summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3400-rebase.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-11-19t34*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-31/+31
Carefully excluding t3404, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in t34*. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t34*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t34\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+3
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-05Merge branch 'es/do-not-let-rebase-switch-to-protected-branch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+19
"git rebase BASE BRANCH" rebased/updated the tip of BRANCH and checked it out, even when the BRANCH is checked out in a different worktree. This has been corrected. * es/do-not-let-rebase-switch-to-protected-branch: rebase: refuse to switch to branch already checked out elsewhere t3400: make test clean up after itself
2020-02-24rebase: refuse to switch to branch already checked out elsewhereLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+18
The invocation "git rebase <upstream> <branch>" switches to <branch> before performing the rebase operation. However, unlike git-switch, git-checkout, and git-worktree which all refuse to switch to a branch that is already checked out in some other worktree, git-rebase switches to <branch> unconditionally. Curb this careless behavior by making git-rebase also refuse to switch to a branch checked out elsewhere. Reported-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-24t3400: make test clean up after itselfLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-1/+1
This test intentionally creates a file which causes rebase to fail, thus it is important that this file be deleted before subsequent tests are run which are not expecting such a failure. In the past, the common way to ensure cleanup (regardless of whether the test succeeded or failed) was either for the next test to perform the previous test's cleanup as its first step or to do the cleanup at global scope outside of any tests. With the introduction of 'test_when_finished', however, tests can be responsible for their own cleanup. Therefore, update this test to clean up after itself. A bit of history: This 'rm' invocation was moved from within the body of the following test to global scope by bffd750adf (rebase: improve error message when upstream argument is missing, 2010-05-31), which postdates, by about a month, introduction of 'test_when_finished' in 3bf7886705 (test-lib: Let tests specify commands to be run at end of test, 2010-05-02). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase: rename the two primary rebase backendsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-8/+8
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --amLibravatar Elijah Newren1-5/+5
We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am flag. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase: fix handling of restrict_revisionLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+19
restrict_revision in the original shell script was an excluded revision range. It is also treated that way by the am-backend. In the conversion from shell to C (see commit 6ab54d17be3f ("rebase -i: implement the logic to initialize $revisions in C", 2018-08-28)), the interactive-backend accidentally treated it as a positive revision rather than a negated one. This was missed as there were no tests in the testsuite that tested an interactive rebase with fork-point behavior. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase: make sure to pass along the quiet flag to the sequencerLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+7
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-16Merge branch 'dl/rebase-with-autobase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
"git rebase" did not work well when format.useAutoBase configuration variable is set, which has been corrected. * dl/rebase-with-autobase: rebase: fix format.useAutoBase breakage format-patch: teach --no-base t4014: use test_config() format-patch: fix indentation t3400: demonstrate failure with format.useAutoBase
2019-12-05rebase: fix format.useAutoBase breakageLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+1
With `format.useAutoBase = true`, running rebase resulted in an error: fatal: failed to get upstream, if you want to record base commit automatically, please use git branch --set-upstream-to to track a remote branch. Or you could specify base commit by --base=<base-commit-id> manually error: git encountered an error while preparing the patches to replay these revisions: ede2467cdedc63784887b587a61c36b7850ebfac..d8f581194799ae29bf5fa72a98cbae98a1198b12 As a result, git cannot rebase them. Fix this by always passing `--no-base` to format-patch from rebase so that the effect of `format.useAutoBase` is negated. Reported-by: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-05t3400: demonstrate failure with format.useAutoBaseLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+6
