summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3303-notes-subtrees.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-01-03Merge branch 'es/test-chain-lint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Broken &&-chains in the test scripts have been corrected. * es/test-chain-lint: t6000-t9999: detect and signal failure within loop t5000-t5999: detect and signal failure within loop t4000-t4999: detect and signal failure within loop t0000-t3999: detect and signal failure within loop tests: simplify by dropping unnecessary `for` loops tests: apply modern idiom for exiting loop upon failure tests: apply modern idiom for signaling test failure tests: fix broken &&-chains in `{...}` groups tests: fix broken &&-chains in `$(...)` command substitutions tests: fix broken &&-chains in compound statements tests: use test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output tests: simplify construction of large blocks of text t9107: use shell parameter expansion to avoid breaking &&-chain t6300: make `%(raw:size) --shell` test more robust t5516: drop unnecessary subshell and command invocation t4202: clarify intent by creating expected content less cleverly t1020: avoid aborting entire test script when one test fails t1010: fix unnoticed failure on Windows t/lib-pager: use sane_unset() to avoid breaking &&-chain
2021-12-13t0000-t3999: detect and signal failure within loopLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-3/+3
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-11-01leak tests: mark some notes tests as passing with SANITIZE=leakLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
Mark some tests that match "*notes*" as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. They'll now be listed as running under the "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI target). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t3[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-5/+5
Carefully excluding t3040, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t3[0-3]*.sh t3206/* && git checkout HEAD -- t3040\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+3
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-17notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notesLibravatar Johan Herland1-0/+1
When using combine_notes_concatenate() to concatenate notes, it currently ensures exactly one newline character between the given notes. However, when using builtin/notes.c:create_note() to concatenate notes (e.g. by 'git notes append'), it adds a newline character to the trailing newline of the preceding notes object, thus resulting in _two_ newlines (aka. a blank line) separating contents of the two notes. This patch brings combine_notes_concatenate() into consistency with builtin/notes.c:create_note(), by ensuring exactly _two_ newline characters between concatenated notes. The patch also changes a few notes-related selftests accordingly. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-17(trivial) t3303: Indent with tabs instead of spaces for consistencyLibravatar Johan Herland1-9/+9
The rest of the file uses tabs for indenting. Fix the one function that doesn't. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-13Teach notes code to properly preserve non-notes in the notes treeLibravatar Johan Herland1-11/+17
The note tree structure allows for non-note entries to coexist with note entries in a notes tree. Although we certainly expect there to be very few non-notes in a notes tree, we should still support them to a certain degree. This patch teaches the notes code to preserve non-notes when updating the notes tree with write_notes_tree(). Non-notes are not affected by fanout restructuring. For non-notes to be handled correctly, we can no longer allow subtree entries that do not match the fanout structure produced by the notes code itself. This means that fanouts like 4/36, 6/34, 8/32, 4/4/32, etc. are no longer recognized as note subtrees; only 2-based fanouts are allowed (2/38, 2/2/36, 2/2/2/34, etc.). Since the notes code has never at any point _produced_ non-2-based fanouts, it is highly unlikely that this change will cause problems for anyone. The patch also adds some tests verifying the correct handling of non-notes in a notes tree. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-19Add selftests verifying concatenation of multiple notes for the same commitLibravatar Johan Herland1-0/+84
Also verify that multiple references to the _same_ note blob are _not_ concatenated. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-19Add selftests verifying that we can parse notes trees with various fanoutsLibravatar Johan Herland1-0/+104
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>