summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-08-15Merge branch 'es/diff-color-moved-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
One of the "diff --color-moved" mode "dimmed_zebra" that was named in an unusual way has been deprecated and replaced by "dimmed-zebra". * es/diff-color-moved-fix: diff: --color-moved: rename "dimmed_zebra" to "dimmed-zebra"
2018-07-25diff: --color-moved: rename "dimmed_zebra" to "dimmed-zebra"Libravatar Eric Sunshine1-2/+2
The --color-moved "dimmed_zebra" mode (with an underscore) is an anachronism. Most options and modes are hyphenated. It is more difficult to type and somewhat more difficult to read than those which are hyphenated. Therefore, rename it to "dimmed-zebra", and nominally deprecate "dimmed_zebra". Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-19diff.c: add white space mode to move detection that allows indent changesLibravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+88
The option of --color-moved has proven to be useful as observed on the mailing list. However when refactoring sometimes the indentation changes, for example when partitioning a functions into smaller helper functions the code usually mostly moved around except for a decrease in indentation. To just review the moved code ignoring the change in indentation, a mode to ignore spaces in the move detection as implemented in a previous patch would be enough. However the whole move coloring as motivated in commit 2e2d5ac (diff.c: color moved lines differently, 2017-06-30), brought up the notion of the reviewer being able to trust the move of a "block". As there are languages such as python, which depend on proper relative indentation for the control flow of the program, ignoring any white space change in a block would not uphold the promises of 2e2d5ac that allows reviewers to pay less attention to the inside of a block, as inside the reviewer wants to assume the same program flow. This new mode of white space ignorance will take this into account and will only allow the same white space changes per line in each block. This patch even allows only for the same change at the beginning of the lines. As this is a white space mode, it is made exclusive to other white space modes in the move detection. This patch brings some challenges, related to the detection of blocks. We need a wide net to catch the possible moved lines, but then need to narrow down to check if the blocks are still intact. Consider this example (ignoring block sizes): - A - B - C + A + B + C At the beginning of a block when checking if there is a counterpart for A, we have to ignore all space changes. However at the following lines we have to check if the indent change stayed the same. Checking if the indentation change did stay the same, is done by computing the indentation change by the difference in line length, and then assume the change is only in the beginning of the longer line, the common tail is the same. That is why the test contains lines like: - <TAB> A ... + A <TAB> ... As the first line starting a block is caught using a compare function that ignores white spaces unlike the rest of the block, where the white space delta is taken into account for the comparison, we also have to think about the following situation: - A - B - A - B + A + B + A + B When checking if the first A (both in the + and - lines) is a start of a block, we have to check all 'A' and record all the white space deltas such that we can find the example above to be just one block that is indented. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-17diff.c: decouple white space treatment from move detection algorithmLibravatar Stefan Beller1-4/+58
In the original implementation of the move detection logic the choice for ignoring white space changes is the same for the move detection as it is for the regular diff. Some cases came up where different treatment would have been nice. Allow the user to specify that white space should be ignored differently during detection of moved lines than during generation of added and removed lines. This is done by providing analogs to the --ignore-space-at-eol, -b, and -w options by introducing the option --color-moved-ws=<modes> with the modes named "ignore-space-at-eol", "ignore-space-change" and "ignore-all-space", which is used only during the move detection phase. As we change the default, we'll adjust the tests. For now we do not infer any options to treat white spaces in the move detection from the generic white space options given to diff. This can be tuned later to reasonable default. As we plan on adding more white space related options in a later patch, that interferes with the current white space options, use a flag field and clamp it down to XDF_WHITESPACE_FLAGS, as that (a) allows to easily check at parse time if we give invalid combinations and (b) can reuse parts of this patch. By having the white space treatment in its own option, we'll also make it easier for a later patch to have an config option for spaces in the move detection. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-17diff.c: add a blocks mode for moved code detectionLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+47
The new "blocks" mode provides a middle ground between plain and zebra. It is as intuitive (few colors) as plain, but still has the requirement for a minimum of lines/characters to count a block as moved. Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> (https://public-inbox.org/git/87o9j0uljo.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/) Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-17t4015: avoid git as a pipe inputLibravatar Stefan Beller1-30/+20
In t4015 we have a pattern of git diff [<options, related to color>] | grep -v "index" | test_decode_color >actual && to produce output that we want to test against. This pattern was introduced in 86b452e2769 (diff.c: add dimming to moved line detection, 2017-06-30) as then the focus on getting the colors right. However the pattern used is not best practice as we do care about the exit code of Git. So let's not have Git as the upstream of a pipe. Piping the output of grep to some function is fine as we assume grep to be un-flawed in our test suite. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-19Merge branch 'bw/submodule-config-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+17
Recent update to the submodule configuration code broke "diff-tree" by accidentally stopping to read from the index upfront. * bw/submodule-config-cleanup: diff-tree: read the index so attribute checks work in bare repositories
2017-12-06diff-tree: read the index so attribute checks work in bare repositoriesLibravatar Brandon Williams1-0/+17
A regression was introduced in 557a5998d (submodule: remove gitmodules_config, 2017-08-03) to how attribute processing was handled in bare repositories when running the diff-tree command. By default the attribute system will first try to read ".gitattribute" files from the working tree and then falls back to reading them from the index if there isn't a copy checked out in the worktree. Prior to 557a5998d the index was read as a side effect of the call to 'gitmodules_config()' which ensured that the index was already populated before entering the attribute subsystem. Since the call to 'gitmodules_config()' was removed the index is no longer being read so when the attribute system tries to read from the in-memory index it doesn't find any ".gitattribute" entries effectively ignoring any configured attributes. Fix this by explicitly reading the index during the setup of diff-tree. Reported-by: Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-27Merge branch 'jc/ignore-cr-at-eol'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+28
The "diff" family of commands learned to ignore differences in carriage return at the end of line. * jc/ignore-cr-at-eol: diff: --ignore-cr-at-eol xdiff: reassign xpparm_t.flags bits
2017-11-08diff: --ignore-cr-at-eolLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+28
A new option --ignore-cr-at-eol tells the diff machinery to treat a carriage-return at the end of a (complete) line as if it does not exist. Just like other "--ignore-*" options to ignore various kinds of whitespace differences, this will help reviewing the real changes you made without getting distracted by spurious CRLF<->LF conversion made by your editor program. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> [jch: squashed in command line completion by Dscho] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-21diff: fix whitespace-skipping with --color-movedLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+67
The code for handling whitespace with --color-moved represents partial strings as a pair of pointers. There are two possible conventions for the end pointer: 1. It points to the byte right after the end of the string. 2. It points to the final byte of the string. But we seem to use both conventions in the code: a. we assign the initial pointers from the NUL-terminated string using (1) b. we eat trailing whitespace by checking the second pointer for isspace(), which needs (2) c. the next_byte() function checks for end-of-string with "if (cp > endp)", which is (2) d. in next_byte() we skip past internal whitespace with "while (cp < end)", which is (1) This creates fewer bugs than you might think, because there are some subtle interactions. Because of (a) and (c), we always return the NUL-terminator from next_byte(). But all of the callers of next_byte() happen to handle that gracefully. Because of the mismatch between (d) and (c), next_byte() could accidentally return a whitespace character right at endp. But because of the interaction of (a) and (b), we fail to actually chomp trailing whitespace, meaning our endp _always_ points to a NUL, canceling out the problem. But that does leave (b) as a real bug: when ignoring whitespace only at the end-of-line, we don't correctly trim it, and fail to match up lines. We can fix the whole thing by moving consistently to one convention. Since convention (1) is idiomatic in our code base, we'll pick that one. The existing "-w" and "-b" tests continue to pass, and a new "--ignore-space-at-eol" shows off the breakage we're fixing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-21t4015: test the output of "diff --color-moved -b"Libravatar Jeff King1-9/+64
Commit fa5ba2c1dd (diff: fix infinite loop with --color-moved --ignore-space-change, 2017-10-12) added a test to make sure that "--color-moved -b" doesn't run forever, but the test in question doesn't actually have any moved lines in it. Let's scrap that test and add a variant of the existing "--color-moved -w" test, but this time we'll check that we find the move with whitespace changes, but not arbitrary whitespace additions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-21t4015: check "negative" case for "-w --color-moved"Libravatar Jeff King1-8/+18
We test that lines with whitespace changes are not found by "--color-moved" by default, but are found if "-w" is added. Let's add one more twist: a line that has non-whitespace changes should not be marked as a pure move. This is perhaps an obvious case for us to get right (and we do), but as we add more whitespace tests, they will form a pattern of "make sure this case is a move and this other case is not". Note that we have to add a line to our moved block, since having a too-small block doesn't trigger the "moved" heuristics. And we also add a line of context to ensure that there's more context lines than moved lines (so the diff shows us moving the lines up, rather than moving the context down). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-21t4015: refactor --color-moved whitespace testLibravatar Jeff King1-20/+29
In preparation for testing several different whitespace options, let's split out the setup and cleanup steps of the whitespace test. While we're here, let's also switch to using "<<-" to indent our here-documents properly, and use q_to_tab to more explicitly mark where we expect whitespace to appear. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-17Merge branch 'sb/diff-color-move'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
A recently added "--color-moved" feature of "diff" fell into infinite loop when ignoring whitespace changes, which has been fixed. * sb/diff-color-move: diff: fix infinite loop with --color-moved --ignore-space-change
2017-10-16diff: fix infinite loop with --color-moved --ignore-space-changeLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+9
The --color-moved code uses next_byte() to advance through the blob contents. When the user has asked to ignore whitespace changes, we try to collapse any whitespace change down to a single space. However, we enter the conditional block whenever we see the IGNORE_WHITESPACE_CHANGE flag, even if the next byte isn't whitespace. This means that the combination of "--color-moved and --ignore-space-change" was completely broken. Worse, because we return from next_byte() without having advanced our pointer, the function makes no forward progress in the buffer and loops infinitely. Fix this by entering the conditional only when we actually see whitespace. We can apply this also to the IGNORE_WHITESPACE change. That code path isn't buggy (because it falls through to returning the next non-whitespace byte), but it makes the logic more clear if we only bother to look at whitespace flags after seeing that the next byte is whitespace. Reported-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-11Merge branch 'sb/test-cmp-expect-actual'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Test tweak. * sb/test-cmp-expect-actual: tests: fix diff order arguments in test_cmp
2017-10-07tests: fix diff order arguments in test_cmpLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+2
Fix the argument order for test_cmp. When given the expected result first the diff shows the actual output with '+' and the expectation with '-', which is the convention for our tests. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-04Merge branch 'jk/ui-color-always-to-auto-maint' into jk/ui-color-always-to-autoLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-14/+14
* jk/ui-color-always-to-auto-maint: color: make "always" the same as "auto" in config provide --color option for all ref-filter users t3205: use --color instead of color.branch=always t3203: drop "always" color test t6006: drop "always" color config tests t7502: use diff.noprefix for --verbose test t7508: use test_terminal for color output t3701: use test-terminal to collect color output t4015: prefer --color to -c color.diff=always test-terminal: set TERM=vt100
2017-10-04t4015: use --color with --color-movedLibravatar Jeff King1-13/+12
The tests for --color-moved write their output to a file, but doing so suppresses color output under "auto". Right now this is solved by running the whole script under "color.diff=always". In preparation for the behavior of "always" changing, let's explicitly enable color. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-04t4015: prefer --color to -c color.diff=alwaysLibravatar Jeff King1-14/+14
t4015 contains many color-related tests which need to override the "is stdout a tty" check. They do so by setting the color.diff config, but we can accomplish the same with the --color option. Besides being shorter to type, switching will prepare us for upcoming changes to "always" when see it in config. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-16diff: define block by number of alphanumeric charsLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-69/+157
The existing behavior of diff --color-moved=zebra does not define the minimum size of a block at all, instead relying on a heuristic applied later to filter out sets of adjacent moved lines that are shorter than 3 lines long. This can be confusing, because a block could thus be colored as moved at the source but not at the destination (or vice versa), depending on its neighbors. Instead, teach diff that the minimum size of a block is 20 alphanumeric characters, the same heuristic used by "git blame". This allows diff to still exclude uninteresting lines appearing on their own (such as those solely consisting of one or a few closing braces), as was the intention of the adjacent-moved-line heuristic. This requires a change in some tests in that some of their lines are no longer considered to be part of a block, because they are too short. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-16diff: respect MIN_BLOCK_LENGTH for last blockLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-0/+37
