| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Now that we can override the default branch name in the tests via
`GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME`, we should avoid expecting a
particular hard-coded name.
So let's rename the initial branch immediately to `primary` and work
with that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
After rebasing, ORIG_HEAD is supposed to point to the old HEAD of the
rebased branch. The code used find_unique_abbrev() to obtain the
object name of the old HEAD and wrote to both
.git/rebase-merge/orig-head (used by `rebase --abort` to go back to
the previous state) and to ORIG_HEAD. The buffer find_unique_abbrev()
gives back is volatile, unfortunately, and was overwritten after the
former file is written but before ORIG_FILE is written, leaving an
incorrect object name in it.
Avoid relying on the volatile buffer of find_unique_abbrev(), and
instead supply our own buffer to keep the object name.
I think that all of the users of head_hash should actually be using
opts->orig_head instead as passing a string rather than a struct
object_id around is a hang over from the scripted implementation. This
patch just fixes the immediate bug and adds a regression test based on
Caspar's reproduction example[1]. The users will be converted to use
struct object_id and head_hash removed in the next few commits.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAFzd1+7PDg2PZgKw7U0kdepdYuoML9wSN4kofmB_-8NHrbbrHg@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Caspar Duregger <herr.kaste@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Ring buffer with size 4 used for bin-hex translation resulted in a
wrong object name in the sequencer's todo output, which has been
corrected.
* ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev:
rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todo
|
|
The commit labels used to explain each side of conflicted hunks
placed by the sequencer machinery have been made more readable by
humans.
* en/sequencer-merge-labels:
sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labels
|
|
sequencer's get_message() exists to provide good labels on conflict
hunks; see commits
d68565402a ("revert: clarify label on conflict hunks", 2010-03-20)
bf975d379d ("cherry-pick, revert: add a label for ancestor", 2010-03-20)
043a4492b3 ("sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin", 2012-01-11).
for background on this function. These labels are of the form
<commitID>... <commit summary>
or
parent of <commitID>... <commit summary>
These labels are then passed as branch names to the merge machinery.
However, these labels, as formatted, often also serve to confuse. For
example, if we have a rename involved in a content merge, then it
results in text such as the following:
<<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c
int j;
========
int counter;
>>>>>>>> b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff:bar.c
Or in various conflict messages, it can make it very difficult to read:
CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface... Removed
unnecessary stuff and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left
in tree.
CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface... Removed
unnecessary stuff inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD,
suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c.
Make a minor change to remove the ellipses and add parentheses around
the commit summary; this makes all three examples much easier to read:
<<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c
int j;
========
int counter;
>>>>>>>> b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff):bar.c
CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface (Removed
unnecessary stuff) and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left
in tree.
CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface (Removed
unnecessary stuff) inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD,
suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
'todo_list_write_to_file' may overwrite the static buffer, originating
from 'find_unique_abbrev', that was used to store the short commit hash
'c' for "# Rebase a..b onto c" message in the todo editor. This is
because the buffer that is returned from 'find_unique_abbrev' is valid
until 4 more calls to `find_unique_abbrev` are made.
As 'todo_list_write_to_file' calls 'find_unique_abbrev' for each rebased
commit, the hash for 'c' is overwritten if there are 4 or more commits
in the rebase. This behavior has been broken since its introduction.
Fix by storing the short onto commit hash in a different buffer that
remains valid, before calling 'todo_list_write_to_file'.
Found-by: Jussi Keränen <jussike@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antti Keränen <detegr@rbx.email>
Acked-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The idea of the magic value "ac4f2ee" in this test is to make the
reworded commit `collide2` have the same shortened ID as the commit
`collide3`.
To port the same idea to the SHA-256 version of Git, we therefore need
another magic value that causes the same collision, but this time with
the SHA-256 version of the commit IDs.
In this patch, we add code guarded by `GIT_TEST_FIND_COLLIDER` to do
exactly that. Essentially, a large number of integers is appended to the
commit message "collide2" to find such a collision. To make it easier to
find such a collision, we reduce the number of digits to 4.