Ever since bb52995f3e (format-patch: introduce format.useAutoBase configuration, 2016-04-26), `git rebase` has been broken when `format.useAutoBase = true`. It fails when rebasing a branch: fatal: failed to get upstream, if you want to record base commit automatically, please use git branch --set-upstream-to to track a remote branch. Or you could specify base commit by --base=<base-commit-id> manually error: git encountered an error while preparing the patches to replay these revisions: ede2467cdedc63784887b587a61c36b7850ebfac..d8f581194799ae29bf5fa72a98cbae98a1198b12 As a result, git cannot rebase them. Demonstrate that failure here. Reported-by: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-21t: teach test_cmp_rev to accept ! for not-equalsLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+1
In the case where we are using test_cmp_rev() to report not-equals, we write `! test_cmp_rev`. However, since test_cmp_rev() contains r1=$(git rev-parse --verify "$1") && r2=$(git rev-parse --verify "$2") && `! test_cmp_rev` will succeed if any of the rev-parses fail. This behavior is not desired. We want the rev-parses to _always_ be successful. Rewrite test_cmp_rev() to optionally accept "!" as the first argument to do a not-equals comparison. Rewrite `! test_cmp_rev` to `test_cmp_rev !` in all tests to take advantage of this new functionality. Also, rewrite the rev-parse logic to end with a `|| return 1` instead of &&-chaining into the rev-comparison logic. This makes it obvious to future readers that we explicitly intend on returning early if either of the rev-parses fail. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-30Merge branch 'dl/rebase-i-keep-base'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git rebase --keep-base <upstream>" tries to find the original base of the topic being rebased and rebase on top of that same base, which is useful when running the "git rebase -i" (and its limited variant "git rebase -x"). The command also has learned to fast-forward in more cases where it can instead of replaying to recreate identical commits. * dl/rebase-i-keep-base: rebase: teach rebase --keep-base rebase tests: test linear branch topology rebase: fast-forward --fork-point in more cases rebase: fast-forward --onto in more cases rebase: refactor can_fast_forward into goto tower t3432: test for --no-ff's interaction with fast-forward t3432: distinguish "noop-same" v.s. "work-same" in "same head" tests t3432: test rebase fast-forward behavior t3431: add rebase --fork-point tests
2019-09-09Merge branch 'bc/reread-attributes-during-rebase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+36
The "git am" based backend of "git rebase" ignored the result of updating ".gitattributes" done in one step when replaying subsequent steps. * bc/reread-attributes-during-rebase: am: reload .gitattributes after patching it path: add a function to check for path suffix
2019-09-03am: reload .gitattributes after patching itLibravatar brian m. carlson1-0/+36
When applying multiple patches with git am, or when rebasing using the am backend, it's possible that one of our patches has updated a gitattributes file. Currently, we cache this information, so if a file in a subsequent patch has attributes applied, the file will be written out with the attributes in place as of the time we started the rebase or am operation, not with the attributes applied by the previous patch. This problem does not occur when using the -m or -i flags to rebase. To ensure we write the correct data into the working tree, expire the cache after each patch that touches a path ending in ".gitattributes". Since we load these attributes in multiple separate files, we must expire them accordingly. Verify that both the am and rebase code paths work correctly, including the conflict marker size with am -3. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-27rebase: fast-forward --onto in more casesLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+1
Before, when we had the following graph, A---B---C (master) \ D (side) running 'git rebase --onto master... master side' would result in D being always rebased, no matter what. However, the desired behavior is that rebase should notice that this is fast-forwardable and do that instead. Add detection to `can_fast_forward` so that this case can be detected and a fast-forward will be performed. First of all, rewrite the function to use gotos which simplifies the logic. Next, since the options.upstream && !oidcmp(&options.upstream->object.oid, &options.onto->object.oid) conditions were removed in `cmd_rebase`, we reintroduce a substitute in `can_fast_forward`. In particular, checking the merge bases of `upstream` and `head` fixes a failing case in t3416. The abbreviated graph for t3416 is as follows: F---G topic / A---B---C---D---E master and the failing command was git rebase --onto master...topic F topic Before, Git would see that there was one merge base (C), and the merge and onto were the same so it would incorrectly return 1, indicating that we could fast-forward. This would cause the rebased graph to be 'ABCFG' when we were expecting 'ABCG'. With the additional logic, we detect that upstream and head's merge base is F. Since onto isn't F, it means we're not rebasing the full set of commits from master..topic. Since we're excluding some commits, a fast-forward cannot be performed and so we correctly return 0. Add '-f' to test cases that failed as a result of this change because they were not expecting a fast-forward so that a rebase is forced. Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-15t3400: stop referring to the scripted rebaseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
