| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Update test to reflect changes.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
To libify `git apply` functionality we have to signal errors to the
caller instead of die()ing.
To do that in a compatible manner with the rest of the error handling
in builtin/apply.c, let's make find_header() return -128 instead of
calling die().
We could make it return -1, unfortunately find_header() already
returns -1 when no header is found.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
- Don't start tests with 'test $? = 0' to catch preparation done
outside the test_expect_success block.
- Move writing the bogus patch and the expected output into the
appropriate test_expect_success blocks.
- Use the test_must_fail helper instead of manually checking for
non-zero exit code.
- Use the debug-friendly test_path_is_file helper instead of 'test -f'.
- No space after '>'.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
to have patched.
Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
The above is on glibc-based systems. On other systems, rather than
getting "null", you may provoke a segfault as git tries to
dereference the NULL file name.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Vasco Almeida
Christian Couder
SZEDER Gábor
Jim Meyering