As the tests are no longer dependent on SHA-1, we also rename their
titles to talk about "commit IDs" instead of "SHA-1s".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The mechanism to prevent "git commit" from making an empty commit
or amending during an interrupted cherry-pick was broken during the
rewrite of "git rebase" in C, which has been corrected.
* pw/advise-rebase-skip:
commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebase
commit: encapsulate determine_whence() for sequencer
commit: use enum value for multiple cherry-picks
sequencer: write CHERRY_PICK_HEAD for reword and edit
cherry-pick: check commit error messages
cherry-pick: add test for `--skip` advice in `git commit`
t3404: use test_cmp_rev
|
|
"git rebase" has learned to use the merge backend (i.e. the
machinery that drives "rebase -i") by default, while allowing
"--apply" option to use the "apply" backend (e.g. the moral
equivalent of "format-patch piped to am"). The rebase.backend
configuration variable can be set to customize.
* en/rebase-backend:
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends
rebase: change the default backend from "am" to "merge"
rebase: make the backend configurable via config setting
rebase tests: repeat some tests using the merge backend instead of am
rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --am
rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for interactive-based rebases
git-prompt: change the prompt for interactive-based rebases
rebase: add an --am option
rebase: move incompatibility checks between backend options a bit earlier
git-rebase.txt: add more details about behavioral differences of backends
rebase: allow more types of rebases to fast-forward
t3432: make these tests work with either am or merge backends
rebase: fix handling of restrict_revision
rebase: make sure to pass along the quiet flag to the sequencer
rebase, sequencer: remove the broken GIT_QUIET handling
t3406: simplify an already simple test
rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become empty
rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the default
t3404: directly test the behavior of interest
git-rebase.txt: update description of --allow-empty-message
|
|
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each:
Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because:
* 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used
for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used
in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones
given that we are making it the default.
* 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is.
* the directory where state is stored is not called
.git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge.
Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because:
* Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point.
* Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the
documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read
it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large
burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very
careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces
annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems.
* Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a
backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the
alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user
tries to explain to another what they are doing.
* While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am
is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools
for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too.
* The directory where state is stored has never been called
.git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply.
For all the reasons listed above:
* Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names
* Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names
to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere
(e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation)
* Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply
* Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new
backend names for us as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is
repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those
tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am
flag.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A large variety of rebase types are supported by the interactive
machinery, not just the explicitly interactive ones. These all share
the same code and write the same reflog messages, but the "-i" moniker
in those messages doesn't really have much meaning. It also becomes
somewhat distracting once we switch the default from the am-backend to
the interactive one. Just remove the "-i" from these messages.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When set to "warn" or "error", `rebase.missingCommitsCheck' would make
`rebase -i' warn if the user removed commits from the todo list to
prevent mistakes. Unfortunately, `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase
--continue' don't take it into account.
This adds the ability for `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue'
to check if commits were dropped by the user. As both edit_todo_list()
and complete_action() parse the todo list and check for dropped commits,
the code doing so in the latter is removed to reduce duplication.
`edit_todo_list_advice' is removed from sequencer.c as it is no longer
used there.
This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it was
saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if the
original todo list has no errors or no dropped commits. Thus, the
backup should be error-free. Without this, sequencer_continue()
(`rebase --continue') could only compare the current todo list against
the original, unedited list. Before this change, this file was only
used by edit_todo_list() and `rebase -p' to create the backup before
the initial edit, and check_todo_list_from_file(), only used by
`rebase -p' to check for dropped commits after its own initial edit.
If the edited list has an error, a file, `dropped', is created to
report the issue. Otherwise, it is deleted. Usually, the edited list
is compared against the list before editing, but if this file exists,
it will be compared to the backup. Also, if the file exists,
sequencer_continue() checks the list for dropped commits. If the
check was performed every time, it would fail when resuming a rebase
after resolving a conflict, as the backup will contain commits that
were picked, but they will not be in the new list. It's safe to
ignore this check if `dropped' does not exist, because that means that
no errors were found at the last edition, so any missing commits here
have already been picked.
