summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3903-stash.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-03-26Merge branch 'tg/retire-scripted-stash'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
"git stash" has kept an escape hatch to use the scripted version for a few releases, which got stale. It has been removed. * tg/retire-scripted-stash: stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting stash: get git_stash_config at the top level
2020-03-05stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin settingLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+14
Remove the stash.useBuiltin setting which was added as an escape hatch to disable the builtin version of stash first released with Git 2.22. Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden, and has in fact become out of date failing a test since the 2.23 release, without anyone noticing until now. So users would be getting a hint to fall back to a potentially buggy version of the tool. We used to shell out to git config to get the useBuiltin configuration to avoid changing any global state before spawning legacy-stash. However that is no longer necessary, so just use the 'git_config' function to get the setting instead. Similar to what we've done in d03ebd411c ("rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting", 2019-03-18), where we remove the corresponding setting for rebase, we leave the documentation in place, so people can refer back to it when searching for it online, and so we can refer to it in the commit message. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19stash: eliminate crude option parsingLibravatar Alexandr Miloslavskiy1-0/+5
Eliminate crude option parsing and rely on real parsing instead, because 1) Crude parsing is crude, for example it's not capable of handling things like `git stash -m Message` 2) Adding options in two places is inconvenient and prone to bugs As a side result, the case of `git stash -m Message` gets fixed. Also give a good error message instead of just throwing usage at user. ---- Some review of what's been happening to this code: Before [1], `git-stash.sh` only verified that all args begin with `-` : # The default command is "push" if nothing but options are given seen_non_option= for opt do case "$opt" in --) break ;; -*) ;; *) seen_non_option=t; break ;; esac done Later, [1] introduced the duplicate code I'm now removing, also making the previous test more strict by white-listing options. ---- [1] Commit 40af1468 ("stash: convert `stash--helper.c` into `stash.c`" 2019-02-26) Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-01Merge branch 'tg/stash-refresh-index'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+6
Recent update to "git stash pop" made the command empty the index when run with the "--quiet" option, which has been corrected. * tg/stash-refresh-index: stash: make sure we have a valid index before writing it
2019-11-14stash: make sure we have a valid index before writing itLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-1/+6
In 'do_apply_stash()' we refresh the index in the end. Since 34933d0eff ("stash: make sure to write refreshed cache", 2019-09-11), we also write that refreshed index when --quiet is given to 'git stash apply'. However if '--index' is not given to 'git stash apply', we also discard the index in the else clause just before. We need to do so because we use an external 'git update-index --add --stdin', which leads to an out of date in-core index. Later we call 'refresh_and_write_cache', which now leads to writing the discarded index, which means we essentially write an empty index file. This is obviously not correct, or the behaviour the user wanted. We should not modify the users index without being asked to do so. Make sure to re-read the index after discarding the current in-core index, to avoid dealing with outdated information. Instead we could also drop the 'discard_cache()' + 'read_cache()', however that would make it easy to fall into the same trap as 34933d0eff did, so it's better to avoid that. We can also drop the 'refresh_and_write_cache' completely in the quiet case. Previously in legacy stash we relied on 'git status' to refresh the index after calling 'git read-tree' when '--index' was passed to 'git apply'. However the 'reset_tree()' call that replaced 'git read-tree' always passes options that are equivalent to '-m', making the refresh of the index unnecessary. Reported-by: Grzegorz Rajchman <rayman17@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Merge branch 'js/update-index-ignore-removal-for-skip-worktree'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
"git stash save" in a working tree that is sparsely checked out mistakenly removed paths that are outside the area of interest. * js/update-index-ignore-removal-for-skip-worktree: stash: handle staged changes in skip-worktree files correctly update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone
2019-11-02stash: handle staged changes in skip-worktree files correctlyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+11
When calling `git stash` while changes were staged for files that are marked with the `skip-worktree` bit (e.g. files that are excluded in a sparse checkout), the files are recorded as _deleted_ instead. The reason is that `git stash` tries to construct the tree reflecting the worktree essentially by copying the index to a temporary one and then updating the files from the worktree. Crucially, it calls `git diff-index` to update also those files that are in the HEAD but have been unstaged in the index. However, when the temporary index is updated via `git update-index --add --remove`, skip-worktree entries mark the files as deleted by mistake. Let's use the newly-introduced `--ignore-skip-worktree-entries` option of `git update-index` to prevent exactly this from happening. Note that the regression test case deliberately avoids replicating the scenario described above and instead tries to recreate just the symptom. Reported by Dan Thompson. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-07Merge branch 'tg/stash-refresh-index'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
"git stash" learned to write refreshed index back to disk. * tg/stash-refresh-index: stash: make sure to write refreshed cache merge: use refresh_and_write_cache factor out refresh_and_write_cache function
2019-09-20stash: make sure to write refreshed cacheLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+16
When converting stash into C, calls to 'git update-index --refresh' were replaced with the 'refresh_cache()' function. That is fine as long as the index is only needed in-core, and not re-read from disk. However in many cases we do actually need the refreshed index to be written to disk, for example 'merge_recursive_generic()' discards the in-core index before re-reading it from disk, and in the case of 'apply --quiet', the 'refresh_cache()' we currently have is pointless without writing the index to disk. Always write the index after refreshing it to ensure there are no regressions in this compared to the scripted stash. In the future we can consider avoiding the write where possible after making sure none of the subsequent calls actually need the refreshed cache, and it is not expected to be refreshed after stash exits or it is written somewhere else already. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-26t3903: abstract away SHA-1-specific constantsLibravatar brian m. carlson1-10/+22
Abstract away the SHA-1-specific constants by sanitizing diff output to remove the index lines, since it's clear from the assertions in question that we are not interested in the specific object IDs. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-25Merge branch 'tg/stash-keep-index-with-removed-paths'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
"git stash --keep-index" did not work correctly on paths that have been removed, which has been fixed. * tg/stash-keep-index-with-removed-paths: stash: fix handling removed files with --keep-index
2019-07-16stash: fix handling removed files with --keep-indexLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+7
git stash push --keep-index is supposed to keep all changes that have been added to the index, both in the index and on disk. Currently this doesn't behave correctly when a file is removed from the index. Instead of keeping it deleted on disk, --keep-index currently restores the file. Fix that behaviour by using 'git checkout' in no-overlay mode which can faithfully restore the index and working tree. This also simplifies the code. Note that this will overwrite untracked files if the untracked file has the same name as a file that has been deleted in the index. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19stash: fix show referencing stash indexLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+18
In the conversion of 'stash show' to C in dc7bd382b1 ("stash: convert show to builtin", 2019-02-25), 'git stash show <n>', where n is the index of a stash got broken, if n is not a file or a valid revision by itself. 'stash show' accepts any flag 'git diff' accepts for changing the output format. Internally we use 'setup_revisions()' to parse these command line flags. Currently we pass the whole argv through to 'setup_revisions()', which includes the stash index. As the stash index is not a valid revision or a file in the working tree in most cases however, this 'setup_revisions()' call (and thus the whole command) ends up failing if we use this form of 'git stash show'. Instead of passing the whole argv to 'setup_revisions()', only pass the flags (and the command name) through, while excluding the stash reference. The stash reference is parsed (and validated) in 'get_stash_info()' already. This separate parsing also means that we currently do produce the correct output if the command succeeds. Reported-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-21stash: setup default diff output format if necessaryLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+18
In the scripted 'git stash show' when no arguments are passed, we just pass '--stat' to 'git diff'. When any argument is passed to 'stash show', we no longer pass '--stat' to 'git diff', and pass whatever flags are passed directly through to 'git diff'. By default 'git diff' shows the patch output. So when a user uses 'git stash show --patience', they would be shown the diff as expected, using the patience algorithm. '--patience' in this case only changes the diff algorithm, but does not cause 'git diff' to show the diff by itself. The diff is shown because that's the default behaviour of 'git diff'. In the C version of 'git stash show', we try to emulate that behaviour using the internal diff API. However we forgot to set up the default output format, in case it wasn't set by any of the flags that were passed through. So 'git stash show --patience' in the builtin version of stash would be completely silent, while it would show the diff in the scripted version. The same thing would happen for other flags that only affect the way a patch is displayed, rather than switching to a different output format than the default one. Fix this by setting up the default output format for 'git diff'. Reported-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07stash: make push -q quietLibravatar Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu1-0/+23
There is a change in behaviour with this commit. When there was no initial commit, the shell version of stash would still display a message. This commit makes `push` to not display any message if `--quiet` or `-q` is specified. Add tests for `--quiet`. Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07stash: rename test cases to be more descriptiveLibravatar Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu1-7/+7
Rename some test cases' labels to be more descriptive and under 80 characters per line. Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07t3903: add test for --intent-to-add fileLibravatar Matthew Kraai1-0/+8
Add a test showing the 'git stash' behaviour with a file that has been added with 'git add --intent-to-add'. Stash fails to stash the file, so the purpose of this test is mainly to make sure git doesn't crash, but exits normally in this situation. This is in preparation for converting stash into a builtin. [tg: pulled the test out into a separate commit] Signed-off-by: Matthew Kraai <mkraai@its.jnj.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07t3903: modernize styleLibravatar Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu1-59/+61
Remove whitespaces after redirection operators and wrap long lines. Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07stash: improve option parsing test coverageLibravatar Joel Teichroeb1-0/+35
In preparation for converting the stash command incrementally to a builtin command, this patch improves test coverage of the option parsing. Both for having too many parameters, or too few. Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb <joel@teichroeb.net> Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-07ident: don't require calling prepare_fallback_ident firstLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+6
In fd5a58477c ("ident: add the ability to provide a "fallback identity"", 2019-02-25) I made it a requirement to call prepare_fallback_ident as the first function in the ident API. However in stash we didn't actually end up following that. This leads to a BUG if user.email and user.name are set. It was not caught in the test suite because we only rely on environment variables for setting the user name and email instead of the config. Instead of making it a bug to call other functions in the ident API first, just return silently if the identity of a user was already set up. Reported-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-19stash: tolerate missing user identityLibravatar Slavica Djukic1-0/+28
The "git stash" command insists on having a usable user identity to the same degree as the "git commit-tree" and "git commit" commands do, because it uses the same codepath that creates commit objects as these commands. It is not strictly necesary to do so. Check if we will barf before creating commit objects and then supply fake identity to please the machinery that creates commits. Add test to document that stash executes correctly both with and without valid ident. This is not that much of usability improvement, as the users who run "git stash" would eventually want to record their changes that are temporarily stored in the stashes in a more permanent history by committing, and they must do "git config user.{name,email}" at that point anyway, so arguably this change is only delaying a step that is necessary to work in the repository. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Slavica Djukic <slawica92@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed argumentsLibravatar Matthew DeVore1-4/+4
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it was easy to find with grep. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-22t3903-stash: don't try to grep non-existing fileLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
The test 'store updates stash ref and reflog' in 't3903-stash.sh' creates a stash from a new file, runs 'git reset --hard' to throw away any modifications to the work tree, and then runs '! grep' to ensure that the staged contents are gone. Since the file didn't exist before, it shouldn't exist after 'git reset' either. Consequently, this 'grep' doesn't fail as expected, because it can't find the staged content, but it fails because it can't open the file. Tighten this check by using 'test_path_is_missing' instead, thereby avoiding an unexpected error from 'grep' as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-23t: make many tests depend less on the refs being filesLibravatar David Turner1-1/+1
Many tests are very focused on the file system representation of the loose and packed refs code. As there are plans to implement other ref storage systems, let's migrate these tests to a form that test the intent of the refs storage system instead of it internals. This will make clear to readers that these tests do not depend on which ref backend is used. The internals of the loose refs backend are still tested in t1400-update-ref.sh, whereas the tests changed in this patch focus on testing other aspects. This patch just takes care of many low hanging fruits. It does not try to completely solves the issue. Helped-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-23Merge branch 'tg/stash-with-pathspec-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+32
"git stash -- <pathspec>" incorrectly blew away untracked files in the directory that matched the pathspec, which has been corrected. * tg/stash-with-pathspec-fix: stash: don't delete untracked files that match pathspec
2018-01-08stash: don't delete untracked files that match pathspecLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+32
Currently when 'git stash push -- <pathspec>' is used, untracked files that match the pathspec will be deleted, even though they do not end up in a stash anywhere. This is because the original commit introducing the pathspec feature in git stash push (df6bba0937 ("stash: teach 'push' (and 'create_stash') to honor pathspec", 2017-02-28)) used the sequence of 'git reset <pathspec> && git ls-files --modified <pathspec> | git checkout-index && git clean <pathspec>'. The intention was to emulate what 'git reset --hard -- <pathspec>' would do. The call to 'git clean' was supposed to clean up the files that were unstaged by 'git reset'. This would work fine if the pathspec doesn't match any files that were untracked before 'git stash push -- <pathspec>'. However if <pathspec> matches a file that was untracked before invoking the 'stash' command, all untracked files matching the pathspec would inadvertently be deleted as well, even though they wouldn't end up in the stash, and are therefore lost. This behaviour was never what was intended, only blobs that also end up in the stash should be reset to their state in HEAD, previously untracked files should be left alone. To achieve this, first match what's in the index and what's in the working tree by adding all changes to the index, ask diff-index what changed between HEAD and the current index, and then apply that patch in reverse to get rid of the changes, which includes removal of added files and resurrection of removed files. Reported-by: Reid Price <reid.price@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-06Merge branch 'ph/stash-save-m-option-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+93
In addition to "git stash -m message", the command learned to accept "git stash -mmessage" form. * ph/stash-save-m-option-fix: stash: learn to parse -m/--message like commit does
2017-11-24stash: learn to parse -m/--message like commit doesLibravatar Phil Hord1-0/+93
`git stash push -m foo` uses "foo" as the message for the stash. But `git stash push -m"foo"` does not parse successfully. Similarly `git stash push --message="My stash message"` also fails. The stash documentation doesn't suggest this syntax should work, but gitcli does and my fingers have learned this pattern long ago for `commit`. Teach `git stash` to parse -mFoo and --message=Foo the same as `git commit` would do. Even though it's an internal function, add similar support to create_stash() for consistency. Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-19stash: add a test for stashing in a detached stateLibravatar Joel Teichroeb1-0/+12
All that we are really testing here is that the message is correct when we are not on any branch. All other functionality is already tested elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb <joel@teichroeb.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-19stash: add a test for when apply fails during stash branchLibravatar Joel Teichroeb1-0/+14
If the return value of merge recursive is not checked, the stash could end up being dropped even though it was not applied properly Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb <joel@teichroeb.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-19stash: add a test for stash create with no filesLibravatar Joel Teichroeb1-0/+8
Ensure the command suceeds and outputs nothing Signed-off-by: Joel Teichroeb <joel@teichroeb.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-22Merge branch 'ps/stash-push-pathspec-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
"git stash push <pathspec>" did not work from a subdirectory at all. Bugfix for a topic in v2.13 * ps/stash-push-pathspec-fix: git-stash: fix pushing stash with pathspec from subdir
2017-06-13git-stash: fix pushing stash with pathspec from subdirLibravatar Patrick Steinhardt1-0/+16
The `git stash push` command recently gained the ability to get a pathspec as its argument to only stash matching files. Calling this command from a subdirectory does not work, though, as one of the first things we do is changing to the top level directory without keeping track of the prefix from which the command is being run. Fix the shortcoming by storing the prefix previous to the call to `cd_to_toplevel` and then subsequently using `git rev-parse --prefix` to correctly resolve the pathspec. Add a test to catch future breakage of this usecase. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-11tests: fix tests broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPleaseLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+2
The GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease compile-time testing option added in my bb946bba76 ("i18n: add GETTEXT_POISON to simulate unfriendly translator", 2011-02-22) has been slowly bitrotting as strings have been marked for translation, and new tests have been added without running it. I brought this up on the list ("[BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease", [1]) asking whether this mode was useful at all anymore. At least one person occasionally uses it, and Lars Schneider offered to change one of the the Travis builds to run in this mode, so fix up the failing ones. My test setup runs most of the tests, with the notable exception of skipping all the p4 tests, so it's possible that there's still some lurking regressions I haven't fixed. 1. <CACBZZX62+acvi1dpkknadTL827mtCm_QesGSZ=6+UnyeMpg8+Q@mail.gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-22stash: keep untracked files intact in stash -kLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+14
Currently when there are untracked changes in a file "one" and in a file "two" in the repository and the user uses: git stash push -k one all changes in "two" are wiped out completely. That is clearly not the intended result. Make sure that only the files given in the pathspec are changed when git stash push -k <pathspec> is used. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-22stash: don't show internal implementation detailsLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-1/+1
git stash push uses other git commands internally. Currently it only passes the -q flag to those if the -q flag is passed to git stash. when using 'git stash push -p -q --no-keep-index', it doesn't even pass the flag on to the internal reset at all. It really is enough for the user to know that the stash is created, without bothering them with the internal details of what's happening. Always pass the -q flag to the internal git clean and git reset commands, to avoid unnecessary and potentially confusing output. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-28stash: allow pathspecs in the no verb formLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+15
Now that stash_push is used in the no verb form of stash, allow specifying the command line for this form as well. Always use -- to disambiguate pathspecs from other non-option arguments. Also make git stash -p an alias for git stash push -p. This allows users to use git stash -p <pathspec>. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-28stash: use stash_push for no verb formLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-3/+1
Now that we have stash_push, which accepts pathspec arguments, use it instead of stash_save in git stash without any additional verbs. Previously we allowed git stash -- -message, which is no longer allowed after this patch. Messages starting with a hyphen was allowed since 3c2eb80f, ("stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options"). However it was never the intent to allow that, but rather it was allowed accidentally. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-28stash: teach 'push' (and 'create_stash') to honor pathspecLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+92
While working on a repository, it's often helpful to stash the changes of a single or multiple files, and leave others alone. Unfortunately git currently offers no such option. git stash -p can be used to work around this, but it's often impractical when there are a lot of changes over multiple files. Allow 'git stash push' to take pathspec to specify which paths to stash. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-19stash: add test for the create command line argumentsLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+18
Currently there is no test showing the expected behaviour of git stash create's command line arguments. Add a test for that to show the current expected behaviour and to make sure future refactorings don't break those expectations. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-19stash: introduce push verbLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+9
Introduce a new git stash push verb in addition to git stash save. The push verb is used to transition from the current command line arguments to a more conventional way, in which the message is given as an argument to the -m option. This allows us to have pathspecs at the end of the command line arguments like other Git commands do, so that the user can say which subset of paths to stash (and leave others behind). Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-17Merge branch 'jk/stash-disable-renames-internally' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
When diff.renames configuration is on (and with Git 2.9 and later, it is enabled by default, which made it worse), "git stash" misbehaved if a file is removed and another file with a very similar content is added. * jk/stash-disable-renames-internally: stash: prefer plumbing over git-diff
2016-12-06stash: prefer plumbing over git-diffLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+9
When creating a stash, we need to look at the diff between the working tree and HEAD, and do so using the git-diff porcelain. Because git-diff enables porcelain config like renames by default, this causes at least one problem. The --name-only format will not mention the source side of a rename, meaning we will fail to stash a deletion that is part of a rename. We could fix that case by passing --no-renames, but this is a symptom of a larger problem. We should be using the diff-index plumbing here, which does not have renames enabled by default, and also does not respect any potentially confusing config options. Reported-by: Matthew Patey <matthew.patey2167@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-26stash: allow stashes to be referenced by index onlyLibravatar Aaron M Watson1-0/+35
Instead of referencing "stash@{n}" explicitly, make it possible to simply reference as "n". Most users only reference stashes by their position in the stash stack (what I refer to as the "index" here). The syntax for the typical stash (stash@{n}) is slightly annoying and easy to forget, and sometimes difficult to escape properly in a script. Because of this the capability to do things with the stash by simply referencing the index is desirable. This patch includes the superior implementation provided by Øsse Walle (thanks for that), with a slight change to fix a broken test in the test suite. I also merged the test scripts as suggested by Jeff King, and un-wrapped the documentation as suggested by Junio Hamano. Signed-off-by: Aaron M Watson <watsona4@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-07-28tests: remove some direct access to .git/logsLibravatar David Turner1-1/+1
Alternate refs backends might store reflogs somewhere other than .git/logs. Change most test code that directly accesses .git/logs to instead use git reflog commands. There are still a few tests which need direct access to reflogs: to check reflog permissions, to manually create reflogs from scratch, to save/restore reflogs, to check the format of raw reflog data, and to remove not just reflog contents, but the reflogs themselves. All cases which don't need direct access have been modified. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-25Merge branch 'jk/stash-require-clean-index' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+0
A hotfix for the topic already in 'master'. * jk/stash-require-clean-index: Revert "stash: require a clean index to apply"
2015-06-16Merge branch 'jk/stash-options' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
Make "git stash something --help" error out, so that users can safely say "git stash drop --help". * jk/stash-options: stash: recognize "--help" for subcommands stash: complain about unknown flags
2015-06-15Revert "stash: require a clean index to apply"Libravatar Jeff King1-7/+0
This reverts commit ed178ef13a26136d86ff4e33bb7b1afb5033f908. That commit was an attempt to improve the safety of applying a stash, because the application process may create conflicted index entries, after which it is hard to restore the original index state. Unfortunately, this hurts some common workflows around "git stash -k", like: git add -p ;# (1) stage set of proposed changes git stash -k ;# (2) get rid of everything else make test ;# (3) make sure proposal is reasonable git stash apply ;# (4) restore original working tree If you "git commit" between steps (3) and (4), then this just works. However, if these steps are part of a pre-commit hook, you don't have that opportunity (you have to restore the original state regardless of whether the tests passed or failed). It's possible that we could provide better tools for this sort of workflow. In particular, even before ed178ef, it could fail with a conflict if there were conflicting hunks in the working tree and index (since the "stash -k" puts the index version into the working tree, and we then attempt to apply the differences between HEAD and the old working tree on top of that). But the fact remains that people have been using it happily for a while, and the safety provided by ed178ef is simply not that great. Let's revert it for now. In the long run, people can work on improving stash for this sort of workflow, but the safety tradeoff is not worth it in the meantime. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-20stash: complain about unknown flagsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+4
The option parser for git-stash stuffs unknown flags into the $FLAGS variable, where they can be accessed by the individual commands. However, most commands do not even look at these extra flags, leading to unexpected results like this: $ git stash drop --help Dropped refs/stash@{0} (e6cf6d80faf92bb7828f7b60c47fc61c03bd30a1) We should notice the extra flags and bail. Rather than annotate each command to reject a non-empty $FLAGS variable, we can notice that "stash show" is the only command that actually _wants_ arbitrary flags. So we switch the default mode to reject unknown flags, and let stash_show() opt into the feature. Reported-by: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-22stash: require a clean index to applyLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+7
If you have staged contents in your index and run "stash apply", we may hit a conflict and put new entries into the index. Recovering to your original state is difficult at that point, because tools like "git reset --keep" will blow away anything staged. We can make this safer by refusing to apply when there are staged changes. It's possible we could provide better tooling here, as "git stash apply" should be writing only conflicts to the index (so we know that any stage-0 entries are potentially precious). But it is the odd duck; most "mergy" commands will update the index for cleanly merged entries, and it is not worth updating our tooling to support this use case which is unlikely to be of interest (besides which, we would still need to block a dirty index for "stash apply --index", since that case _would_ be ambiguous). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>