summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3400-rebase.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-10-07t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed argumentsLibravatar Matthew DeVore1-4/+4
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it was easy to find with grep. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-16t3000-t3999: fix broken &&-chainsLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEADLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+2
The new command `git rebase --show-current-patch` is useful for seeing the commit related to the current rebase state. Some however may find the "git show" command behind it too limiting. You may want to increase context lines, do a diff that ignores whitespaces... For these advanced use cases, the user can execute any command they want with the new pseudo ref REBASE_HEAD. This also helps show where the stopped commit is from, which is hard to see from the previous patch which implements --show-current-patch. Helped-by: Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12rebase: add --show-current-patchLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+33
It is useful to see the full patch while resolving conflicts in a rebase. The only way to do it now is less .git/rebase-*/patch which could turn out to be a lot longer to type if you are in a linked worktree, or not at top-dir. On top of that, an ordinary user should not need to peek into .git directory. The new option is provided to examine the patch. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-18rebase: use mboxrd format to avoid split errorsLibravatar Eric Wong1-0/+22
The mboxrd format allows the use of embedded "From " lines in commit messages without being misinterpreted by mailsplit Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17tests: unpack-trees: update to use test_i18n* functionsLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-2/+2
Use functions test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep to successfully pass tests running under GETTEXT_POISON. The output strings compared to in these test were marked for translation in ed47fdf ("i18n: unpack-trees: mark strings for translation", 2016-04-09) and later improved in 2e3926b ("i18n: unpack-trees: avoid substituting only a verb in sentences", 2016-05-12). Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-pointLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+23
When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-19rebase: allow "-" short-hand for the previous branchLibravatar Brian Gesiak1-0/+17
Teach rebase the same shorthand as checkout and merge to name the branch to rebase the current branch on; that is, that "-" means "the branch we were previously on". Requested-by: Tim Chase <git@tim.thechases.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-09rebase: fix fork-point with zero argumentsLibravatar John Keeping1-2/+10
When no arguments are specified, $switch_to is empty so we end up passing the empty string to "git merge-base --fork-point", which causes an error. git-rebase carries on at this point, but in fact we have failed to apply the fork-point operation. It turns out that the test in t3400 that was meant to test this didn't actually need the fork-point behaviour, so enhance it to make sure that the fork-point is applied correctly. The modified test fails without the change to git-rebase.sh in this patch. Reported-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-10rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstreamLibravatar John Keeping1-2/+4
Commit 15a147e (rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified, 2011-02-09) says: Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. but that isn't actually the case. Since commit d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19), pull has actually chosen the most recent reflog entry which is an ancestor of the current branch if it can find one. Add a '--fork-point' argument to git-rebase that can be used to trigger this behaviour. This option is turned on by default if no non-option arguments are specified on the command line, otherwise we treat an upstream specified on the command-line literally. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-24Merge branch 'rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
Allow various commit objects to be given to "git rebase" by ':/look for this string' syntax, e.g. "git rebase --onto ':/there'". * rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query: rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriate sh-setup: add new peel_committish() helper t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revision
2013-06-23Merge branch 'mz/rebase-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-52/+1
* mz/rebase-tests: rebase topology tests: fix commit names on case-insensitive file systems tests: move test for rebase messages from t3400 to t3406 t3406: modernize style add tests for rebasing merged history add tests for rebasing root add tests for rebasing of empty commits add tests for rebasing with patch-equivalence present add simple tests of consistency across rebase types
2013-06-20Merge branch 'fc/show-non-empty-errors-in-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* fc/show-non-empty-errors-in-test: test: test_must_be_empty helper
2013-06-14rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriateLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-1/+1
The revisions specified on the command-line as <onto> and <upstream> arguments could be of the form :/quuxery; so, use peel_committish() to resolve them. The failing tests in t/rebase and t/rebase-interactive now pass. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-14t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revisionLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-0/+11