Five tests are added to t3404. The tests for
`rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck =
error' have a similar structure. First, we start a rebase with an
incorrect command on the first line. Then, we edit the todo list,
removing the first and the last lines. This demonstrates that
`--edit-todo' notices dropped commits, but not when the command is
incorrect. Then, we restore the original todo list, and edit it to
remove the last line. This demonstrates that if we add a commit after
the initial edit, then remove it, `--edit-todo' will notice that it
has been dropped. Then, the actual rebase takes place. In the third
test, it is also checked that `--continue' will refuse to resume the
rebase if commits were dropped. The fourth test checks that no errors
are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, the fifth
checks that no errors are raised when editing the todo list after
pausing the rebase.
Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When `rebase.missingCommitsCheck` is in effect, we use the backup of the
todo list that was copied just before the user was allowed to edit it.
That backup is, of course, just as susceptible to the hash collision as
the todo list itself: a reworded commit could make a previously
unambiguous short commit ID ambiguous all of a sudden.
So let's not just copy the todo list, but let's instead write out the
backup with expanded commit IDs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 66ae9a57b88 (t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision,
2013-08-23), we added a test case that demonstrated how it is possible
that a previously unambiguous short commit ID could become ambiguous
*during* a rebase.
In 75c69766554 (rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), we
fixed that problem simply by writing out the todo list with expanded
commit IDs (except *right* before letting the user edit the todo list,
in which case we shorten them, but we expand them right after the file
was edited).
However, the bug resurfaced as a side effect of 393adf7a6f6 (sequencer:
directly call pick_commits() from complete_action(), 2019-11-24): as of
this commit, the sequencer no longer re-reads the todo list after
writing it out with expanded commit IDs.
The only redeeming factor is that the todo list is already parsed at
that stage, including all the commits corresponding to the commands,
therefore the sequencer can continue even if the internal todo list has
short commit IDs.
That does not prevent problems, though: the sequencer writes out the
`done` and `git-rebase-todo` files incrementally (i.e. overwriting the
todo list with a version that has _short_ commit IDs), and if a merge
conflict happens, or if an `edit` or a `break` command is encountered, a
subsequent `git rebase --continue` _will_ re-read the todo list, opening
an opportunity for the "short SHA-1 collision" bug again.
To avoid that, let's make sure that we do expand the commit IDs in the
todo list as soon as we have parsed it after letting the user edit it.
Additionally, we improve the 'short SHA-1 collide' test case in t3404 to
test specifically for the case where the rebase is resumed. We also
hard-code the expected colliding short SHA-1s, to document the
expectation (and to make it easier on future readers).
Note that we specifically test that the short commit ID is used in the
`git-rebase-todo.tmp` file: this file is created by the fake editor in
the test script and reflects the state that would have been presented to
the user to edit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
t3404.3 is a simple test added by commit d078c3910689 ("t3404: todo list
with commented-out commands only aborts", 2018-08-10) which was designed
to test a todo list that only contained commented-out commands. There
were two problems with this test: (1) its title did not reflect the
purpose of the test, and (2) it tested the desired behavior through a
side-effect of other functionality instead of directly testing the
desired behavior discussed in the commit message.
Modify the test to directly test the desired behavior and update the
test title.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This test case was added in 66ae9a57b88 (t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate
short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), and it is not indented in the way we
usually indent sub-shell code in our test cases these days.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In dcb500dc16c (cherry-pick/revert: advise using --skip, 2019-07-02),
`git commit` learned to suggest to run `git cherry-pick --skip` when
trying to cherry-pick an empty patch.
However, it was overlooked that there are more conditions than just a
`git cherry-pick` when this advice is printed (which originally
suggested the neutral `git reset`): the same can happen during a rebase.
Let's suggest the correct command, even during a rebase.
