summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5100/sample.mbox
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-11-20git am/mailinfo: Don't look at in-body headers when rebasingLibravatar Lukas Sandström1-0/+33
When we are rebasing we know that the header lines in the patch are good and that we don't need to pick up any headers from the body of the patch. This makes it possible to rebase commits whose commit message start with "From" or "Date". Test vectors by Jeff King. Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <luksan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-26Teach mailinfo to ignore everything before -- >8 -- markLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+89
This teaches mailinfo the scissors -- >8 -- mark; the command ignores everything before it in the message body. For lefties among us, we also support -- 8< -- ;-) Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-15Revert "mailinfo: Remove only one set of square brackets"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This reverts commit 650d30d8a120c8982309ccb9ef40432b4ea2eb74. Some mailing lists are configured add prefix "[listname] " to all their messages, and also people hand-edit subject lines, be it an output from format-patch or a patch generated by some other means. We cannot stop people from mucking with the subject line, and with the change, there always will be need for hand editing the subject when that happens. People have depended on the leading [bracketed string] removal.
2009-07-10Merge branch 'ae/maint-mailinfo-rm-only-one-patch-marker'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* ae/maint-mailinfo-rm-only-one-patch-marker: mailinfo: Remove only one set of square brackets
2009-07-08mailinfo: Remove only one set of square bracketsLibravatar Andreas Ericsson1-1/+1
git-format-patch prepends patches with a [PATCH x/n] prefix, but mailinfo used to remove any number of square-bracket pairs and the content between them. This prevents one from using a commit subject like this: [ and ] must be allowed as input Removing the square bracket pair from this rather clumsily constructed subject line loses important information, so we must take care not to. This patch causes the subject stripping to stop after it has encountered one pair of square brackets. One possible downside of this patch is that the patch-handling programs will now fail at removing author-added square-brackets to be removed, such as [RFC][PATCH x/n] However, since format-patch only adds one set of square brackets, this behaviour is quite easily undesrstood and defended while the previous behaviour is not. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-18t5100: use ancient encoding syntax for backwards compatibilityLibravatar Brandon Casey1-4/+4
Some ancient platforms do not have an extensive list of alternate names for character encodings. For example, Solaris 7 does not know that ISO-8859-1 is the same as ISO8859-1. Modern platforms do know this, so use the older names. The following conversions were performed: ISO-8859-1 --> ISO8859-1 ISO-8859-2 --> ISO8859-2 ISO-8859-8 --> ISO8859-8 iso-2022-jp --> ISO-2022-JP Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-01mailinfo: cleanup extra spaces for complex 'From:'Libravatar Kirill Smelkov1-2/+2
currently for cases like From: A U Thor <a.u.thor@example.com> (Comment) mailinfo extracts the following 'Author:' field: Author: A U Thor (Comment) ^^ which has two extra spaces left in there after removed email part. I think this is wrong so here is a fix. Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-28mailinfo: add explicit test for mails like '<a.u.thor@example.com> (A U Thor)'Libravatar Kirill Smelkov1-0/+5
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
2009-01-12mailinfo: 'From:' header should be unfold as wellLibravatar Kirill Smelkov1-1/+4
At present we do headers unfolding (see RFC822 3.1.1. LONG HEADER FIELDS) for all fields except 'From' (always) and 'Subject' (when keep_subject is set) Not unfolding 'From' is a bug -- see above-mentioned RFC link. Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-10mailinfo: correctly handle multiline 'Subject:' headerLibravatar Kirill Smelkov1-0/+52
When native language (RU) is in use, subject header usually contains several parts, e.g. Subject: [Navy-patches] [PATCH] =?utf-8?b?0JjQt9C80LXQvdGR0L0g0YHQv9C40YHQvtC6INC/0LA=?= =?utf-8?b?0LrQtdGC0L7QsiDQvdC10L7QsdGF0L7QtNC40LzRi9GFINC00LvRjyA=?= =?utf-8?b?0YHQsdC+0YDQutC4?= This exposes several bugs in builtin-mailinfo.c: 1. decode_b_segment: do not append explicit NUL -- explicit NUL was preventing correct header construction on parts concatenation via strbuf_addbuf in decode_header_bq. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па Then 2. Do not emit '\n' between "encoded-word" where RFC2046 says that linear white space between them are ignored when displaying. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па кетов необходимых для сборки Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-18mailinfo: re-fix MIME multipart boundary parsingLibravatar Don Zickus1-0/+1
Recent changes to is_multipart_boundary() caused git-mailinfo to segfault. The reason was after handling the end of the boundary the code tried to look for another boundary. Because the boundary list was empty, dereferencing the pointer to the top of the boundary caused the program to go boom. The fix is to check to see if the list is empty and if so go on its merry way instead of looking for another boundary. I also fixed a couple of increments and decrements that didn't look correct relating to content_top. The boundary test case was updated to catch future problems like this again. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-09mailinfo: fix MIME multi-part message boundary handlingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+35
After finding a MIME multi-part message boundary line, the handle_body() function is supposed to first flush any accumulated contents from the previous part to the output stream. However, the code mistakenly output the boundary line it found. The old code that used one global, fixed-length buffer line[] used an alternate static buffer newline[] for keeping track of this accumulated contents and flushed newline[] upon seeing the boundary; when 3b6121f (git-mailinfo: use strbuf's instead of fixed buffers, 2008-07-13) converted a fixed-length buffer in this program to use strbuf,these two buffers were converted to "line" and "prev" (the latter of which now has a much more sensible name) strbufs, but the code mistakenly flushed "line" (which contains the boundary we have just found), instead of "prev". This resulted in the first boundary to be output in front of the first line of the message. The rewritten implementation of handle_boundary() lost the terminating newline; this would then result in the second line of the message to be stuck with the first line. The is_multipart_boundary() was designed to catch both the internal boundary and the terminating one (the one with trailing "--"); this also was broken with the rewrite, and the code in the handle_boundary() to handle the terminating boundary was never triggered. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13git-mailinfo: Fix getting the subject from the in-body [PATCH] lineLibravatar Lukas Sandström1-0/+35
"Subject: " isn't in the static array "header", and thus memcmp("Subject:", header[i], 7) will never match. Even if it did so, hdr_data[] may not have been allocated if there weren't a "Subject: " in-body when we process "[PATCH]" in the affected codepath. Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-15mailinfo: feed only one line to handle_filter() for QP inputLibravatar Jay Soffian1-0/+23
The function is intended to be fed one logical line at a time to inspect, but a QP encoded raw input line can have more than one lines, just like BASE64 encoded one. Quoting LF as =0A may be unusual but RFC2045 allows it. The issue was noticed and fixed by Jay Soffian. JC added a test to protect the fix from regressing later. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-02Make mailsplit and mailinfo strip whitespace from the start of the inputLibravatar Simon Sasburg1-0/+3
Signed-off-by: Simon Sasburg <Simon.Sasburg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-03-12Add a couple more test cases to the suite.Libravatar Don Zickus1-0/+18
They handle cases where there is no attached patch. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-27mailinfo: do not get confused with logical lines that are too long.Libravatar Linus Torvalds1-0/+71
It basically considers all the continuation lines to be lines of their own, and if the total line is bigger than what we can fit in it, we just truncate the result rather than stop in the middle and then get confused when we try to parse the "next" line (which is just the remainder of the first line). [jc: added test, and tightened boundary a bit per list discussion.] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-17t5100: mailinfo and mailsplit tests.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+317
Currently the test passes with 1.3.3 but not with the tip of "master". This is to verify the fixes from Eric W Biedermann. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>