summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t4038-diff-combined.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-02-07log,diff-tree: add --combined-all-paths optionLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+88
The combined diff format for merges will only list one filename, even if rename or copy detection is active. For example, with raw format one might see: ::100644 100644 100644 fabadb8 cc95eb0 4866510 MM describe.c ::100755 100755 100755 52b7a2d 6d1ac04 d2ac7d7 RM bar.sh ::100644 100644 100644 e07d6c5 9042e82 ee91881 RR phooey.c This doesn't let us know what the original name of bar.sh was in the first parent, and doesn't let us know what either of the original names of phooey.c were in either of the parents. In contrast, for non-merge commits, raw format does provide original filenames (and a rename score to boot). In order to also provide original filenames for merge commits, add a --combined-all-paths option (which must be used with either -c or --cc, and is likely only useful with rename or copy detection active) so that we can print tab-separated filenames when renames are involved. This transforms the above output to: ::100644 100644 100644 fabadb8 cc95eb0 4866510 MM desc.c desc.c desc.c ::100755 100755 100755 52b7a2d 6d1ac04 d2ac7d7 RM foo.sh bar.sh bar.sh ::100644 100644 100644 e07d6c5 9042e82 ee91881 RR fooey.c fuey.c phooey.c Further, in patch format, this changes the from/to headers so that instead of just having one "from" header, we get one for each parent. For example, instead of having --- a/phooey.c +++ b/phooey.c we would see --- a/fooey.c --- a/fuey.c +++ b/phooey.c Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-09doc: replace more gmane linksLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-26Merge branch 'jk/diff-tree-t-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+34
Fix (rarely used) "git diff-tree -t" regression in 2.0. * jk/diff-tree-t-fix: intersect_paths: respect mode in git's tree-sort
2014-08-20intersect_paths: respect mode in git's tree-sortLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+34
When we do a combined diff, we individually diff against each parent, and then use intersect_paths to do a parallel walk through the sorted results and come up with a final list of interesting paths. The sort order here is that returned by the diffs, which means it is in git's tree-order which sorts sub-trees as if their paths have "/" at the end. When we do our parallel walk, we need to use a comparison function which provides the same order. Since 8518ff8 (combine-diff: optimize combine_diff_path sets intersection, 2014-01-20), we use a simple strcmp to compare the pathnames, and get this wrong. It's somewhat hard to trigger because normally a diff does not produce tree entries at all, and therefore the sort order is the same as a strcmp. However, if the "-t" option is used with the diff, then we will produce diff_filepairs for both trees and files. We can use base_name_compare to do the comparison, just as the tree-diff code does. Even though what we have are not technically base names (they are full paths within the tree), the end result is the same (we do not care about interior slashes at all, only about the final character). However, since we do not have the length of each path stored, we take a slight shortcut: if neither of the entries is a sub-tree then the comparison is equivalent to a strcmp. This lets us skip the extra strlen calls in the common case without having to reimplement base_name_compare from scratch. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-30t4038-diff-combined.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitutionLibravatar Elia Pinto1-1/+1
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f} done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-02Merge branch 'mk/combine-diff-context-horizon-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+48
"git diff -c -p" was not showing a deleted line from a hunk when another hunk immediately begins where the earlier one ends. * mk/combine-diff-context-horizon-fix: combine-diff.c: Fix output when changes are exactly 3 lines apart
2013-05-15combine-diff.c: Fix output when changes are exactly 3 lines apartLibravatar Matthijs Kooijman1-0/+48
When a deletion is followed by exactly 3 (or whatever the number of context lines) unchanged lines, followed by another change, the combined diff output would hide the first deletion, resulting in a malformed diff. This happened because the 3 lines before each change are painted interesting, but also marked as no_pre_delete to prevent showing deletes that were previously marked as uninteresting. This behaviour was introduced in c86fbe53 (diff -c/--cc: do not include uninteresting deletion before leading context). However, as a side effect, this could also mark deletes that were already interesting as no_pre_delete. This would happen only if the delete was exactly 3 lines away from the next change, since lines farther away would not be touched by the "paint three lines before the change" code and lines closer would be painted by the "merge two adjacent hunks" code instead, which does not set the no_pre_delete flag. This commit fixes this problem by only setting the no_pre_delete flag for changes that were previously uninteresting. Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25combine-diff: coalesce lost lines optimallyLibravatar Antoine Pelisse1-0/+129
This replaces the greedy implementation to coalesce lost lines by using dynamic programming to find the Longest Common Subsequence. The O(n²) time complexity is obviously bigger than previous implementation but it can produce shorter diff results (and most likely easier to read). List of lost lines is now doubly-linked because we reverse-read it when reading the direction matrix. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-14Allow combined diff to ignore white-spacesLibravatar Antoine Pelisse1-0/+111
The combined diff --cc output does not honor options to ignore whitespace changes (-b, -w, and --ignore-space-at-eol). Correct this by passing diff flags to diff engine, so that combined diff behaves as normal diff does with spaces, and by coalescing lines that are removed from both (or more) parents, honoring the same rule to ignore whitespace changes. With this change, a conflict-less merge done using a ignore-* strategy option will not show any conflict if shown in combined-diff using the same option. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-05t4038: add tests for "diff --cc --raw <trees>"Libravatar John Keeping1-0/+24
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-17combined diff: correctly handle truncated fileLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+8
Consider an evil merge of two commits A and B, both of which have a file 'foo', but the merge result does not have that file. The combined-diff code learned in 4462731 (combine-diff: do not punt on removed or added files., 2006-02-06) to concisely show only the removal, since that is the evil part and the previous contents are presumably uninteresting. However, to diagnose an empty merge result, it overloaded the variable that holds the file's length. This means that the check also triggers for truncated files. Consequently, such files were not shown in the diff at all despite the merge being clearly evil. Fix this by adding a new variable that distinguishes whether the file was deleted (which is the case 4462731 handled) or truncated. In the truncated case, we show the full combined diff again, which is rather spammy but at least does not hide the evilness. Reported-by: David Martínez Martí <desarrollo@gestiweb.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-28tests: update tests that used to failLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"diff --cc" output t4038 tests was fixed by b810cbb (diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectly, 2009-07-22), which was actually the commit that introduced this test.. An error in "git merge -s resolve" t6035 tests was fixed by 730f728 (unpack-trees.c: look ahead in the index, 2009-09-20). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-22diff --cc: a lost line at the beginning of the file is shown incorrectlyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+84
When combine-diff inspected the diff from one parent to the merge result, it misinterpreted a header in the form @@ -l,k +0,0 @@. This hunk header means that K lines were removed from the beginning of the file, so the lost lines must be queued to the sline that represents the first line of the merge result, but we incremented our pointer incorrectly and ended up queuing it to the second line, which in turn made the lossage appear _after_ the first line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>