While at it, we adjust more places in `builtin/commit.c` that
incorrectly assumed that the presence of a `CHERRY_PICK_HEAD` meant that
surely this must be a `cherry-pick` in progress.
Note: we take pains to handle the situation when a user runs a `git
cherry-pick` _during_ a rebase. This is quite valid (e.g. in an `exec`
line in an interactive rebase). On the other hand, it is not possible to
run a rebase during a cherry-pick, meaning: if both `rebase-merge/` and
`sequencer/` exist or CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and REBASE_HEAD point to the same
commit , we still want to advise to use `git cherry-pick --skip`.
Original-patch-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There are a number of places where we compare two revisions with
test $(git rev-parse rev1) = $(git rev-parse rev2)
when these fail there's no indication what has gone wrong and you need
to be running with `-x` to see where the test has failed. Lets use
test_cmp_rev instead.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"rebase -i" ceased to run post-commit hook by mistake in an earlier
update, which has been corrected.
* pw/post-commit-from-sequencer:
sequencer: run post-commit hook
move run_commit_hook() to libgit and use it there
sequencer.h fix placement of #endif
t3404: remove uneeded calls to set_fake_editor
t3404: set $EDITOR in subshell
t3404: remove unnecessary subshell
|
|
Prior to commit 356ee4659b ("sequencer: try to commit without forking
'git commit'", 2017-11-24) the sequencer would always run the
post-commit hook after each pick or revert as it forked `git commit` to
create the commit. The conversion to committing without forking `git
commit` omitted to call the post-commit hook after creating the commit.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some tests were calling set_fake_editor to ensure they had a sane no-op
editor set. Now that all the editor setting is done in subshells these
tests can rely on EDITOR=: and so do not need to call set_fake_editor.
Also add a test at the end to detect any future additions messing with
the exported value of $EDITOR.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As $EDITOR is exported setting it in one test affects all subsequent
tests. Avoid this by always setting it in a subshell. This commit leaves
20 calls to set_fake_editor that are not in subshells as they can
safely be removed in the next commit once all the other editor setting
is done inside subshells.
I have moved the call to set_fake_editor in some tests so it comes
immediately before the call to 'git rebase' to avoid moving unrelated
commands into the subshell. In one case ('rebase -ix with
--autosquash') the call to set_fake_editor is moved past an invocation
of 'git rebase'. This is safe as that invocation of 'git rebase'
requires EDITOR=: or EDITOR=fake-editor.sh without FAKE_LINES being
set which will be the case as the preceding tests either set their
editor in a subshell or call set_fake_editor without setting FAKE_LINES.
In a one test ('auto-amend only edited commits after "edit"') a call
to test_tick are now in a subshell. I think this is OK as it is there
to set the date for the next commit which is executed in the same
subshell rather than updating GIT_COMMITTER_DATE for later tests (the
next test calls test_tick before doing anything else).
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Neither of the commands executed in the subshell change any shell
variables or the current directory so there is no need for them to be
executed in a subshell.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git rebase -i" showed a wrong HEAD while "reword" open the editor.
* pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword:
sequencer: simplify root commit creation
rebase -i: check for updated todo after squash and reword
rebase -i: always update HEAD before rewording
|
|
"git rebase --keep-base <upstream>" tries to find the original base
of the topic being rebased and rebase on top of that same base,
which is useful when running the "git rebase -i" (and its limited
variant "git rebase -x").
The command also has learned to fast-forward in more cases where it
can instead of replaying to recreate identical commits.
* dl/rebase-i-keep-base:
rebase: teach rebase --keep-base
rebase tests: test linear branch topology
rebase: fast-forward --fork-point in more cases
rebase: fast-forward --onto in more cases
rebase: refactor can_fast_forward into goto tower
t3432: test for --no-ff's interaction with fast-forward
t3432: distinguish "noop-same" v.s. "work-same" in "same head" tests
t3432: test rebase fast-forward behavior
t3431: add rebase --fork-point tests
|
|
Code cleanup.
