summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t1500-rev-parse.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-05-05Don't use the 'export NAME=value' in the test scripts.Libravatar Bryan Donlan1-4/+5
This form is not portable across all shells, so replace instances of: export FOO=bar with: FOO=bar export FOO Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-06fix config reading in testsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
Previously, we set the GIT_CONFIG environment variable in our tests so that only that file was read. However, setting it to a static value is not correct, since we are not necessarily always in the same directory; instead, we want the usual git config file lookup to happen. To do this, we stop setting GIT_CONFIG, which means that we must now suppress the reading of the system-wide and user configs. This exposes an incorrect test in t1500, which is also fixed (the incorrect test worked because we were failing to read the core.bare value from the config file, since the GIT_CONFIG variable was pointing us to the wrong file). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-10Reinstate the old behaviour when GIT_DIR is set and GIT_WORK_TREE is unsetLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+4
The old behaviour was to unilaterally default to the cwd is the work tree when GIT_DIR was set, but GIT_WORK_TREE wasn't, no matter if we are inside the GIT_DIR, or if GIT_DIR is actually something like ../../../.git. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01Clean up work-tree handlingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-10/+10
The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06extend rev-parse test for --is-inside-work-treeLibravatar Matthias Lederhofer1-12/+17
Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06test git rev-parseLibravatar Matthias Lederhofer1-0/+72
Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>