One test case's title mentioned the then-current implementation detail that the `--am` backend was implemented in `git-rebase--am.sh`. This is no longer the case, so let's update the title to reflect the current reality. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-16Merge branch 'ab/drop-scripted-rebase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
Retire scripted "git rebase" implementation. * ab/drop-scripted-rebase: rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting
2019-03-20rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin settingLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+16
Remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting, which was added as an escape hatch to disable the builtin version of rebase first released with Git 2.20. See [1] for the initial implementation of rebase.useBuiltin, and [2] and [3] for the documentation and corresponding GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN option. Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden as seen in 7e097e27d3 ("legacy-rebase: backport -C<n> and --whitespace=<option> checks", 2018-11-20) and 9aea5e9286 ("rebase: fix regression in rebase.useBuiltin=false test mode", 2019-02-13). Since the built-in version has been shown to be stable enough let's remove the legacy version. As noted in [3] having use_builtin_rebase() shell out to get its config doesn't make any sense anymore, that was done for the purposes of spawning the legacy rebase without having modified any global state. Let's instead handle this case in rebase_config(). There's still a bunch of references to git-legacy-rebase in po/*.po, but those will be dealt with in time by the i18n effort. Even though this configuration variable only existed two releases let's not entirely delete the entry from the docs, but note its absence. Individual versions of git tend to be around for a while due to distro packaging timelines, so e.g. if we're "lucky" a given version like 2.21 might be installed on say OSX for half a decade. That'll mean some people probably setting this in config, and then when they later wonder if it's needed they can Google search the config option name or check it in git-config. It also allows us to refer to the docs from the warning for details. 1. 55071ea248 ("rebase: start implementing it as a builtin", 2018-08-07) 2. d8d0a546f0 ("rebase doc: document rebase.useBuiltin", 2018-11-14) 3. 62c23938fa ("tests: add a special setup where rebase.useBuiltin is off", 2018-11-14) 3. https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903141544110.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/ Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-04built-in rebase: set ORIG_HEAD just once, before the rebaseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
Technically, the scripted version set ORIG_HEAD only in two spots (which really could have been one, because it called `git checkout $onto^0` to start the rebase and also if it could take a shortcut, and in both cases it called `git update-ref $orig_head`). Practically, it *implicitly* reset ORIG_HEAD whenever `git reset --hard` was called. However, what we really want is that it is set exactly once, at the beginning of the rebase. So let's do that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-04built-in rebase: demonstrate that ORIG_HEAD is not set correctlyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+8
The ORIG_HEAD pseudo ref is supposed to refer to the original, pre-rebase state after a successful rebase. Let's add a regression test to prove that this regressed: With GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false, this test case passes, with GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=true (or unset), it fails. Reported by Nazri Ramliy. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed argumentsLibravatar Matthew DeVore1-4/+4
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it was easy to find with grep. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-16t3000-t3999: fix broken &&-chainsLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEADLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+2
The new command `git rebase --show-current-patch` is useful for seeing the commit related to the current rebase state. Some however may find the "git show" command behind it too limiting. You may want to increase context lines, do a diff that ignores whitespaces... For these advanced use cases, the user can execute any command they want with the new pseudo ref REBASE_HEAD. This also helps show where the stopped commit is from, which is hard to see from the previous patch which implements --show-current-patch. Helped-by: Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12rebase: add --show-current-patchLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+33
It is useful to see the full patch while resolving conflicts in a rebase. The only way to do it now is less .git/rebase-*/patch which could turn out to be a lot longer to type if you are in a linked worktree, or not at top-dir. On top of that, an ordinary user should not need to peek into .git directory. The new option is provided to examine the patch. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-18rebase: use mboxrd format to avoid split errorsLibravatar Eric Wong1-0/+22
The mboxrd format allows the use of embedded "From " lines in commit messages without being misinterpreted by mailsplit Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17tests: unpack-trees: update to use test_i18n* functionsLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-2/+2
Use functions test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep to successfully pass tests running under GETTEXT_POISON. The output strings compared to in these test were marked for translation in ed47fdf ("i18n: unpack-trees: mark strings for translation", 2016-04-09) and later improved in 2e3926b ("i18n: unpack-trees: avoid substituting only a verb in sentences", 2016-05-12). Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-pointLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+23
When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-19rebase: allow "-" short-hand for the previous branchLibravatar Brian Gesiak1-0/+17
Teach rebase the same shorthand as checkout and merge to name the branch to rebase the current branch on; that is, that "-" means "the branch we were previously on". Requested-by: Tim Chase <git@tim.thechases.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-09rebase: fix fork-point with zero argumentsLibravatar John Keeping1-2/+10
When no arguments are specified, $switch_to is empty so we end up passing the empty string to "git merge-base --fork-point", which causes an error. git-rebase carries on at this point, but in fact we have failed to apply the fork-point operation. It turns out that the test in t3400 that was meant to test this didn't actually need the fork-point behaviour, so enhance it to make sure that the fork-point is applied correctly. The modified test fails without the change to git-rebase.sh in this patch. Reported-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-10rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstreamLibravatar John Keeping1-2/+4
Commit 15a147e (rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified, 2011-02-09) says: Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. but that isn't actually the case. Since commit d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19), pull has actually chosen the most recent reflog entry which is an ancestor of the current branch if it can find one. Add a '--fork-point' argument to git-rebase that can be used to trigger this behaviour. This option is turned on by default if no non-option arguments are specified on the command line, otherwise we treat an upstream specified on the command-line literally. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-24Merge branch 'rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
Allow various commit objects to be given to "git rebase" by ':/look for this string' syntax, e.g. "git rebase --onto ':/there'". * rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query: rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriate sh-setup: add new peel_committish() helper t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revision
2013-06-23Merge branch 'mz/rebase-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-52/+1
* mz/rebase-tests: rebase topology tests: fix commit names on case-insensitive file systems tests: move test for rebase messages from t3400 to t3406 t3406: modernize style add tests for rebasing merged history add tests for rebasing root add tests for rebasing of empty commits add tests for rebasing with patch-equivalence present add simple tests of consistency across rebase types
2013-06-20Merge branch 'fc/show-non-empty-errors-in-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* fc/show-non-empty-errors-in-test: test: test_must_be_empty helper
2013-06-14rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriateLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-1/+1
The revisions specified on the command-line as <onto> and <upstream> arguments could be of the form :/quuxery; so, use peel_committish() to resolve them. The failing tests in t/rebase and t/rebase-interactive now pass. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-14t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revisionLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+11
The following commands fail, even if :/quuxery and :/foomery resolve to perfectly valid commits: $ git rebase [-i] --onto :/quuxery :/foomery This is because rebase [-i] attempts to rev-parse ${REV}^0 to verify that the given revision resolves to a commit. Add tests to document these failures. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-09test: test_must_be_empty helperLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
There are quite a lot places where an output file is expected to be empty, and we fail the test when it is not. The output from running the test script with -i -v can be helped if we showed the unexpected contents at that point. We could of course do >expected.empty && test_cmp expected.empty actual but this is commmon enough to be done with a dedicated helper. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07tests: move test for rebase messages from t3400 to t3406Libravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-22/+0
t3406 is supposed to test "messages from rebase operation", so let's move tests in t3400 that fit that description into 3406. Most of the functionality they tested, except for the messages, has now been subsumed by t3420. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07add tests for rebasing merged historyLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-30/+1
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-26Merge branch 'ph/rebase-original'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
* ph/rebase-original: rebase: find orig_head unambiguously
2013-04-23rebase: find orig_head unambiguouslyLibravatar Phil Hord1-0/+7
When we 'git rebase $upstream', git uses 'rev-parse --verify $current_branch' to find ORIG_HEAD. But if $current_branch is ambiguous, 'rev-parse --verify' emits a warning and returns a SHA1 anyway. When the wrong ambiguous choice is used, git-rebase fails non-gracefully: it emits a warning about failing to lock $current_branch, an error about being unable to checkout $current_branch again, and it might even decide the rebase is a fast-forward when it is not. In the 'rebase $upstream' case, we already know the unambiguous spelling of $current_branch is "HEAD". Fix git-rebase to find $orig_head unambiguously. Add a test in t3400-rebase.sh which creates an ambiguous branch name and rebases it implicitly with 'git rebase $other'. Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25t3400: use test_config to set/unset git config variablesLibravatar Yann Droneaud1-2/+1
Instead of using construct such as: test_when_finished "git config --unset <key>" git config <key> <value> uses test_config <key> <value> The latter takes care of removing <key> at the end of the test. Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-25i18n: rebase: mark messages for translationLibravatar Jiang Xin1-4/+4
Mark messages in git-rebase.sh for translation. While doing this Jonathan noticed that the comma usage and sentence structure of the resolvemsg was not quite right, so correct that and its cousins in git-am.sh and t/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh at the same time. Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after this update. Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output to avoid such issues. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-04Make git-{pull,rebase} message without tracking information friendlierLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-4/+2
The current message is too long and at too low a level for anybody to understand it if they don't know about the configuration format already. The text about setting up a remote is superfluous and doesn't help understand or recover from the error that has happened. Show the usage more prominently and explain how to set up the tracking information. If there is only one remote, that name is used instead of the generic <remote>. Also simplify the message we print on detached HEAD to remove unnecessary information which is better left for the documentation. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-10Merge branch 'jc/parse-date-raw'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
* jc/parse-date-raw: parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestamp parse_date(): allow ancient git-timestamp
2012-02-03parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
The only place that the issue this series addresses was observed where we read "cat-file commit" output and put it in GIT_AUTHOR_DATE in order to replay a commit with an ancient timestamp. With the previous patch alone, "git commit --date='20100917 +0900'" can be misinterpreted to mean an ancient timestamp, not September in year 2010. Guard this codepath by requring an extra '@' in front of the raw git timestamp on the parsing side. This of course needs to be compensated by updating get_author_ident_from_commit and the code for "git commit --amend" to prepend '@' to the string read from the existing commit in the GIT_AUTHOR_DATE environment variable. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08test: fix '&&' chainingLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-2/+2
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain by adding " &&" at the end of line to the commands that need them. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specifiedLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-9/+18
'git rebase' without arguments is currently not supported. Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. Defaulting to @{upstream} will make it possible to run e.g. 'git rebase -i' without arguments, which is probably a quite common use case. It also improves the scenario where you have multiple branches that rebase against a remote-tracking branch, where you currently have to choose between the extra network delay of 'git pull' or the slightly awkward keys to enter 'git rebase @{u}'. The error reporting when no upstream is configured for the current branch or when no branch is checked out is reused from git-pull.sh. A function is extracted into git-parse-remote.sh for this purpose. Helped-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21Merge branch 'dg/local-mod-error-messages'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* dg/local-mod-error-messages: t7609: test merge and checkout error messages unpack_trees: group error messages by type merge-recursive: distinguish "removed" and "overwritten" messages merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkout Turn unpack_trees_options.msgs into an array + enum Conflicts: t/t3400-rebase.sh