issue: - 'git push' is executed with its standard output and error redirected to the file 'out'. - 'git push' executes 'git receive-pack' internally, which inherits the open file descriptors, so its output and error goes into that same 'out' file. - 'git push' ends without waiting for the close of 'git-receive-pack' for some cases, and the file 'out' is reused for test of 'git show-ref' afterwards. - A mixture of the output of 'git show-ref' abd 'git receive-pack' leads to this issue. The first intuitive reaction to resolve this issue is to remove the file 'out' after use, so that the newly created file 'out' will have a different file descriptor and will not be overwritten by the 'git receive-pack' process. But Johannes pointed out that removing an open file is not possible on Windows. So we use different temporary file names to store the output of 'git push' to solve this issue. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-31t5411: start adjusting the support files for init.defaultBranch=mainLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-20/+20
This trick was performed via $ sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t/t5411/test-00[3-5]* We do not convert the files in `t/t5411/` in one go because the patch would be too big (mails larger than 100kB are rejected by the Git mailing list). Instead, we start with roughly half of the support files. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-27New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushLibravatar Jiang Xin1-1/+1
The new introduced "proc-receive" hook may handle a command for a pseudo-reference with a zero-old as its old-oid, while the hook may create or update a reference with different name, different new-oid, and different old-oid (the reference may exist already with a non-zero old-oid). Current "report-status" protocol cannot report the status for such reference rewrite. Add new capability "report-status-v2" and new report protocol which is not backward compatible for report of git-push. If a user pushes to a pseudo-reference "refs/for/master/topic", and "receive-pack" creates two new references "refs/changes/23/123/1" and "refs/changes/24/124/1", for client without the knowledge of "report-status-v2", "receive-pack" will only send "ok/ng" directives in the report, such as: ok ref/for/master/topic But for client which has the knowledge of "report-status-v2", "receive-pack" will use "option" directives to report more attributes for the reference given by the above "ok/ng" directive. ok refs/for/master/topic option refname refs/changes/23/123/1 option new-oid <new-oid> ok refs/for/master/topic option refname refs/changes/24/124/1 option new-oid <new-oid> The client will report two new created references to the end user. Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-27receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveLibravatar Jiang Xin1-1/+1
When commands are fed to the "post-receive" hook, report options will be parsed and the real old-oid, new-oid, reference name will feed to the "post-receive" hook. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-27receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookLibravatar Jiang Xin1-0/+91
Git calls an internal `execute_commands` function to handle commands sent from client to `git-receive-pack`. Regardless of what references the user pushes, git creates or updates the corresponding references if the user has write-permission. A contributor who has no write-permission, cannot push to the repository directly. So, the contributor has to write commits to an alternate location, and sends pull request by emails or by other ways. We call this workflow as a distributed workflow. It would be more convenient to work in a centralized workflow like what Gerrit provided for some cases. For example, a read-only user who cannot push to a branch directly can run the following `git push` command to push commits to a pseudo reference (has a prefix "refs/for/", not "refs/heads/") to create a code review. git push origin \ HEAD:refs/for/<branch-name>/<session> The `<branch-name>` in the above example can be as simple as "master", or a more complicated branch name like "foo/bar". The `<session>` in the above example command can be the local branch name of the client side, such as "my/topic". We cannot implement a centralized workflow elegantly by using "pre-receive" + "post-receive", because Git will call the internal function "execute_commands" to create references (even the special pseudo reference) between these two hooks. Even though we can delete the temporarily created pseudo reference via the "post-receive" hook, having a temporary reference is not safe for concurrent pushes. So, add a filter and a new handler to support this kind of workflow. The filter will check the prefix of the reference name, and if the command has a special reference name, the filter will turn a specific field (`run_proc_receive`) on for the command. Commands with this filed turned on will be executed by a new handler (a hook named "proc-receive") instead of the internal `execute_commands` function. We can use this "proc-receive" command to create pull requests or send emails for code review. Suggested by Junio, this "proc-receive" hook reads the commands, push-options (optional), and send result using a protocol in pkt-line format. In the following example, the letter "S" stands for "receive-pack" and letter "H" stands for the hook. # Version and features negotiation. S: PKT-LINE(version=1\0push-options atomic...) S: flush-pkt H: PKT-LINE(version=1\0push-options...) H: flush-pkt # Send commands from server to the hook. S: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref>) S: ... ... S: flush-pkt # Send push-options only if the 'push-options' feature is enabled. S: PKT-LINE(push-option) S: ... ... S: flush-pkt # Receive result from the hook. # OK, run this command successfully. H: PKT-LINE(ok <ref>) # NO, I reject it. H: PKT-LINE(ng <ref> <reason>) # Fall through, let 'receive-pack' to execute it. H: PKT-LINE(ok <ref>) H: PKT-LINE(option fall-through) # OK, but has an alternate reference. The alternate reference name # and other status can be given in options H: PKT-LINE(ok <ref>) H: PKT-LINE(option refname <refname>) H: PKT-LINE(option old-oid <old-oid>) H: PKT-LINE(option new-oid <new-oid>) H: PKT-LINE(option forced-update) H: ... ... H: flush-pkt After receiving a command, the hook will execute the command, and may create/update different reference. For example, a command for a pseudo reference "refs/for/master/topic" may create/update different reference such as "refs/pull/123/head". The alternate reference name and other status are given in option lines. The list of commands returned from "proc-receive" will replace the relevant commands that are sent from user to "receive-pack", and "receive-pack" will continue to run the "execute_commands" function and other routines. Finally, the result of the execution of these commands will be reported to end user. The reporting function from "receive-pack" to "send-pack" will be extended in latter commit just like what the "proc-receive" hook reports to "receive-pack". Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>