Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-04-24 | archive-zip: add tests for big ZIP archives | René Scharfe | 1 | -0/+0 | |
Test the creation of ZIP archives bigger than 4GB and containing files bigger than 4GB. They are marked as EXPENSIVE because they take quite a while and because the first one needs a bit more than 4GB of disk space to store the resulting archive. The big archive in the first test is made up of a tree containing thousands of copies of a small file. Yet the test has to write out the full archive because unzip doesn't offer a way to read from stdin. The big file in the second test is provided as a zipped pack file to avoid writing another 4GB file to disk and then adding it. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |||||
2013-05-09 | t5004: resurrect original empty tar archive test | René Scharfe | 1 | -0/+0 | |
Add a test to verify the emptiness of an archive by extracting its contents. Don't run this test if the version of tar doesn't support archives containing only a comment header, though. The existing check 'tar archive of empty tree is empty' used to work like that (minus the tar capability check) but was changed to depend on the exact representation of empty tar files created by git archive instead of on the behaviour of tar in order to avoid issues with different tar versions. The different approaches test different things: The existing one is for empty trees, for which we know the exact expected output and thus we can simply check it without extracting; the new one is for commits with empty trees, whose archives include stamps and so the more "natural" check by extraction is a better fit because it focuses on the interesting aspect, namely the absence of any archive entries. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | |||||
2013-03-10 | archive: handle commits with an empty tree | Jeff King | 1 | -0/+0 | |
git-archive relies on get_pathspec to convert its argv into a list of pathspecs. When get_pathspec is given an empty argv list, it returns a single pathspec, the empty string, to indicate that everything matches. When we feed this to our path_exists function, we typically see that the pathspec turns up at least one item in the tree, and we are happy. But when our tree is empty, we erroneously think it is because the pathspec is too limited, when in fact it is simply that there is nothing to be found in the tree. This is a weird corner case, but the correct behavior is almost certainly to produce an empty archive, not to exit with an error. This patch teaches git-archive to create empty archives when there is no pathspec given (we continue to complain if a pathspec is given, since it obviously is not matched). It also confirms that the tar and zip writers produce sane output in this instance. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |