summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t1006-cat-file.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-07-12cat-file: split --batch input lines on whitespaceLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+7
If we get an input line to --batch or --batch-check that looks like "HEAD foo bar", we will currently feed the whole thing to get_sha1(). This means that to use --batch-check with `rev-list --objects`, one must pre-process the input, like: git rev-list --objects HEAD | cut -d' ' -f1 | git cat-file --batch-check Besides being more typing and slightly less efficient to invoke `cut`, the result loses information: we no longer know which path each object was found at. This patch teaches cat-file to split input lines at the first whitespace. Everything to the left of the whitespace is considered an object name, and everything to the right is made available as the %(reset) atom. So you can now do: git rev-list --objects HEAD | git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize) %(rest)' to collect object sizes at particular paths. Even if %(rest) is not used, we always do the whitespace split (which means you can simply eliminate the `cut` command from the first example above). This whitespace split is backwards compatible for any reasonable input. Object names cannot contain spaces, so any input with spaces would have resulted in a "missing" line. The only input hurt is if somebody really expected input of the form "HEAD is a fine-looking ref!" to fail; it will now parse HEAD, and make "is a fine-looking ref!" available as %(rest). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-12cat-file: add --batch-check=<format>Libravatar Jeff King1-0/+6
The `cat-file --batch-check` command can be used to quickly get information about a large number of objects. However, it provides a fixed set of information. This patch adds an optional <format> option to --batch-check to allow a caller to specify which items they are interested in, and in which order to output them. This is not very exciting for now, since we provide the same limited set that you could already get. However, it opens the door to adding new format items in the future without breaking backwards compatibility (or forcing callers to pay the cost to calculate uninteresting items). Since the --batch option shares code with --batch-check, it receives the same feature, though it is less likely to be of interest there. The format atom names are chosen to match their counterparts in for-each-ref. Though we do not (yet) share any code with for-each-ref's formatter, this keeps the interface as consistent as possible, and may help later on if the implementations are unified. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-11t1006: modernize output comparisonsLibravatar Jeff King1-43/+18
In modern tests, we typically put output into a file and compare it with test_cmp. This is nicer than just comparing via "test", and much shorter than comparing via "test" and printing a custom message. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-17cat-file: print tags raw for "cat-file -p"Libravatar Jeff King1-4/+1
When "cat-file -p" prints commits, it shows them in their raw format, since git's format is already human-readable. For tags, however, we print the whole thing raw except for one thing: we convert the timestamp on the tagger line into a human-readable date. This dates all the way back to a0f15fa (Pretty-print tagger dates, 2006-03-01). At that time there was no other way to pretty-print a tag. These days, however, neither of those matters much. The normal way to pretty-print a tag is with "git show", which is much more flexible than "cat-file -p". Commit a0f15fa also built "verify-tag --verbose" (and subsequently "tag -v") around the "cat-file -p" output. However, that behavior was lost in commit 62e09ce (Make git tag a builtin, 2007-07-20), and we went back to printing the raw tag contents. Nobody seems to have noticed the bug since then (and it is arguably a saner behavior anyway, as it shows the actual bytes for which we verified the signature). Let's drop the tagger-date formatting for "cat-file -p". It makes us more consistent with cat-file's commit pretty-printer, and as a bonus, we can drop the hand-rolled tag parsing code in cat-file (which happened to behave inconsistently with the tag pretty-printing code elsewhere). This is a change of output format, so it's possible that some callers could considered this a regression. However, the original behavior was arguably a bug (due to the inconsistency with commits), likely nobody was relying on it (even we do not use it ourselves these days), and anyone relying on the "-p" pretty-printer should be able to expect a change in the output format (i.e., while "cat-file" is plumbing, the output format of "-p" was never guaranteed to be stable). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and testsLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-2/+2
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-09cat-file --batch / --batch-check: do not exit if hashes are missingLibravatar Lea Wiemann1-3/+21
Previously, cat-file --batch / --batch-check would silently exit if it was passed a non-existent SHA1 on stdin. Now it prints "<SHA1> missing" as in all other cases (and as advertised in the documentation). Note that cat-file --batch-check (but not --batch) will still output "error: unable to find <SHA1>" on stderr if a non-existent SHA1 is passed, but this does not affect parsing its stdout. Also, type <= 0 was previously using the potentially uninitialized type variable (relying on it being 0); it is now being initialized. Signed-off-by: Lea Wiemann <LeWiemann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-09t1006-cat-file.sh: typoLibravatar Lea Wiemann1-1/+1
Previously timestamps were removed unconditionally (though this didn't seem to break this test). Now they are only removed if $no_ts is non-empty. Signed-off-by: Lea Wiemann <LeWiemann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-23change quoting in test t1006-cat-file.shLibravatar Michele Ballabio1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-05git-cat-file: Add --batch optionLibravatar Adam Roben1-17/+57
--batch is similar to --batch-check, except that the contents of each object is also printed. The output's form is: <sha1> SP <type> SP <size> LF <contents> LF Signed-off-by: Adam Roben <aroben@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-05git-cat-file: Add --batch-check optionLibravatar Adam Roben1-0/+65
This new option allows multiple objects to be specified on stdin. For each object specified, a line of the following form is printed: <sha1> SP <type> SP <size> LF If the object does not exist in the repository, a line of the following form is printed: <object> SP missing LF Signed-off-by: Adam Roben <aroben@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-05Add tests for git cat-fileLibravatar Adam Roben1-0/+121
Signed-off-by: Adam Roben <aroben@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>