Currently, MIN_BLOCK_LENGTH is only checked when diff encounters a line that does not belong to the current block. In particular, this means that MIN_BLOCK_LENGTH is not checked after all lines are encountered. Perform that check. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-30diff.c: add dimming to moved line detectionLibravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+124
Any lines inside a moved block of code are not interesting. Boundaries of blocks are only interesting if they are next to another block of moved code. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-30diff.c: color moved lines differently, plain modeLibravatar Stefan Beller1-1/+50
Add the 'plain' mode for move detection of code. This omits the checking for adjacent blocks, so it is not as useful. If you have a lot of the same blocks moved in the same patch, the 'Zebra' would end up slow as it is O(n^2) (n is number of same blocks). So this may be useful there and is generally easy to add. Instead be very literal at the move detection, do not skip over short blocks here. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-30diff.c: color moved lines differentlyLibravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+261
When a patch consists mostly of moving blocks of code around, it can be quite tedious to ensure that the blocks are moved verbatim, and not undesirably modified in the move. To that end, color blocks that are moved within the same patch differently. For example (OM, del, add, and NM are different colors): [OM] -void sensitive_stuff(void) [OM] -{ [OM] - if (!is_authorized_user()) [OM] - die("unauthorized"); [OM] - sensitive_stuff(spanning, [OM] - multiple, [OM] - lines); [OM] -} void another_function() { [del] - printf("foo"); [add] + printf("bar"); } [NM] +void sensitive_stuff(void) [NM] +{ [NM] + if (!is_authorized_user()) [NM] + die("unauthorized"); [NM] + sensitive_stuff(spanning, [NM] + multiple, [NM] + lines); [NM] +} However adjacent blocks may be problematic. For example, in this potentially malicious patch, the swapping of blocks can be spotted: [OM] -void sensitive_stuff(void) [OM] -{ [OMA] - if (!is_authorized_user()) [OMA] - die("unauthorized"); [OM] - sensitive_stuff(spanning, [OM] - multiple, [OM] - lines); [OMA] -} void another_function() { [del] - printf("foo"); [add] + printf("bar"); } [NM] +void sensitive_stuff(void) [NM] +{ [NMA] + sensitive_stuff(spanning, [NMA] + multiple, [NMA] + lines); [NM] + if (!is_authorized_user()) [NM] + die("unauthorized"); [NMA] +} If the moved code is larger, it is easier to hide some permutation in the code, which is why some alternative coloring is needed. This patch implements the first mode: * basic alternating 'Zebra' mode This conveys all information needed to the user. Defer customization to later patches. First I implemented an alternative design, which would try to fingerprint a line by its neighbors to detect if we are in a block or at the boundary. This idea iss error prone as it inspected each line and its neighboring lines to determine if the line was (a) moved and (b) if was deep inside a hunk by having matching neighboring lines. This is unreliable as the we can construct hunks which have equal neighbors that just exceed the number of lines inspected. (Think of 'AXYZBXYZCXYZD..' with each letter as a line, that is permutated to AXYZCXYZBXYZD..'). Instead this provides a dynamic programming greedy algorithm that finds the largest moved hunk and then has several modes on highlighting bounds. A note on the options '--submodule=diff' and '--color-words/--word-diff': In the conversion to use emit_line in the prior patches both submodules as well as word diff output carefully chose to call emit_line with sign=0. All output with sign=0 is ignored for move detection purposes in this patch, such that no weird looking output will be generated for these cases. This leads to another thought: We could pass on '--color-moved' to submodules such that they color up moved lines for themselves. If we'd do so only line moves within a repository boundary are marked up. It is useful to have moved lines colored, but there are annoying corner cases, such as a single line moved, that is very common. For example in a typical patch of C code, we have closing braces that end statement blocks or functions. While it is technically true that these lines are moved as they show up elsewhere, it is harmful for the review as the reviewers attention is drawn to such a minor side annoyance. For now let's have a simple solution of hardcoding the number of moved lines to be at least 3 before coloring them. Note, that the length is applied across all blocks to find the 'lonely' blocks that pollute new code, but do not interfere with a permutated block where each permutation has less lines than 3. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-04diff: introduce diff.wsErrorHighlight optionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+35
With the preparatory steps, it has become trivial to teach the system a new diff.wsErrorHighlight configuration that gives the default value for --ws-error-highlight command line option. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-04t4015: split out the "setup" part of ws-error-highlight testLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-18/+21
We'd want to run this same set of test twice, once with the option and another time with an equivalent configuration setting. Split out the step that prepares the test data and expected output and move the test for the command line option into a separate test. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-26diff.c: --ws-error-highlight=<kind> optionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+96
Traditionally, we only cared about whitespace breakages introduced in new lines. Some people want to paint whitespace breakages on old lines, too. When they see a whitespace breakage on a new line, they can spot the same kind of whitespace breakage on the corresponding old line and want to say "Ah, those breakages are there but they were inherited from the original, so let's not touch them for now." Introduce `--ws-error-highlight=<kind>` option, that lets them pass a comma separated list of `old`, `new`, and `context` to specify what lines to highlight whitespace errors on. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-26t4015: separate common setup and per-test expectationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+13
The last two tests in the script were to - set up color.diff.* slots - set up an expectation for a single test - run that test and check the result but split in a wrong way. It did the first two in the first test and the third one in the second test. The latter two belong to each other. This matters when you plan to add more of these tests that share the common coloring. While at it, make sure we use a color different from old, which is also red. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-26t4015: modernise styleLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-238/+173
Move the preparatory steps that create the expected output inside the test bodies, remove unnecessary blank lines before and after the test bodies, and drop SP between redirection operator and its target. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-04t4015: simplify sed command that is not even seen by sedLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
Noticed by Andreas Schwab; \<LF> inside a double quotes pair is eaten by the shell to become an empty string and is not doing anything. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-28Change sed i\ usage to something Solaris' sed can handleLibravatar Ben Walton1-2/+4
Solaris' sed was choking on the i\ commands used in t4015-diff-whitespace as it couldn't parse the program properly. Modify two uses of sed that worked in GNU sed but not Solaris' (/usr/bin or /usr/xpg4/bin) to an equivalent form that is handled properly by both. Signed-off-by: Ben Walton <bdwalton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-19diff: add --ignore-blank-lines optionLibravatar Antoine Pelisse1-0/+345
The goal of the patch is to introduce the GNU diff -B/--ignore-blank-lines as closely as possible. The short option is not available because it's already used for "break-rewrites". When this option is used, git-diff will not create hunks that simply add or remove empty lines, but will still show empty lines addition/suppression if they are close enough to "valuable" changes. There are two differences between this option and GNU diff -B option: - GNU diff doesn't have "--inter-hunk-context", so this must be handled - The following sequence looks like a bug (context is displayed twice): $ seq 5 >file1 $ cat <<EOF >file2 change 1 2 3 4 5 change EOF $ diff -u -B file1 file2 --- file1 2013-06-08 22:13:04.471517834 +0200 +++ file2 2013-06-08 22:13:23.275517855 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ +change 1 2 + 3 4 5 @@ -3,3 +5,4 @@ 3 4 5 +change So here is a more thorough description of the option: - real changes are interesting - blank lines that are close enough (less than context size) to interesting changes are considered interesting (recursive definition) - "context" lines are used around each hunk of interesting changes - If two hunks are separated by less than "inter-hunk-context", they will be merged into one. The implementation does the "interesting changes selection" in a single pass. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-06xdiff: print post-image for common records instead of pre-imageLibravatar René Scharfe1-7/+7
Normally it doesn't matter if we show the pre-image or th post-image for the common parts of a diff because they are the same. If white-space changes are ignored they can differ, though. The new text after applying the diff is more interesting in that case, so show that instead of the old contents. Note: GNU diff shows the pre-image. Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-01Make the tab width used for whitespace checks configurableLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+28
A new whitespace "rule" is added that sets the tab width to use for whitespace checks and fix-ups and replaces the hard-coded constant 8. Since the setting is part of the rules, it can be set per file using .gitattributes. The new configuration is backwards compatible because older git versions simply ignore unknown whitespace rules. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-24Merge branch 'en/and-cascade-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* en/and-cascade-tests: (25 commits) t4124 (apply --whitespace): use test_might_fail t3404: do not use 'describe' to implement test_cmp_rev t3404 (rebase -i): introduce helper to check position of HEAD t3404 (rebase -i): move comment to description t3404 (rebase -i): unroll test_commit loops t3301 (notes): use test_expect_code for clarity t1400 (update-ref): use test_must_fail t1502 (rev-parse --parseopt): test exit code from "-h" t6022 (renaming merge): chain test commands with && test-lib: introduce test_line_count to measure files tests: add missing &&, batch 2 tests: add missing && Introduce sane_unset and use it to ensure proper && chaining t7800 (difftool): add missing && t7601 (merge-pull-config): add missing && t7001 (mv): add missing && t6016 (rev-list-graph-simplify-history): add missing && t5602 (clone-remote-exec): add missing && t4026 (color): remove unneeded and unchained command t4019 (diff-wserror): add lots of missing && ... Conflicts: t/t7006-pager.sh
