summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-08-03Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+21
Abandoning an already applied change in "git rebase -i" with "--continue" left CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and confused later steps. * js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip: rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bug
2015-06-29rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behindLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When skipping commits whose changes were already applied via `git rebase --continue`, we need to clean up said file explicitly. The same is not true for `git rebase --skip` because that will execute `git reset --hard` as part of the "skip" handling in git-rebase.sh, even before git-rebase--interactive.sh is called. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bugLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+21
When rev-list's --cherry option does not detect that a patch has already been applied upstream, an interactive rebase would offer to reapply it and consequently stop at that patch with a failure, mentioning that the diff is empty. Traditionally, a `git rebase --continue` simply skips the commit in such a situation. However, as pointed out by Gábor Szeder, this leaves a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD behind, making the Git prompt believe that a cherry pick is still going on. This commit adds a test case demonstrating this bug. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-05Merge branch 'ph/rebase-i-redo' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+47
"git rebase -i" moved the "current" command from "todo" to "done" a bit too prematurely, losing a step when a "pick" did not even start. * ph/rebase-i-redo: rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pick
2015-04-29rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pickLibravatar Phil Hord1-0/+47
When rebase--interactive processes a task, it removes the item from the todo list and appends it to another list of executed tasks. If a pick (this includes squash and fixup) fails before the index has recorded the changes, take the corresponding item and put it on the todo list again. Otherwise, the changes introduced by the scheduled commit would be lost. That kind of decision is possible since the cherry-pick command signals why it failed to apply the changes of the given commit. Either the changes are recorded in the index using a conflict (return value 1) and rebase does not continue until they are resolved or the changes are not recorded in the index (return value neither 0 nor 1) and rebase has to try again with the same task. Add a test cases for regression testing to the "rebase-interactive" test suite. Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch <bafain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-23Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary. * es/rebase-i-count-todo: rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count
2015-03-20t: fix trivial &&-chain breakageLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: fix moderate &&-chain breakageLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but in a way that probably does not effect the outcome of the test. Most of these are of the form: some_cmd >actual test_cmp expect actual The main point of the test is to verify the output, and a failure in some_cmd would probably be noticed by bogus output. But it is good for the tests to also confirm that "some_cmd" does not die unexpectedly after producing its output. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-17Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary. * es/rebase-i-count-todo: rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count
2015-03-06rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item countLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+9
97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10) taught rebase-interactive to compute an item count with 'wc -l' and display it in the instruction list comments: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s)) On Mac OS X, however, it renders as: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 ( 4 TODO item(s)) since 'wc -l' indents its output with leading spaces. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-22rebase -i: use full object name internally throughout the scriptLibravatar Kirill A. Shutemov1-0/+7
In earlier days, the abbreviated commit object name shown to the end users were generated with hardcoded --abbrev=7; 56895038 (rebase -i: respect core.abbrev, 2013-09-28) tried to make it honor the user specified core.abbrev, but it missed the very initial invocation of the editor. These days, we try to use the full 40-hex object names internally to avoid ambiguity that can arise after rebase starts running. Newly created objects during the rebase may share the same prefix with existing commits listed in the insn sheet. These object names are shortened just before invoking the sequence editor to present the insn sheet to the end user, and then expanded back to full object names when the editor returns. But the code still used the shortened names when preparing the insn sheet for the very first time, resulting "7 hexdigits or more" output to the user. Change the code to use full 40-hex commit object names from the very beginning to make things more uniform. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-06Merge branch 'mt/rebase-i-keep-empty-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
* mt/rebase-i-keep-empty-test: rebase --keep-empty -i: add test
2014-05-19rebase --keep-empty -i: add testLibravatar Michael S. Tsirkin1-0/+8
There's some special code in rebase -i to deal with --keep-empty. Add test for this combination. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-19tests: use "env" to run commands with temporary env-var settingsLibravatar David Tran1-56/+13
Ordinarily, we would say "VAR=VAL command" to execute a tested command with environment variable(s) set only for that command. This however does not work if 'command' is a shell function (most notably 'test_must_fail'); the result of the assignment is retained and affects later commands. To avoid this, we used to assign and export environment variables and run such a test in a subshell, like so: ( VAR=VAL && export VAR && test_must_fail git command to be tested ) But with "env" utility, we should be able to say: test_must_fail env VAR=VAL git command to be tested which is much shorter and easier to read. Signed-off-by: David Tran <unsignedzero@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-11Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-no-abbrev'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+87
The commit object names in the insn sheet that was prepared at the beginning of "rebase -i" session can become ambiguous as the rebasing progresses and the repository gains more commits. Make sure the internal record is kept with full 40-hex object names. * es/rebase-i-no-abbrev: rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision t3404: make tests more self-contained
2013-08-25rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collisionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The 'todo' sheet for interactive rebase shows abbreviated SHA-1's and then performs its operations upon those shortened values. This can lead to an abort if the SHA-1 of a reworded or edited commit is no longer unique within the abbreviated SHA-1 space and a subsequent SHA-1 in the todo list has the same abbreviated value. For example: edit f00dfad first pick badbeef second If, after editing, the new SHA-1 of "first" also has prefix badbeef, then the subsequent 'pick badbeef second' will fail since badbeef is no longer a unique SHA-1 abbreviation: error: short SHA1 badbeef is ambiguous. fatal: Needed a single revision Invalid commit name: badbeef Fix this problem by expanding the SHA-1's in the todo list before performing the operations. [es: also collapse & expand SHA-1's for --edit-todo; respect core.commentchar in transform_todo_ids(); compose commit message] Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-25t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collisionLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+24
The 'todo' sheet for interactive rebase shows abbreviated SHA-1's and then performs its operations upon those shortened values. This can lead to an abort if the SHA-1 of a reworded or edited commit is no longer unique within the abbreviated SHA-1 space and a subsequent SHA-1 in the todo list has the same abbreviated value. For example: edit f00dfad first pick badbeef second If, after editing, the new SHA-1 of "first" also has prefix badbeef, then the subsequent 'pick badbeef second' will fail since badbeef is no longer a unique SHA-1 abbreviation: error: short SHA1 badbeef is ambiguous. fatal: Needed a single revision Invalid commit name: badbeef Demonstrate this problem with a couple of specially crafted commits which initially have distinct abbreviated SHA-1's, but for which the abbreviated SHA-1's collide after a simple rewording of the first commit's message. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-25t3404: make tests more self-containedLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-2/+63
As its very first action, t3404 installs (via set_fake_editor) a specialized $EDITOR which simplifies automated 'rebase -i' testing. Many tests rely upon this setting, thus tests which need a different editor must take extra care upon completion to restore $EDITOR in order to avoid breaking following tests. This places extra burden upon such tests and requires that they undesirably have extra knowledge about surrounding tests. Ease this burden by having each test install the $EDITOR it requires, rather than relying upon a global setting. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-07die_with_status: use "printf '%s\n'", not "echo"Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+13
Some implementations of 'echo' (e.g. dash's built-in) interpret backslash sequences in their arguments. This triggered at least one bug: the error message of "rebase -i" was turning \t in commit messages into actual tabulations. There may be others. Using "printf '%s\n'" instead avoids this bad behavior, and is the form used by the "say" function. Noticed-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-18Merge branch 'rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+15
"git rebase [-i]" used to leave just "rebase" as its reflog message for some operations. This rewords them to be more informative. * rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword: rebase -i: use a better reflog message rebase: use a better reflog message
2013-07-02Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebaseLibravatar Arnaud Fontaine1-0/+11
Merge strategy and its options can be specified in `git rebase`, but with `--interactive`, they were completely ignored. Signed-off-by: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-24Merge branch 'rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
Allow various commit objects to be given to "git rebase" by ':/look for this string' syntax, e.g. "git rebase --onto ':/there'". * rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query: rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriate sh-setup: add new peel_committish() helper t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revision
2013-06-23rebase -i: use a better reflog messageLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+15
Now that the "checkout" invoked internally from "rebase -i" knows to honor GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, we can start to use it to write a better reflog message when "rebase anotherbranch", "rebase --onto branch", etc. internally checks out the new fork point. We will write: rebase -i: checkout master instead of the old rebase -i As all the calls git-rebase--interactive make to underlying git commands that leave reflog messages are preceded by the internal comment_for_reflog helper function, which uses the original value of the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION variable it saw when it first started, the new assignments to GIT_REFLOG_ACTION actively contaminate the value of the variable, knowing that it will be reset to a sane value before it is used again. This does not generally hold true but it should suffice for now. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-23Merge branch 'mz/rebase-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+1
* mz/rebase-tests: rebase topology tests: fix commit names on case-insensitive file systems tests: move test for rebase messages from t3400 to t3406 t3406: modernize style add tests for rebasing merged history add tests for rebasing root add tests for rebasing of empty commits add tests for rebasing with patch-equivalence present add simple tests of consistency across rebase types
2013-06-14rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriateLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-1/+1
The revisions specified on the command-line as <onto> and <upstream> arguments could be of the form :/quuxery; so, use peel_committish() to resolve them. The failing tests in t/rebase and t/rebase-interactive now pass. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-14t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revisionLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+11
The following commands fail, even if :/quuxery and :/foomery resolve to perfectly valid commits: $ git rebase [-i] --onto :/quuxery :/foomery This is because rebase [-i] attempts to rev-parse ${REV}^0 to verify that the given revision resolves to a commit. Add tests to document these failures. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07add tests for rebasing merged historyLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-9/+1
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-28test: rebase: fix --interactive testLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25t4304: use test_config to set/unset git config variablesLibravatar Yann Droneaud1-2/+1
Instead of using construct such as: test_when_finished "git config --unset <key>" git config <key> <value> uses test_config <key> <value> The latter takes care of removing <key> at the end of the test. Tests are modified to assume correct (default) configuration at entry, and to reset the modified configuration variables at the end. Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-17Merge branch 'jk/rebase-i-comment-char'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
Finishing touches to the earlier core.commentchar topic to cover "rebase -i" as well. * jk/rebase-i-comment-char: rebase -i: respect core.commentchar
2013-02-12rebase -i: respect core.commentcharLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+14
Commit eff80a9 (Allow custom "comment char") introduced a custom comment character for commit messages but did not teach git-rebase--interactive to use it. Change git-rebase--interactive to read core.commentchar and use its value when generating commit messages and for the command list. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-22tests: move test_cmp_rev to test-lib-functionsLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-6/+0
A function for checking that two given parameters refer to the same revision was defined in several places, so move the definition to test-lib-functions.sh instead. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-29Merge branch 'aw/rebase-i-edit-todo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+18
Teach an option to edit the insn sheet to "git rebase -i". * aw/rebase-i-edit-todo: rebase -i: suggest using --edit-todo to fix an unknown instruction rebase -i: Add tests for "--edit-todo" rebase -i: Teach "--edit-todo" action rebase -i: Refactor help messages for todo file rebase usage: subcommands can not be combined with -i
2012-09-18rebase -i: fix misleading error message after 'exec no-such' instructionLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+11
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error: Execution failed: no-such You can fix the problem, and then run git rebase --continue fatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken? The reason is that the shell that attempted to run the command exits with code 127. rebase--interactive just forwards this code to the caller (the git wrapper). But our smart run-command infrastructure detects this special exit code and turns it into ENOENT, which in turn is interpreted by the git wrapper as if the external command that it just executed did not exist. This is finally translated to the misleading last two lines in error message cited above. Fix it by translating the error code before it is forwarded. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-17rebase -i: Add tests for "--edit-todo"Libravatar Andrew Wong1-0/+18
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-31Merge branch 'jx/i18n-1.7.11'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Add i18n support for scripted Porcelains, and mark strings in merge(-recursive), am, and rebase for i18n. * jx/i18n-1.7.11: i18n: merge-recursive: mark strings for translation Remove dead code which contains bad gettext block i18n: am: mark more strings for translation rebase: remove obsolete and unused LONG_USAGE which breaks xgettext i18n: Rewrite gettext messages start with dash i18n: rebase: mark messages for translation i18n: New keywords for xgettext extraction from sh
2012-07-26i18n: Rewrite gettext messages start with dashLibravatar Jiang Xin1-1/+1
Gettext message in a shell script should not start with '-', one workaround is adding '--' between gettext and the message, like: gettext -- "--exec option ..." But due to a bug in the xgettext extraction, xgettext can not extract the actual message for this case. Rewriting the message is a simpler and better solution. Reported-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-25Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
Finishing touches to the "rebase -i --root" (new feature for 1.7.12). * cw/rebase-i-root: rebase -i: handle fixup of root commit correctly
2012-07-24rebase -i: handle fixup of root commit correctlyLibravatar Chris Webb1-0/+8
There is a bug with git rebase -i --root when a fixup or squash line is applied to the new root. We attempt to amend the commit onto which they apply with git reset --soft HEAD^ followed by a normal commit. Unlike a real commit --amend, this sequence will fail against a root commit as it has no parent. Fix rebase -i to use commit --amend for fixup and squash instead, and add a test for the case of a fixup of the root commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-15Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+31
"git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the history down to the root. * cw/rebase-i-root: t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto rebase -i: support --root without --onto
2012-07-05t3404: make test 57 work with dash and othersLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-1/+5
The construct VAR=value test_must_fail command args works only for some shells (such as bash) but not others (such as dash) because VAR=value does not end up in the environment for command when it is called by the shell function test_must_fail. That is why we explicitly set and export variable in a subshell, i.e. ( VAR=value && export VAR && test_must_fail command args ) in most places already, bar the newly introduced 57 from b64b7fe (Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto, 2012-06-26). Make test 57 use that construct also. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26Add tests for rebase -i --root without --ontoLibravatar Chris Webb1-0/+27
Test for likely breakages in t3404, including successful reordering of non-conflicting changes with a new root, correct preservation of commit message and author in a root commit when it is squashed with the sentinel, and presence of the sentinel following a conflicting cherry-pick of a new root. Remove test_must_fail for git rebase --root without --onto from t3412 as this case will now be successfully handled by an implicit git rebase -i. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-13rebase -i: teach "--exec <cmd>"Libravatar Lucien Kong1-0/+117
