summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-07-24Merge branch 'jc/t3404-one-shot-export-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+8
Correct a broken use of "VAR=VAL shell_func" in a test. * jc/t3404-one-shot-export-fix: t3404: fix use of "VAR=VAL cmd" with a shell function
2018-07-24Merge branch 'en/rebase-consistency'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+4
"git rebase" behaved slightly differently depending on which one of the three backends gets used; this has been documented and an effort to make them more uniform has begun. * en/rebase-consistency: git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the default t3401: add directory rename testcases for rebase and am git-rebase.txt: document behavioral differences between modes directory-rename-detection.txt: technical docs on abilities and limitations git-rebase.txt: address confusion between --no-ff vs --force-rebase git-rebase: error out when incompatible options passed t3422: new testcases for checking when incompatible options passed git-rebase.sh: update help messages a bit git-rebase.txt: document incompatible options
2018-07-12t3404: fix use of "VAR=VAL cmd" with a shell functionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+8
Bash may take it happily but running test with dash reveals a breakage. This was not discovered for a long time as no tests after this test depended on GIT_AUTHOR_NAME to be reverted correctly back to the original value after this step is done. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-27git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the defaultLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+4
rebase backends currently behave differently with empty commit messages, largely as a side-effect of the different underlying commands on which they are based. am-based rebases apply commits with an empty commit message without stopping or requiring the user to specify an extra flag. (It is interesting to note that am-based rebases are the default rebase type, and no one has ever requested a --no-allow-empty-message flag to change this behavior.) merge-based and interactive-based rebases (which are ultimately based on git-commit), will currently halt on any such commits and require the user to manually specify what to do with the commit and continue. One possible rationale for the difference in behavior is that the purpose of an "am" based rebase is solely to transplant an existing history, while an "interactive" rebase is one whose purpose is to polish a series before making it publishable. Thus, stopping and asking for confirmation for a possible problem is more appropriate in the latter case. However, there are two problems with this rationale: 1) merge-based rebases are also non-interactive and there are multiple types of rebases that use the interactive machinery but are not explicitly interactive (e.g. when either --rebase-merges or --keep-empty are specified without --interactive). These rebases are also used solely to transplant an existing history, and thus also should default to --allow-empty-message. 2) this rationale only says that the user is more accepting of stopping in the case of an explicitly interactive rebase, not that stopping for this particular reason actually makes sense. Exploring whether it makes sense, requires backing up and analyzing the underlying commands... If git-commit did not error out on empty commits by default, accidental creation of commits with empty messages would be a very common occurrence (this check has caught me many times). Further, nearly all such empty commit messages would be considered an accidental error (as evidenced by a huge amount of documentation across version control systems and in various blog posts explaining how important commit messages are). A simple check for what would otherwise be a common error thus made a lot of sense, and git-commit gained an --allow-empty-message flag for special case overrides. This has made commits with empty messages very rare. There are two sources for commits with empty messages for rebase (and cherry-pick): (a) commits created in git where the user previously specified --allow-empty-message to git-commit, and (b) commits imported into git from other version control systems. In case (a), the user has already explicitly specified that there is something special about this commit that makes them not want to specify a commit message; forcing them to re-specify with every cherry-pick or rebase seems more likely to be infuriating than helpful. In case (b), the commit is highly unlikely to have been authored by the person who has imported the history and is doing the rebase or cherry-pick, and thus the user is unlikely to be the appropriate person to write a commit message for it. Stopping and expecting the user to modify the commit before proceeding thus seems counter-productive. Further, note that while empty commit messages was a common error case for git-commit to deal with, it is a rare case for rebase (or cherry-pick). The fact that it is rare raises the question of why it would be worth checking and stopping on this particular condition and not others. For example, why doesn't an interactive rebase automatically stop if the commit message's first line is 2000 columns long, or is missing a blank line after the first line, or has every line indented with five spaces, or any number of other myriad problems? Finally, note that if a user doing an interactive rebase does have the necessary knowledge to add a message for any such commit and wants to do so, it is rather simple for them to change the appropriate line from 'pick' to 'reword'. The fact that the subject is empty in the todo list that the user edits should even serve as a way to notify them. As far as I can tell, the fact that merge-based and interactive-based rebases stop on commits with empty commit messages is solely a by-product of having been based on git-commit. It went without notice for a long time precisely because such cases are rare. The rareness of this situation made it difficult to reason about, so when folks did eventually notice this behavior, they assumed it was there for a good reason and just added an --allow-empty-message flag. In my opinion, stopping on such messages not desirable in any of these cases, even the (explicitly) interactive case. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-19sequencer: do not squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflictsLibravatar Phillip Wood1-0/+28