The following commands fail, even if :/quuxery and :/foomery resolve to perfectly valid commits: $ git rebase [-i] --onto :/quuxery :/foomery This is because rebase [-i] attempts to rev-parse ${REV}^0 to verify that the given revision resolves to a commit. Add tests to document these failures. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-09test: test_must_be_empty helperLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
There are quite a lot places where an output file is expected to be empty, and we fail the test when it is not. The output from running the test script with -i -v can be helped if we showed the unexpected contents at that point. We could of course do >expected.empty && test_cmp expected.empty actual but this is commmon enough to be done with a dedicated helper. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07tests: move test for rebase messages from t3400 to t3406Libravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-22/+0
t3406 is supposed to test "messages from rebase operation", so let's move tests in t3400 that fit that description into 3406. Most of the functionality they tested, except for the messages, has now been subsumed by t3420. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07add tests for rebasing merged historyLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-30/+1
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-26Merge branch 'ph/rebase-original'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
* ph/rebase-original: rebase: find orig_head unambiguously
2013-04-23rebase: find orig_head unambiguouslyLibravatar Phil Hord1-0/+7
When we 'git rebase $upstream', git uses 'rev-parse --verify $current_branch' to find ORIG_HEAD. But if $current_branch is ambiguous, 'rev-parse --verify' emits a warning and returns a SHA1 anyway. When the wrong ambiguous choice is used, git-rebase fails non-gracefully: it emits a warning about failing to lock $current_branch, an error about being unable to checkout $current_branch again, and it might even decide the rebase is a fast-forward when it is not. In the 'rebase $upstream' case, we already know the unambiguous spelling of $current_branch is "HEAD". Fix git-rebase to find $orig_head unambiguously. Add a test in t3400-rebase.sh which creates an ambiguous branch name and rebases it implicitly with 'git rebase $other'. Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25t3400: use test_config to set/unset git config variablesLibravatar Yann Droneaud1-2/+1
Instead of using construct such as: test_when_finished "git config --unset <key>" git config <key> <value> uses test_config <key> <value> The latter takes care of removing <key> at the end of the test. Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-25i18n: rebase: mark messages for translationLibravatar Jiang Xin1-4/+4
Mark messages in git-rebase.sh for translation. While doing this Jonathan noticed that the comma usage and sentence structure of the resolvemsg was not quite right, so correct that and its cousins in git-am.sh and t/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh at the same time. Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after this update. Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output to avoid such issues. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-04Make git-{pull,rebase} message without tracking information friendlierLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-4/+2
The current message is too long and at too low a level for anybody to understand it if they don't know about the configuration format already. The text about setting up a remote is superfluous and doesn't help understand or recover from the error that has happened. Show the usage more prominently and explain how to set up the tracking information. If there is only one remote, that name is used instead of the generic <remote>. Also simplify the message we print on detached HEAD to remove unnecessary information which is better left for the documentation. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-10Merge branch 'jc/parse-date-raw'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
* jc/parse-date-raw: parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestamp parse_date(): allow ancient git-timestamp
2012-02-03parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
The only place that the issue this series addresses was observed where we read "cat-file commit" output and put it in GIT_AUTHOR_DATE in order to replay a commit with an ancient timestamp. With the previous patch alone, "git commit --date='20100917 +0900'" can be misinterpreted to mean an ancient timestamp, not September in year 2010. Guard this codepath by requring an extra '@' in front of the raw git timestamp on the parsing side. This of course needs to be compensated by updating get_author_ident_from_commit and the code for "git commit --amend" to prepend '@' to the string read from the existing commit in the GIT_AUTHOR_DATE environment variable. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08test: fix '&&' chainingLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-2/+2
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain by adding " &&" at the end of line to the commands that need them. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specifiedLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-9/+18
'git rebase' without arguments is currently not supported. Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. Defaulting to @{upstream} will make it possible to run e.g. 'git rebase -i' without arguments, which is probably a quite common use case. It also improves the scenario where you have multiple branches that rebase against a remote-tracking branch, where you currently have to choose between the extra network delay of 'git pull' or the slightly awkward keys to enter 'git rebase @{u}'. The error reporting when no upstream is configured for the current branch or when no branch is checked out is reused from git-pull.sh. A function is extracted into git-parse-remote.sh for this purpose. Helped-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21Merge branch 'dg/local-mod-error-messages'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* dg/local-mod-error-messages: t7609: test merge and checkout error messages unpack_trees: group error messages by type merge-recursive: distinguish "removed" and "overwritten" messages merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkout Turn unpack_trees_options.msgs into an array + enum Conflicts: t/t3400-rebase.sh
2010-08-11unpack_trees: group error messages by typeLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+2
When an error is encountered, it calls add_rejected_file() which either - directly displays the error message and stops if in plumbing mode (i.e. if show_all_errors is not initialized at 1) - or stores it so that it will be displayed at the end with display_error_msgs(), Storing the files by error type permits to have a list of files for which there is the same error instead of having a serie of almost identical errors. As each bind_overlap error combines a file and an old file, a list cannot be done, therefore, theses errors are not stored but directly displayed. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-23rebase: protect against diff.renames configurationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+23
We currently do not disable diff.renames configuration while rebase internally runs "format-patch" to feed "am -3". The end user configuration for "diff" should not affect the result produced by the higher level command that is related to "diff" only because internally it is implemented in terms of it. For that matter, I have a feeling that format-patch should not even look at diff.renames, but we seem to have been doing this for a long time so there is no easy way to fix this thinko. In any case, here is a much straightforward fix for "rebase". [jn: with test case from David] Reported-by: David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@kilzer.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-23t3400 (rebase): whitespace cleanupLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-90/+92
This test used 5-space indents since it was added in 2005, but recently the temptation to use tabs to indent has been too strong, resulting in uneven whitespace. Switch over completely to tabs. While at it, use a more modern style for consistency with other tests: - names of tests go on the same line as test_expect_success; - extra whitespace after > redirection operators is removed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-27Merge branch 'js/maint-am-rebase-invalid-author'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
* js/maint-am-rebase-invalid-author: am: use get_author_ident_from_commit instead of mailinfo when rebasing
2010-06-16am: use get_author_ident_from_commit instead of mailinfo when rebasingLibravatar Jay Soffian1-2/+7
In certain situations, commit authorship can consist of an invalid e-mail address. For example, this is the case when working with git svn repos where the author email has had the svn repo UUID appended such as: author@example.com <author@example.com@deadbeef-dead-beef-dead-beefdeadbeef> Given such an address, mailinfo extracts the authorship incorrectly as it assumes a valid domain. However, when rebasing the original authorship should be preserved irrespective of its validity as an email address. Using get_author_ident_from_commit instead of mailinfo when rebasing preserves the original authorship. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-31rebase: improve error message when upstream argument is missingLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+12
Strip out options before checking for a missing upstream argument. Before: $ git rebase -m shift: 426: can't shift that many After: $ git rebase -m Usage: git rebase ... While at it, fix the usage message to explain that the upstream argument is mandatory. Reported-by: Jon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-24Merge branch 'tr/notes-display'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+17
* tr/notes-display: git-notes(1): add a section about the meaning of history notes: track whether notes_trees were changed at all notes: add shorthand --ref to override GIT_NOTES_REF commit --amend: copy notes to the new commit rebase: support automatic notes copying notes: implement helpers needed for note copying during rewrite notes: implement 'git notes copy --stdin' rebase -i: invoke post-rewrite hook rebase: invoke post-rewrite hook commit --amend: invoke post-rewrite hook Documentation: document post-rewrite hook Support showing notes from more than one notes tree test-lib: unset GIT_NOTES_REF to stop it from influencing tests Conflicts: git-am.sh refs.c
2010-03-12rebase: support automatic notes copyingLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+17
Luckily, all the support already happens to be there. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-25tests: consolidate CR removal/addition functionsLibravatar Stephen Boyd1-4/+0
append_cr(), remove_cr(), q_to_nul() and q_to_cr() are defined in multiple tests. Consolidate them into test-lib.sh so we can stop redefining them. The use of remove_cr() in t0020 to test for a CR is replaced with a new function has_cr() to accurately reflect what is intended (the output of remove_cr() was being thrown away). Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-05Allow mailsplit (and hence git-am) to handle mails with CRLF line-endingsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+24
It is not that uncommon to have mails with DOS line-ending, notably Thunderbird and web mailers like Gmail (when saving what they call "original" message). So modify mailsplit to convert CRLF line-endings to just LF. Since git-rebase is built on top of git-am, add an option to mailsplit to be used by git-am when it is acting on behalf of git-rebase, to refrain from doing this conversion. And add a test to make sure that rebase still works. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-18am, rebase: teach quiet optionLibravatar Stephen Boyd1-6/+13
git-am and git-rebase are talkative scripts. Teach them to be quiet when told, allowing them to speak only when they fail or experience errors. The quiet option is maintained when git-am or git-rebase fails to apply a patch. This means subsequent --resolved, --continue, --skip, --abort invocations will be quiet if the original invocation was quiet. Drop a handful of >&2 redirection; the rest of the program sends all the info messages to stdout, not to stderr. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-24t/t3400-rebase.sh: add more tests to help migrating git-rebase.sh to CLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+31
These new tests make sure I don't miss any check being performed before rebase is proceeded (which is well tested by other tests) Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-19test-lib: Introduce test_chmod and use it instead of update-index --chmodLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-2/+2
This function replaces sequences of 'chmod +x' and 'git update-index --chmod=+x' in the test suite, whose purpose is to help filesystems that need core.filemode=false. Two places where only 'chmod +x' was used we also use this new function. The function calls 'git update-index --chmod' without checking core.filemode (unlike some of the call sites did). We do this because the call sites *expect* that the executable bit ends up in the index (ie. it is not the purpose of the call sites to *test* whether git treats 'chmod +x' and 'update-index --chmod=+x' correctly). Therefore, on filesystems with core.filemode=true the 'git update-index --chmod' is a no-op. The function uses --add with update-index to help one call site in t6031-merge-recursive. It makes no difference for the other callers. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
2009-03-01t3400-rebase: Move detached HEAD check earlierLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-4/+4
Short story: There is a section in t3400 that tests fundamental rebase properties. 3ec7371f (Add two extra tests for git rebase, 2009-02-09) added a check that rebase works on a detached HEAD, but the test was put near the end of the file. This moves it to a more suitable place. Long story: The test that preceded the one in question tests that a rebased commit degrades from a content change with mode change to a mere mode change. But on Windows, where we have core.filemode=false, the original commit did not record the mode change, and so the rebase operation did not rebase anything. This caused the subsequent detached HEAD test to fail. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-08Add two extra tests for git rebaseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+12
2008-09-03tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599)Libravatar Nanako Shiraishi1-3/+3
Converts tests between t0050-t3903. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-14Merge branch 'bd/tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* bd/tests: Rename the test trash directory to contain spaces. Fix tests breaking when checkout path contains shell metacharacters Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts. lib-git-svn.sh: Fix quoting issues with paths containing shell metacharacters test-lib.sh: Fix some missing path quoting Use test_set_editor in t9001-send-email.sh test-lib.sh: Add a test_set_editor function to safely set $VISUAL git-send-email.perl: Handle shell metacharacters in $EDITOR properly config.c: Escape backslashes in section names properly git-rebase.sh: Fix --merge --abort failures when path contains whitespace Conflicts: t/t9115-git-svn-dcommit-funky-renames.sh
2008-05-13fix bsd shell negationLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
On some shells (notably /bin/sh on FreeBSD 6.1), the construct foo && ! bar | baz is true if foo && baz whereas for most other shells (such as bash) is true if foo && ! baz We can work around this by specifying foo && ! (bar | baz) which works everywhere. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-05Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts.Libravatar Bryan Donlan1-1/+2
This form is not portable across all shells, so replace instances of: export FOO=bar with: FOO=bar export FOO Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01Sane use of test_expect_failureLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-16apply --index-info: fall back to current index for mode changesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+15
"git diff" does not record index lines for pure mode changes (i.e. no lines changed). Therefore, apply --index-info would call out a bogus error. Instead, fall back to reading the info from the current index. Incidentally, this fixes an error where git-rebase would not rebase a commit including a pure mode change, and changes requiring a threeway merge. Noticed and later tested by Chris Shoemaker. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-04Allow rebase to run if upstream is completely mergedLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-1/+38
Consider this history: o--o-...-B <- origin \ \ x--x--M--x--x <- master In this situation, rebase considers master fully up-to-date and would not do anything. However, if there were additional commits on origin, the rebase would run and move the commits x on top of origin. Here we change rebase to short-circuit out only if the history since origin is strictly linear. Consequently, the above as well as a history like this would be linearized: o--o <- origin \ x--x \ \ x--M--x--x <- master Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>