summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-07-08make deleting a missing ref more quietLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+7
If git attempts to delete a ref, but the unlink of the ref file fails, we print a message to stderr. This is usually a good thing, but if the error is ENOENT, then it indicates that the ref has _already_ been deleted. And since that's our goal, it doesn't make sense to complain to the user. This harmonizes the error reporting behavior for the unpacked and packed cases; the packed case already printed nothing on ENOENT, but the unpacked printed unconditionally. Additionally, send-pack would, when deleting the tracking ref corresponding to a remote delete, print "Failed to delete" on any failure. This can be a misleading message, since we actually _did_ delete at the remote side, but we failed to delete locally. Rather than make the message more precise, let's just eliminate it entirely; the delete_ref routine already takes care of printing out a much more specific message about what went wrong. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-17send-pack: check ref->status before updating tracking refsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+5
Previously, we manually checked the 'NONE' and 'UPTODATE' conditions. Now that we have ref->status, we can easily say "only update if we pushed successfully". This adds a test for and fixes a regression introduced in ed31df31 where deleted refs did not have their tracking branches removed. This was due to a bogus per-ref error test that is superseded by the more accurate ref->status flag. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Completely-Acked-By: Alex "Sleepy" Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-17send-pack: track errors for each refLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+11
Instead of keeping the 'ret' variable, we instead have a status flag for each ref that tracks what happened to it. We then print the ref status after all of the refs have been examined. This paves the way for three improvements: - updating tracking refs only for non-error refs - incorporating remote rejection into the printed status - printing errors in a different order than we processed (e.g., consolidating non-ff errors near the end with a special message) Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-12Add a test checking if send-pack updated local tracking branches correctlyLibravatar Alex Riesen1-0/+40
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>