* dl/use-sq-from-test-lib:
t: use common $SQ variable
|
|
Preparation for SHA-256 upgrade continues in the test department.
* bc/hash-independent-tests-part-5:
t4009: make hash size independent
t4002: make hash independent
t4000: make hash size independent
t3903: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t3800: make hash-size independent
t3600: make hash size independent
t3506: make hash independent
t3430: avoid hard-coded object IDs
t3404: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t3306: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t3305: make hash size independent
t3301: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t3206: abstract away hash size constants
t3201: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
|
|
In many test scripts, there are bespoke definitions of the single quote
that are some variation of this:
SQ="'"
Define a common $SQ variable in test-lib.sh and replace all usages of
these bespoke variables with the common one.
This change was done by running `git grep =\"\'\" t/` and
`git grep =\\\\\'` and manually changing the resulting definitions and
corresponding usages.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A few test scripts assign a single LF to $LF, but that is already
given by test-lib.sh to everybody.
Remove the unnecessary reassignment.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Before, when we had the following graph,
A---B---C (master)
\
D (side)
running 'git rebase --onto master... master side' would result in D
being always rebased, no matter what. However, the desired behavior is
that rebase should notice that this is fast-forwardable and do that
instead.
Add detection to `can_fast_forward` so that this case can be detected
and a fast-forward will be performed. First of all, rewrite the function
to use gotos which simplifies the logic. Next, since the
options.upstream &&
!oidcmp(&options.upstream->object.oid, &options.onto->object.oid)
conditions were removed in `cmd_rebase`, we reintroduce a substitute in
`can_fast_forward`. In particular, checking the merge bases of
`upstream` and `head` fixes a failing case in t3416.
The abbreviated graph for t3416 is as follows:
F---G topic
/
A---B---C---D---E master
and the failing command was
git rebase --onto master...topic F topic
Before, Git would see that there was one merge base (C), and the merge
and onto were the same so it would incorrectly return 1, indicating that
we could fast-forward. This would cause the rebased graph to be 'ABCFG'
when we were expecting 'ABCG'.
With the additional logic, we detect that upstream and head's merge base
is F. Since onto isn't F, it means we're not rebasing the full set of
commits from master..topic. Since we're excluding some commits, a
fast-forward cannot be performed and so we correctly return 0.
Add '-f' to test cases that failed as a result of this change because
they were not expecting a fast-forward so that a rebase is forced.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Adjust the test so that it computes variables for object IDs instead of
using hard-coded hashes. Add a use of $EMPTY_TREE instead of a
hard-coded value. Remove a comment about hard-coded hashes which is no
longer applicable.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If the user runs git log while rewording a commit it is confusing if
sometimes we're amending the commit that's being reworded and at other
times we're creating a new commit depending on whether we could
fast-forward or not[1]. Fix this inconsistency by always committing the
picked commit and then running 'git commit --amend' to do the reword.
The first commit is performed by the sequencer without forking git
commit and does not impact on the speed of rebase. In a test rewording
100 commits with
GIT_EDITOR=true GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR='sed -i s/pick/reword/' \
../bin-wrappers/git rebase -i --root
and taking the best of three runs the current master took
957ms and with this patch it took 961ms.
This change fixes rewording the new root commit when rearranging commits
with --root.
Note that the new code no longer updates CHERRY_PICK_HEAD after creating
a root commit - I'm not sure why the old code was that creating that ref
after a successful commit, everywhere else it is removed after a
successful commit.
[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqlfvu4be3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/T/#m133009cb91cf0917bcf667300f061178be56680a
Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Use "Erase in Line" CSI sequence that is already used in the editor
support to clear cruft in the progress output.
* sg/rebase-progress:
progress: use term_clear_line()
rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x'
pager: add a helper function to clear the last line in the terminal
t3404: make the 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck=ignore' test more focused
t3404: modernize here doc style
|
|
Typofix.
