summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5100/info0012
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-07-15Revert "mailinfo: Remove only one set of square brackets"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This reverts commit 650d30d8a120c8982309ccb9ef40432b4ea2eb74. Some mailing lists are configured add prefix "[listname] " to all their messages, and also people hand-edit subject lines, be it an output from format-patch or a patch generated by some other means. We cannot stop people from mucking with the subject line, and with the change, there always will be need for hand editing the subject when that happens. People have depended on the leading [bracketed string] removal.
2009-07-08mailinfo: Remove only one set of square bracketsLibravatar Andreas Ericsson1-1/+1
git-format-patch prepends patches with a [PATCH x/n] prefix, but mailinfo used to remove any number of square-bracket pairs and the content between them. This prevents one from using a commit subject like this: [ and ] must be allowed as input Removing the square bracket pair from this rather clumsily constructed subject line loses important information, so we must take care not to. This patch causes the subject stripping to stop after it has encountered one pair of square brackets. One possible downside of this patch is that the patch-handling programs will now fail at removing author-added square-brackets to be removed, such as [RFC][PATCH x/n] However, since format-patch only adds one set of square brackets, this behaviour is quite easily undesrstood and defended while the previous behaviour is not. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-10mailinfo: correctly handle multiline 'Subject:' headerLibravatar Kirill Smelkov1-0/+5
When native language (RU) is in use, subject header usually contains several parts, e.g. Subject: [Navy-patches] [PATCH] =?utf-8?b?0JjQt9C80LXQvdGR0L0g0YHQv9C40YHQvtC6INC/0LA=?= =?utf-8?b?0LrQtdGC0L7QsiDQvdC10L7QsdGF0L7QtNC40LzRi9GFINC00LvRjyA=?= =?utf-8?b?0YHQsdC+0YDQutC4?= This exposes several bugs in builtin-mailinfo.c: 1. decode_b_segment: do not append explicit NUL -- explicit NUL was preventing correct header construction on parts concatenation via strbuf_addbuf in decode_header_bq. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па Then 2. Do not emit '\n' between "encoded-word" where RFC2046 says that linear white space between them are ignored when displaying. Fixes: -Subject: Изменён список пакетов необходимых для сборки +Subject: Изменён список па кетов необходимых для сборки Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>