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-20diff: handle lines containing only whitespace and tabs betterLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+37
When a line contains nothing but whitespace with at least one tab and the core.whitespace config option contains blank-at-eol, the whitespace on the line is being printed twice, once unhighlighted (unless otherwise matched by one of the other core.whitespace values), and a second time highlighted for blank-at-eol. Update the leading indentation check to stop checking when it reaches the trailing whitespace. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-18Merge branch 'cc/maint-diff-CC-binary'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+37
* cc/maint-diff-CC-binary: diff: fix "git show -C -C" output when renaming a binary file Conflicts: diff.c
2010-06-06diff: fix "git show -C -C" output when renaming a binary fileLibravatar Christian Couder1-0/+37
A bug was introduced in 3e97c7c6af2901cec63bf35fcd43ae3472e24af8 (No diff -b/-w output for all-whitespace changes, Nov 19 2009) that made the lines: diff --git a/bar b/sub/bar similarity index 100% rename from bar rename to sub/bar disappear from "git show -C -C" output when file bar is a binary file. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-04whitespace: tests for git-diff --check with tab-in-indent error classLibravatar Chris Webb1-0/+42
[jc: with test fixes from J6t] Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20No diff -b/-w output for all-whitespace changesLibravatar Greg Bacon1-2/+12
Change git-diff's whitespace-ignoring modes to generate output only if a non-empty patch results, which git-apply rejects. Update the tests to look for the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Greg Bacon <gbacon@dbresearch.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-15Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-blank-at-eof' (early part) into ↵Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+9
jc/maint-blank-at-eof * 'jc/maint-1.6.0-blank-at-eof' (early part): diff --whitespace: fix blank lines at end core.whitespace: split trailing-space into blank-at-{eol,eof} diff --color: color blank-at-eof diff --whitespace=warn/error: fix blank-at-eof check diff --whitespace=warn/error: obey blank-at-eof diff.c: the builtin_diff() deals with only two-file comparison apply --whitespace: warn blank but not necessarily empty lines at EOF apply --whitespace=warn/error: diagnose blank at EOF apply.c: split check_whitespace() into two apply --whitespace=fix: detect new blank lines at eof correctly apply --whitespace=fix: fix handling of blank lines at the eof
2009-09-04diff --whitespace=warn/error: fix blank-at-eof checkLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
The "diff --check" logic used to share the same issue as the one fixed for "git apply" earlier in this series, in that a patch that adds new blank lines at end could appear as @@ -l,5 +m,7 @@$ _context$ _context$ -deleted$ +$ +$ +$ _$ _$ where _ stands for SP and $ shows a end-of-line. Instead of looking at each line in the patch in the callback, simply count the blank lines from the end in two versions, and notice the presence of new ones. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-04diff --whitespace=warn/error: obey blank-at-eofLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The "diff --check" code used to conflate trailing-space whitespace error class with this, but now we have a proper separate error class, we should check it under blank-at-eof, not trailing-space. The whitespace error is not about _having_ blank lines at end, but about adding _new_ blank lines. To keep the message consistent with what is given by "git apply", call whitespace_error_string() to generate it, instead of using a hardcoded custom message. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-21Merge branch 'kc/maint-diff-bwi-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
* kc/maint-diff-bwi-fix: Fix combined use of whitespace ignore options to diff
2009-01-19Fix combined use of whitespace ignore options to diffLibravatar Keith Cascio1-4/+4
The code used to misbehave when options to ignore certain whitespaces (-w -b and --ignore-at-eol) were combined. Signed-off-by: Keith Cascio <keith@cs.ucla.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-19test more combinations of ignore-whitespace options to diffLibravatar Keith Cascio1-0/+27
There are three flags involved (-w -b and --ignore-space-at-eol) which makes 8 combinations possible in total, but only 3 cases are tested (none, -w alone and -b alone). This adds the other 5 cases. Signed-off-by: Keith Cascio <keith@cs.ucla.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-17test more combinations of ignore-whitespace options to diffLibravatar Keith Cascio1-0/+27
There are three flags involved (-w -b and --ignore-space-at-eol) which makes 8 combinations possible in total, but only 3 cases are tested (none, -w alone and -b alone). This adds the other 5 cases. Signed-off-by: Keith Cascio <keith@cs.ucla.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>