During an interactive rebase session, it is sometimes desirable to run tests on each commit in the resulting history. This can be done by adding "exec <test command>" when editing the insn sheet, but the command used for testing is often the same for all resulting commits. By passing "--exec <cmd>" from the command line, automatically add these "exec" lines after each commit in the final history. To work well with the --autosquash option, these are added at the end of each run of "fixup" and "squash". Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-20Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
By Jens Lehmann (1) and Johannes Sixt (1) * maint: Consistently use "superproject" instead of "supermodule" t3404: begin "exchange commits with -p" test with correct preconditions
2012-05-20t3404: begin "exchange commits with -p" test with correct preconditionsLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+1
The test case shows a bug in 'rebase -p', but even if the bug were fixed the test would fail because it did not ensure that the preconditions match the postconditions that were checked. Insert the suitable 'git checkout'. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-30diff --stat: use less columns for change countsLibravatar Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek1-1/+1
Number of columns required for change counts is now computed based on the maximum number of changed lines instead of being fixed. This means that usually a few more columns will be available for the filenames and the graph. The graph width logic is also modified to include enough space for "Bin XXX -> YYY bytes". If changes to binary files are mixed with changes to text files, change counts are padded to take at least three columns. And the other way around, if change counts require more than three columns, then "Bin"s are padded to align with the change count. This way, the +- part starts in the same column as "XXX -> YYY" part for binary files. This makes the graph easier to parse visually thanks to the empty column. This mimics the layout of diff --stat before this change. Tests and the tutorial are updated to reflect the new --stat output. This means either the removal of extra padding and/or the addition of up to three extra characters to truncated filenames. One test is added to check the graph alignment when a binary file change and text file change of more than 999 lines are committed together. Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-09rebase -i continue: don't skip commits that only change submodulesLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+30
When git-rebase--interactive stops due to a conflict and the only change to be committed is in a submodule, the test for whether there is anything to be committed ignores the staged submodule change. This leads rebase to skip creating the commit for the change. While unstaged submodule changes should be ignored to avoid needing to update submodules during a rebase, it is safe to remove the --ignore-submodules option to diff-index because --cached ensures that it is only checking the index. This was discussed in [1] and a test is included to ensure that unstaged changes are still ignored correctly. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/188713 Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-26rebase -i: clean error message for --continue after failed execLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+14
After an "exec false" stops the rebase and gives the control back to the user, if changes are added to the index, "rebase --continue" fails with this message, which may technically be correct, but does not point at the real problem: .../git-rebase--interactive: line 774: .../.git/rebase-merge/author-script: No such file or directory We could try auto-amending HEAD, but this goes against the logic of .git/rebase-merge/author-script (see also the testcase 'auto-amend only edited commits after "edit"' in t3404-rebase-interactive.sh) to auto-amend something the user hasn't explicitely asked to edit. Instead of doing anything automatically, detect the situation and give a clean error message. While we're there, also clarify the error message in case '. "$author_script"' fails, which now corresponds to really weird senario where the author script exists but can't be read. Test-case-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-06-19rebase -i -p: include non-first-parent commits in todo listLibravatar Andrew Wong1-1/+1
Consider this graph: D---E (topic, HEAD) / / A---B---C (master) \ F (topic2) and the following three commands: 1. git rebase -i -p A 2. git rebase -i -p --onto F A 3. git rebase -i -p B Currently, (1) and (2) will pick B, D, C, and E onto A and F, respectively. However, (3) will only pick D and E onto B, but not C, which is inconsistent with (1) and (2). As a result, we cannot modify C during the interactive-rebase. The current behavior also creates a bug if we do: 4. git rebase -i -p C In (4), E is never picked. And since interactive-rebase resets "HEAD" to "onto" before picking any commits, D and E are lost after the interactive-rebase. This patch fixes the inconsistency and bug by ensuring that all children of upstream are always picked. This essentially reverts the commit: d80d6bc146232d81f1bb4bc58e5d89263fd228d4 When compiling the todo list, commits reachable from "upstream" should never be skipped under any conditions. Otherwise, we lose the ability to modify them like (3), and create a bug like (4). Two of the tests contain a scenario like (3). Since the new behavior added more commits for picking, these tests need to be updated to account for the additional pick lines. A new test has also been added for (4). Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-27rebase: write a reflog entry when finishingLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we finish a rebase, our detached HEAD is at the final result. We update the original branch ref with this result, and then point the HEAD symbolic ref at the updated branch. We write a reflog for the branch update, but not for the update of HEAD. Because we're already at the final result on the detached HEAD, moving to the branch actually doesn't change our commit sha1 at all. So in that sense, a reflog entry would be pointless. However, humans do read reflogs, and an entry saying "rebase finished: returning to refs/heads/master" can be helpful in understanding what is going on. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>