* js/t3404-typofix:
t3404: fix a typo
|
|
Use "Erase in Line" CSI sequence that is already used in the editor
support to clear cruft in the progress output.
* sg/rebase-progress:
progress: use term_clear_line()
rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x'
pager: add a helper function to clear the last line in the terminal
t3404: make the 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck=ignore' test more focused
t3404: modernize here doc style
|
|
Typofix.
* js/t3404-typofix:
t3404: fix a typo
|
|
The test 'rebase -i respects rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' is
mainly interested in the warning about the dropped commits, but it
checks the whole output of 'git rebase', including progress lines and
what not that are not at all relevant to 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck',
but make it necessary to update this test whenever e.g. the way we
show progress is updated (as it will happen in one of the later
patches of this series).
Modify the test to verify only the first four lines of 'git rebase's
output that contain all the important lines, notably the line
containing the "Warning:" itself and the oneline log of the dropped
commit.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 't3404-rebase-interactive.sh' the expected output of several tests
is prepared from here documents, which are outside of
'test_expect_success' blocks and have spaces around redirection
operators.
Move these here documents into the corresponding 'test_expect_success'
block and avoid spaces between filename and redition operators.
Furthermore, quote the here docs' delimiter word to prevent parameter
expansions and what not, where applicable.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This one slipped through the review of a9279c678588 (sequencer: do not
squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflicts, 2018-06-19).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting, which was added as an escape
hatch to disable the builtin version of rebase first released with Git
2.20.
See [1] for the initial implementation of rebase.useBuiltin, and [2]
and [3] for the documentation and corresponding
GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN option.
Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden as seen in
7e097e27d3 ("legacy-rebase: backport -C<n> and --whitespace=<option>
checks", 2018-11-20) and 9aea5e9286 ("rebase: fix regression in
rebase.useBuiltin=false test mode", 2019-02-13). Since the built-in
version has been shown to be stable enough let's remove the legacy
version.
As noted in [3] having use_builtin_rebase() shell out to get its
config doesn't make any sense anymore, that was done for the purposes
of spawning the legacy rebase without having modified any global
state. Let's instead handle this case in rebase_config().
There's still a bunch of references to git-legacy-rebase in po/*.po,
but those will be dealt with in time by the i18n effort.
Even though this configuration variable only existed two releases
let's not entirely delete the entry from the docs, but note its
absence. Individual versions of git tend to be around for a while due
to distro packaging timelines, so e.g. if we're "lucky" a given
version like 2.21 might be installed on say OSX for half a decade.
That'll mean some people probably setting this in config, and then
when they later wonder if it's needed they can Google search the
config option name or check it in git-config. It also allows us to
refer to the docs from the warning for details.
1. 55071ea248 ("rebase: start implementing it as a builtin",
2018-08-07)
2. d8d0a546f0 ("rebase doc: document rebase.useBuiltin", 2018-11-14)
3. 62c23938fa ("tests: add a special setup where rebase.useBuiltin is
off", 2018-11-14)
3. https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903141544110.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix a recently introduced regression in c762aada1a ("rebase -x: sanity
check command", 2019-01-29) triggered when running the tests with
GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false. See 62c23938fa ("tests: add a
special setup where rebase.useBuiltin is off", 2018-11-14) for how
that test mode works.
As discussed on-list[1] it's not worth it to implement the sanity
check in the legacy rebase code, we plan to remove it after the 2.21
release. So let's do the bare minimum to make the tests pass under the
GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false special setup.
1. https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqva1nbeno.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git rebase -x $cmd" did not reject multi-line command, even though
the command is incapable of handling such a command. It now is
rejected upfront.
* pw/rebase-x-sanity-check:
rebase -x: sanity check command
|
|
If the user gives an empty argument to --exec then git creates a todo
list that it cannot parse. The rebase starts to run before erroring out
with
error: missing arguments for exec
error: invalid line 2: exec
You can fix this with 'git rebase --edit-todo' and then run 'git rebase --continue'.
Or you can abort the rebase with 'git rebase --abort'.