Ever since commit 18633e1a22 ("rebase -i: use the rebase--helper builtin", 2017-02-09), when a commit marked as 'reword' in an interactive rebase has conflicts and fails to apply, when the rebase is resumed that commit will be squashed into its parent with its commit message taken. The issue can be understood better by looking at commit 56dc3ab04b ("sequencer (rebase -i): implement the 'edit' command", 2017-01-02), which introduced error_with_patch() for the edit command. For the edit command, it needs to stop the rebase whether or not the patch applies cleanly. If the patch does apply cleanly, then when it resumes it knows it needs to amend all changes into the previous commit. If it does not apply cleanly, then the changes should not be amended. Thus, it passes !res (success of applying the 'edit' commit) to error_with_patch() for the to_amend flag. The problematic line of code actually came from commit 04efc8b57c ("sequencer (rebase -i): implement the 'reword' command", 2017-01-02). Note that to get to this point in the code: * !!res (i.e. patch application failed) * item->command < TODO_SQUASH * item->command != TODO_EDIT * !is_fixup(item->command) [i.e. not squash or fixup] So that means this can only be a failed patch application that is either a pick, revert, or reword. We only need to amend HEAD when rewording the root commit or a commit that has been fast-forwarded, for any of the other cases we want a new commit, so we should not set the to_amend flag. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Original-patch-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-19t3404: check root commit in 'rebase -i --root reword root commit'Libravatar Todd Zullinger1-1/+2
When testing a reworded root commit, ensure that the squash-onto commit which is created and amended is still the root commit. Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18rebase --root: fix amending root commit messagesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
The code path that triggered that "BUG" really does not want to run without an explicit commit message. In the case where we want to amend a commit message, we have an *implicit* commit message, though: the one of the commit to amend. Therefore, this code path should not even be entered. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-06-18rebase --root: demonstrate a bug while amending root commit messagesLibravatar Todd Zullinger1-0/+9
When splitting a repository, running `git rebase -i --root` to reword the initial commit, Git dies with BUG: sequencer.c:795: root commit without message. Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-06rebase -i --root: let the sequencer handle even the initial partLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-6/+13
In this developer's earlier attempt to accelerate interactive rebases by converting large parts from Unix shell script into portable, performant C, the --root handling was specifically excluded (to simplify the task a little bit; it still took over a year to get that reduced set of patches into Git proper). This patch ties up that loose end: now only --preserve-merges uses the slow Unix shell script implementation to perform the interactive rebase. As the rebase--helper reports progress to stderr (unlike the scripted interactive rebase, which reports it to stdout, of all places), we have to adjust a couple of tests that did not expect that for `git rebase -i --root`. This patch fixes -- at long last! -- the really old bug reported in 6a6bc5bdc4d (add tests for rebasing root, 2013-06-06) that rebasing with --root *always* rewrote the root commit, even if there were no changes. The bug still persists in --preserve-merges mode, of course, but that mode will be deprecated as soon as the new --rebase-merges mode stabilizes, anyway. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-25Merge branch 'ps/test-chmtime-get'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Test cleanup. * ps/test-chmtime-get: t/helper: 'test-chmtime (--get|-g)' to print only the mtime
2018-04-11Merge branch 'nd/combined-test-helper'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Small test-helper programs have been consolidated into a single binary. * nd/combined-test-helper: (36 commits) t/helper: merge test-write-cache into test-tool t/helper: merge test-wildmatch into test-tool t/helper: merge test-urlmatch-normalization into test-tool t/helper: merge test-subprocess into test-tool t/helper: merge test-submodule-config into test-tool t/helper: merge test-string-list into test-tool t/helper: merge test-strcmp-offset into test-tool t/helper: merge test-sigchain into test-tool t/helper: merge test-sha1-array into test-tool t/helper: merge test-scrap-cache-tree into test-tool t/helper: merge test-run-command into test-tool t/helper: merge test-revision-walking into test-tool t/helper: merge test-regex into test-tool t/helper: merge test-ref-store into test-tool t/helper: merge test-read-cache into test-tool t/helper: merge test-prio-queue into test-tool t/helper: merge test-path-utils into test-tool t/helper: merge test-online-cpus into test-tool t/helper: merge test-mktemp into test-tool t/helper: merge (unused) test-mergesort into test-tool ...
2018-04-10Merge branch 'ps/contains-id-error-message'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+2
"git tag --contains no-such-commit" gave a full list of options after giving an error message. * ps/contains-id-error-message: parse-options: do not show usage upon invalid option value
2018-04-09t/helper: 'test-chmtime (--get|-g)' to print only the mtimeLibravatar Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu1-1/+1
Compared to 'test-chmtime -v +0 file' which prints the mtime and and the file name, 'test-chmtime --get file' displays only the mtime. If it is used in combination with (+|=|=+|=-|-)seconds, it changes and prints the new value. test-chmtime -v +0 file | sed 's/[^0-9].*$//' is now equivalent to: test-chmtime --get file Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-27t/helper: merge test-chmtime into test-toolLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-22parse-options: do not show usage upon invalid option valueLibravatar Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu1-4/+2
Usually, the usage should be shown only if the user does not know what options are available. If the user specifies an invalid value, the user is already aware of the available options. In this case, there is no point in displaying the usage anymore. This patch applies to "git tag --contains", "git branch --contains", "git branch --points-at", "git for-each-ref --contains" and many more. Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-06Merge branch 'nd/rebase-show-current-patch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
The new "--show-current-patch" option gives an end-user facing way to get the diff being applied when "git rebase" (and "git am") stops with a conflict. * nd/rebase-show-current-patch: rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEAD rebase: add --show-current-patch am: add --show-current-patch
2018-02-13Merge branch 'pw/sequencer-in-process-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
The sequencer infrastructure is shared across "git cherry-pick", "git rebase -i", etc., and has always spawned "git commit" when it needs to create a commit. It has been taught to do so internally, when able, by reusing the codepath "git commit" itself uses, which gives performance boost for a few tens of percents in some sample scenarios. * pw/sequencer-in-process-commit: sequencer: run 'prepare-commit-msg' hook t7505: add tests for cherry-pick and rebase -i/-p t7505: style fixes sequencer: assign only free()able strings to gpg_sign sequencer: improve config handling t3512/t3513: remove KNOWN_FAILURE_CHERRY_PICK_SEES_EMPTY_COMMIT=1 sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git commit' sequencer: load commit related config sequencer: simplify adding Signed-off-by: trailer commit: move print_commit_summary() to libgit commit: move post-rewrite code to libgit Add a function to update HEAD after creating a commit commit: move empty message checks to libgit t3404: check intermediate squash messages
2018-02-12rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEADLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+4
The new command `git rebase --show-current-patch` is useful for seeing the commit related to the current rebase state. Some however may find the "git show" command behind it too limiting. You may want to increase context lines, do a diff that ignores whitespaces... For these advanced use cases, the user can execute any command they want with the new pseudo ref REBASE_HEAD. This also helps show where the stopped commit is from, which is hard to see from the previous patch which implements --show-current-patch. Helped-by: Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12rebase: add --show-current-patchLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+5
It is useful to see the full patch while resolving conflicts in a rebase. The only way to do it now is less .git/rebase-*/patch which could turn out to be a lot longer to type if you are in a linked worktree, or not at top-dir. On top of that, an ordinary user should not need to peek into .git directory. The new option is provided to examine the patch. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-22sequencer: assign only free()able strings to gpg_signLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+10
The gpg_sign member of the replay_opts structure is of type `char *`, meaning that the sequencer deems the string to which gpg_sign points to be under its custody, i.e. it needs to be free()d by the sequencer. Therefore, let's only assign malloc()ed buffers to it. Reported-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-05t3404: add test case for abbreviated commandsLibravatar Liam Beguin1-0/+22
Make sure the todo list ends up using single-letter command abbreviations when the rebase.abbreviateCommands is enabled. This configuration option should not change anything else. Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-11t3404: check intermediate squash messagesLibravatar Phillip Wood1-0/+4
When there is more than one squash/fixup command in a row check the intermediate messages are correct. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-06Merge branch 'jk/rebase-i-exec-gitdir-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
A recent regression in "git rebase -i" that broke execution of git commands from subdirectories via "exec" insn has been fixed. * jk/rebase-i-exec-gitdir-fix: sequencer: pass absolute GIT_DIR to exec commands
2017-11-02sequencer: pass absolute GIT_DIR to exec commandsLibravatar Jacob Keller1-0/+11
When we replaced the old shell script based interactive rebase in commmit 18633e1a22a6 ("rebase -i: use the rebase--helper builtin", 2017-02-09) we introduced a regression of functionality in that the GIT_DIR would be sent to the environment of the exec command as-is. This generally meant that it would be passed as "GIT_DIR=.git", which causes problems for any exec command that wants to run git commands in a subdirectory. This isn't a very large regression, since it is not that likely that the exec command will run a git command, and even less likely that it will need to do so in a subdir. This regression was discovered by a build system which uses git-describe to find the current version of the build system, and happened to do so from the src/ sub directory of the project. Fix this by passing in the absolute path of the git directory into the child environment. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-27t3404: relax rebase.missingCommitsCheck testsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-18/+4
These tests were a bit anal about the *exact* warning/error message printed by git rebase. But those messages are intended for the *end user*, therefore it does not make sense to test so rigidly for the *exact* wording. In the following, we will reimplement the missing commits check in the sequencer, with slightly different words. So let's just test for the parts in the warning/error message that we *really* care about, nothing more, nothing less. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-30Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-regression-fix-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
Fix a recent regression to "git rebase -i" and add tests that would have caught it and others. * pw/rebase-i-regression-fix-tests: t3420: fix under GETTEXT_POISON build rebase: add more regression tests for console output rebase: add regression tests for console output rebase -i: add test for reflog message sequencer: print autostash messages to stderr
2017-06-19rebase -i: add test for reflog messageLibravatar Phillip Wood1-0/+7
Check that the reflog message written to the branch reflog when the rebase is completed is correct Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-11tests: fix tests broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPleaseLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-7/+7
The GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease compile-time testing option added in my bb946bba76 ("i18n: add GETTEXT_POISON to simulate unfriendly translator", 2011-02-22) has been slowly bitrotting as strings have been marked for translation, and new tests have been added without running it. I brought this up on the list ("[BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease", [1]) asking whether this mode was useful at all anymore. At least one person occasionally uses it, and Lars Schneider offered to change one of the the Travis builds to run in this mode, so fix up the failing ones. My test setup runs most of the tests, with the notable exception of skipping all the p4 tests, so it's possible that there's still some lurking regressions I haven't fixed. 1. <CACBZZX62+acvi1dpkknadTL827mtCm_QesGSZ=6+UnyeMpg8+Q@mail.gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-09rebase -i: use the rebase--helper builtinLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
Now that the sequencer learned to process a "normal" interactive rebase, we use it. The original shell script is still used for "non-normal" interactive rebases, i.e. when --root or --preserve-merges was passed. Please note that the --root option (via the $squash_onto variable) needs special handling only for the very first command, hence it is still okay to use the helper upon continue/skip. Also please note that the --no-ff setting is volatile, i.e. when the interactive rebase is interrupted at any stage, there is no record of it. Therefore, we have to pass it from the shell script to the rebase--helper. Note: the test t3404 had to be adjusted because the the error messages produced by the sequencer comply with our current convention to start with a lower-case letter. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-17sequencer: update reading author-scriptLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+16
Rather than abusing a strbuf to come up with an environment block, let's just use the argv_array structure which serves the same purpose much better. While at it, rename the function to reflect the fact that it does not really care exactly what environment variables are defined in said file. Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-11-23Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-commentchar-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
"git rebase -i" did not work well with core.commentchar configuration variable for two reasons, both of which have been fixed. * js/rebase-i-commentchar-fix: rebase -i: handle core.commentChar=auto stripspace: respect repository config rebase -i: highlight problems with core.commentchar
2016-11-21rebase -i: handle core.commentChar=autoLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When 84c9dc2 (commit: allow core.commentChar=auto for character auto selection, 2014-05-17) extended the core.commentChar functionality to allow for the value 'auto', it forgot that rebase -i was already taught to handle core.commentChar, and in turn forgot to let rebase -i handle that new value gracefully. Reported by Taufiq Hoven. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-11-21rebase -i: highlight problems with core.commentcharLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+11
The interactive rebase does not currently play well with core.commentchar. Let's add some tests to highlight those problems that will be fixed in the remainder of the series. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-07rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction linesLibravatar Ralf Thielow1-3/+3
If we found bad instruction lines in the instruction sheet of interactive rebase, we give the user advice on how to fix it. However, we don't tell the user what to do afterwards. Give the user advice to run 'git rebase --continue' after the fix. Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-12t3404: become resilient to GETTEXT_POISONLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-1/+1
The concerned test greps the output of exit_with_patch() in git-rebase--interactive.sh script. Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-28Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
A few tests that specifically target "git rebase -i" have been added. * js/rebase-i-tests: rebase -i: we allow extra spaces after fixup!/squash! rebase -i: demonstrate a bug with --autosquash t3404: add a test for the --gpg-sign option
2016-07-13Merge branch 'js/t3404-grammo-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Grammofix. * js/t3404-grammo-fix: t3404: fix a grammo (commands are ran -> commands are run)
2016-07-07t3404: add a test for the --gpg-sign optionLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+8
For the upcoming rebase--helper work (which will accelerate the interactive rebase noticably), it is important to verify that the --gpg-sign option is handled properly. Please note that this patch does this on the cheap, by verifying that the expected option is printed in the message of the 'edit' operation. We really should test that the interactive rebase signs the commits properly, iff GPG is available. This test is left for later. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-29t3404: fix a grammo (commands are ran -> commands are run)Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17tests: unpack-trees: update to use test_i18n* functionsLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-2/+2
Use functions test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep to successfully pass tests running under GETTEXT_POISON. The output strings compared to in these test were marked for translation in ed47fdf ("i18n: unpack-trees: mark strings for translation", 2016-04-09) and later improved in 2e3926b ("i18n: unpack-trees: avoid substituting only a verb in sentences", 2016-05-12). Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17i18n: rebase-interactive: mark here-doc strings for translationLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-7/+7
Use pipe to send gettext output to git stripspace instead of the original method of using shell here-document, because command substitution '$(...)' would not take place inside the here-documents. The exception is the case of the last here-document redirecting to cat, in which commands substitution works and, thus, is preserved in this commit. t3404: adapt test to the strings newly marked for translation Test t3404-rebase-interactive.sh would fail under GETTEXT_POISON unless using test_i18ngrep. Add eval_ngettext fallback functions to be called when running, for instance, under GETTEXT_POISON. Otherwise, tests would fail under GETTEXT_POISON, or other build that doesn't support the GNU gettext, because that function could not be found. Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-10t3404: fix typoLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-22Merge branch 'jk/use-write-script-more'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+3
Code clean-up. * jk/use-write-script-more: t3404: use write_script t1020: do not overuse printf and use write_script t5532: use write_script
2016-04-12t3404: use write_scriptLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+3
The test uses hardcoded #!/bin/sh to create a pre-commit hook script. Because the generated script uses $(command substitution), which is not supported by /bin/sh on some platforms (e.g. Solaris), the resulting pre-commit always fails. Which is not noticeable as the test that uses the hook is about checking the behaviour of the command when the hook fails ;-), but nevertheless it is not testing what we wanted to test. Use write_script so that the resulting script is run under the same shell our scripted Porcelain commands are run, which must support the necessary $(construct). Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-18t3404: cleanup double empty lines between testsLibravatar Stefan Beller1-6/+0
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-18rebase: decouple --exec from --interactiveLibravatar Stefan Beller1-7/+6
In the later steps of preparing a patch series I do not want to edit or reorder the patches any more, but just make sure the test suite passes after each patch and also to fix breakage right there if some of the steps fail. I could run EDITOR=true git rebase -i <anchor> -x "make test" but it would be simpler if it can be spelled like so: git rebase <anchor> -x "make test" Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-11rebase -i: remember merge options beyond continue actionsLibravatar Fabian Ruch1-0/+16
If the user explicitly specified a merge strategy or strategy options, continue to use that strategy/option after "rebase --continue". Add a test of the corrected behavior. If --merge is specified or implied by -s or -X, then "strategy and "strategy_opts" are set to values from which "strategy_args" can be derived; otherwise they are set to empty strings. Either way, their values are propagated from one step of an interactive rebase to the next via state files. "do_merge", on the other hand, is *not* propagated to later steps of an interactive rebase. Therefore, making the initialization of "strategy_args" conditional on "do_merge" being set prevents later steps of an interactive rebase from setting it correctly. Luckily, we don't need the "do_merge" guard at all. If the rebase was started without --merge, then "strategy" and "strategy_opts" are both the empty string, which results in "strategy_args" also being set to the empty string, which is just what we want in that situation. So remove the "do_merge" guard and derive "strategy_args" from "strategy" and "strategy_opts" every time. Reported-by: Diogo de Campos <campos@esss.com.br> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch <bafain@gmail.com> Helped-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-11Merge branch 'cb/t3404-shellquote' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* cb/t3404-shellquote: t3404: fix quoting of redirect for some versions of bash
2015-12-04t3404: fix quoting of redirect for some versions of bashLibravatar Charles Bailey1-1/+1
As CodingGuidelines says, some versions of bash errors out when $variable substitution is used as the target for redirection without being quoted (even though POSIX may not require such a quote). Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-03Merge branch 'gr/rebase-i-drop-warn' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Recent update to "rebase -i" that tries to sanity check the edited insn sheet before it uses it has become too picky on Windows where CRLF left by the editor is turned into a trailing CR on the line read via the "read" built-in command. * gr/rebase-i-drop-warn: rebase-i: work around Windows CRLF line endings t3404: "rebase -i" gets broken when insn sheet uses CR/LF line endings