summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3903-stash.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-06-16Fix typo: existant->existentLibravatar Dmitry Ivankov1-1/+1
refs.c had a error message "Trying to write ref with nonexistant object". And no tests relied on the wrong spelling. Also typo was present in some test scripts internals, these tests still pass. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ivankov <divanorama@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-27Merge branch 'dm/stash-k-i-p'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
* dm/stash-k-i-p: stash: ensure --no-keep-index and --patch can be used in any order stash: add two more tests for --no-keep-index
2011-04-27Merge branch 'jk/maint-stash-oob'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+11
* jk/maint-stash-oob: stash: fix false positive in the invalid ref test. stash: fix accidental apply of non-existent stashes Conflicts: t/t3903-stash.sh
2011-04-07stash: add two more tests for --no-keep-indexLibravatar Dan McGee1-0/+8
One of these passes just fine; the other one exposes a problem where command line flag order matters for --no-keep-index and --patch interaction. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-06stash: drop dirty worktree check on applyLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+16
Before we apply a stash, we make sure there are no changes in the worktree that are not in the index. This check dates back to the original git-stash.sh, and is presumably intended to prevent changes in the working tree from being accidentally lost during the merge. However, this check has two problems: 1. It is overly restrictive. If my stash changes only file "foo", but "bar" is dirty in the working tree, it will prevent us from applying the stash. 2. It is redundant. We don't touch the working tree at all until we actually call merge-recursive. But it has its own (much more accurate) checks to avoid losing working tree data, and will abort the merge with a nicer message telling us which paths were problems. So we can simply drop the check entirely. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-05stash: fix false positive in the invalid ref test.Libravatar Jon Seymour1-5/+5
Jeff King reported a problem with git stash apply incorrectly applying an invalid stash reference. There is an existing test that should have caught this, but the test itself was broken, resulting in a false positive. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-05stash: fix accidental apply of non-existent stashesLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+6
Once upon a time, "git rev-parse ref@{9999999}" did not generate an error. Therefore when we got an invalid stash reference in "stash apply", we could end up not noticing until quite late. Commit b0f0ecd (detached-stash: work around git rev-parse failure to detect bad log refs, 2010-08-21) handled this by checking for the "Log for stash has only %d entries" warning on stderr when we validated the ref. A few days later, e6eedc3 (rev-parse: exit with non-zero status if ref@{n} is not valid., 2010-08-24) fixed the original issue. That made the extra stderr test superfluous, but also introduced a new bug. Now the early call to: git rev-parse --symbolic "$@" fails, but we don't notice the exit code. Worse, its empty output means we think the user didn't provide us a ref, and we try to apply stash@{0}. This patch checks the rev-parse exit code and fails early in the revision parsing process. We can also get rid of the stderr test; as a bonus, this means that "stash apply" can now run under GIT_TRACE=1 properly. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-20Add test: git stash shows status relative to current dirLibravatar Piotr Krukowiecki1-0/+19
[jc: moved "cd subdir" inside subshell and fixed comparison with expected] Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+3
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29stash: fix git stash branch regression when branch creation failsLibravatar Jon Seymour1-1/+1
"git stash branch <branch> <stash>" started discarding the stash when the branch creation fails. It should have kept the stash intact when aborting. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29stash drops the stash even if creating the branch fails because it already ↵Libravatar Tomas Carnecky1-0/+11
exists This bug was disovered by someone on IRC when he tried to $ git stash branch <branch> <stash> while <branch> already existed. In that case the stash is dropped even though it isn't applied on any branch, so the stash is effectively lost. Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-26git-stash: fix flag parsingLibravatar Brian Gernhardt1-4/+4
Currently git-stash uses `git rev-parse --no-revs -- "$@"` to set its FLAGS variable. This is the same as `FLAGS="-- $@"`. It should use `git rev-parse --no-revs --flags "$@"`, but that eats any "-q" or "--quiet" argument. So move the check for quiet before rev-parse. Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-26t/t3903-stash: improve testing of git-stash showLibravatar Brandon Casey1-4/+58
Recently, the 'stash show' functionality was broken for the case when a stash-like argument was supplied. Since, commit 9bf09e, 'stash show' when supplied a stash-like argument prints nothing and still exists with a zero status. Unfortunately, the flaw slipped through the test suite cracks since the output of 'stash show' was not verified to be correct. Improve and expand on the existing tests so that this flaws is detected. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09tests: subshell indentation stylefixLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-2/+3
Format the subshells introduced by the previous patch (Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around, 2010-09-06) like so: ( cd subdir && ... ) && This is generally easier to read and has the nice side-effect that this patch will show what commands are used in the subshell, making it easier to check for lost environment variables and similar behavior changes. Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-06Merge branch 'jl/maint-fix-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* jl/maint-fix-test: Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around Conflicts: t/t9600-cvsimport.sh
2010-09-06Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of aroundLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-3/+3
Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell. Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.". Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-31t3903: fix broken test_must_fail callsLibravatar Jon Seymour1-18/+18
Some tests in detached-stash are calling test_must_fail in such a way that the arguments to test_must_fail do, indeed, fail but not in the manner expected by the test. This patch removes the unnecessary and unhelpful double quotes. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: tests of git stash with stash-like argumentsLibravatar Jon Seymour1-0/+112
Adds new tests which check that: * git stash branch handles a stash-like argument when there is a stash stack * git stash branch handles a stash-like argument when there is not a stash stack * git stash show handles a stash-like argument when there is a stash stack * git stash show handles a stash-like argument when there is not a stash stack * git stash drop fails early if the specified argument is not a stash reference * git stash pop fails early if the specified argument is not a stash reference * git stash * fails early if the reference supplied is bogus * git stash fails early with stash@{n} where n >= length of stash log Helped-by: Johannes Sixt Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-21Merge branch 'gv/portable'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* gv/portable: test-lib: use DIFF definition from GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS build: propagate $DIFF to scripts Makefile: Tru64 portability fix Makefile: HP-UX 10.20 portability fixes Makefile: HPUX11 portability fixes Makefile: SunOS 5.6 portability fix inline declaration does not work on AIX Allow disabling "inline" Some platforms lack socklen_t type Make NO_{INET_NTOP,INET_PTON} configured independently Makefile: some platforms do not have hstrerror anywhere git-compat-util.h: some platforms with mmap() lack MAP_FAILED definition test_cmp: do not use "diff -u" on platforms that lack one fixup: do not unconditionally disable "diff -u" tests: use "test_cmp", not "diff", when verifying the result Do not use "diff" found on PATH while building and installing enums: omit trailing comma for portability Makefile: -lpthread may still be necessary when libc has only pthread stubs Rewrite dynamic structure initializations to runtime assignment Makefile: pass CPPFLAGS through to fllow customization Conflicts: Makefile wt-status.h
2010-05-31tests: use "test_cmp", not "diff", when verifying the resultLibravatar Gary V. Vaughan1-1/+1
In tests, call test_cmp rather than raw diff where possible (i.e. if the output does not go to a pipe), to allow the use of, say, 'cmp' when the default 'diff -u' is not compatible with a vendor diff. When that is not possible, use $DIFF, as set in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS. Signed-off-by: Gary V. Vaughan <gary@thewrittenword.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-20stash tests: stash can lose data in a file removed from the indexLibravatar Charles Bailey1-0/+150
If a file is removed from the index and then modified in the working tree then stash will discard the working tree file with no way to recover the changes. This can might be done in one of a number of ways. git rm file vi file # edit a new version git stash or with git mv git mv file newfile vi file # make a new file with the old name git stash Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
2010-02-15stash pop: remove 'apply' options during 'drop' invocationLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+9
The 'git stash pop' option parsing used to remove the first argument in --index mode. At the time this was implemented, this first argument was always --index. However, since the invention of the -q option in fcdd0e9 (stash: teach quiet option, 2009-06-17) you can cause an internal invocation of git stash drop --index by running git stash pop -q --index which then of course fails because drop doesn't know --index. To handle this, instead let 'git stash apply' decide what the future argument to 'drop' should be. Warning: this means that 'git stash apply' must parse all options that 'drop' can take, and deal with them in the same way. This is currently true for its only option -q. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-01stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown optionsLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+11
With the earlier DWIM patches, certain combination of options defaulted to the "save" command correctly while certain equally valid combination did not. For example, "git stash -k" were Ok but "git stash -q -k" did not work. This makes the logic of defaulting to "save" much simpler. If there are no non-flag arguments, it is clear that there is no command word, and we default to "save" subcommand. This rule prevents "git stash -q apply" from quietly creating a stash with "apply" as the message. This also teaches "git stash save" to reject an unknown option. This is to keep a mistyped "git stash save --quite" from creating a stash with a message "--quite", and this safety is more important with the new logic to default to "save" with any option-looking argument without an explicit comand word. [jc: this is based on Matthieu's 3-patch series, and a follow-up discussion, and he and Peff take all the credit; if I have introduced bugs while reworking, they are mine.] Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-31Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+8
To save me from the carpal tunnel syndrome, make 'git stash' accept the short option '-k' instead of '--keep-index', and for even more convenience, let's DWIM when this developer forgot to type the 'save' command. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-18stash: teach quiet optionLibravatar Stephen Boyd1-0/+23
Teach stash pop, apply, save, and drop to be quiet when told. By using the quiet option (-q), these actions will be silent unless errors are encountered. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-03tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599)Libravatar Nanako Shiraishi1-1/+1
Converts tests between t0050-t3903. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-06Add a test for "git stash branch"Libravatar Abhijit Menon-Sen1-0/+60
Make sure that applying the stash to a new branch after a conflicting change doesn't result in an error when you try to commit. Signed-off-by: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-14fix whitespace violations in test scriptsLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
These violations are simply wrong, but were never caught because whitespace policy checking is turned off in the test scripts. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-13add test_cmp function for test scriptsLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Many scripts compare actual and expected output using "diff -u". This is nicer than "cmp" because the output shows how the two differ. However, not all versions of diff understand -u, leading to unnecessary test failure. This adds a test_cmp function to the test scripts and switches all "diff -u" invocations to use it. The function uses the contents of "$GIT_TEST_CMP" to compare its arguments; the default is "diff -u". On systems with a less-capable diff, you can do: GIT_TEST_CMP=cmp make test Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-03t3903-stash.sh: Add tests for new stash commands drop and popLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+45
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-03t3903-stash.sh: Add missing '&&' to body of testcaseLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-25Make sure git-stash works from subdirectory.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
We say "SUBDIRECTORY_OK" but we did not chdir to toplevel; this is fine as long as everything we use can be started from a subdirectory, but unfortunately "merge-recursive" is not one of the programs you can safely use from a subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-06Teach git-stash to "apply --index"Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+69
When given this subcommand, git-stash will try to merge the stashed index into the current one. Only trivial merges are possible, since we have no index for the index ;-) If a trivial merge is not possible, git-stash will bail out with a hint to skip the --index option. For good measure, finally include a test case. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>