Instead check for empty commands before starting the rebase.
Also check that the command does not contain any newlines as the
todo-list format is unable to cope with multiline commands. Note that
this changes the behavior, before this change one could do
git rebase --exec='echo one
exec echo two'
and it would insert two exec lines in the todo list, now it will error
out.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR is set then rebase runs it when executing
implicit interactive rebases which are supposed to appear
non-interactive to the user. Fix this by setting GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=:
rather than GIT_EDITOR=:. A couple of tests relied on the old behavior
so they are updated to work with the new regime.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In preparation to the day when we can deprecate and remove the
"rebase -p", make sure we can skip and later remove tests for
it.
* js/rebase-p-tests:
tests: optionally skip `git rebase -p` tests
t3418: decouple test cases from a previous `rebase -p` test case
t3404: decouple some test cases from outcomes of previous test cases
|
|
* sg/test-rebase-editor-fix:
t3404-rebase-interactive: test abbreviated commands
|
|
The `--preserve-merges` mode of the `rebase` command is slated to be
deprecated soon, as the more powerful `--rebase-merges` mode is
available now, and the latter was designed with the express intent to
address the shortcomings of `--preserve-merges`' design (e.g. the
inability to reorder commits in an interactive rebase).
As such, we will eventually even remove the `--preserve-merges` support,
and along with it, its tests.
In preparation for this, and also to allow the Windows phase of our
automated tests to save some well-needed time when running the test
suite, this commit introduces a new prerequisite REBASE_P, which can be
forced to being unmet by setting the environment variable
`GIT_TEST_SKIP_REBASE_P` to any non-empty string.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Originally, the `--preserve-merges` option of the `git rebase` command
piggy-backed on top of the `--interactive` feature. For that reason, the
early test cases were added to the very same test script that contains
the `git rebase -i` tests: `t3404-rebase-interactive.sh`.
However, since c42abfe7857 (rebase: introduce a dedicated backend for
--preserve-merges, 2018-05-28), the `--preserve-merges` feature got its
own backend, in preparation for converting the rest of the
`--interactive` code to built-in code, written in C rather than shell.
The reason why the `--preserve-merges` feature was not converted at the
same time is that we have something much better now: `--rebase-merges`.
That option intends to supersede `--preserve-merges`, and we will
probably deprecate the latter soon.
Once `--preserve-merges` has been deprecated for a good amount of time,
it will be time to remove it, and along with it, its tests.
In preparation for that, let's make the rest of the test cases in
`t3404-rebase-interactive.sh` independent of the test cases dedicated to
`--preserve-merges`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Rewrite of the remaining "rebase -i" machinery in C.
* ag/rebase-i-in-c:
rebase -i: move rebase--helper modes to rebase--interactive
rebase -i: remove git-rebase--interactive.sh
rebase--interactive2: rewrite the submodes of interactive rebase in C
rebase -i: implement the main part of interactive rebase as a builtin
rebase -i: rewrite init_basic_state() in C
rebase -i: rewrite write_basic_state() in C
rebase -i: rewrite the rest of init_revisions_and_shortrevisions() in C
rebase -i: implement the logic to initialize $revisions in C
rebase -i: remove unused modes and functions
rebase -i: rewrite complete_action() in C
t3404: todo list with commented-out commands only aborts
sequencer: change the way skip_unnecessary_picks() returns its result
sequencer: refactor append_todo_help() to write its message to a buffer
rebase -i: rewrite checkout_onto() in C
rebase -i: rewrite setup_reflog_action() in C
sequencer: add a new function to silence a command, except if it fails
rebase -i: rewrite the edit-todo functionality in C
editor: add a function to launch the sequence editor
rebase -i: rewrite append_todo_help() in C
sequencer: make three functions and an enum from sequencer.c public
|
Johannes Schindelin
Phillip Wood
Junio C Hamano
Elijah Newren
Antti Keränen
Alban Gruin
Denton Liu
brian m. carlson
SZEDER Gábor
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason